EarthFinder is a Probe Mission concept selected for study by NASA for input
to the 2020 astronomy decadal survey. This study is currently active and a
final white paper report is due to NASA at the end of calendar 2018. We are
tasked with evaluating the scientific rationale for obtaining precise radial
velocity (PRV) measurements in space, which is a two-part inquiry: What can be
gained from going to space? What can't be done form the ground? These two
questions flow down to these specific tasks for our study - Identify the
velocity limit, if any, introduced from micro- and macro-telluric absorption in
the Earth's atmosphere; Evaluate the unique advantages that a space-based
platform provides to emable the identification and mitigation of stellar
acitivity for multi-planet signal recovery.
We discuss how visions for the futures of humanity in space and SETI are
intertwined, and are shaped by prior work in the fields and by science fiction.
This appears in the language used in the fields, and in the sometimes implicit
assumptions made in discussions of them. We give examples from articulations of
the so-called Fermi Paradox, discussions of the settlement of the Solar System
(in the near future) and the Galaxy (in the far future), and METI. We argue
that science fiction, especially the campy variety, is a significant
contributor to the "giggle factor" that hinders serious discussion and funding
for SETI and Solar System settlement projects. We argue that humanity's
long-term future in space will be shaped by our short-term visions for who goes
there and how. Because of the way they entered the fields, we recommend
avoiding the term "colony" and its cognates when discussing the settlement of
space, as well as other terms with similar pedigrees. We offer examples of
science fiction and other writing that broaden and challenge our visions of
human futures in space and SETI. In an appendix, we use an analogy with the
well-funded and relatively uncontroversial searches for the dark matter
particle to argue that SETI's lack of funding in the national science portfolio
is primarily a problem of perception, not inherent merit.
The precise radial velocity survey at Keck Observatory began over 20 years
ago. Its survey of thousands of stars now has the time baseline to be sensitive
to planets with decade-long orbits, including Jupiter analogs. I present
several newly-finished orbital solutions for long-period giant planets.
Although hot Jupiters are generally "lonely" (i.e. they are not part of
multiplanet systems), those that are not appear to often have giant companions
at 5 AU or beyond. I present two of the highest period- ratios among planets in
a two-planet system, and some of the longest orbital periods ever measured for
exoplanets. In many cases, combining Keck radial velocities from those from
other long-term surveys at Lick Observatory, McDonald Observatory, HARPS, and,
of course, OHP spectrographs, produces superior orbital fits, constraining both
period and eccentricity better than could be possible with any single set
alone. Stellar magnetic activity cycles can masquerade as long-period planets.
In most cases this effect is very small, but a loud minority of stars,
including, apparently, HD 154345, show very strong RV-activity correlations.
We present a database of well determined orbital parameters of exoplanets.
This database comprises spectroscopic orbital elements measured for 427 planets
orbiting 363 stars from radial velocity and transit measurements as reported in
the literature. We have also compiled fundamental transit parameters, stellar
parameters, and the method used for the planets discovery. This Exoplanet Orbit
Database includes all planets with robust, well measured orbital parameters
reported in peer-reviewed articles. The database is available in a searchable,
filterable, and sortable form on the Web at http://exoplanets.org through the
Exoplanets Data Explorer Table, and the data can be plotted and explored
through the Exoplanets Data Explorer Plotter. We use the Data Explorer to
generate publication-ready plots giving three examples of the signatures of
exoplanet migration and dynamical evolution: We illustrate the character of the
apparent correlation between mass and period in exoplanet orbits, the selection
different biases between radial velocity and transit surveys, and that the
multiplanet systems show a distinct semi-major axis distribution from
apparently singleton systems.