• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • The asymptotic volume of diagonal subpolytopes of symmetric stochastic matrices (1701.07719)

    J. de Jong, R. Wulkenhaar
    June 16, 2017 math.CO
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The asymptotic volume of the polytope of symmetric stochastic matrices can be determined by asymptotic enumeration techniques as in the case of the Birkhoff polytope. These methods can be extended to polytopes of symmetric stochastic matrices with given diagonal, if this diagonal varies not too wildly. To this end, the asymptotic number of symmetric matrices with natural entries, zero diagonal and varying row sums is determined and a third order correction factor to this is examined.
  • The mass-hierarchy and CP-violation discovery reach of the LBNO long-baseline neutrino experiment (1312.6520)

    LAGUNA-LBNO Collaboration: S.K. Agarwalla, M. Aittola, F. Antoniou, P. Ballett, G. Barr, O. Bésida, E. Borriello, M. Buizza-Avanzini, M. Campanelli, M.G. Catanesi, D. Chesneanu, P. Crivelli, J. De Jong, C. Densham, J. Dumarchez, T. Enqvist, T. Esanu, G. Gavrilov, J.J. Gomez, N. Grant, S. Haug, J. Ilic, K. Kainulainen, M. Khabibullin, A. Korzenev, Y. Kudenko, P. Kuusiniemi, K. Loo, R.M. Margineanu K. Mavrokoridis, O. Mineev, M. Murdoch, K. Nguyen, H. O'Keeffe, Y. Papaphilippou, E. Pennacchio, B. Popov, Y. Ramachers, F. Resnati, K. Rummukainen, J. Sarkamo, F. Sergiampietri, M. Slupecki, D. Stanca, S. Stoica, M. Szeptycka, A. Tonazzo, K. Tuominen, F. Vanucci, H. Vincke, A. Weber (16, 26), M. Weber, N. Yershov ETH Zurich, Institute for Particle Physics, Zurich, Switzerland, University of Bern, Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental Physics, Laboratory for High Energy Physics University of Bucharest, Faculty of Physics, Bucharest-Magurele, Romania, Université de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, IPN Lyon IFIC (CSIC, University of Valencia), Valencia, Spain, Queen Mary University of London, School of Physics, London, United Kingdom, Institute for Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia, IRFU, CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France, National Research Nuclear University "MEPhI", Moscow, Russia, Moscow Institute of Physics, Technology, Moscow region, Russia, Department of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, Finland, Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya Marg, Sainik School Post, Bhubaneswar, India, National Centre for Nuclear Research University of Warwick, Department of Physics, Coventry, United Kingdom, Oxford University, Department of Physics, Oxford, United Kingdom, University of Liverpool, Department of Physics, Liverpool, United Kingdom, University of Geneva, Section de Physique, DPNC, Geneva, Switzerland, Institute for Particle Physics Phenomenology, Department of Physics, Durham University, United Kingdom, INFN Sezione di Napoli, Università di Napoli, Dipartimento di Fisica, Napoli, Italy, Oulu Southern Institute, Department of Physics, University of Oulu, Finland, INFN, Dipartimento interateneo di Fisica di Bari, Bari, Italy, LAPP, Université de Savoie, CNRS/IN2P3, Annecy-le-Vieux, France, Physics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom, STFC, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, United Kingdom, UPMC, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, Laboratoire de Physique Nucléaire et de Hautes Energies APC, AstroParticule et Cosmologie, Université Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, CEA/Irfu, Observatoire de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris Cedex 13, France, Institut Universitaire de France, Maison des Universités, Paris, France, Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute Dept. of Physics, Astronomy, University College London, London, United Kingdom, III. Physikalisches Institut, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, Horia Hulubei National Institute of R, D for Physics, Nuclear Engineering, IFIN-HH, Romania, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany, , Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, Iwate University, Department of Electrical Engineering, Computer Science, Morioka, Iwate, Japan, INFN-Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom St. Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia, Bulgaria Yerevan Physics Institute, Armenia)
    Jan. 20, 2014 hep-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The next generation neutrino observatory proposed by the LBNO collaboration will address fundamental questions in particle and astroparticle physics. The experiment consists of a far detector, in its first stage a 20 kt LAr double phase TPC and a magnetised iron calorimeter, situated at 2300 km from CERN and a near detector based on a high-pressure argon gas TPC. The long baseline provides a unique opportunity to study neutrino flavour oscillations over their 1st and 2nd oscillation maxima exploring the $L/E$ behaviour, and distinguishing effects arising from $\delta_{CP}$ and matter. In this paper we have reevaluated the physics potential of this setup for determining the mass hierarchy (MH) and discovering CP-violation (CPV), using a conventional neutrino beam from the CERN SPS with a power of 750 kW. We use conservative assumptions on the knowledge of oscillation parameter priors and systematic uncertainties. The impact of each systematic error and the precision of oscillation prior is shown. We demonstrate that the first stage of LBNO can determine unambiguously the MH to $>5\sigma$C.L. over the whole phase space. We show that the statistical treatment of the experiment is of very high importance, resulting in the conclusion that LBNO has $\sim$ 100% probability to determine the MH in at most 4-5 years of running. Since the knowledge of MH is indispensable to extract $\delta_{CP}$ from the data, the first LBNO phase can convincingly give evidence for CPV on the $3\sigma$C.L. using today's knowledge on oscillation parameters and realistic assumptions on the systematic uncertainties.
  • The 2010 Interim Report of the Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment Collaboration Physics Working Groups (1110.6249)

    The LBNE Collaboration: T. Akiri, D. Allspach, M. Andrews, K. Arisaka, E. Arrieta-Diaz, M. Artuso, X. Bai, B. Balantekin, B. Baller, W. Barletta, G. Barr, M. Bass, A. Beck, B. Becker, V. Bellini, O. Benhar, B. Berger, M. Bergevin, E. Berman, H. Berns, A. Bernstein, F. Beroz, V. Bhatnagar, B. Bhuyan, R. Bionta, M. Bishai, A. Blake, E. Blaufuss, B. Bleakley, E. Blucher, S. Blusk, D. Boehnlein, T. Bolton, J. Brack, R. Bradford, R. Breedon, C. Bromberg, R. Brown, N. Buchanan, L. Camilleri, M. Campbell, R. Carr, G. Carminati, A. Chen, H. Chen, D. Cherdack, C. Chi, S. Childress, B. Choudhary, E. Church, D. Cline, S. Coleman, R. Corey, M. D'Agostino, G. Davies, S. Dazeley, J. De Jong, B. DeMaat, D. Demuth, A. Dighe, Z. Djurcic, J. Dolph, G. Drake, A. Drozhdin, H. Duan, H. Duyang, S. Dye, T. Dykhuis, D. Edmunds, S. Elliott, S. Enomoto, C. Escobar, J. Felde, F. Feyzi, B. Fleming, J. Fowler, W. Fox, A. Friedland, B. Fujikawa, H. Gallagher, G. Garilli, G. Garvey, V. Gehman, G. Geronimo, R. Gill, M. Goodman, J. Goon, D. Gorbunov, R. Gran, V. Guarino, E. Guarnaccia, R. Guenette, P. Gupta, A. Habig, R. Hackenberg, A. Hahn, R. Hahn, T. Haines, S. Hans, J. Harton, S. Hays, E. Hazen, Q. He, A. Heavey, K. Heeger, R. Hellauer, A. Himmel, G. Horton-Smith, J. Howell, P. Huber, P. Hurh, J. Huston, J. Hylen, J. Insler, D. Jaffe, C. James, C. Johnson, M. Johnson, R. Johnson, W. Johnson, W. Johnston, J. Johnstone, B. Jones, H. Jostlein, T. Junk, S. Junnarkar, R. Kadel, T. Kafka, D. Kaminski, G. Karagiorgi, A. Karle, J. Kaspar, T. Katori, B. Kayser, E. Kearns, S. Kettell, F. Khanam, J. Klein, J. Kneller, G. Koizumi, J. Kopp, S. Kopp, W. Kropp, V. Kudryavtsev, A. Kumar, J. Kumar, T. Kutter, T. Lackowski, K. Lande, C. Lane, K. Lang, F. Lanni, R. Lanza, T. Latorre, J. Learned, D. Lee, K. Lee, Y. Li, S. Linden, J. Ling, J. Link, L. Littenberg, L. Loiacono, T. Liu, J. Losecco, W. Louis, P. Lucas, C. Lunardini, B. Lundberg, T. Lundin, D. Makowiecki, S. Malys, S. Mandal, A. Mann, A. Mann, P. Mantsch, W. Marciano, C. Mariani, J. Maricic, A. Marino, M. Marshak, R. Maruyama, J. Mathews, S. Matsuno, C. Mauger, E. McCluskey, K. McDonald, K. McFarland, R. McKeown, R. McTaggart, R. Mehdiyev, W. Melnitchouk, Y. Meng, B. Mercurio, M. Messier, W. Metcalf, R. Milincic, W. Miller, G. Mills, S. Mishra, S. MoedSher, D. Mohapatra, N. Mokhov, C. Moore, J. Morfin, W. Morse, A. Moss, S. Mufson, J. Musser, D. Naples, J. Napolitano, M. Newcomer, B. Norris, S. Ouedraogo, B. Page, S. Pakvasa, J. Paley, V. Paolone, V. Papadimitriou, Z. Parsa, K. Partyka, Z. Pavlovic, C. Pearson, S. Perasso, R. Petti, R. Plunkett, C. Polly, S. Pordes, R. Potenza, A. Prakash, O. Prokofiev, X. Qian, J. Raaf, V. Radeka, R. Raghavan, R. Rameika, B. Rebel, S. Rescia, D. Reitzner, M. Richardson, K. Riesselman, M. Robinson, M. Rosen, C. Rosenfeld, R. Rucinski, T. Russo, S. Sahijpal, S. Salon, N. Samios, M. Sanchez, R. Schmitt, D. Schmitz, J. Schneps, K. Scholberg, S. Seibert, F. Sergiampietri, M. Shaevitz, P. Shanahan, M. Shaposhnikov, R. Sharma, N. Simos, V. Singh, G. Sinnis, W. Sippach, T. Skwarnicki, M. Smy, H. Sobel, M. Soderberg, J. Sondericker, W. Sondheim, J. Spitz, N. Spooner, M. Stancari, I. Stancu, J. Stewart, P. Stoler, J. Stone, S. Stone, J. Strait, T. Straszheim, S. Striganov, G. Sullivan, R. Svoboda, B. Szczerbinska, A. Szelc, R. Talaga, H. Tanaka, R. Tayloe, D. Taylor, J. Thomas, L. Thompson, M. Thomson, C. Thorn, X. Tian, W. Toki, N. Tolich, M. Tripathi, M. Trovato, H. Tseung, M. Tzanov, J. Urheim, S. Usman, M. Vagins, R. Van Berg, R. Van de Water, G. Varner, K. Vaziri, G. Velev, B. Viren, T. Wachala, C. Walter, H. Wang, Z. Wang, D. Warner, D. Webber, A. Weber, R. Wendell, C. Wendt, M. Wetstein, H. White, S. White, L. Whitehead, W. Willis, R. J. Wilson, L. Winslow, J. Ye, M. Yeh, B. Yu, G. Zeller, C. Zhang, E. Zimmerman, R. Zwaska
    Oct. 27, 2011 hep-ex
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    In early 2010, the Long-Baseline Neutrino Experiment (LBNE) science collaboration initiated a study to investigate the physics potential of the experiment with a broad set of different beam, near- and far-detector configurations. Nine initial topics were identified as scientific areas that motivate construction of a long-baseline neutrino experiment with a very large far detector. We summarize the scientific justification for each topic and the estimated performance for a set of far detector reference configurations. We report also on a study of optimized beam parameters and the physics capability of proposed Near Detector configurations. This document was presented to the collaboration in fall 2010 and updated with minor modifications in early 2011.
  • Magnetic field measurements and wind-line variability of OB-type stars (1008.4260)

    R.S. Schnerr, H.F. Henrichs, C. Neiner, E. Verdugo, J. de Jong, V.C. Geers, K. Wiersema, B. van Dalen, A. Tijani, B. Plaggenborg, K.L.J. Rygl
    Aug. 25, 2010 astro-ph.SR
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Context. The first magnetic fields in O- and B-type stars that do not belong to the Bp-star class, have been discovered. The cyclic UV wind-line variability, which has been observed in a significant fraction of early-type stars, is likely to be related to such magnetic fields. Aims. We attempt to improve our understanding of massive-star magnetic fields, and observe twenty-five carefully-selected, OB-type stars. Methods. Of these stars we obtain 136 magnetic field strength measurements. We present the UV wind-line variability of all selected targets and summarise spectropolarimetric observations acquired using the MUSICOS spectropolarimeter, mounted at the TBL, Pic du Midi, between December 1998 and November 2004. From the average Stokes I and V line profiles, derived using the LSD method, we measure the magnetic field strengths, radial velocities, and first moment of the line profiles. Results. No significant magnetic field is detected in any OB-type star that we observed. Typical 1{\sigma} errors are between 15 and 200 G. A possible magnetic-field detection for the O9V star 10 Lac remains uncertain, because the field measurements depend critically on the fringe- effect correction in the Stokes V spectra. We find excess emission in UV-wind lines, centred about the rest wavelength, to be a new indirect indicator of the presence of a magnetic field in early B-type stars. The most promising candidates to host magnetic fields are the B-type stars {\delta} Cet and 6 Cep, and a number of O stars. Conclusions. Although some O and B stars have strong dipolar field, which cause periodic variability in the UV wind-lines, such strong fields are not widespread. If the variability observed in the UV wind-lines of OB stars is generally caused by surface magnetic fields, these fields are either weak (<~few hundred G) or localised.
  • The Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS) on the Herschel Space Observatory (1005.1487)

    A. Poglitsch, C. Waelkens, N. Geis, H. Feuchtgruber, B. Vandenbussche, L. Rodriguez, O. Krause, E. Renotte, C. van Hoof, P. Saraceno, J. Cepa, F. Kerschbaum, P. Agnese, B. Ali, B. Altieri, P. Andreani, J.-L. Augueres, Z. Balog, L. Barl, O.H. Bauer, N. Belbachir, M. Benedettini, N. Billot, O. Boulade, H. Bischof, J. Blommaert, E. Callut, C. Cara, R. Cerulli, D. Cesarsky, A. Contursi, Y. Creten, W. De Meester, V. Doublier, E. Doumayrou, L. Duband, K. Exter, R. Genzel, J.-M. Gillis, U. Grözinger, T. Henning, J. Herreros, R. Huygen, M. Inguscio, G. Jakob, C. Jamar, C. Jean, J. de Jong, R. Katterloher, C. Kiss, U. Klaas, D. Lemke, D. Lutz, S. Madden, B. Marquet, J. Martignac, A. Mazy, P. Merken, F. Montfort, L. Morbidelli, T. Müller, M. Nielbock, K. Okumura, R. Orfei, R. Ottensamer, S. Pezzuto, P. Popesso, J. Putzeys, S. Regibo, V. Reveret, P. Royer, M. Sauvage, J. Schreiber, J. Stegmaier, D. Schmitt, J. Schubert, E. Sturm, M. Thiel, G. Tofani, R. Vavrek, M. Wetzstein, E. Wieprecht, E. Wiezorrek
    May 20, 2010 astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The Photodetector Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS) is one of the three science instruments on ESA's far infrared and submillimetre observatory. It employs two Ge:Ga photoconductor arrays (stressed and unstressed) with 16x25 pixels, each, and two filled silicon bolometer arrays with 16x32 and 32x64 pixels, respectively, to perform integral-field spectroscopy and imaging photometry in the 60-210\mu\ m wavelength regime. In photometry mode, it simultaneously images two bands, 60-85\mu\ m or 85-125\mu\m and 125-210\mu\ m, over a field of view of ~1.75'x3.5', with close to Nyquist beam sampling in each band. In spectroscopy mode, it images a field of 47"x47", resolved into 5x5 pixels, with an instantaneous spectral coverage of ~1500km/s and a spectral resolution of ~175km/s. We summarise the design of the instrument, describe observing modes, calibration, and data analysis methods, and present our current assessment of the in-orbit performance of the instrument based on the Performance Verification tests. PACS is fully operational, and the achieved performance is close to or better than the pre-launch predictions.
  • Herschel-PACS spectroscopy of IR-bright galaxies at high redshift (1005.1511)

    E. Sturm, A. Verma, J. Graciá-Carpio, S. Hailey-Dunsheath, A. Contursi, J. Fischer, E. González-Alfonso, A. Poglitsch, A. Sternberg, R. Genzel, D. Lutz, L. Tacconi, N. Christopher, J. de Jong
    May 17, 2010 astro-ph.CO
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We present Herschel-PACS observations of rest-frame mid-infrared and far-infrared spectral line emissions from two lensed, ultra-luminous infrared galaxies at high redshift: MIPS J142824.0+352619 (MIPS J1428), a starburst-dominated system at z = 1.3, and IRAS F10214+4724 (F10214), a source at z = 2.3 hosting both star-formation and a luminous AGN. We have detected [OI]63 micron and [OIII]52 micron in MIPS J1428, and tentatively [OIII]52 micron in F10214. Together with the recent ZEUS-CSO [CII]158 micron detection in MIPS J1428 we can for the first time combine [OI], [CII] and far-IR (FIR) continuum measurements for photo-dissociation (PDR) modeling of an ultra-luminous (L_IR > 10^12 L_sun) star forming galaxy at the peak epoch of cosmic star formation. We find that MIPS J1428, contrary to average local ULIRGs, does not show a deficit in [OI] relative to FIR. The combination of far-UV flux G_0 and gas density n (derived from the PDR models), as well as the star formation efficiency (derived from CO and FIR) is similar to normal or starburst galaxies, despite the high infrared luminosity of this system. In contrast, F10214 has stringent upper limits on [OIV] and [SIII], and an [OIII]/FIR ratio at least an order of magnitude lower than local starbursts or AGN, similar to local ULIRGs.
  • The effects of star formation on the low-metallicity ISM: NGC4214 mapped with Herschel/PACS spectroscopy (1005.1942)

    D. Cormier, S. C. Madden, S. Hony, A. Contursi, A. Poglitsch, F. Galliano, E. Sturm, V. Doublier, H. Feuchtgruber, M. Galametz, N. Geis, J. de Jong, K. Okumura, P. Panuzzo, M. Sauvage
    May 11, 2010 astro-ph.CO
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We present Herschel/PACS spectroscopic maps of the dwarf galaxy NC4214 observed in 6 far infrared fine-structure lines: [C II] 158mu, [O III] 88mu, [O I] 63mu, [O I] 146mu, [N II] 122mu, and [N II] 205mu. The maps are sampled to the full telescope spatial resolution and reveal unprecedented detail on ~ 150 pc size scales. We detect [C II] emission over the whole mapped area, [O III] being the most luminous FIR line. The ratio of [O III]/[C II] peaks at about 2 toward the sites of massive star formation, higher than ratios seen in dusty starburst galaxies. The [C II]/CO ratios are 20 000 to 70 000 toward the 2 massive clusters, which are at least an order of magnitude larger than spiral or dusty starbursts, and cannot be reconciled with single-slab PDR models. Toward the 2 massive star-forming regions, we find that L[CII] is 0.5 to 0.8% of the LTIR . All of the lines together contribute up to 2% of LTIR . These extreme findings are a consequence of the lower metallicity and young, massive-star formation commonly found in dwarf galaxies. These conditions promote large-scale photodissociation into the molecular reservoir, which is evident in the FIR line ratios. This illustrates the necessity to move to multiphase models applicable to star-forming clusters or galaxies as a whole.
  • GRB 051028: an intrinsically faint GRB at high redshift? (astro-ph/0609654)

    A.J. Castro-Tirado, M. Jelinek, S.B. Pandey, S. McBreen, J. de Jong, D.K. Sahu, P. Ferrero, J.A. Caballero, J. Gorosabel, D.A. Kann, S. Klose, A. de Ugarte Postigo, G.C. Anupama, C. Gry, S. Guziy, S. Srividya, L. Valdivielso, S. Vanniarajan, A. A. Henden
    Sept. 24, 2006 astro-ph
    We present multiwavelength observations of the gamma-ray burst GRB 051028 detected by HETE-2 in order to derive its afterglow emission parameters and to determine the reason for its optical faintness when compared to other events. Observations were taken in the optical (2.0m Himalayan Chandra Telescope, 1.34m Tautenburg, 4.2m William Herschel Telescope) and in X-rays (Swift/XRT) between 2.7 hours and 10 days after the onset of the event. The data can be interpreted by collimated emission in a jet with a typical value of $p$ = 2.4 which is moving in an homogeneous interstellar medium and with a cooling frequency nu_{c} still above the X-rays at 0.5 days after the burst onset. GRB 051028 can be classified as a ``gray'' or ``potentially dark'' GRB. On the basis of the combined optical and Swift/XRT data, we conclude that the reason for the optical dimness is not extra absorption in the host galaxy, but rather the GRB taking place at high-redshift.We also notice the very striking similarity with the optical lightcurve of GRB 050730, a burst with a spectroscopic redshift of 3.967, although GRB 051028 is about 3 mag fainter. We suggest that the bump could be explained by multiple energy injection episodes and that the burst is intrinsically faint when compared to the average afterglows detected since 1997. The non-detection of the host galaxy down to R = 25.1 is also consistent with the burst arising at high redshift, compatible with the published pseudo-z of 3.7 +/- 1.8.