• ### Independent sets in hypergraphs and Ramsey properties of graphs and the integers(1701.04754)

Nov. 27, 2018 math.CO
Many important problems in combinatorics and other related areas can be phrased in the language of independent sets in hypergraphs. Recently Balogh, Morris and Samotij, and independently Saxton and Thomason developed very general container theorems for independent sets in hypergraphs; both of which have seen numerous applications to a wide range of problems. In this paper we use the container method to give relatively short and elementary proofs of a number of results concerning Ramsey (and Tur\'an) properties of (hyper)graphs and the integers. In particular: (i) We generalise the random Ramsey theorem of R\"odl and Ruci\'nski by providing a resilience analogue. Our result unifies and generalises several fundamental results in the area including the random version of Tur\'an's theorem due to Conlon and Gowers and Schacht. (ii) The above result also resolves a general subcase of the asymmetric random Ramsey conjecture of Kohayakawa and Kreuter. (iii) All of the above results in fact hold for uniform hypergraphs. (iv) For a (hyper)graph $H$, we determine, up to an error term in the exponent, the number of $n$-vertex (hyper)graphs $G$ that have the Ramsey property with respect to $H$ (that is, whenever $G$ is $r$-coloured, there is a monochromatic copy of $H$ in $G$). (v) We strengthen the random Rado theorem of Friedgut, R\"odl and Schacht by proving a resilience version of the result. (vi) For partition regular matrices $A$ we determine, up to an error term in the exponent, the number of subsets of $\{1,\dots,n\}$ for which there exists an $r$-colouring which contains no monochromatic solutions to $Ax=0$. Along the way a number of open problems are posed.
• ### Tilings in randomly perturbed dense graphs(1708.09243)

May 11, 2018 math.CO
A perfect $H$-tiling in a graph $G$ is a collection of vertex-disjoint copies of a graph $H$ in $G$ that together cover all the vertices in $G$. In this paper we investigate perfect $H$-tilings in a random graph model introduced by Bohman, Frieze and Martin in which one starts with a dense graph and then adds $m$ random edges to it. Specifically, for any fixed graph $H$, we determine the number of random edges required to add to an arbitrary graph of linear minimum degree in order to ensure the resulting graph contains a perfect $H$-tiling with high probability. Our proof utilises Szemer\'edi's Regularity lemma as well as a special case of a result of Koml\'os concerning almost perfect $H$-tilings in dense graphs.
• ### Sharp bound on the number of maximal sum-free subsets of integers(1502.07605)

May 11, 2018 math.CO, math.NT
Cameron and Erd\H{o}s asked whether the number of \emph{maximal} sum-free sets in $\{1, \dots , n\}$ is much smaller than the number of sum-free sets. In the same paper they gave a lower bound of $2^{\lfloor n/4 \rfloor }$ for the number of maximal sum-free sets. Here, we prove the following: For each $1\leq i \leq 4$, there is a constant $C_i$ such that, given any $n\equiv i \mod 4$, $\{1, \dots , n\}$ contains $(C_i+o(1)) 2^{n/4}$ maximal sum-free sets. Our proof makes use of container and removal lemmas of Green, a structural result of Deshouillers, Freiman, S\'os and Temkin and a recent bound on the number of subsets of integers with small sumset by Green and Morris. We also discuss related results and open problems on the number of maximal sum-free subsets of abelian groups.
• ### Applications of graph containers in the Boolean lattice(1602.05870)

Feb. 14, 2018 math.CO
We apply the graph container method to prove a number of counting results for the Boolean lattice $\mathcal P(n)$. In particular, we: (i) Give a partial answer to a question of Sapozhenko estimating the number of $t$ error correcting codes in $\mathcal P(n)$, and we also give an upper bound on the number of transportation codes; (ii) Provide an alternative proof of Kleitman's theorem on the number of antichains in $\mathcal P(n)$ and give a two-coloured analogue; (iii) Give an asymptotic formula for the number of $(p,q)$-tilted Sperner families in $\mathcal P(n)$; (iv) Prove a random version of Katona's $t$-intersection theorem. In each case, to apply the container method, we first prove corresponding supersaturation results. We also give a construction which disproves two conjectures of Ilinca and Kahn on maximal independent sets and antichains in the Boolean lattice. A number of open questions are also given.
• ### On solution-free sets of integers II(1611.08498)

July 25, 2017 math.CO, math.NT
Given a linear equation $\mathcal{L}$, a set $A \subseteq [n]$ is $\mathcal{L}$-free if $A$ does not contain any non-trivial' solutions to $\mathcal{L}$. We determine the precise size of the largest $\mathcal{L}$-free subset of $[n]$ for several general classes of linear equations $\mathcal{L}$ of the form $px+qy=rz$ for fixed $p,q,r \in \mathbb N$ where $p \geq q \geq r$. Further, for all such linear equations $\mathcal{L}$, we give an upper bound on the number of maximal $\mathcal{L}$-free subsets of $[n]$. In the case when $p=q\geq 2$ and $r=1$ this bound is exact up to an error term in the exponent. We make use of container and removal lemmas of Green to prove this result. Our results also extend to various linear equations with more than three variables.
• ### An improved lower bound for Folkman's theorem(1703.02473)

June 5, 2017 math.CO
Folkman's Theorem asserts that for each $k \in \mathbb{N}$, there exists a natural number $n = F(k)$ such that whenever the elements of $[n]$ are two-coloured, there exists a set $A \subset [n]$ of size $k$ with the property that all the sums of the form $\sum_{x \in B} x$, where $B$ is a nonempty subset of $A$, are contained in $[n]$ and have the same colour. In 1989, Erd\H{o}s and Spencer showed that $F(k) \ge 2^{ck^2/ \log k}$, where $c >0$ is an absolute constant; here, we improve this bound significantly by showing that $F(k) \ge 2^{2^{k-1}/k}$ for all $k\in \mathbb{N}$.
• ### On the complexity of finding and counting solution-free sets of integers(1704.03758)

April 12, 2017 math.CO, cs.CC
Given a linear equation $\mathcal{L}$, a set $A$ of integers is $\mathcal{L}$-free if $A$ does not contain any non-trivial' solutions to $\mathcal{L}$. This notion incorporates many central topics in combinatorial number theory such as sum-free and progression-free sets. In this paper we initiate the study of (parameterised) complexity questions involving $\mathcal{L}$-free sets of integers. The main questions we consider involve deciding whether a finite set of integers $A$ has an $\mathcal{L}$-free subset of a given size, and counting all such $\mathcal{L}$-free subsets. We also raise a number of open problems.
• ### On degree sequences forcing the square of a Hamilton cycle(1412.3498)

Nov. 24, 2016 math.CO
A famous conjecture of P\'osa from 1962 asserts that every graph on $n$ vertices and with minimum degree at least $2n/3$ contains the square of a Hamilton cycle. The conjecture was proven for large graphs in 1996 by Koml\'os, S\'ark\"ozy and Szemer\'edi. In this paper we prove a degree sequence version of P\'osa's conjecture: Given any $\eta >0$, every graph $G$ of sufficiently large order $n$ contains the square of a Hamilton cycle if its degree sequence $d_1\leq \dots \leq d_n$ satisfies $d_i \geq (1/3+\eta)n+i$ for all $i \leq n/3$. The degree sequence condition here is asymptotically best possible. Our approach uses a hybrid of the Regularity-Blow-up method and the Connecting-Absorbing method.
• ### On solution-free sets of integers(1607.08399)

Oct. 19, 2016 math.CO, math.NT
Given a linear equation $\mathcal{L}$, a set $A \subseteq [n]$ is $\mathcal{L}$-free if $A$ does not contain any non-trivial' solutions to $\mathcal{L}$. In this paper we consider the following three general questions: (i) What is the size of the largest $\mathcal{L}$-free subset of $[n]$? (ii) How many $\mathcal{L}$-free subsets of $[n]$ are there? (iii) How many maximal $\mathcal{L}$-free subsets of $[n]$ are there? We completely resolve (i) in the case when $\mathcal{L}$ is the equation $px+qy=z$ for fixed $p,q\in \mathbb N$ where $p\geq 2$. Further, up to a multiplicative constant, we answer (ii) for a wide class of such equations $\mathcal{L}$, thereby refining a special case of a result of Green. We also give various bounds on the number of maximal $\mathcal{L}$-free subsets of $[n]$ for three-variable homogeneous linear equations $\mathcal{L}$. For this, we make use of container and removal lemmas of Green.
• ### The complexity of perfect matchings and packings in dense hypergraphs(1609.06147)

Sept. 20, 2016 math.CO
Given two $k$-graphs $H$ and $F$, a perfect $F$-packing in $H$ is a collection of vertex-disjoint copies of $F$ in $H$ which together cover all the vertices in $H$. In the case when $F$ is a single edge, a perfect $F$-packing is simply a perfect matching. For a given fixed $F$, it is often the case that the decision problem whether an $n$-vertex $k$-graph $H$ contains a perfect $F$-packing is NP-complete. Indeed, if $k \geq 3$, the corresponding problem for perfect matchings is NP-complete whilst if $k=2$ the problem is NP-complete in the case when $F$ has a component consisting of at least $3$ vertices. In this paper we give a general tool which can be used to determine classes of (hyper)graphs for which the corresponding decision problem for perfect $F$-packings is polynomial time solvable. We then give three applications of this tool: (i) Given $1\leq \ell \leq k-1$, we give a minimum $\ell$-degree condition for which it is polynomial time solvable to determine whether a $k$-graph satisfying this condition has a perfect matching; (ii) Given any graph $F$ we give a minimum degree condition for which it is polynomial time solvable to determine whether a graph satisfying this condition has a perfect $F$-packing; (iii) We also prove a similar result for perfect $K$-packings in $k$-graphs where $K$ is a $k$-partite $k$-graph. For a range of values of $\ell,k$ (i) resolves a conjecture of Keevash, Knox and Mycroft whilst (ii) answers a question of Yuster in the negative. In many cases our results are best possible in the sense that lowering the minimum degree condition means that the corresponding decision problem becomes NP-complete.
• ### Tiling directed graphs with tournaments(1603.08198)

March 27, 2016 math.CO
The Hajnal--Szemer\'edi theorem states that for any integer $r \ge 1$ and any multiple $n$ of $r$, if $G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices and $\delta(G) \ge (1 - 1/r)n$, then $G$ can be partitioned into $n/r$ vertex-disjoint copies of the complete graph on $r$ vertices. We prove a very general analogue of this result for directed graphs: for any integer $r \ge 4$ and any sufficiently large multiple $n$ of $r$, if $G$ is a directed graph on $n$ vertices and every vertex is incident to at least $2(1 - 1/r)n - 1$ directed edges, then $G$ can be partitioned into $n/r$ vertex-disjoint subgraphs of size $r$ each of which contain every tournament on $r$ vertices. A related Tur\'an-type result is also proven.
• ### A degree sequence Hajnal--Szemer\'edi theorem(1412.1774)

Jan. 22, 2016 math.CO
We say that a graph $G$ has a perfect $H$-packing if there exists a set of vertex-disjoint copies of $H$ which cover all the vertices in $G$. The seminal Hajnal--Szemer\'edi theorem characterises the minimum degree that ensures a graph $G$ contains a perfect $K_r$-packing. Balogh, Kostochka and Treglown proposed a degree sequence version of the Hajnal--Szemer\'edi theorem which, if true, gives a strengthening of the Hajnal--Szemer\'edi theorem. In this paper we prove this conjecture asymptotically. Another fundamental result in the area is the Alon--Yuster theorem which gives a minimum degree condition that ensures a graph contains a perfect $H$-packing for an \emph{arbitrary} graph $H$. We give a wide-reaching generalisation of this result by answering another conjecture of Balogh, Kostochka and Treglown on the degree sequence of a graph that forces a perfect $H$-packing. We also prove a degree sequence result concerning perfect transitive tournament packings in directed graphs. The proofs blend together the regularity and absorbing methods.
• ### A note on perfect matchings in uniform hypergraphs(1503.03357)

Jan. 12, 2016 math.CO
We determine the \emph{exact} minimum $\ell$-degree threshold for perfect matchings in $k$-uniform hypergraphs when the corresponding threshold for perfect fractional matchings is significantly less than $\frac{1}{2} \binom{n}{k- \ell}$. This extends our previous results that determine the minimum $\ell$-degree thresholds for perfect matchings in $k$-uniform hypergraphs for all $\ell\ge k/2$ and provides two new (exact) thresholds: $(k,\ell)=(5,2)$ and $(7,3)$.
• ### Exact minimum codegree threshold for $K^- _4$-factors(1509.02577)

Sept. 8, 2015 math.CO
Given hypergraphs $F$ and $H$, an $F$-factor in $H$ is a set of vertex-disjoint copies of $F$ which cover all the vertices in $H$. Let $K^- _4$ denote the $3$-uniform hypergraph with $4$ vertices and $3$ edges. We show that for sufficiently large $n\in 4 \mathbb N$, every $3$-uniform hypergraph $H$ on $n$ vertices with minimum codegree at least $n/2-1$ contains a $K^- _4$-factor. Our bound on the minimum codegree here is best-possible. It resolves a conjecture of Lo and Markstr\"om for large hypergraphs, who earlier proved an asymptotically exact version of this result. Our proof makes use of the absorbing method as well as a result of Keevash and Mycroft concerning almost perfect matchings in hypergraphs.
• ### On directed versions of the Hajnal--Szemer\'edi theorem(1406.3229)

Jan. 24, 2015 math.CO
We say that a (di)graph $G$ has a perfect $H$-packing if there exists a set of vertex-disjoint copies of $H$ which cover all the vertices in $G$. The seminal Hajnal--Szemer\'edi theorem characterises the minimum degree that ensures a graph $G$ contains a perfect $K_r$-packing. In this paper we prove the following analogue for directed graphs: Suppose that $T$ is a tournament on $r$ vertices and $G$ is a digraph of sufficiently large order $n$ where $r$ divides $n$. If $G$ has minimum in- and outdegree at least $(1-1/r)n$ then $G$ contains a perfect $T$-packing. In the case when $T$ is a cyclic triangle, this result verifies a recent conjecture of Czygrinow, Kierstead and Molla (for large digraphs). Furthermore, in the case when $T$ is transitive we conjecture that it suffices for every vertex in $G$ to have sufficiently large indegree or outdegree. We prove this conjecture for transitive triangles and asymptotically for all $r \geq 3$. Our approach makes use of a result of Keevash and Mycroft concerning almost perfect matchings in hypergraphs as well as the Directed Graph Removal lemma.
• ### Proof of the 1-factorization and Hamilton decomposition conjectures II: the bipartite case(1401.4164)

Oct. 23, 2014 math.CO
In a sequence of four papers, we prove the following results (via a unified approach) for all sufficiently large $n$: (i) [1-factorization conjecture] Suppose that $n$ is even and $D \geq 2\lceil n/4\rceil -1$. Then every $D$-regular graph $G$ on $n$ vertices has a decomposition into perfect matchings. Equivalently, $\chi'(G)=D$. (ii) [Hamilton decomposition conjecture] Suppose that $D \ge \lfloor n/2 \rfloor$. Then every $D$-regular graph $G$ on $n$ vertices has a decomposition into Hamilton cycles and at most one perfect matching. (iii) [Optimal packings of Hamilton cycles] Suppose that $G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices with minimum degree $\delta\ge n/2$. Then $G$ contains at least ${\rm reg}_{\rm even}(n,\delta)/2 \ge (n-2)/8$ edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles. Here ${\rm reg}_{\rm even}(n,\delta)$ denotes the degree of the largest even-regular spanning subgraph one can guarantee in a graph on $n$ vertices with minimum degree $\delta$. According to Dirac, (i) was first raised in the 1950s. (ii) and the special case $\delta= \lceil n/2 \rceil$ of (iii) answer questions of Nash-Williams from 1970. All of the above bounds are best possible. In the current paper, we prove the above results for the case when $G$ is close to a complete balanced bipartite graph.
• ### Proof of the 1-factorization and Hamilton decomposition conjectures III: approximate decompositions(1401.4178)

Oct. 23, 2014 math.CO
In a sequence of four papers, we prove the following results (via a unified approach) for all sufficiently large $n$: (i) [1-factorization conjecture] Suppose that $n$ is even and $D\geq 2\lceil n/4\rceil -1$. Then every $D$-regular graph $G$ on $n$ vertices has a decomposition into perfect matchings. Equivalently, $\chi'(G)=D$. (ii) [Hamilton decomposition conjecture] Suppose that $D \ge \lfloor n/2 \rfloor$. Then every $D$-regular graph $G$ on $n$ vertices has a decomposition into Hamilton cycles and at most one perfect matching. (iii) We prove an optimal result on the number of edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles in a graph of given minimum degree. According to Dirac, (i) was first raised in the 1950s. (ii) and (iii) answer questions of Nash-Williams from 1970. The above bounds are best possible. In the current paper, we show the following: suppose that $G$ is close to a complete balanced bipartite graph or to the union of two cliques of equal size. If we are given a suitable set of path systems which cover a set of exceptional' vertices and edges of $G$, then we can extend these path systems into an approximate decomposition of $G$ into Hamilton cycles (or perfect matchings if appropriate).
• ### Proof of the $1$-factorization and Hamilton Decomposition Conjectures(1401.4159)

Oct. 22, 2014 math.CO
In this paper we prove the following results (via a unified approach) for all sufficiently large $n$: (i) [$1$-factorization conjecture] Suppose that $n$ is even and $D\geq 2\lceil n/4\rceil -1$. Then every $D$-regular graph $G$ on $n$ vertices has a decomposition into perfect matchings. Equivalently, $\chi'(G)=D$. (ii) [Hamilton decomposition conjecture] Suppose that $D \ge \lfloor n/2 \rfloor$. Then every $D$-regular graph $G$ on $n$ vertices has a decomposition into Hamilton cycles and at most one perfect matching. (iii) [Optimal packings of Hamilton cycles] Suppose that $G$ is a graph on $n$ vertices with minimum degree $\delta\ge n/2$. Then $G$ contains at least ${\rm reg}_{\rm even}(n,\delta)/2 \ge (n-2)/8$ edge-disjoint Hamilton cycles. Here $\text{reg}_{\text{even}}(n,\delta)$ denotes the degree of the largest even-regular spanning subgraph one can guarantee in a graph on $n$ vertices with minimum degree $\delta$. (i) was first explicitly stated by Chetwynd and Hilton. (ii) and the special case $\delta= \lceil n/2 \rceil$ of (iii) answer questions of Nash-Williams from 1970. All of the above bounds are best possible.
• ### A random version of Sperner's theorem(1404.5079)

Oct. 3, 2014 math.CO
Let $\mathcal{P}(n)$ denote the power set of $[n]$, ordered by inclusion, and let $\mathcal{P}(n,p)$ be obtained from $\mathcal{P}(n)$ by selecting elements from $\mathcal{P}(n)$ independently at random with probability $p$. A classical result of Sperner asserts that every antichain in $\mathcal{P}(n)$ has size at most that of the middle layer, $\binom{n}{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}$. In this note we prove an analogous result for $\mathcal{P} (n,p)$: If $pn \rightarrow \infty$ then, with high probability, the size of the largest antichain in $\mathcal{P}(n,p)$ is at most $(1+o(1)) p \binom{n}{\lfloor n/2 \rfloor}$. This solves a conjecture of Osthus who proved the result in the case when $pn/\log n \rightarrow \infty$. Our condition on $p$ is best-possible. In fact, we prove a more general result giving an upper bound on the size of the largest antichain for a wider range of values of $p$.
• ### The number of maximal sum-free subsets of integers(1409.5661)

Sept. 19, 2014 math.CO, math.NT
Cameron and Erd\H{o}s raised the question of how many maximal sum-free sets there are in $\{1, \dots , n\}$, giving a lower bound of $2^{\lfloor n/4 \rfloor }$. In this paper we prove that there are in fact at most $2^{(1/4+o(1))n}$ maximal sum-free sets in $\{1, \dots , n\}$. Our proof makes use of container and removal lemmas of Green as well as a result of Deshouillers, Freiman, S\'os and Temkin on the structure of sum-free sets.
• ### On perfect packings in dense graphs(1110.3490)

March 8, 2013 math.CO
We say that a graph G has a perfect H-packing if there exists a set of vertex-disjoint copies of H which cover all the vertices in G. We consider various problems concerning perfect H-packings: Given positive integers n, r, D, we characterise the edge density threshold that ensures a perfect K_r-packing in any graph G on n vertices and with minimum degree at least D. We also give two conjectures concerning degree sequence conditions which force a graph to contain a perfect H-packing. Other related embedding problems are also considered. Indeed, we give a structural result concerning K_r-free graphs that satisfy a certain degree sequence condition.
• ### Matchings in 3-uniform hypergraphs(1009.1298)

Nov. 13, 2012 math.CO
We determine the minimum vertex degree that ensures a perfect matching in a 3-uniform hypergraph. More precisely, suppose that H is a sufficiently large 3-uniform hypergraph whose order n is divisible by 3. If the minimum vertex degree of H is greater than \binom{n-1}{2}-\binom{2n/3}{2}, then H contains a perfect matching. This bound is tight and answers a question of Han, Person and Schacht. More generally, we show that H contains a matching of size d\le n/3 if its minimum vertex degree is greater than \binom{n-1}{2}-\binom{n-d}{2}, which is also best possible. This extends a result of Bollobas, Daykin and Erdos.
• ### Exact minimum degree thresholds for perfect matchings in uniform hypergraphs(1210.7356)

Oct. 27, 2012 math.CO
Given positive integers k and r where 4 divides k and k/2 \leq r \leq k-1, we give a minimum r-degree condition that ensures a perfect matching in a k-uniform hypergraph. This condition is best possible and improves on work of Pikhurko who gave an asymptotically exact result. Our approach makes use of the absorbing method, as well as the hypergraph removal lemma and a structural result of Keevash and Sudakov relating to the Turan number of the expanded triangle.
• ### Exact minimum degree thresholds for perfect matchings in uniform hypergraphs II(1210.7359)

Oct. 27, 2012 math.CO
Given positive integers k\geq 3 and r where k/2 \leq r \leq k-1, we give a minimum r-degree condition that ensures a perfect matching in a k-uniform hypergraph. This condition is best possible and improves on work of Pikhurko who gave an asymptotically exact result. Our approach makes use of the absorbing method, and builds on work in 'Exact minimum degree thresholds for perfect matchings in uniform hypergraphs', where we proved the result for k divisible by 4.
• ### Embedding spanning bipartite graphs of small bandwidth(1111.4292)

Sept. 5, 2012 math.CO
Boettcher, Schacht and Taraz gave a condition on the minimum degree of a graph G on n vertices that ensures G contains every r-chromatic graph H on n vertices of bounded degree and of bandwidth o(n), thereby proving a conjecture of Bollobas and Komlos. We strengthen this result in the case when H is bipartite. Indeed, we give an essentially best-possible condition on the degree sequence of a graph G on n vertices that forces G to contain every bipartite graph H on n vertices of bounded degree and of bandwidth o(n). This also implies an Ore-type result. In fact, we prove a much stronger result where the condition on G is relaxed to a certain robust expansion property. Our result also confirms the bipartite case of a conjecture of Balogh, Kostochka and Treglown concerning the degree sequence of a graph which forces a perfect H-packing.