• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • Instrumental Methods for Professional and Amateur Collaborations in Planetary Astronomy (1305.3647)

    O. Mousis, R. Hueso, J.-P. Beaulieu, S. Bouley, B. Carry, F. Colas, A. Klotz, C. Pellier, J.-M. Petit, P. Rousselot, M. Ali Dib, W. Beisker, M. Birlan, C. Buil, A. Delsanti, E. Frappa, H. B. Hammel, A.-C. Levasseur-Regourd, G. S. Orton, A. Sanchez-Lavega, A. Santerne, P. Tanga, J. Vaubaillon, B. Zanda, D. Baratoux, T. Boehm, V. Boudon, A. Bouquet, L. Buzzi, J.-L. Dauvergne, A. Decock, M. Delcroix, P. Drossart, N. Esseiva, G. Fischer, L. N. Fletcher, S. Foglia, J. M. Gomez-Forrellad, J. Guarro-Flo, D. Herald, E. Jehin, F. Kugel, J.-P. Lebreton, J. Lecacheux, A. Leroy, L. Maquet, G. Masi, A. Maury, F. Meyer, S. Pérez-Hoyos, A. S. Rajpurohit, C. Rinner, J. H. Rogers, F. Roques, R. W. Schmude, Jr., B. Sicardy, B. Tregon, M. Vanhuysse, A. Wesley, T. Widemann
    March 4, 2014 astro-ph.EP, astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Amateur contributions to professional publications have increased exponentially over the last decades in the field of Planetary Astronomy. Here we review the different domains of the field in which collaborations between professional and amateur astronomers are effective and regularly lead to scientific publications. We discuss the instruments, detectors, softwares and methodologies typically used by amateur astronomers to collect the scientific data in the different domains of interest. Amateur contributions to the monitoring of planets and interplanetary matter, characterization of asteroids and comets, as well as the determination of the physical properties of Kuiper Belt Objects and exoplanets are discussed.
  • Asteroids' physical models from combined dense and sparse photometry and scaling of the YORP effect by the observed obliquity distribution (1301.6943)

    J. Hanuš, J. Ďurech, M. Brož, A. Marciniak, B. D. Warner, F. Pilcher, R. Stephens, R. Behrend, B. Carry, D. Čapek, P. Antonini, M. Audejean, K. Augustesen, E. Barbotin, P. Baudouin, A. Bayol, L. Bernasconi, W. Borczyk, J.-G. Bosch, E. Brochard, L. Brunetto, S. Casulli, A. Cazenave, S. Charbonnel, B. Christophe, F. Colas, J. Coloma, M. Conjat, W. Cooney, H. Correira, V. Cotrez, A. Coupier, R. Crippa, M. Cristofanelli, Ch. Dalmas, C. Danavaro, C. Demeautis, T. Droege, R. Durkee, N. Esseiva, M. Esteban, M. Fagas, G. Farroni, M. Fauvaud, S. Fauvaud, F. Del Freo, L. Garcia, S. Geier, C. Godon, K. Grangeon, H. Hamanowa, H. Hamanowa, N. Heck, S. Hellmich, D. Higgins, R. Hirsch, M. Husarik, T. Itkonen, O. Jade, K. Kamiński, P. Kankiewicz, A. Klotz, R. A. Koff, A. Kryszczyńska, T. Kwiatkowski, A. Laffont, A. Leroy, J. Lecacheux, Y. Leonie, C. Leyrat, F. Manzini, A. Martin, G. Masi, D. Matter, J. Michałowski, M. J. Michałowski, T. Michałowski, J. Michelet, R. Michelsen, E. Morelle, S. Mottola, R. Naves, J. Nomen, J. Oey, W. Ogloza, A. Oksanen, D. Oszkiewicz, P. Pääkkönen, M. Paiella, H. Pallares, J. Paulo, M. Pavic, B. Payet, M. Polińska, D. Polishook, R. Poncy, Y. Revaz, C. Rinner, M. Rocca, A. Roche, D. Romeuf, R. Roy, H. Saguin, P. A. Salom, S. Sanchez, G. Santacana, T. Santana-Ros, J.-P. Sareyan, K. Sobkowiak, S. Sposetti, D. Starkey, R. Stoss, J. Strajnic, J.-P. Teng, B. Tregon, A. Vagnozzi, F. P. Velichko, N. Waelchli, K. Wagrez, H. Wücher
    Jan. 29, 2013 astro-ph.EP
    The larger number of models of asteroid shapes and their rotational states derived by the lightcurve inversion give us better insight into both the nature of individual objects and the whole asteroid population. With a larger statistical sample we can study the physical properties of asteroid populations, such as main-belt asteroids or individual asteroid families, in more detail. Shape models can also be used in combination with other types of observational data (IR, adaptive optics images, stellar occultations), e.g., to determine sizes and thermal properties. We use all available photometric data of asteroids to derive their physical models by the lightcurve inversion method and compare the observed pole latitude distributions of all asteroids with known convex shape models with the simulated pole latitude distributions. We used classical dense photometric lightcurves from several sources and sparse-in-time photometry from the U.S. Naval Observatory in Flagstaff, Catalina Sky Survey, and La Palma surveys (IAU codes 689, 703, 950) in the lightcurve inversion method to determine asteroid convex models and their rotational states. We also extended a simple dynamical model for the spin evolution of asteroids used in our previous paper. We present 119 new asteroid models derived from combined dense and sparse-in-time photometry. We discuss the reliability of asteroid shape models derived only from Catalina Sky Survey data (IAU code 703) and present 20 such models. By using different values for a scaling parameter cYORP (corresponds to the magnitude of the YORP momentum) in the dynamical model for the spin evolution and by comparing synthetics and observed pole-latitude distributions, we were able to constrain the typical values of the cYORP parameter as between 0.05 and 0.6.