
Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) polarimeters aspire to measure the faint
$B$mode signature predicted to arise from inflationary gravitational waves.
They also have the potential to constrain cosmic birefringence which would
produce nonzero expectation values for the CMB's $TB$ and $EB$ spectra.
However, instrumental systematic effects can also cause these $TB$ and $EB$
correlations to be nonzero. In particular, an overall miscalibration of the
polarization orientation of the detectors produces $TB$ and $EB$ spectra which
are degenerate with isotropic cosmological birefringence, while also
introducing a small but predictable bias on the $BB$ spectrum. The \bicep
threeyear spectra, which use our standard calibration of detector polarization
angles from a dielectric sheet, are consistent with a polarization rotation of
$\alpha = 2.77^\circ \pm 0.86^\circ \text{(statistical)} \pm 1.3^\circ
\text{(systematic)}$. We revise the estimate of systematic error on the
polarization rotation angle from the twoyear analysis by comparing multiple
calibration methods. We investigate the polarization rotation for the \bicep
100 GHz and 150 GHz bands separately to investigate theoretical models that
produce frequencydependent cosmic birefringence. We find no evidence in the
data supporting either these models or Faraday rotation of the CMB polarization
by the Milky Way galaxy's magnetic field. If we assume that there is no cosmic
birefringence, we can use the $TB$ and $EB$ spectra to calibrate detector
polarization orientations, thus reducing bias of the cosmological $B$mode
spectrum from leaked $E$modes due to possible polarization orientation
miscalibration. After applying this "selfcalibration" process, we find that
the upper limit on the tensortoscalar ratio decreases slightly, from $r<0.70$
to $r<0.65$ at $95\%$ confidence.

Statistical measures of galaxy clusters are sensitive to neutrino masses in
the subeV range. We explore the possibility of using cluster number counts
from the ongoing PLANCK/SZ and future cosmicvariancelimited surveys to
constrain neutrino masses from CMB data alone. The precision with which the
total neutrino mass can be determined from SZ number counts is limited mostly
by uncertainties in the cluster mass function and intracluster gas evolution;
these are explicitly accounted for in our analysis. We find that projected
results from the PLANCK/SZ survey can be used to determine the total neutrino
mass with a (1\sigma) uncertainty of 0.06 eV, assuming it is in the range
0.10.3 eV, and the survey detection limit is set at the 5\sigma significance
level. Our results constitute a significant improvement on the limits expected
from PLANCK/CMB lensing measurements, 0.15 eV. Based on expected results from
future cosmicvariancelimited (CVL) SZ survey we predict a 1\sigma uncertainty
of 0.04 eV, a level comparable to that expected when CMB lensing extraction is
carried out with the same experiment. A few percent uncertainty in the mass
function parameters could result in up to a factor \sim 23 degradation of our
PLANCK and CVL forecasts. Our analysis shows that cluster number counts provide
a viable complementary cosmological probe to CMB lensing constraints on the
total neutrino mass.

The standard cosmological model is assumed to respect parity symmetry. Under
this assumption the crosscorrelations of the CMB's temperature anisotropy and
`gradient'like polarization, with the `curl'like polarization identically
vanish over the full sky. However, extensions of the standard model which allow
for light scalar field or axion coupling to the electromagnetic field, or
coupling to the Riemann gravitational fieldstrength, as well as other
modifications of field theories, may induce a rotation of the CMB polarization
plane on cosmological scales and manifest itself as nonvanishing TB and EB
crosscorrelations. Recently, the degree of parity violation (reflected in
polarization rotation) was constrained using data from BOOMERANG, WMAP and
QUAD. Forecasts have been made for nearfuture experiments (e.g. PLANCK) to
further constrain parity and Lorentzviolating terms in the fundamental
interactions of nature. Here we consider a realworld effect induced by a class
of telescope beam systematics which can mimic the rotation of polarization
plane or otherwise induce nonvanishing TB and EB correlations. In particular,
adopting the viewpoint that the primary target of future experiments will be
the inflationary Bmode signal, we assume the beamsystematics of the upcoming
PLANCK and POLARBEAR experiments are optimized towards this goal, and explore
the implications of the allowed levels of beam systematics on the resulting
precision of polarizationrotation measurements.

The CMB's Bmode polarization provides a handle on several cosmological
parameters most notably the tensortoscalar ratio, $r$, and is sensitive to
parameters which govern the growth of large scale structure (LSS) and evolution
of the gravitational potential. The primordial gravitationalwave and
secondary lensinginduced Bmode signals are very weak and therefore prone to
various foregrounds and systematics. In this work we use Fishermatrixbased
estimations and apply, for the first time, MonteCarlo Markov Chain (MCMC)
simulations to determine the effect of beam systematics on the inferred
cosmological parameters from five upcoming experiments: PLANCK, POLARBEAR,
SPIDER, QUIET+CLOVER and CMBPOL. We consider beam systematics which couple the
beam substructure to the gradient of temperature anisotropy and polarization
(differential beamwidth, pointing and ellipticity) and beam systematics due to
differential beam normalization (differential gain) and orientation (beam
rotation) of the polarizationsensitive axes (the latter two effects are
insensitive to the beam substructure). We determine allowable levels of beam
systematics for given tolerances on the induced parameter errors and check for
possible biases in the inferred parameters concomitant with potential increases
in the statistical uncertainty. All our results are scaled to the 'worst case
scenario'. In this case and for our tolerance levels, the beam rotation should
not exceed the fewdegree to subdegree level, typical ellipticity is required
to be 1% level, the differential gain allowed level is a few parts in $10^{3}$
to $10^{4}$, differential beamwidth upper limits are of the subpercent level
and differential pointing should not exceed the few to subarcsec level.

We examine the use of the CMB's TE cross correlation power spectrum as a
complementary test to detect primordial gravitational waves (PGWs). The first
method used is based on the determination of the lowest multipole, $\ell_0$,
where the TE power spectrum, $C_{\ell}^{TE}$, first changes sign. The second
method uses Wiener filtering on the CMB TE data to remove the density
perturbations contribution to the TE power spectrum. In principle this leaves
only the contribution of PGWs. We examine two toy experiments (one ideal and
another more realistic) to see their ability to constrain PGWs using the TE
power spectrum alone. We found that an ideal experiment, one limited only by
cosmic variance, can detect PGWs with a ratio of tensor to scalar metric
perturbation power spectra $r=0.3$ at 99.9% confidence level using only the TE
correlation. This value is comparable with current constraints obtained by WMAP
based on the $2\sigma$ upper limits to the Bmode amplitude. We demonstrate
that to measure PGWs by their contribution to the TE cross correlation power
spectrum in a realistic ground based experiment when real instrumental noise is
taken into account, the tensortoscalar ratio, $r$, should be approximately
three times larger.

In this paper we continue our study of CMB TE cross correlation as a source
of information about primordial gravitational waves. In an accompanying paper,
we considered the zero multipole method. In this paper we use Wiener filtering
of the CMB TE data to remove the density perturbation contribution to the TE
power spectrum. In principle this leaves only the contribution of PGWs. We
examine two toy experiments (one ideal and one more realistic), to see how well
they constrain PGWs using the TE power spectrum. We consider three tests
applied to a combination of observational data and data sets generated by Monte
Carlo simulations: (1) SignaltoNoise test, (2) sign test, and (3) Wilcoxon
rank sum test. We compare these tests with each other and with the zero
multipole method. Finally, we compare the signaltonoise ratio of TE
correlation measurements first with corresponding signaltonoise ratios for BB
ground based measurements and later with current and future TE correlation
space measurements. We found that an ideal TE correlation experiment limited
only by cosmic variance can detect PGWs with a tensortoscalar ratio $r=0.3$
at 98% confidence level with the $S/N$ test, 93% confidence level with the sign
test, and 80% confidence level for the Wilcoxon rank sum test. We also compare
all results with corresponding results obtained using the zero multipole
method. We demonstrate that to measure PGWs by their contribution to the TE
cross correlation power spectrum in a realistic ground based experiment when
real instrumental noise is taken into account, the tensortoscalar ratio, $r$,
must be approximately four times larger. In the sense to detect PGWs, the zero
multipole method is the best, next best is the S/N test, then the sign test,
and the worst is the Wilcoxon rank sum test.

We describe the development of a bolometric receiver designed to measure the
arcminutescale polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The
Polatron will be mounted at the Cassegrain focus of the 5.5 m telescope at the
Owens Valley Radio Observatory (OVRO). The receiver will measure both the Q and
U Stokes parameters over a 20% passband centered near 100 GHz, with the input
polarization signal modulated at ~0.6 Hz by a rotating, birefringent, quartz
halfwave plate. In six months of observation we plan to observe ~400 2.5
arcminute pixels in a ring about the North Celestial Pole to a precision of ~6
\mu K/pixel in each of Q and U, adequate to unambiguously detect CMB
polarization at levels predicted by current models.