
Given a large number of homogeneous players that are distributed across three
possible states, we consider the problem in which these players have to control
their transition rates, while minimizing a cost. The optimal transition rates
are based on the players' knowledge of their current state and of the
distribution of all the other players, and this introduces meanfield terms in
the running and the terminal cost. The first contribution involves a meanfield
game model that brings together macroscopic and microscopic dynamics. We obtain
the meanfield equilibrium associated with this model, by solving the
corresponding initialterminal value problem. We perform an asymptotic analysis
to obtain a stationary equilibrium for the system. The second contribution
involves the study of the microscopic dynamics of the system for a finite
number of players that interact in a structured environment modeled by an
interaction topology. The third contribution is the specialization of the model
to describe honeybee swarms, virus propagation, and cascading failures in
interconnected smartgrids. A numerical analysis is conducted which involves
two types of cyberattacks. We simulate in which ways failures propagate across
the interconnected smart grids and the impact on the grids frequencies. We
reframe our analysis within the context of Lyapunov's linearisation method and
stability theory of nonlinear systems and Kuramoto coupled oscillators model.

This paper deals with transient stability in interconnected microgrids. The
main contribution involves i) robust classification of transient dynamics for
different intervals of the microgrid parameters (synchronization, inertia, and
damping); ii) exploration of the analogies with consensus dynamics and bounds
on the damping coefficient separating underdamped and overdamped dynamics iii)
the extension to the case of disturbed measurements due to hackering or
parameter uncertainties.

In this paper we introduce the novel framework of distributionally robust
games. These are multiplayer games where each player models the state of
nature using a worstcase distribution, also called adversarial distribution.
Thus each player's payoff depends on the other players' decisions and on the
decision of a virtual player (nature) who selects an adversarial distribution
of scenarios. This paper provides three main contributions. Firstly, the
distributionally robust game is formulated using the statistical notions of
$f$divergence between two distributions, here represented by the adversarial
distribution, and the exact distribution. Secondly, the complexity of the
problem is significantly reduced by means of triality theory. Thirdly,
stochastic Bregman learning algorithms are proposed to speedup the computation
of robust equilibria. Finally, the theoretical findings are illustrated in a
convex setting and its limitations are tested with a nonconvex nonconcave
function.

Given a large population of players, each player has three possible choices
between option 1 or 2 or no option. The two options are equally favorable and
the population has to reach consensus on one of the two options quickly and in
a distributed way. The more popular an option is, the more likely it is to be
chosen by uncommitted players. Uncommitted players can be attracted by those
committed to any of the other two options through a crossinhibitory signal.
This model originates in the context of honeybees swarms, and we generalize it
to duopolistic competition and opinion dynamics. The contributions of this work
include (1) the formulation of an evolutionary game model to explain the
behavioral traits of the honeybees, (2) the study of the individuals and
collective behavior including equilibrium points and stability, (3) the
extension of the results to the case of structured environment via complex
network theory, (4) the analysis of the impact of the connectivity on
consensus, and (5) the study of absolute stability for the collective system
under timevarying and uncertain crossinhibitory parameter.

Within the realm of dynamic of \emph{smart buildings} and \emph{smart
cities}, dynamic response management is playing an everincreasing role thus
attracting the attention of scientists from different disciplines. Dynamic
demand response management involves a set of operations aiming at
decentralizing the control of loads in large and complex power networks. Each
single appliance if fully responsive and readjusts its energy demand to the
overall network load. A main issue is related to mains frequency oscillations
resulting from an unbalance between supply and demand. In a nutshell, this
paper contributes to the topic by equipping each signal consumer with strategic
insight. In particular, we highlight three main contributions and a few other
minor contributions. First, we design a meanfield game for the TCLs
application, study the meanfield equilibrium for the deterministic meanfield
game and investigate on asymptotic stability for the microscopic dynamics.
Second, we extend the analysis and design to imperfect models which involve
both stochastic or deterministic disturbances. This leads to robust meanfield
equilibrium strategies guaranteeing stochastic and worstcase stability,
respectively. Minor contributions involve the use of stochastic control
strategies rather than deterministic, and some numerical studies illustrating
the efficacy of the proposed strategies.

This paper reframes approachability theory within the context of population
games. Thus, whilst one player aims at driving her average payoff to a
predefined set, her opponent is not malevolent but rather extracted randomly
from a population of individuals with given distribution on actions. First,
convergence conditions are revisited based on the common prior on the
population distribution, and we define the notion of \emph{1stmoment
approachability}. Second, we develop a model of two coupled partial
differential equations (PDEs) in the spirit of meanfield game theory: one
describing the bestresponse of every player given the population distribution
(this is a \emph{HamiltonJacobiBellman equation}), the other capturing the
macroscopic evolution of average payoffs if every player plays its best
response (this is an \emph{advection equation}). Third, we provide a detailed
analysis of existence, nonuniqueness, and stability of equilibria (fixed points
of the two PDEs). Fourth, we apply the model to regretbased dynamics, and use
it to establish convergence to Bayesian equilibrium under incomplete
information.

This article examines meanfield games for marriage. The results support the
argument that optimizing the longterm wellbeing through effort and social
feeling state distribution (meanfield) will help to stabilize marriage.
However, if the cost of effort is very high, the couple fluctuates in a bad
feeling state or the marriage breaks down. We then examine the influence of
society on a couple using mean field sentimental games. We show that, in
meanfield equilibrium, the optimal effort is always higher than the oneshot
optimal effort. We illustrate numerically the influence of the couple's network
on their feeling states and their wellbeing.

We introduce the concept of attainable sets of payoffs in twoplayer repeated
games with vector payoffs. A set of payoff vectors is called {\em attainable}
if player 1 can ensure that there is a finite horizon $T$ such that after time
$T$ the distance between the set and the cumulative payoff is arbitrarily
small, regardless of what strategy player 2 is using. This paper focuses on the
case where the attainable set consists of one payoff vector. In this case the
vector is called an attainable vector. We study properties of the set of
attainable vectors, and characterize when a specific vector is attainable and
when every vector is attainable.

We consider logistic networks in which the control and disturbance inputs
take values in finite sets. We derive a necessary and sufficient condition for
the existence of robustly control invariant (hyperbox) sets. We show that a
stronger version of this condition is sufficient to guarantee robust global
attractivity, and we construct a counterexample demonstrating that it is not
necessary. Being constructive, our proofs of sufficiency allow us to extract
the corresponding robust control laws and to establish the invariance of
certain sets. Finally, we highlight parallels between our results and existing
results in the literature, and we conclude our study with two simple
illustrative examples.

We study a distributed allocation process where, repeatedly in time, every
player renegotiates past allocations with neighbors and allocates new revenues.
The average allocations evolve according to a doubly (over time and space)
averaging algorithm. We study conditions under which the average allocations
reach consensus to any point within a predefined target set even in the
presence of adversarial disturbances. Motivations arise in the context of
coalitional games with transferable utilities (TU) where the target set is any
set of allocations that make the grand coalitions stable.

This paper considers a dynamic game with transferable utilities (TU), where
the characteristic function is a continuoustime bounded mean ergodic process.
A central planner interacts continuously over time with the players by choosing
the instantaneous allocations subject to budget constraints. Before the game
starts, the central planner knows the nature of the process (bounded mean
ergodic), the bounded set from which the coalitions' values are sampled, and
the long run average coalitions' values. On the other hand, he has no knowledge
of the underlying probability function generating the coalitions' values. Our
goal is to find allocation rules that use a measure of the extra reward that a
coalition has received up to the current time by redistributing the budget
among the players. The objective is twofold: i) guaranteeing convergence of
the average allocations to the core (or a specific point in the core) of the
average game, ii) driving the coalitions' excesses to an a priori given cone.
The resulting allocation rules are robust as they guarantee the aforementioned
convergence properties despite the uncertain and timevarying nature of the
coaltions' values. We highlight three main contributions. First, we design an
allocation rule based on full observation of the extra reward so that the
average allocation approaches a specific point in the core of the average game,
while the coalitions' excesses converge to an a priori given direction. Second,
we design a new allocation rule based on partial observation on the extra
reward so that the average allocation converges to the core of the average
game, while the coalitions' excesses converge to an a priori given cone. And
third, we establish connections to approachability theory and attainability
theory.

We consider a sequence of transferable utility (TU) games where, at each
time, the characteristic function is a random vector with realizations
restricted to some set of values. The game differs from other ones in the
literature on dynamic, stochastic or interval valued TU games as it combines
dynamics of the game with an allocation protocol for the players that
dynamically interact with each other. The protocol is an iterative and
decentralized algorithm that offers a paradigmatic mathematical description of
negotiation and bargaining processes. The first part of the paper contributes
to the definition of a robust (coalitional) TU game and the development of a
distributed bargaining protocol. We prove the convergence with probability 1 of
the bargaining process to a random allocation that lies in the core of the
robust game under some mild conditions on the underlying communication graphs.
The second part of the paper addresses the more general case where the robust
game may have empty core. In this case, with the dynamic game we associate a
dynamic average game by averaging over time the sequence of characteristic
functions. Then, we consider an accordingly modified bargaining protocol.
Assuming that the sequence of characteristic functions is ergodic and the core
of the average game has a nonempty relative interior, we show that the modified
bargaining protocol converges with probability 1 to a random allocation that
lies in the core of the average game.

Mixed integer predictive control deals with optimizing integer and real
control variables over a receding horizon. The mixed integer nature of controls
might be a cause of intractability for instances of larger dimensions. To
tackle this little issue, we propose a decomposition method which turns the
original $n$dimensional problem into $n$ indipendent scalar problems of lot
sizing form. Each scalar problem is then reformulated as a shortest path one
and solved through linear programming over a receding horizon. This last
reformulation step mirrors a standard procedure in mixed integer programming.
The approximation introduced by the decomposition can be lowered if we operate
in accordance with the predictive control technique: i) optimize controls over
the horizon ii) apply the first control iii) provide measurement updates of
other states and repeat the procedure.

We consider stationary consensus protocols for networks of dynamic agents
with switching topologies. The measure of the neighbors' state is affected by
Unknown But Bounded disturbances. Here the main contribution is the formulation
and solution of what we call the $\epsilon$consensus problem, where the states
are required to converge in a tube of ray $\epsilon$ asymptotically or in
finite time.