• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • AWAKE readiness for the study of the seeded self-modulation of a 400\,GeV proton bunch (1708.01087)

    P. Muggli, E. Adli, R. Apsimon, F. Asmus, R. Baartman, A.-M. Bachmann, M. Barros Marin, F. Batsch, J. Bauche, V. K. Berglyd Olsen, M. Bernardini, B. Biskup, A. Boccardi, T. Bogey, T. Bohl, C. Bracco, F. Braunmuller, S. Burger, G. Burt, S. Bustamante, B. Buttenschon, A. Butterworth, A. Caldwell, M. Cascella, E. Chevallay, M. Chung, H. Damerau, L. Deacon, A. Dexter, P. Dirksen, S. Doebert, J. Farmer, V. Fedosseev, T. Feniet, G. Fior, R. Fiorito, R. Fonseca, F. Friebel, P. Gander, S. Gessner, I. Gorgisyan, A. A. Gorn, O. Grulke, E. Gschwendtner, A. Guerrero, J. Hansen, C. Hessler, W. Hofle, J. Holloway, M. Huther, M. Ibison, M.R. Islam, L. Jensen, S. Jolly, M. Kasim, F. Keeble, S.-Y. Kim, F. Krause, A. Lasheen, T. Lefevre, G. LeGodec, Y. Li, S. Liu, N. Lopes, K. V. Lotov, M. Martyanov, S. Mazzoni, D. Medina Godoy, O. Mete, V. A. Minakov, R. Mompo, J. Moody, M. T. Moreira, J. Mitchell, C. Mutin, P. Norreys, E. Oz, E. Ozturk, W. Pauw, A. Pardone, C. Pasquino, K. Pepitone, A. Petrenko, S. Pitmann, G. Plyushchev, A. Pukhov, K. Rieger, H. Ruhl, J. Schmidt, I. A. Shalimova, E. Shaposhnikova, P. Sherwood, L. Silva, A. P. Sosedkin, R. I. Spitsyn, K. Szczurek, J. Thomas, P. V. Tuev, M. Turner, V. Verzilov, J. Vieira, H. Vincke, C. P. Welsch, B. Williamson, M. Wing, G. Xia, H. Zhang
    Aug. 3, 2017 physics.plasm-ph, physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    AWAKE is a proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration experiment. % We show that the experimental setup briefly described here is ready for systematic study of the seeded self-modulation of the 400\,GeV proton bunch in the 10\,m-long rubidium plasma with density adjustable from 1 to 10$\times10^{14}$\,cm$^{-3}$. % We show that the short laser pulse used for ionization of the rubidium vapor propagates all the way along the column, suggesting full ionization of the vapor. % We show that ionization occurs along the proton bunch, at the laser time and that the plasma that follows affects the proton bunch. %
  • PERLE: Powerful Energy Recovery Linac for Experiments - Conceptual Design Report (1705.08783)

    D. Angal-Kalinin, G. Arduini, B. Auchmann, J. Bernauer, A. Bogacz, F. Bordry, S. Bousson, C. Bracco, O. Brüning, R. Calaga, K. Cassou, V. Chetvertkova, E. Cormier, E. Daly, D. Douglas, K. Dupraz, B. Goddard, J. Henry, A. Hutton, E. Jensen, W. Kaabi, M. Klein, P. Kostka, F. Marhauser, A. Martens, A. Milanese, B. Militsyn, Y. Peinaud, D. Pellegrini, N. Pietralla, Y.A. Pupkov, R. A. Rimmer, K. Schirm, D. Schulte, S. Smith, A. Stocchi, A. Valloni, C. Welsch, G. Willering, D. Wollmann, F. Zimmermann, F. Zomer
    May 24, 2017 physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    A conceptual design is presented of a novel ERL facility for the development and application of the energy recovery technique to linear electron accelerators in the multi-turn, large current and large energy regime. The main characteristics of the powerful energy recovery linac experiment facility (PERLE) are derived from the design of the Large Hadron electron Collider, an electron beam upgrade under study for the LHC, for which it would be the key demonstrator. PERLE is thus projected as a facility to investigate efficient, high current (> 10 mA) ERL operation with three re-circulation passages through newly designed SCRF cavities, at 801.58 MHz frequency, and following deceleration over another three re-circulations. In its fully equipped configuration, PERLE provides an electron beam of approximately 1 GeV energy. A physics programme possibly associated with PERLE is sketched, consisting of high precision elastic electron-proton scattering experiments, as well as photo-nuclear reactions of unprecedented intensities with up to 30 MeV photon beam energy as may be obtained using Fabry-Perot cavities. The facility has further applications as a general technology test bed that can investigate and validate novel superconducting magnets (beam induced quench tests) and superconducting RF structures (structure tests with high current beams, beam loading and transients). Besides a chapter on operation aspects, the report contains detailed considerations on the choices for the SCRF structure, optics and lattice design, solutions for arc magnets, source and injector and on further essential components. A suitable configuration derived from the here presented design concept may next be moved forward to a technical design and possibly be built by an international collaboration which is being established.
  • AWAKE, The Advanced Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment at CERN (1512.05498)

    E. Gschwendtner, E. Adli, L. Amorim, R. Apsimon, R. Assmann, A.-M. Bachmann, F. Batsch, J. Bauche, V.K. Berglyd Olsen, M. Bernardini, R. Bingham, B. Biskup, T. Bohl, C. Bracco, P. N. Burrows, G. Burt, B. Buttenschon, A. Butterworth, A. Caldwell, M. Cascella, E. Chevallay, S. Cipiccia, H. Damerau, L. Deacon, P. Dirksen, S. Doebert, U. Dorda, J. Farmer, V. Fedosseev, E. Feldbaumer, R. Fiorito, R. Fonseca, F. Friebel, A.A. Gorn, O. Grulke, J. Hansen, C. Hessler, W. Hofle, J. Holloway, M. Huther, D. Jaroszynski, L. Jensen, S. Jolly, A. Joulaei, M. Kasim, F. Keeble, Y. Li, S. Liu, N. Lopes, K.V. Lotov, S. Mandry, R. Martorelli, M. Martyanov, S. Mazzoni, O. Mete, V.A. Minakov, J. Mitchell, J. Moody, P. Muggli, Z. Najmudin, P. Norreys, E. Oz, A. Pardons, K. Pepitone, A. Petrenko, G. Plyushchev, A. Pukhov, K. Rieger, H. Ruhl, F. Salveter, N. Savard, J. Schmidt, A. Seryi, E. Shaposhnikova, Z.M. Sheng, P. Sherwood, L. Silva, L. Soby, A.P. Sosedkin, R.I. Spitsyn, R. Trines, P.V. Tuev, M. Turner, V. Verzilov, J. Vieira, H. Vincke, Y. Wei, C.P. Welsch, M. Wing, G. Xia, H. Zhang
    Dec. 17, 2015 physics.plasm-ph, physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The Advanced Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment (AWAKE) aims at studying plasma wakefield generation and electron acceleration driven by proton bunches. It is a proof-of-principle R&D experiment at CERN and the world's first proton driven plasma wakefield acceleration experiment. The AWAKE experiment will be installed in the former CNGS facility and uses the 400 GeV/c proton beam bunches from the SPS. The first experiments will focus on the self-modulation instability of the long (rms ~12 cm) proton bunch in the plasma. These experiments are planned for the end of 2016. Later, in 2017/2018, low energy (~15 MeV) electrons will be externally injected to sample the wakefields and be accelerated beyond 1 GeV. The main goals of the experiment will be summarized. A summary of the AWAKE design and construction status will be presented.
  • Path to AWAKE: Evolution of the concept (1511.09032)

    A. Caldwell, E. Adli, L. Amorim, R. Apsimon, T. Argyropoulos, R. Assmann, A.-M. Bachmann, F. Batsch, J. Bauche, V.K. Berglyd Olsen, M. Bernardini, R. Bingham, B. Biskup, T. Bohl, C. Bracco, P.N. Burrows, G. Burt, B. Buttenschon, A. Butterworth, M. Cascella, S. Chattopadhyay, E. Chevallay, S. Cipiccia, H. Damerau, L. Deacon, P. Dirksen, S. Doebert, U. Dorda, E. Elsen, J. Farmer, S. Fartoukh, V. Fedosseev, E. Feldbaumer, R. Fiorito, R. Fonseca, F. Friebel, G. Geschonke, B. Goddard, A.A. Gorn, O. Grulke, E. Gschwendtner, J. Hansen, C. Hessler, S. Hillenbrand, W. Hofle, J. Holloway, C. Huang, M. Huther, D. Jaroszynski, L. Jensen, S. Jolly, A. Joulaei, M. Kasim, F. Keeble, R. Kersevan, N. Kumar, Y. Li, S. Liu, N. Lopes, K.V. Lotov, W. Lu, J. Machacek, S. Mandry, I. Martin, R. Martorelli, M. Martyanov, S. Mazzoni, M. Meddahi, L. Merminga, O. Mete, V.A. Minakov, J. Mitchell, J. Moody, A.-S. Muller, Z. Najmudin, T.C.Q. Noakes, P. Norreys, J. Osterhoff, E. Oz, A. Pardons, K. Pepitone, A. Petrenko, G. Plyushchev, J. Pozimski, A. Pukhov, O. Reimann, K. Rieger, S. Roesler, H. Ruhl, T. Rusnak, F. Salveter, N. Savard, J. Schmidt, H. von der Schmitt, A. Seryi, E. Shaposhnikova, Z.M. Sheng, P. Sherwood, L. Silva, F. Simon, L. Soby, A.P. Sosedkin, R.I. Spitsyn, T. Tajima, R. Tarkeshian, H. Timko, R. Trines, T. Tueckmantel, P.V. Tuev, M. Turner, F. Velotti, V. Verzilov, J. Vieira, H. Vincke, Y. Wei, C.P. Welsch, M. Wing, G. Xia, V. Yakimenko, H. Zhang, F. Zimmermann
    Nov. 29, 2015 physics.plasm-ph, physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    This report describes the conceptual steps in reaching the design of the AWAKE experiment currently under construction at CERN. We start with an introduction to plasma wakefield acceleration and the motivation for using proton drivers. We then describe the self-modulation instability --- a key to an early realization of the concept. This is then followed by the historical development of the experimental design, where the critical issues that arose and their solutions are described. We conclude with the design of the experiment as it is being realized at CERN and some words on the future outlook. A summary of the AWAKE design and construction status as presented in this conference is given in [1].
  • Testing Beam-Induced Quench Levels of LHC Superconducting Magnets (1502.05261)

    B. Auchmann, T. Baer, M. Bednarek, G. Bellodi, C. Bracco, R. Bruce, F. Cerutti, V. Chetvertkova, B. Dehning, P.P. Granieri, W. Hofle, E.B. Holzer, A. Lechner, E. Nebot Del Busto, A.Priebe, S. Redaelli, B. Salvachua, M. Sapinski, R. Schmidt, N. Shetty, E. Skordis, M. Solfaroli, J. Steckert, D. Valuch, A. Verweij, J. Wenninger, D. Wollmann, M. Zerlauth
    June 26, 2015 physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    In the years 2009-2013 the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) has been operated with the top beam energies of 3.5 TeV and 4 TeV per proton (from 2012) instead of the nominal 7 TeV. The currents in the superconducting magnets were reduced accordingly. To date only seventeen beam-induced quenches have occurred; eight of them during specially designed quench tests, the others during injection. There has not been a single beam- induced quench during normal collider operation with stored beam. The conditions, however, are expected to become much more challenging after the long LHC shutdown. The magnets will be operating at near nominal currents, and in the presence of high energy and high intensity beams with a stored energy of up to 362 MJ per beam. In this paper we summarize our efforts to understand the quench levels of LHC superconducting magnets. We describe beam-loss events and dedicated experiments with beam, as well as the simulation methods used to reproduce the observable signals. The simulated energy deposition in the coils is compared to the quench levels predicted by electro-thermal models, thus allowing to validate and improve the models which are used to set beam-dump thresholds on beam-loss monitors for Run 2.
  • Simulations and measurements of beam loss patterns at the CERN Large Hadron Collider (1409.3123)

    R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, C. Bracco, M. Brugger, M. Cauchi, F. Cerutti, D. Deboy, A. Ferrari, L. Lari, A. Marsili, A. Mereghetti, D. Mirarchi, E. Quaranta, S. Redaelli, G. Robert-Demolaize, A. Rossi, B. Salvachua, E. Skordis, C. Tambasco, G. Valentino, T. Weiler, V. Vlachoudis, , D. Wollmann
    Sept. 10, 2014 nucl-ex, physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The CERN Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is designed to collide proton beams of unprecedented energy, in order to extend the frontiers of high-energy particle physics. During the first very successful running period in 2010--2013, the LHC was routinely storing protons at 3.5--4 TeV with a total beam energy of up to 146 MJ, and even higher stored energies are foreseen in the future. This puts extraordinary demands on the control of beam losses. An un-controlled loss of even a tiny fraction of the beam could cause a superconducting magnet to undergo a transition into a normal-conducting state, or in the worst case cause material damage. Hence a multi-stage collimation system has been installed in order to safely intercept high-amplitude beam protons before they are lost elsewhere. To guarantee adequate protection from the collimators, a detailed theoretical understanding is needed. This article presents results of numerical simulations of the distribution of beam losses around the LHC that have leaked out of the collimation system. The studies include tracking of protons through the fields of more than 5000 magnets in the 27 km LHC ring over hundreds of revolutions, and Monte-Carlo simulations of particle-matter interactions both in collimators and machine elements being hit by escaping particles. The simulation results agree typically within a factor 2 with measurements of beam loss distributions from the previous LHC run. Considering the complex simulation, which must account for a very large number of unknown imperfections, and in view of the total losses around the ring spanning over 7 orders of magnitude, we consider this an excellent agreement. Our results give confidence in the simulation tools, which are used also for the design of future accelerators.
  • Proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration: a path to the future of high-energy particle physics (1401.4823)

    AWAKE Collaboration: R. Assmann, R. Bingham, T. Bohl, C. Bracco, B. Buttenschon, A. Butterworth, A. Caldwell, S. Chattopadhyay, S. Cipiccia, E. Feldbaumer, R.A. Fonseca, B. Goddard, M. Gross, O. Grulke, E. Gschwendtner, J. Holloway, C. Huang, D. Jaroszynski, S. Jolly, P. Kempkes, N. Lopes, K. Lotov, J. Machacek, S.R. Mandry, J.W. McKenzie, M. Meddahi, B.L. Militsyn, N. Moschuering, P. Muggli, Z. Najmudin, T.C.Q. Noakes, P.A. Norreys, E. Oz, A. Pardons, A. Petrenko, A. Pukhov, K. Rieger, O. Reimann, H. Ruhl, E. Shaposhnikova, L.O. Silva, A. Sosedkin, R. Tarkeshian, R.M.G.N. Trines, T. Tuckmantel, J. Vieira, H. Vincke, M. Wing, G. Xia
    April 2, 2014 physics.plasm-ph, hep-ex, physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    New acceleration technology is mandatory for the future elucidation of fundamental particles and their interactions. A promising approach is to exploit the properties of plasmas. Past research has focused on creating large-amplitude plasma waves by injecting an intense laser pulse or an electron bunch into the plasma. However, the maximum energy gain of electrons accelerated in a single plasma stage is limited by the energy of the driver. Proton bunches are the most promising drivers of wakefields to accelerate electrons to the TeV energy scale in a single stage. An experimental program at CERN -- the AWAKE experiment -- has been launched to study in detail the important physical processes and to demonstrate the power of proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration. Here we review the physical principles and some experimental considerations for a future proton-driven plasma wakefield accelerator.
  • On the Relation of the LHeC and the LHC (1211.5102)

    J. L. Abelleira Fernandez, C. Adolphsen, P. Adzic, A. N. Akay, H. Aksakal, J. L. Albacete, B. Allanach, S. Alekhin, P. Allport, V. Andreev, R. B. Appleby, E. Arikan, N. Armesto, G. Azuelos, M. Bai, D. Barber, J. Bartels, O. Behnke, J. Behr, A. S. Belyaev, I. Ben-Zvi, N. Bernard, S. Bertolucci, S. Bettoni, S. Biswal, J. Blümlein, H. Böttcher, A. Bogacz, C. Bracco, J. Bracinik, G. Brandt, H. Braun, S. Brodsky, O. Brüning, E. Bulyak, A. Buniatyan, H. Burkhardt, I. T. Cakir, O. Cakir, R. Calaga, A. Caldwell, V. Cetinkaya, V. Chekelian, E. Ciapala, R. Ciftci, A. K. Ciftci, B. A. Cole, J. C. Collins, O. Dadoun, J. Dainton, A. De. Roeck, D. d'Enterria, P. DiNezza, M. D'Onofrio, A. Dudarev, A. Eide, R. Enberg, E. Eroglu, K. J. Eskola, L. Favart, M. Fitterer, S. Forte, A. Gaddi, P. Gambino, H. García Morales, T. Gehrmann, P. Gladkikh, C. Glasman, A. Glazov, R. Godbole, B. Goddard, T. Greenshaw, A. Guffanti, V. Guzey, C. Gwenlan, T. Han, Y. Hao, F. Haug, W. Herr, A. Hervé, B. J. Holzer, M. Ishitsuka, M. Jacquet, B. Jeanneret, E. Jensen, J. M. Jimenez, J. M. Jowett, H. Jung, H. Karadeniz, D. Kayran, A. Kilic, K. Kimura, R. Klees, M. Klein, U. Klein, T. Kluge, F. Kocak, M. Korostelev, A. Kosmicki, P. Kostka, H. Kowalski, M. Kraemer, G. Kramer, D. Kuchler, M. Kuze, T. Lappi, P. Laycock, E. Levichev, S. Levonian, V. N. Litvinenko, A. Lombardi, J. Maeda, C. Marquet, B. Mellado, K. H. Mess, A. Milanese, J. G. Milhano, S. Moch, I. I. Morozov, Y. Muttoni, S. Myers, S. Nandi, Z. Nergiz, P. R. Newman, T. Omori, J. Osborne, E. Paoloni, Y. Papaphilippou, C. Pascaud, H. Paukkunen, E. Perez, T. Pieloni, E. Pilicer, B. Pire, R. Placakyte, A. Polini, V. Ptitsyn, Y. Pupkov, V. Radescu, S. Raychaudhuri, L. Rinolfi, E. Rizvi, R. Rohini, J. Rojo, S. Russenschuck, M. Sahin, C. A. Salgado, K. Sampei, R. Sassot, E. Sauvan, M. Schaefer, U. Schneekloth, T. Schörner-Sadenius, D. Schulte, A. Senol, A. Seryi, P. Sievers, A. N. Skrinsky, W. Smith, D. South, H. Spiesberger, A. M. Stasto, M. Strikman, M. Sullivan, S. Sultansoy, Y. P. Sun, B. Surrow, L. Szymanowski, P. Taels, I. Tapan, T. Tasci, E. Tassi, H. Ten. Kate, J. Terron, H. Thiesen, L. Thompson, P. Thompson, K. Tokushuku, R. Tomás García, D. Tommasini, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, J. Tuckmantel, S. Turkoz, T. N. Trinh, K. Tywoniuk, G. Unel, T. Ullrich, J. Urakawa, P. VanMechelen, A. Variola, R. Veness, A. Vivoli, P. Vobly, J. Wagner, R. Wallny, S. Wallon, G. Watt, C. Weiss, U. A. Wiedemann, U. Wienands, F. Willeke, B.-W. Xiao, V. Yakimenko, A. F. Zarnecki, Z. Zhang, F. Zimmermann, R. Zlebcik, F. Zomer
    Jan. 9, 2013 hep-ph, hep-ex
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The present note relies on the recently published conceptual design report of the LHeC and extends the first contribution to the European strategy debate in emphasising the role of the LHeC to complement and complete the high luminosity LHC programme. The brief discussion therefore focuses on the importance of high precision PDF and $\alpha_s$ determinations for the physics beyond the Standard Model (GUTs, SUSY, Higgs). Emphasis is also given to the importance of high parton density phenomena in nuclei and their relevance to the heavy ion physics programme at the LHC.
  • A Large Hadron Electron Collider at CERN (1211.4831)

    J. L. Abelleira Fernandez, C. Adolphsen, P. Adzic, A. N. Akay, H. Aksakal, J. L. Albacete, B. Allanach, S. Alekhin, P. Allport, V. Andreev, R. B. Appleby, E. Arikan, N. Armesto, G. Azuelos, M. Bai, D. Barber, J. Bartels, O. Behnke, J. Behr, A. S. Belyaev, I. Ben-Zvi, N. Bernard, S. Bertolucci, S. Bettoni, S. Biswal, J. Blümlein, H. Böttcher, A. Bogacz, C. Bracco, J. Bracinik, G. Brandt, H. Braun, S. Brodsky, O. Brüning, E. Bulyak, A. Buniatyan, H. Burkhardt, I. T. Cakir, O. Cakir, R. Calaga, A. Caldwell, V. Cetinkaya, V. Chekelian, E. Ciapala, R. Ciftci, A. K. Ciftci, B. A. Cole, J. C. Collins, O. Dadoun, J. Dainton, A. De. Roeck, D. d'Enterria, P. DiNezza, M. D'Onofrio, A. Dudarev, A. Eide, R. Enberg, E. Eroglu, K. J. Eskola, L. Favart, M. Fitterer, S. Forte, A. Gaddi, P. Gambino, H. García Morales, T. Gehrmann, P. Gladkikh, C. Glasman, A. Glazov, R. Godbole, B. Goddard, T. Greenshaw, A. Guffanti, V. Guzey, C. Gwenlan, T. Han, Y. Hao, F. Haug, W. Herr, A. Hervé, B. J. Holzer, M. Ishitsuka, M. Jacquet, B. Jeanneret, E. Jensen, J. M. Jimenez, J. M. Jowett, H. Jung, H. Karadeniz, D. Kayran, A. Kilic, K. Kimura, R. Klees, M. Klein, U. Klein, T. Kluge, F. Kocak, M. Korostelev, A. Kosmicki, P. Kostka, H. Kowalski, M. Kraemer, G. Kramer, D. Kuchler, M. Kuze, T. Lappi, P. Laycock, E. Levichev, S. Levonian, V. N. Litvinenko, A. Lombardi, J. Maeda, C. Marquet, B. Mellado, K. H. Mess, A. Milanese, J. G. Milhano, S. Moch, I. I. Morozov, Y. Muttoni, S. Myers, S. Nandi, Z. Nergiz, P. R. Newman, T. Omori, J. Osborne, E. Paoloni, Y. Papaphilippou, C. Pascaud, H. Paukkunen, E. Perez, T. Pieloni, E. Pilicer, B. Pire, R. Placakyte, A. Polini, V. Ptitsyn, Y. Pupkov, V. Radescu, S. Raychaudhuri, L. Rinolfi, E. Rizvi, R. Rohini, J. Rojo, S. Russenschuck, M. Sahin, C. A. Salgado, K. Sampei, R. Sassot, E. Sauvan, M. Schaefer, U. Schneekloth, T. Schörner-Sadenius, D. Schulte, A. Senol, A. Seryi, P. Sievers, A. N. Skrinsky, W. Smith, D. South, H. Spiesberger, A. M. Stasto, M. Strikman, M. Sullivan, S. Sultansoy, Y. P. Sun, B. Surrow, L. Szymanowski, P. Taels, I. Tapan, T. Tasci, E. Tassi, H. Ten. Kate, J. Terron, H. Thiesen, L. Thompson, P. Thompson, K. Tokushuku, R. Tomás García, D. Tommasini, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, J. Tuckmantel, S. Turkoz, T. N. Trinh, K. Tywoniuk, G. Unel, T. Ullrich, J. Urakawa, P. VanMechelen, A. Variola, R. Veness, A. Vivoli, P. Vobly, J. Wagner, R. Wallny, S. Wallon, G. Watt, C. Weiss, U. A. Wiedemann, U. Wienands, F. Willeke, B.-W. Xiao, V. Yakimenko, A. F. Zarnecki, Z. Zhang, F. Zimmermann, R. Zlebcik, F. Zomer
    Jan. 9, 2013 hep-ex, physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    This document provides a brief overview of the recently published report on the design of the Large Hadron Electron Collider (LHeC), which comprises its physics programme, accelerator physics, technology and main detector concepts. The LHeC exploits and develops challenging, though principally existing, accelerator and detector technologies. This summary is complemented by brief illustrations of some of the highlights of the physics programme, which relies on a vastly extended kinematic range, luminosity and unprecedented precision in deep inelastic scattering. Illustrations are provided regarding high precision QCD, new physics (Higgs, SUSY) and electron-ion physics. The LHeC is designed to run synchronously with the LHC in the twenties and to achieve an integrated luminosity of O(100) fb$^{-1}$. It will become the cleanest high resolution microscope of mankind and will substantially extend as well as complement the investigation of the physics of the TeV energy scale, which has been enabled by the LHC.
  • A Large Hadron Electron Collider at CERN: Report on the Physics and Design Concepts for Machine and Detector (1206.2913)

    J. L. Abelleira Fernandez, C. Adolphsen, A. N. Akay, H. Aksakal, J. L. Albacete, S. Alekhin, P. Allport, V. Andreev, R. B. Appleby, E. Arikan, N. Armesto, G. Azuelos, M. Bai, D. Barber, J. Bartels, O. Behnke, J. Behr, A. S. Belyaev, I. Ben-Zvi, N. Bernard, S. Bertolucci, S. Bettoni, S. Biswal, J. Blümlein, H. Böttcher, A. Bogacz, C. Bracco, G. Brandt, H. Braun, S. Brodsky, O. Brüning, E. Bulyak, A. Buniatyan, H. Burkhardt, I. T. Cakir, O. Cakir, R. Calaga, V. Cetinkaya, E. Ciapala, R. Ciftci, A. K. Ciftci, B. A. Cole, J. C. Collins, O. Dadoun, J. Dainton, A. De. Roeck, D. d'Enterria, A. Dudarev, A. Eide, R. Enberg, E. Eroglu, K. J. Eskola, L. Favart, M. Fitterer, S. Forte, A. Gaddi, P. Gambino, H. García Morales, T. Gehrmann, P. Gladkikh, C. Glasman, R. Godbole, B. Goddard, T. Greenshaw, A. Guffanti, V. Guzey, C. Gwenlan, T. Han, Y. Hao, F. Haug, W. Herr, A. Hervé, B. J. Holzer, M. Ishitsuka, M. Jacquet, B. Jeanneret, J. M. Jimenez, J. M. Jowett, H. Jung, H. Karadeniz, D. Kayran, A. Kilic, K. Kimura, M. Klein, U. Klein, T. Kluge, F. Kocak, M. Korostelev, A. Kosmicki, P. Kostka, H. Kowalski, G. Kramer, D. Kuchler, M. Kuze, T. Lappi, P. Laycock, E. Levichev, S. Levonian, V. N. Litvinenko, A. Lombardi, J. Maeda, C. Marquet, S. J. Maxfield, B. Mellado, K. H. Mess, A. Milanese, S. Moch, I. I. Morozov, Y. Muttoni, S. Myers, S. Nandi, Z. Nergiz, P. R. Newman, T. Omori, J. Osborne, E. Paoloni, Y. Papaphilippou, C. Pascaud, H. Paukkunen, E. Perez, T. Pieloni, E. Pilicer, B. Pire, R. Placakyte, A. Polini, V. Ptitsyn, Y. Pupkov, V. Radescu, S. Raychaudhuri, L. Rinolfi, R. Rohini, J. Rojo, S. Russenschuck, M. Sahin, C. A. Salgado, K. Sampei, R. Sassot, E. Sauvan, U. Schneekloth, T. Schörner-Sadenius, D. Schulte, A. Senol, A. Seryi, P. Sievers, A. N. Skrinsky, W. Smith, H. Spiesberger, A. M. Stasto, M. Strikman, M. Sullivan, S. Sultansoy, Y. P. Sun, B. Surrow, L. Szymanowski, P. Taels, I. Tapan, A. T. Tasci, E. Tassi, H. Ten. Kate, J. Terron, H. Thiesen, L. Thompson, K. Tokushuku, R. Tomás García, D. Tommasini, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, J. Tuckmantel, S. Turkoz, T. N. Trinh, K. Tywoniuk, G. Unel, J. Urakawa, P. VanMechelen, A. Variola, R. Veness, A. Vivoli, P. Vobly, J. Wagner, R. Wallny, S. Wallon, G. Watt, C. Weiss, U. A. Wiedemann, U. Wienands, F. Willeke, B.-W. Xiao, V. Yakimenko, A. F. Zarnecki, Z. Zhang, F. Zimmermann, R. Zlebcik, F. Zomer
    Sept. 7, 2012 hep-ex, physics.ins-det, physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The physics programme and the design are described of a new collider for particle and nuclear physics, the Large Hadron Electron Collider (LHeC), in which a newly built electron beam of 60 GeV, up to possibly 140 GeV, energy collides with the intense hadron beams of the LHC. Compared to HERA, the kinematic range covered is extended by a factor of twenty in the negative four-momentum squared, $Q^2$, and in the inverse Bjorken $x$, while with the design luminosity of $10^{33}$ cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$ the LHeC is projected to exceed the integrated HERA luminosity by two orders of magnitude. The physics programme is devoted to an exploration of the energy frontier, complementing the LHC and its discovery potential for physics beyond the Standard Model with high precision deep inelastic scattering measurements. These are designed to investigate a variety of fundamental questions in strong and electroweak interactions. The physics programme also includes electron-deuteron and electron-ion scattering in a $(Q^2, 1/x)$ range extended by four orders of magnitude as compared to previous lepton-nucleus DIS experiments for novel investigations of neutron's and nuclear structure, the initial conditions of Quark-Gluon Plasma formation and further quantum chromodynamic phenomena. The LHeC may be realised either as a ring-ring or as a linac-ring collider. Optics and beam dynamics studies are presented for both versions, along with technical design considerations on the interaction region, magnets and further components, together with a design study for a high acceptance detector. Civil engineering and installation studies are presented for the accelerator and the detector. The LHeC can be built within a decade and thus be operated while the LHC runs in its high-luminosity phase. It thus represents a major opportunity for progress in particle physics exploiting the investment made in the LHC.
  • Injection and dump considerations for a 16.5 TeV HE-LHC (1108.1664)

    B. Goddard, M. Barnes, W. Bartmann, J. Borburgh, C. Bracco, L. Ducimetière, V. Kain, M. Meddahi, V. Mertens, V. Senaj, J. Uythoven
    Aug. 8, 2011 physics.acc-ph
    Injection and beam dumping is considered for a 16.5 TeV hadron accelerator in the current LHC tunnel, with an injection energy in the range 1 - 1.3 TeV. The present systems are described and the possible upgrade scenarios investigated for higher beam rigidity. In addition to the required equipment performance, the machine protection related aspects are explored. The expected constraints on the machine layout are also given. The technological challenges for the different equipment subsystems are detailed, and areas where R&D is necessary are highlighted.
  • The UA9 experimental layout (1106.5861)

    W. Scandale, G. Arduini, R. Assmann, C. Bracco, F. Cerutti, J. Christiansen, S. Gilardoni, E. Laface, R.Losito, A. Masi, E. Metral, D. Mirarchi, S. Montesano, V. Previtali, S. Redaelli, G. Valentino, P. Schoofs, G. Smirnov, L. Tlustos, E. Bagli, S. Baricordi, P. Dalpiaz, V. Guidi, A. Mazzolari, D. Vincenzi, S. Dabagov, F. Murtas, A. Carnera, G. Della Mea, D. De Salvador, A. Lombardi, O. Lytovchenko, M. Tonezzer, G. Cavoto, L. Ludovici, R. Santacesaria, P. Valente, F. Galluccio, A.G. Afonin, M.K. Bulgakov, Yu.A. Chesnokov, V.A. Maisheev, I.A. Yazynin, A.D. Kovalenko, A.M. Taratin, Yu.A. Gavrikov, Yu.M. Ivanov, L.P. Lapina, V.V. Skorobogatov, W. Ferguson, J. Fulcher, G. Hall, M. Pesaresi, M. Raymond, A. Rose, M. Ryan, O. Zorba, G. Robert-Demolaize, T. Markiewicz, M. Oriunno, U. Wienands
    June 29, 2011 physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The UA9 experimental equipment was installed in the CERN-SPS in March '09 with the aim of investigating crystal assisted collimation in coasting mode. Its basic layout comprises silicon bent crystals acting as primary collimators mounted inside two vacuum vessels. A movable 60 cm long block of tungsten located downstream at about 90 degrees phase advance intercepts the deflected beam. Scintillators, Gas Electron Multiplier chambers and other beam loss monitors measure nuclear loss rates induced by the interaction of the beam halo in the crystal. Roman pots are installed in the path of the deflected particles and are equipped with a Medipix detector to reconstruct the transverse distribution of the impinging beam. Finally UA9 takes advantage of an LHC-collimator prototype installed close to the Roman pot to help in setting the beam conditions and to analyze the efficiency to deflect the beam. This paper describes in details the hardware installed to study the crystal collimation during 2010.
  • Measurements of heavy ion beam losses from collimation (0908.2553)

    R. Bruce, R.W. Assmann, G. Bellodi, C. Bracco, H. H. Braun, S. Gilardoni, E. B. Holzer, J.M. Jowett, S. Redaelli, T. Weiler
    Aug. 18, 2009 physics.acc-ph
    The collimation efficiency for Pb ion beams in the LHC is predicted to be lower than requirements. Nuclear fragmentation and electromagnetic dissociation in the primary collimators create fragments with a wide range of Z/A ratios, which are not intercepted by the secondary collimators but lost where the dispersion has grown sufficiently large. In this article we present measurements and simulations of loss patterns generated by a prototype LHC collimator in the CERN SPS. Measurements were performed at two different energies and angles of the collimator. We also compare with proton loss maps and find a qualitative difference between Pb ions and protons, with the maximum loss rate observed at different places in the ring. This behavior was predicted by simulations and provides a valuable benchmark of our understanding of ion beam losses caused by collimation.
  • A Pedagogical Discussion Concerning the Gravitational Energy Radiated by Keplerian Systems (0811.0317)

    C. Bracco, J.-P. Provost, P. Salati
    April 3, 2009 physics.gen-ph, physics.pop-ph
    We first discuss the use of dimensional arguments (and of the quadrupolar emission hypothesis) in the derivation of the gravitational power radiated on a circular orbit. Then, we show how to simply obtain the instantaneous power radiated on a general Keplerian orbit by approximating it locally by a circle. This allows recovering with a good precision, in the case of an ellipse, the highly non trivial dependence on the eccentricity of the average power given by general relativity. The whole approach is understandable by undergraduate students.
  • A simple derivation of Kepler's laws without solving differential equations (0812.2755)

    J.-P. Provost, C. Bracco
    Dec. 15, 2008 physics.hist-ph, physics.pop-ph
    Proceeding like Newton with a discrete time approach of motion and a geometrical representation of velocity and acceleration, we obtain Kepler's laws without solving differential equations. The difficult part of Newton's work, when it calls for non trivial properties of ellipses, is avoided by the introduction of polar coordinates. Then a simple reconsideration of Newton's figure naturally leads to en explicit expression of the velocity and to the equation of the trajectory. This derivation, which can be fully apprehended by beginners at university (or even before) can be considered as a first application of mechanical concepts to a physical problem of great historical and pedagogical interest.
  • Scintillation in scalar-tensor theories of gravity (gr-qc/9811090)

    C. Bracco, P. Teyssandier
    Nov. 26, 1998 gr-qc
    We study the scintillation produced by time-varying gravitational fields within scalar-tensor theories of gravity. The problem is treated in the geometrical optics approximation for a very distant light source emitting quasi plane monochromatic electromagnetic waves. We obtain a general formula giving the time dependence of the photon flux received by a freely falling observer. In the weak-field approximation, we show that the contribution to the scintillation effect due to the focusing of the light beam by a gravitational wave is of first order in the amplitude of the scalar perturbation. Thus scalar-tensor theories contrast with general relativity, which predicts that the only first-order effect is due to the spectral shift. Moreover, we find that the scintillation effects caused by the scalar field have a local character: they depend only on the value of the perturbation at the observer. This effect provides in principle a mean to detect the presence of a long range scalar field in the Universe, but its smallness constitutes a tremendous challenge for detection.