• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • Measurement of $\nu_\mu$-induced charged-current neutral pion production cross sections on mineral oil at $E_\nu\in0.5-2.0$ GeV (1010.3264)

    A.A.Aguilar-Arevalo, C.E.Anderson, A.O.Bazarko, S.J.Brice, B.C.Brown, L.Bugel, J.Cao, L.Coney, J.M.Conrad, D.C.Cox, A.Curioni, R.Dharmapalan, Z.Djurcic, D.A.Finley, B.T.Fleming, R.Ford, F.G.Garcia, G.T.Garvey, J.Grange, C.Green, J.A.Green, T.L.Hart, E.Hawker, R.Imlay, R.A.Johnson, G.Karagiorgi, P.Kasper, T.Katori, T.Kobilarcik, I.Kourbanis, S.Koutsoliotas, E.M.Laird, S.K.Linden, J.M.Link, Y.Liu, Y.Liu, W.C.Louis, K.B.M.Mahn, W.Marsh, C.Mauger, V.T.McGary, G.McGregor, W.Metcalf, P.D.Meyers, F.Mills, G.B.Mills, J.Monroe, C.D.Moore, J.Mousseau, R.H.Nelson, P.Nienaber, J.A.Nowak, B.Osmanov, S.Ouedraogo, R.B.Patterson, Z.Pavlovic, D.Perevalov, C.C.Polly, E.Prebys, J.L.Raaf, H.Ray, B.P.Roe, A.D.Russell, V.Sandberg, R.Schirato, D.Schmitz, M.H.Shaevitz, F.C.Shoemaker, D.Smith, M.Soderberg, M.Sorel, P.Spentzouris, J.Spitz, I.Stancu, R.J.Stefanski, M.Sung, H.A.Tanaka, R.Tayloe, M.Tzanov, R.G.VandeWater, M.O.Wascko, D.H.White, M.J.Wilking, H.J.Yang, G.P.Zeller, E.D.Zimmerman
    Feb. 10, 2011 hep-ex, nucl-ex
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Using a custom 3 \v{C}erenkov-ring fitter, we report cross sections for $\nu_\mu$-induced charged-current single $\pi^0$ production on mineral oil (\chtwo) from a sample of 5810 candidate events with 57% signal purity over an energy range of $0.5-2.0$GeV. This includes measurements of the absolute total cross section as a function of neutrino energy, and flux-averaged differential cross sections measured in terms of $Q^2$, $\mu^-$ kinematics, and $\pi^0$ kinematics. The sample yields a flux-averaged total cross section of $(9.2\pm0.3_{stat.}\pm1.5_{syst.})\times10^{-39}$cm$^2$/CH$_2$ at mean neutrino energy of 0.965GeV.
  • Low Q^2 low x structure function analysis of CCFR data for F2 (hep-ex/9908064)

    CCFR Collaboration: B.H.Tamminga, T.Adams, A.Alton, C.G.Arroyo, S.Avvakumov, L.de Barbaro, P.de Barbaro, A.O.Bazarko, R.H.Bernstein, A.Bodek, T.Bolton, J.Brau, D.Buchholz, H.Budd, L.Bugel, J.Conrad, R.B.Drucker, J.A.Formaggio, R.Frey, J.Goldman, M.Goncharov, D.A.Harris, R.A.Johnson, J.H.Kim, B.J.King, T.Kinnel, S.Koutsoliotas, M.J.Lamm, W.Marsh, D.Mason, K.S.McFarland, C.McNulty, S.R.Mishra, D.Naples, P.Nienaber, A.Romosan, W.K.Sakumoto, H.Schellman, F.J.Sciulli, W.G.Seligman, M.H.Shaevitz, W.H.Smith, P.Spentzouris, E.G.Stern, M.Vakili, A.Vaitaitis, V.Wu, U.K.Yang, J.Yu, G.P.Zeller, E.D.Zimmerman
    Aug. 30, 1999 hep-ex
    Analyses of structure functions (SFs) from neutrino and muon deep inelastic scattering data have shown discrepancies in F2 for x < 0.1. A new SF analysis of the CCFR collaboration data examining regions in x down to x=.0015 and 0.4 < Q^2 < 1.0 is presented. Comparison to corrected charged lepton scattering results for F2 from the NMC and E665 experiments are made. Differences between muon and neutrino scattering allow that the behavior of F2 from muon scattering could be different from F2 from neutrino scattering as Q^2 approaches zero. Comparisons between F2 muon and F2 neutrino are made in this limit.