
We constrain the massrichness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational
lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $\lambda$ and
redshift $z$ for $\lambda\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the
mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling
the scaling relation as $\langle M_{\rm 200m}\lambda,z\rangle = M_0
(\lambda/40)^F ((1+z)/1.35)^G$, we constrain the normalization of the scaling
relation at the 5.0 per cent level as $M_0 = [3.081 \pm 0.075 ({\rm stat}) \pm
0.133 ({\rm sys})] \cdot 10^{14}\ {\rm M}_\odot$ at $\lambda=40$ and $z=0.35$.
The richness scaling index is constrained to be $F=1.356 \pm 0.051\ ({\rm
stat})\pm 0.008\ ({\rm sys})$ and the redshift scaling index $G=0.30\pm 0.30\
({\rm stat})\pm 0.06\ ({\rm sys})$. These are the tightest measurements of the
normalization and richness scaling index made to date. We use a semianalytic
covariance matrix to characterize the statistical errors in the recovered weak
lensing profiles. Our analysis accounts for the following sources of systematic
error: shear and photometric redshift errors, cluster miscentering, cluster
member dilution of the source sample, systematic uncertainties in the modeling
of the halomass correlation function, halo triaxiality, and projection
effects. We discuss prospects for reducing this systematic error budget, which
dominates the uncertainty on $M_0$. Our result is in excellent agreement with,
but has significantly smaller uncertainties than, previous measurements in the
literature, and augurs well for the power of the DES cluster survey as a tool
for precision cosmology and upcoming galaxy surveys such as LSST, Euclid and
WFIRST.

Using $\sim 100$ Xray selected clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification data, we constrain the luminosity function (LF) of cluster red
sequence galaxies as a function of redshift. This is the first homogeneous
optical/Xray sample large enough to constrain the evolution of the luminosity
function simultaneously in redshift ($0.1<z<1.05$) and cluster mass ($13.5 \le
\rm{log_{10}}(M_{200crit}) \sim< 15.0$). We pay particular attention to
completeness issues and the detection limit of the galaxy sample. We then apply
a hierarchical Bayesian model to fit the cluster galaxy LFs via a Schecter
function, including its characteristic break ($m^*$) to a faint end powerlaw
slope ($\alpha$). Our method enables us to avoid known issues in similar
analyses based on stacking or binning the clusters. We find weak and
statistically insignificant ($\sim 1.9 \sigma$) evolution in the faint end
slope $\alpha$ versus redshift. We also find no dependence in $\alpha$ or $m^*$
with the Xray inferred cluster masses. However, the amplitude of the LF as a
function of cluster mass is constrained to $\sim 20\%$ precision. As a
byproduct of our algorithm, we utilize the correlation between the LF and
cluster mass to provide an improved estimate of the individual cluster masses
as well as the scatter in true mass given the Xray inferred masses. This
technique can be applied to a larger sample of Xray or optically selected
clusters from the Dark Energy Survey, significantly improving the sensitivity
of the analysis.

We use weaklensing shear measurements to determine the mean mass of
optically selected galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification
data. In a blinded analysis, we split the sample of more than 8,000 redMaPPer
clusters into 15 subsets, spanning ranges in the richness parameter $5 \leq
\lambda \leq 180$ and redshift $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.8$, and fit the averaged mass
density contrast profiles with a model that accounts for seven distinct sources
of systematic uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors;
clustermember contamination; miscentering; deviations from the NFW halo
profile; halo triaxiality; and lineofsight projections. We combine the
inferred cluster masses to estimate the joint scaling relation between mass,
richness and redshift, $\mathcal{M}(\lambda,z) \varpropto M_0 \lambda^{F}
(1+z)^{G}$. We find $M_0 \equiv \langle
M_{200\mathrm{m}}\,\,\lambda=30,z=0.5\rangle=\left[ 2.35 \pm 0.22\ \rm{(stat)}
\pm 0.12\ \rm{(sys)} \right] \cdot 10^{14}\ M_\odot$, with $F =
1.12\,\pm\,0.20\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.06\ \rm{(sys)}$ and $G = 0.18\,\pm\,
0.75\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.24\ \rm{(sys)}$. The amplitude of the massrichness
relation is in excellent agreement with the weaklensing calibration of
redMaPPer clusters in SDSS by Simet et al. (2016) and with the Saro et al.
(2015) calibration based on abundance matching of SPTdetected clusters. Our
results extend the redshift range over which the massrichness relation of
redMaPPer clusters has been calibrated with weak lensing from $z\leq 0.3$ to
$z\leq0.8$. Calibration uncertainties of shear measurements and photometric
redshift estimates dominate our systematic error budget and require substantial
improvements for forthcoming studies.

Using the science verification data of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) for a new
sample of 106 XRay selected clusters and groups, we study the stellar mass
growth of Bright Central Galaxies (BCGs) since redshift 1.2. Compared with the
expectation in a semianalytical model applied to the Millennium Simulation,
the observed BCGs become undermassive/underluminous with decreasing redshift.
We incorporate the uncertainties associated with cluster mass, redshift, and
BCG stellar mass measurements into analysis of a redshiftdependent BCGcluster
mass relation, $m_{*}\propto(\frac{M_{200}}{1.5\times
10^{14}M_{\odot}})^{0.24\pm 0.08}(1+z)^{0.19\pm0.34}$, and compare the
observed relation to the model prediction. We estimate the average growth rate
since $z = 1.0$ for BCGs hosted by clusters of $M_{200, z}=10^{13.8}M_{\odot}$,
at $z=1.0$: $m_{*, BCG}$ appears to have grown by $0.13\pm0.11$ dex, in tension
at $\sim 2.5 \sigma$ significance level with the $0.40$ dex growth rate
expected from the semianalytic model. We show that the buildup of extended
intracluster light after $z=1.0$ may alleviate this tension in BCG growth
rates.