
Cosmic shear is a powerful probe of cosmological parameters, but its
potential can be fully utilised only if galaxy shapes are measured with great
accuracy. Two major effects have been identified which are likely to account
for most of the bias for maximum likelihood methods in recent shear measurement
challenges. Model bias occurs when the true galaxy shape is not well
represented by the fitted model. Noise bias occurs due to the nonlinear
relationship between image pixels and galaxy shape. In this paper we
investigate the potential interplay between these two effects when an imperfect
model is used in the presence of high noise. We present analytical expressions
for this bias, which depends on the residual difference between the model and
real data. They can lead to biases not accounted for in previous calibration
schemes. By measuring the model bias, noise bias and their interaction, we
provide a complete statistical framework for measuring galaxy shapes with model
fitting methods from GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing (GREAT) like
images. We demonstrate the noise and model interaction bias using a simple toy
model, which indicates that this effect can potentially be significant. Using
real galaxy images from the Cosmological Evolution Survey (COSMOS) we quantify
the strength of the model bias, noise bias and their interaction. We find that
the interaction term is often a similar size to the model bias term, and is
smaller than the requirements of the current and shortly upcoming galaxy
surveys.

We present and describe im3shape, a new publicly available galaxy shape
measurement code for weak gravitational lensing shear. im3shape performs a
maximum likelihood fit of a bulgeplusdisc galaxy model to noisy images,
incorporating an applied point spread function. We detail challenges faced and
choices made in its design and implementation, and then discuss various
limitations that affect this and other maximum likelihood methods. We assess
the bias arising from fitting an incorrect galaxy model using simple noisefree
images and find that it should not be a concern for current cosmic shear
surveys.
We test im3shape on the GREAT08 Challenge image simulations, and meet the
requirements for upcoming cosmic shear surveys in the case that the simulations
are encompassed by the fitted model, using a simple correction for image noise
bias. For the fiducial branch of GREAT08 we obtain a negligible additive shear
bias and subtwo percent level multiplicative bias, which is suitable for
analysis of current surveys. We fall short of the subpercent level requirement
for upcoming surveys, which we attribute to a combination of noise bias and the
mismatch between our galaxy model and the model used in the GREAT08
simulations. We meet the requirements for current surveys across all branches
of GREAT08, except those with small or high noise galaxies, which we would cut
from our analysis. Using the GREAT08 metric we we obtain a score of Q=717 for
the usable branches, relative to the goal of Q=1000 for future experiments. The
code is freely available from https://bitbucket.org/joezuntz/im3shape

Weak gravitational lensing has the potential to constrain cosmological
parameters to high precision. However, as shown by the Shear TEsting Programmes
(STEP) and GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing (GREAT) Challenges, measuring
galaxy shears is a nontrivial task: various methods introduce different
systematic biases which have to be accounted for. We investigate how pixel
noise on the image affects the bias on shear estimates from a
MaximumLikelihood forward modelfitting approach using a sum of coelliptical
S\'{e}rsic profiles, in complement to the theoretical approach of an an
associated paper. We evaluate the bias using a simple but realistic galaxy
model and find that the effects of noise alone can cause biases of order 110%
on measured shears, which is significant for current and future lensing
surveys. We evaluate a simulationbased calibration method to create a bias
model as a function of galaxy properties and observing conditions. This model
is then used to correct the simulated measurements. We demonstrate that this
method can effectively reduce noise bias so that shear measurement reaches the
level of accuracy required for estimating cosmic shear in upcoming lensing
surveys.

GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) is a public image
analysis challenge aimed at the development of algorithms to analyze
astronomical images. Specifically, the challenge is to measure varying image
distortions in the presence of a variable convolution kernel, pixelization and
noise. This is the second in a series of challenges set to the astronomy,
computer science and statistics communities, providing a structured environment
in which methods can be improved and tested in preparation for planned
astronomical surveys. GREAT10 extends upon previous work by introducing
variable fields into the challenge. The "Galaxy Challenge" involves the precise
measurement of galaxy shape distortions, quantified locally by two parameters
called shear, in the presence of a known convolution kernel. Crucially, the
convolution kernel and the simulated gravitational lensing shape distortion
both now vary as a function of position within the images, as is the case for
real data. In addition, we introduce the "Star Challenge" that concerns the
reconstruction of a variable convolution kernel, similar to that in a typical
astronomical observation. This document details the GREAT10 Challenge for
potential participants. Continually updated information is also available from
http://www.greatchallenges.info.

We present the results of the GREAT08 Challenge, a blind analysis challenge
to infer weak gravitational lensing shear distortions from images. The primary
goal was to stimulate new ideas by presenting the problem to researchers
outside the shear measurement community. Six GREAT08 Team methods were
presented at the launch of the Challenge and five additional groups submitted
results during the 6 month competition. Participants analyzed 30 million
simulated galaxies with a range in signal to noise ratio, pointspread function
ellipticity, galaxy size, and galaxy type. The large quantity of simulations
allowed shear measurement methods to be assessed at a level of accuracy
suitable for currently planned future cosmic shear observations for the first
time. Different methods perform well in different parts of simulation parameter
space and come close to the target level of accuracy in several of these. A
number of fresh ideas have emerged as a result of the Challenge including a
reexamination of the process of combining information from different galaxies,
which reduces the dependence on realistic galaxy modelling. The image
simulations will become increasingly sophisticated in future GREAT challenges,
meanwhile the GREAT08 simulations remain as a benchmark for additional
developments in shear measurement algorithms.

The GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2008 (GREAT08) Challenge focuses
on a problem that is of crucial importance for future observations in
cosmology. The shapes of distant galaxies can be used to determine the
properties of dark energy and the nature of gravity, because light from those
galaxies is bent by gravity from the intervening dark matter. The observed
galaxy images appear distorted, although only slightly, and their shapes must
be precisely disentangled from the effects of pixelisation, convolution and
noise. The worldwide gravitational lensing community has made significant
progress in techniques to measure these distortions via the Shear TEsting
Program (STEP). Via STEP, we have run challenges within our own community, and
come to recognise that this particular image analysis problem is ideally
matched to experts in statistical inference, inverse problems and computational
learning. Thus, in order to continue the progress seen in recent years, we are
seeking an infusion of new ideas from these communities. This document details
the GREAT08 Challenge for potential participants. Please visit
http://www.great08challenge.info for the latest information.