• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • Study of muons from ultra-high energy cosmic ray air showers measured with the Telescope Array experiment (1804.03877)

    Telescope Array Collaboration: R.U. Abbasi, T. Abu-Zayyad, J.W. Belz, J. Chiba, M. Fukushima, M. Hayashi, D. Ikeda, D. Ivanov, F. Kakimoto, S. Kawakami, J.H. Kim, V. Kuzmin, B. Lubsandorzhiev, T. Matsuyama, K. Mukai, T. Nakamura, M. Ohnishi, R. Onogi, J. Remington, H. Sagawa, N. Sakurai, F. Shibata, J.D. Smith, T.A. Stroman, M. Takeda, Y. Tameda, G.B. Thomson, T. Tomida, S. Udo, H. Yamaoka, S. Yoshida High Energy Astrophysics Institute, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, The Graduate School of Science, Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama, Japan, Graduate School of Science, Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Physics, The Research Institute of Natural Science, Hanyang University, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, Korea, Department of Physics, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba, Japan, Department of Physics, Kindai University, Higashi Osaka, Osaka, Japan, Service de Physique Théorique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Osaka, Japan, Kavli Institute for the Physics, Mathematics of the Universe, Todai Institutes for Advanced Study, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan, Information Engineering Graduate School of Science, Technology, Shinshu University, Nagano, Nagano, Japan, Faculty of Engineering, Kanagawa University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan, Astrophysical Big Bang Laboratory, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama, Japan, Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Jang-an-gu, Suwon, Korea, Department of Physics, Tokyo City University, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan, Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, Advanced Research Institute for Science, Engineering, Waseda University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Physics, Chiba University, Chiba, Chiba, Japan, Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science, Technology, UNIST-gil, Ulsan, Korea, Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea, Academic Assembly School of Science, Technology Institute of Engineering, Shinshu University, Nagano, Nagano, Japan, Faculty of Science, Kochi University, Kochi, Kochi, Japan, Department of Physical Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow M.V. Lomonosov State University, Moscow, Russia, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Rutgers University - The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering, Osaka Electro-Communication University, Neyagawa-shi, Osaka, Japan, Graduate School of Information Sciences, Hiroshima City University, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan, Institute of Particle, Nuclear Studies, KEK, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, National Institute of Radiological Science, Chiba, Chiba, Japan, CEICO, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic, Department of Physics, Institute for the Early Universe, Ewha Womans University, Seodaaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea, Department of Physics, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan)
    April 11, 2018 astro-ph.HE
    One of the uncertainties in interpretation of ultra-high energy cosmic ray (UHECR) data comes from the hadronic interaction models used for air shower Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The number of muons observed at the ground from UHECR-induced air showers is expected to depend upon the hadronic interaction model. One may therefore test the hadronic interaction models by comparing the measured number of muons with the MC prediction. In this paper, we present the results of studies of muon densities in UHE extensive air showers obtained by analyzing the signal of surface detector stations which should have high $\it{muon \, purity}$. The muon purity of a station will depend on both the inclination of the shower and the relative position of the station. In 7 years' data from the Telescope Array experiment, we find that the number of particles observed for signals with an expected muon purity of $\sim$65% at a lateral distance of 2000 m from the shower core is $1.72 \pm 0.10{\rm (stat.)} \pm 0.37 {\rm (syst.)}$ times larger than the MC prediction value using the QGSJET II-03 model for proton-induced showers. A similar effect is also seen in comparisons with other hadronic models such as QGSJET II-04, which shows a $1.67 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.36$ excess. We also studied the dependence of these excesses on lateral distances and found a slower decrease of the lateral distribution of muons in the data as compared to the MC, causing larger discrepancy at larger lateral distances.
  • Study of muons from ultra-high energy cosmic ray air showers measured with the Telescope Array experiment (1804.03877)

    Telescope Array Collaboration: R.U. Abbasi, T. Abu-Zayyad, J.W. Belz, J. Chiba, M. Fukushima, M. Hayashi, D. Ikeda, D. Ivanov, F. Kakimoto, S. Kawakami, J.H. Kim, V. Kuzmin, B. Lubsandorzhiev, T. Matsuyama, K. Mukai, T. Nakamura, M. Ohnishi, R. Onogi, J. Remington, H. Sagawa, N. Sakurai, F. Shibata, J.D. Smith, T.A. Stroman, M. Takeda, Y. Tameda, G.B. Thomson, T. Tomida, S. Udo, H. Yamaoka, S. Yoshida High Energy Astrophysics Institute, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, The Graduate School of Science, Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama, Japan, Graduate School of Science, Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Physics, The Research Institute of Natural Science, Hanyang University, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, Korea, Department of Physics, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba, Japan, Department of Physics, Kindai University, Higashi Osaka, Osaka, Japan, Service de Physique Théorique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Osaka, Japan, Kavli Institute for the Physics, Mathematics of the Universe, Todai Institutes for Advanced Study, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan, Information Engineering Graduate School of Science, Technology, Shinshu University, Nagano, Nagano, Japan, Faculty of Engineering, Kanagawa University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan, Astrophysical Big Bang Laboratory, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama, Japan, Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Jang-an-gu, Suwon, Korea, Department of Physics, Tokyo City University, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan, Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, Advanced Research Institute for Science, Engineering, Waseda University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Physics, Chiba University, Chiba, Chiba, Japan, Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science, Technology, UNIST-gil, Ulsan, Korea, Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea, Academic Assembly School of Science, Technology Institute of Engineering, Shinshu University, Nagano, Nagano, Japan, Faculty of Science, Kochi University, Kochi, Kochi, Japan, Department of Physical Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow M.V. Lomonosov State University, Moscow, Russia, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Rutgers University - The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering, Osaka Electro-Communication University, Neyagawa-shi, Osaka, Japan, Graduate School of Information Sciences, Hiroshima City University, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan, Institute of Particle, Nuclear Studies, KEK, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, National Institute of Radiological Science, Chiba, Chiba, Japan, CEICO, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic, Department of Physics, Institute for the Early Universe, Ewha Womans University, Seodaaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea, Department of Physics, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan)
    April 11, 2018 astro-ph.HE
    One of the uncertainties in interpretation of ultra-high energy cosmic ray (UHECR) data comes from the hadronic interaction models used for air shower Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The number of muons observed at the ground from UHECR-induced air showers is expected to depend upon the hadronic interaction model. One may therefore test the hadronic interaction models by comparing the measured number of muons with the MC prediction. In this paper, we present the results of studies of muon densities in UHE extensive air showers obtained by analyzing the signal of surface detector stations which should have high $\it{muon \, purity}$. The muon purity of a station will depend on both the inclination of the shower and the relative position of the station. In 7 years' data from the Telescope Array experiment, we find that the number of particles observed for signals with an expected muon purity of $\sim$65% at a lateral distance of 2000 m from the shower core is $1.72 \pm 0.10{\rm (stat.)} \pm 0.37 {\rm (syst.)}$ times larger than the MC prediction value using the QGSJET II-03 model for proton-induced showers. A similar effect is also seen in comparisons with other hadronic models such as QGSJET II-04, which shows a $1.67 \pm 0.10 \pm 0.36$ excess. We also studied the dependence of these excesses on lateral distances and found a slower decrease of the lateral distribution of muons in the data as compared to the MC, causing larger discrepancy at larger lateral distances.
  • Evidence for Declination Dependence of Ultrahigh Energy Cosmic Ray Spectrum in the Northern Hemisphere (1801.07820)

    R.U. Abbasi, R. Azuma, R. Cady, T. Fujii, W. Hanlon, K. Hibino, R. Ishimori, C.C.H. Jui, H. Kawai, H.B. Kim, Y. Kitamura, K.H. Lee, K. Martens, K. Mukai, R. Nakamura, S. Ogio, M. Ono, M.S. Pshirkov, H. Sagawa, N. Sakurai, F. Shibata, J.D. Smith, T.A. Stroman, M. Takeda, Y. Tameda, G.B. Thomson, T. Tomida, S. Udo, H. Yamaoka, S. Yoshida High Energy Astrophysics Institute, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, The Graduate School of Science, Engineering, Saitama University, Saitama, Saitama, Japan, Graduate School of Science, Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Physics, The Research Institute of Natural Science, Hanyang University, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, Korea, Department of Physics, Tokyo University of Science, Noda, Chiba, Japan, Department of Physics, Kinki University, Higashi Osaka, Osaka, Japan, Service de Physique Thèorique, Universitè Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan, Graduate School of Science, Osaka City University, Osaka, Osaka, Japan, Kavli Institute for the Physics, Mathematics of the Universe, Todai Institutes for Advanced Study, the University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan, Information Engineering Graduate School of Science, Technology, Shinshu University, Nagano, Nagano, Japan, Faculty of Engineering, Kanagawa University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Medicine, Engineering, University of Yamanashi, Kofu, Yamanashi, Japan, Astrophysical Big Bang Laboratory, RIKEN, Wako, Saitama, Japan, Department of Physics, Sungkyunkwan University, Jang-an-gu, Suwon, Korea, Department of Physics, Tokyo City University, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo, Japan, Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, Advanced Research Institute for Science, Engineering, Waseda University, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Physics, Chiba University, Chiba, Chiba, Japan, Department of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Ulsan National Institute of Science, Technology, UNIST-gil, Ulsan, Korea, Department of Physics, Yonsei University, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea, Academic Assembly School of Science, Technology Institute of Engineering, Shinshu University, Nagano, Nagano, Japan, Faculty of Science, Kochi University, Kochi, Kochi, Japan, Department of Physical Sciences, Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan, Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow M.V. Lomonosov State University, Moscow, Russia, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Rutgers University - The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA, Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, Department of Engineering Science, Faculty of Engineering Osaka Electro-Communication University, Osaka, Osaka, Japan, Graduate School of Information Sciences, Hiroshima City University, Hiroshima, Hiroshima, Japan, Institute of Particle, Nuclear Studies, KEK, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, National Institute of Radiological Science, Chiba, Chiba, Japan, Central European Institute for Cosmology, Fundamental Physics, Institute of Physics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Na Slovance 1999/2 Prague, Czech Republic, Department of Physics, Institute for the Early Universe, Ewha Womans University, Seodaaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea, Department of Physics, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Ehime, Japan)
    Jan. 24, 2018 astro-ph.HE
    The energy of the ultrahigh energy spectral cutoff was measured, integrating over the northern hemisphere sky, by the Telescope Array (TA) collaboration, to be $10^{19.78 \pm 0.06}$ eV, in agreement with the High Resolution Fly's Eye (HiRes) experiment, whereas the Pierre Auger experiment, integrating over the southern hemisphere sky, measured the cutoff to be at 10$^{19.62 \pm 0.02}$ eV. An 11% energy scale difference between the TA and Auger does not account for this difference. However, in comparing the spectra of the Telescope Array and Pierre Auger experiments in the band of declination common to both experiments ($-15.7^{\circ} < \delta < 24.8^{\circ}$) we have found agreement in the energy of the spectral cutoff. While the Auger result is essentially unchanged, the TA cutoff energy has changed to $10^{19.59 \pm 0.06}$ eV. In this paper we argue that this is an astrophysical effect.