• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • An Improved Transit Measurement for a 2.4 R_{Earth} Planet Orbiting A Bright Mid-M Dwarf K2$-$28 (1801.10177)

    Ge Chen, Heather A. Knutson, Courtney D. Dressing, Caroline V. Morley, Michael Werner, Varoujan Gorjian, Charles Beichman, Björn Benneke, Jessie Christiansen, David Ciardi, Ian Crossfield, Steve B. Howell, Jessica E. Krick, John Livingston, Farisa Y. Morales, Joshua E. Schlieder
    April 12, 2018 astro-ph.EP
    We present a new {\em Spitzer} transit observation of K2$-$28b, a sub-Neptune ($R_{\rm p} = 2.45\pm0.28 R_{Earth}$) orbiting a relatively bright ($V_{\rm mag} = 16.06$, $K_{\rm mag} = 10.75$) metal-rich M4 dwarf (EPIC 206318379). This star is one of only seven with masses less than 0.2 M_{Sun} known to host transiting planets, and the planet appears to be a slightly smaller analogue of GJ 1214b ($2.85\pm0.20 R_{Earth}$; \citealt{2013A&A...549A..10H}). Our new {\em Spitzer} observations were taken two years after the original K2 discovery data and have a significantly higher cadence, allowing us to derive improved estimates for this planet's radius, semi-major axis, and orbital period, which greatly reduce the uncertainty in the prediction of near future transit times for the {\em James Webb Space Telescope} ({\em JWST}) observations. We also evaluate the system's suitability for atmospheric characterization with {\em JWST} and find that it is currently the only small (< 3 R_{Earth}) and cool ($< 600$ K) planet aside from GJ 1214b with a potentially detectable secondary eclipse. We also note that this system is a favorable target for near-infrared radial velocity instruments on larger telescopes (e.g., the Habitable Planet Finder on the Hobby-Eberly Telescope), making it one of only a handful of small, cool planets accessible with this technique. Finally, we compare our results with the simulated catalog of the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite ({\em TESS}) and find K2$-$28b to be representative of the kind of mid-M systems that should be detectible in the {\em TESS} sample.
  • Spitzer Observations Confirm and Rescue the Habitable-Zone Super-Earth K2-18b for Future Characterization (1610.07249)

    Björn Benneke, Michael Werner, Erik Petigura, Heather Knutson, Courtney Dressing, Ian J. M. Crossfield, Joshua E. Schlieder, John Livingston, Charles Beichman, Jessie Christiansen, Jessica Krick, Varoujan Gorjian, Andrew W. Howard, Evan Sinukoff, David R. Ciardi, Rachel L. Akeson
    Oct. 24, 2016 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The recent detections of two transit events attributed to the super-Earth candidate K2-18b have provided the unprecedented prospect of spectroscopically studying a habitable-zone planet outside the Solar System. Orbiting a nearby M2.5 dwarf and receiving virtually the same stellar insolation as Earth, K2-18b would be a prime candidate for the first detailed atmospheric characterization of a habitable-zone exoplanet using HST and JWST. Here, we report the detection of a third transit of K2-18b near the predicted transit time using the Spitzer Space Telescope. The Spitzer detection demonstrates the periodic nature of the two transit events discovered by K2, confirming that K2-18 is indeed orbited by a super-Earth in a 33-day orbit and ruling out the alternative scenario of two similarly-sized, long-period planets transiting only once within the 75-day K2 observation. We also find, however, that the transit event detected by Spitzer occurred 1.85 hours (7-sigma) before the predicted transit time. Our joint analysis of the Spitzer and K2 photometry reveals that this early occurrence of the transit is not caused by transit timing variations (TTVs), but the result of an inaccurate K2 ephemeris due to a previously undetected data anomaly in the K2 photometry likely caused by a cosmic ray hit. We refit the ephemeris and find that K2-18b would have been lost for future atmospheric characterizations with HST and JWST if we had not secured its ephemeris shortly after the discovery. We caution that immediate follow-up observations as presented here will also be critical in confirming and securing future planets discovered by TESS, in particular if only two transit events are covered by the relatively short 27-day TESS campaigns.
  • Spitzer Observations of Exoplanets Discovered with The Kepler K2 Mission (1603.01934)

    Charles Beichman, John Livingston, Michael Werner, Varoujan Gorjian, Jessica Krick, Katherine Deck, Heather Knutson, Ian Wong, Erik A. Petigura, Jessie Christiansen, David Ciardi, Thomas P. Greene, Joshua E. Schlieder, Mike Line, Ian Crossfield, Andrew Howard, Evan Sinukoff
    March 7, 2016 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We have used the {\it Spitzer Space Telescope} to observe two transiting planetary systems orbiting low mass stars discovered in the \Kepler \Ktwo mission. The system K2-3 (EPIC 201367065) hosts three planets while EPIC 202083828 (K2-26) hosts a single planet. Observations of all four objects in these two systems confirm and refine the orbital and physical parameters of the planets. The refined orbital information and more precise planet radii possible with \Spitzer will be critical for future observations of these and other \Ktwo targets. For K2-3b we find marginally significant evidence for a Transit Timing Variation between the \Ktwo and \Spitzer\ epochs.
  • Identifying False Alarms in the Kepler Planet Candidate Catalog (1602.03204)

    F. Mullally, Jeffery L. Coughlin, Susan E. Thompson, Jessie Christiansen, Christopher Burke, Bruce D. Clarke, Michael R.Haas
    Feb. 9, 2016 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We present a new automated method to identify instrumental features masquerading as small, long period planets in the \kepler\ planet candidate catalog. These systematics, mistakenly identified as planet transits, can have a strong impact on occurrence rate calculations because they cluster in a region of parameter space where Kepler's sensitivity to planets is poor. We compare individual transit-like events to a variety of models of real transits and systematic events, and use a Bayesian Information Criterion to evaluate the likelihood that each event is real. We describe our technique and test its performance on simulated data. Results from this technique are incorporated in the \kepler\ Q1-17 DR24 planet candidate catalog of \citet{Coughlin15}.
  • Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler VI: Planet Sample from Q1-Q16 (47 Months) (1502.02038)

    F. Mullally, Jeffrey L. Coughlin, Susan E. Thompson, Jason Rowe, Christopher Burke, David W. Latham, Natalie M. Batalha, Stephen T. Bryson, Jessie Christiansen, Christopher E. Henze, Aviv Ofir, Billy Quarles, Avi Shporer, Vincent Van Eylen, Christa Van Laerhoven, Yash Shah, Angie Wolfgang, W. J. Chaplin, Ji-Wei Xie, Rachel Akeson, Vic Argabright, Eric Bachtell, Thomas Barclay William J. Borucki, Douglas A. Caldwell, Jennifer R. Campbell, Joseph H. Catanzarite, William D. Cochran, Riley M. Duren, Scott W. Fleming, Dorothy Fraquelli, Forrest R. Girouard, Michael R. Haas, Krzysztof G. Hełminiak, Steve B. Howell, Daniel Huber, Kipp Larson, Thomas N. Gautier III, Jon Jenkins, Jie Li, Jack J. Lissauer, Scot McArthur, Chris Miller, Robert L. Morris, Anima Patil-Sabale, Peter Plavchan, Dustin Putnam, Elisa V. Quintana, Solange Ramirez, V. Silva Aguirre, Shawn Seader, Jeffrey C. Smith, Jason H. Steffen, Chris Stewart, Jeremy Stober, Martin Still, Peter Tenenbaum, John Troeltzsch, Joseph D. Twicken, Khadeejah A. Zamudio
    Feb. 6, 2015 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    \We present the sixth catalog of Kepler candidate planets based on nearly 4 years of high precision photometry. This catalog builds on the legacy of previous catalogs released by the Kepler project and includes 1493 new Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) of which 554 are planet candidates, and 131 of these candidates have best fit radii <1.5 R_earth. This brings the total number of KOIs and planet candidates to 7305 and 4173 respectively. We suspect that many of these new candidates at the low signal-to-noise limit may be false alarms created by instrumental noise, and discuss our efforts to identify such objects. We re-evaluate all previously published KOIs with orbital periods of >50 days to provide a consistently vetted sample that can be used to improve planet occurrence rate calculations. We discuss the performance of our planet detection algorithms, and the consistency of our vetting products. The full catalog is publicly available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.
  • Observations of Transiting Exoplanets with the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific (PASP), December 2014 (1411.1754)

    Charles Beichman, Bjoern Benneke, Heather Knutson, Roger Smith, Courtney Dressing, David Latham, Drake Deming, Jonathan Lunine, Pierre-Olivier Lagage, Alessandro Sozzetti, Charles Beichman, David Sing, Eliza Kempton, George Ricker, Jacob Bean, Laura Kreidberg, Jeroen Bouwman, Ian Crossfield, Jessie Christiansen, David Ciardi, Jonathan Fortney, Loïc Albert, René Doyon, Marcia Rieke, George Rieke, Mark Clampin, Matt Greenhouse, Paul Goudfrooij, Dean Hines, Tony Keyes, Janice Lee, Peter McCullough, Massimo Robberto, John Stansberry, Jeff Valenti, Pieter D. Deroo, Avi Mandell, Michael E. Ressler, Avi Shporer, Mark Swain, Gautam Vasisht, Sean Carey, Jessica Krick, Stephan Birkmann, Pierre Ferruit, Giovanna Giardino, Tom Greene, Steve Howell
    Nov. 6, 2014 astro-ph.EP, astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    This article summarizes a workshop held on March, 2014, on the potential of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to revolutionize our knowledge of the physical properties of exoplanets through transit observations. JWST's unique combination of high sensitivity and broad wavelength coverage will enable the accurate measurement of transits with high signal-to-noise. Most importantly, JWST spectroscopy will investigate planetary atmospheres to determine atomic and molecular compositions, to probe vertical and horizontal structure, and to follow dynamical evolution, i.e. exoplanet weather. JWST will sample a diverse population of planets of varying masses and densities in a wide variety of environments characterized by a range of host star masses and metallicities, orbital semi-major axes and eccentricities. A broad program of exoplanet science could use a substantial fraction of the overall JWST mission.
  • Masses, Radii, and Orbits of Small Kepler Planets: The Transition from Gaseous to Rocky Planets (1401.4195)

    Geoffrey W. Marcy, Howard Isaacson, Andrew W. Howard, Jason F. Rowe, Jon M. Jenkins, Stephen T. Bryson, David W. Latham, Steve B. Howell, Thomas N. Gautier III, Natalie M. Batalha, Leslie A. Rogers, David Ciardi, Debra A. Fischer, Ronald L. Gilliland, Hans Kjeldsen, Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Daniel Huber, William J. Chaplin, Sarbani Basu, Lars A. Buchhave, Samuel N. Quinn, William J. Borucki, David G. Koch, Roger Hunter, Douglas A. Caldwell, Jeffrey Van Cleve, Rea Kolbl, Lauren M. Weiss, Erik Petigura, Sara Seager, Timothy Morton, John Asher Johnson, Sarah Ballard, Chris Burke, William D. Cochran, Michael Endl, Phillip MacQueen, Mark E. Everett, Jack J. Lissauer, Eric B. Ford, Guillermo Torres, Francois Fressin, Timothy M. Brown, Jason H. Steffen, David Charbonneau, Gibor S. Basri, Dimitar D. Sasselov, Joshua Winn, Roberto Sanchis-Ojeda, Jessie Christiansen, Elisabeth Adams, Christopher Henze, Andrea Dupree, Daniel C. Fabrycky, Jonathan J. Fortney, Jill Tarter, Matthew J. Holman, Peter Tenenbaum, Avi Shporer, Philip W. Lucas, William F. Welsh, Jerome A. Orosz, T. R. Bedding, T. L. Campante, G. R. Davies, Y. Elsworth, R. Handberg, S. Hekker, C. Karoff, S. D. Kawaler, M. N. Lund, M. Lundkvist, T. S. Metcalfe, A. Miglio, V. Silva Aguirre, D. Stello, T. R. White, Alan Boss, Edna Devore, Alan Gould, Andrej Prsa, Eric Agol, Thomas Barclay, Jeff Coughlin, Erik Brugamyer, Fergal Mullally, Elisa V. Quintana, Martin Still, Susan E. hompson, David Morrison, Joseph D. Twicken, Jean-Michel Désert, Josh Carter, Justin R. Crepp, Guillaume Hébrard, Alexandre Santerne, Claire Moutou, Charlie Sobeck, Douglas Hudgins, Michael R. Haas, Paul Robertson, Jorge Lillo-Box, David Barrado
    Jan. 16, 2014 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We report on the masses, sizes, and orbits of the planets orbiting 22 Kepler stars. There are 49 planet candidates around these stars, including 42 detected through transits and 7 revealed by precise Doppler measurements of the host stars. Based on an analysis of the Kepler brightness measurements, along with high-resolution imaging and spectroscopy, Doppler spectroscopy, and (for 11 stars) asteroseismology, we establish low false-positive probabilities for all of the transiting planets (41 of 42 have a false-positive probability under 1%), and we constrain their sizes and masses. Most of the transiting planets are smaller than 3X the size of Earth. For 16 planets, the Doppler signal was securely detected, providing a direct measurement of the planet's mass. For the other 26 planets we provide either marginal mass measurements or upper limits to their masses and densities; in many cases we can rule out a rocky composition. We identify 6 planets with densities above 5 g/cc, suggesting a mostly rocky interior for them. Indeed, the only planets that are compatible with a purely rocky composition are smaller than ~2 R_earth. Larger planets evidently contain a larger fraction of low-density material (H, He, and H2O).
  • The false positive rate of Kepler and the occurrence of planets (1301.0842)

    Francois Fressin, Guillermo Torres, David Charbonneau, Stephen T. Bryson, Jessie Christiansen, Courtney D. Dressing, Jon M. Jenkins, Lucianne M. Walkowicz, Natalie M. Batalha
    Jan. 4, 2013 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The Kepler Mission is uniquely suited to study the frequencies of extrasolar planets. This goal requires knowledge of the incidence of false positives such as eclipsing binaries in the background of the targets, or physically bound to them, which can mimic the photometric signal of a transiting planet. We perform numerical simulations to predict the occurrence of astrophysical false positives detectable by the Mission, and quantify the fraction of them that would pass the Kepler candidate vetting procedure. By comparing their distribution with that of the Kepler Objects of Interest detected during the first six quarters of operation of the spacecraft, we infer the false positive rate of Kepler and study its dependence on spectral type, candidate planet size, and orbital period. We find that the global false positive rate of Kepler is 9.4 %, peaking for giant planets (6-22 Earth radii) at 17.7 %, reaching a low of 6.7 % for small Neptunes (2-4 Earth radii), and increasing again for Earth-size planets (0.8-1.25 Earth radii) to 12.3 %. Most importantly, we also quantify and characterize the distribution and rate of occurrence of planets down to Earth size with no prior assumptions on their frequency, by subtracting from the population of actual Kepler candidates our simulated population of astrophysical false positives. We find that 16.5 +/- 3.6 % of main-sequence FGK stars have at least one planet between 0.8 and 1.25 Earth radii with orbital periods up to 85 days. There is no significant dependence of the rates of planet occurrence between 0.8 and 4 Earth radii with spectral type. In the process, we derive also a prescription for the signal recovery rate of Kepler that enables a good match to both the KOI size and orbital period distribution, as well as their signal-to-noise distribution.
  • Planet Occurrence within 0.25 AU of Solar-type Stars from Kepler (1103.2541)

    Andrew W. Howard, Geoffrey W. Marcy, Stephen T. Bryson, Jon M. Jenkins, Jason F. Rowe, Natalie M. Batalha, William J. Borucki, David G. Koch, Edward W. Dunham, Thomas N. Gautier III, Jeffrey Van Cleve, William D. Cochran, David W. Latham, Jack J. Lissauer, Guillermo Torres, Timothy M. Brown, Ronald L. Gilliland, Lars A. Buchhave, Douglas A. Caldwell, Jorgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, David Ciardi, Francois Fressin, Michael R. Haas, Steve B. Howell, Hans Kjeldsen, Sara Seager, Leslie Rogers, Dimitar D. Sasselov, Jason H. Steffen, Gibor S. Basri, David Charbonneau, Jessie Christiansen, Bruce Clarke, Andrea Dupree, Daniel C. Fabrycky, Debra A. Fischer, Eric B. Ford, Jonathan J. Fortney, Jill Tarter, Forrest R. Girouard, Matthew J. Holman, John Asher Johnson, Todd C. Klaus, Pavel Machalek, Althea V. Moorhead, Robert C. Morehead, Darin Ragozzine, Peter Tenenbaum, Joseph D. Twicken, Samuel N. Quinn, Howard Isaacson, Avi Shporer, Philip W. Lucas, Lucianne M. Walkowicz, William F. Welsh, Alan Boss, Edna Devore, Alan Gould, Jeffrey C. Smith, Robert L. Morris, Andrej Prsa, Timothy D. Morton
    March 13, 2011 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We report the distribution of planets as a function of planet radius (R_p), orbital period (P), and stellar effective temperature (Teff) for P < 50 day orbits around GK stars. These results are based on the 1,235 planets (formally "planet candidates") from the Kepler mission that include a nearly complete set of detected planets as small as 2 Earth radii (Re). For each of the 156,000 target stars we assess the detectability of planets as a function of R_p and P. We also correct for the geometric probability of transit, R*/a. We consider first stars within the "solar subset" having Teff = 4100-6100 K, logg = 4.0-4.9, and Kepler magnitude Kp < 15 mag. We include only those stars having noise low enough to permit detection of planets down to 2 Re. We count planets in small domains of R_p and P and divide by the included target stars to calculate planet occurrence in each domain. Occurrence of planets varies by more than three orders of magnitude and increases substantially down to the smallest radius (2 Re) and out to the longest orbital period (50 days, ~0.25 AU) in our study. For P < 50 days, the radius distribution is given by a power law, df/dlogR= k R^\alpha. This rapid increase in planet occurrence with decreasing planet size agrees with core-accretion, but disagrees with population synthesis models. We fit occurrence as a function of P to a power law model with an exponential cutoff below a critical period P_0. For smaller planets, P_0 has larger values, suggesting that the "parking distance" for migrating planets moves outward with decreasing planet size. We also measured planet occurrence over Teff = 3600-7100 K, spanning M0 to F2 dwarfs. The occurrence of 2-4 Re planets in the Kepler field increases with decreasing Teff, making these small planets seven times more abundant around cool stars than the hottest stars in our sample. [abridged]