• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • Measurement of the Transverse Beam Spin Asymmetry in Elastic Electron Proton Scattering and the Inelastic Contribution to the Imaginary Part of the Two-Photon Exchange Amplitude (nucl-ex/0410013)

    F. E. Maas, K. Aulenbacher, S. Baunack, L. Capozza, J. Diefenbach, B. Gläser, Y. Imai, T. Hammel, D. von Harrach, E.-M. Kabub, R. Kothe, J. H. Lee, A. Sanchez-Lorente, E. Schilling, D. Schwaab, G. Stephan, G. Weber, C. Weinrich, I. Altarev, J. Arvieux, M. Elyakoubi, R. Frascaria, R. Kunne, M. Morlet, S. Ong, J. Vandewiele, S. Kowalski, R. Suleiman, S. Taylor
    Oct. 9, 2004 nucl-ex
    We report on a measurement of the asymmetry in the scattering of transversely polarized electrons off unpolarized protons, A$_\perp$, at two Q$^2$ values of \qsquaredaveragedlow (GeV/c)$^2$ and \qsquaredaveragedhighII (GeV/c)$^2$ and a scattering angle of $30^\circ < \theta_e < 40^\circ$. The measured transverse asymmetries are A$_{\perp}$(Q$^2$ = \qsquaredaveragedlow (GeV/c)$^2$) = (\experimentalasymmetry alulowcorr $\pm$ \statisticalerrorlow$_{\rm stat}$ $\pm$ \combinedsyspolerrorlowalucor$_{\rm sys}$) $\times$ 10$^{-6}$ and A$_{\perp}$(Q$^2$ = \qsquaredaveragedhighII (GeV/c)$^2$) = (\experimentalasymme tryaluhighcorr $\pm$ \statisticalerrorhigh$_{\rm stat}$ $\pm$ \combinedsyspolerrorhighalucor$_{\rm sys}$) $\times$ 10$^{-6}$. The first errors denotes the statistical error and the second the systematic uncertainties. A$_\perp$ arises from the imaginary part of the two-photon exchange amplitude and is zero in the one-photon exchange approximation. From comparison with theoretical estimates of A$_\perp$ we conclude that $\pi$N-intermediate states give a substantial contribution to the imaginary part of the two-photon amplitude. The contribution from the ground state proton to the imaginary part of the two-photon exchange can be neglected. There is no obvious reason why this should be different for the real part of the two-photon amplitude, which enters into the radiative corrections for the Rosenbluth separation measurements of the electric form factor of the proton.