Recently it was shown that certain fluid-mechanical 'pilot-wave' systems can
strikingly mimic a range of quantum properties, including single particle
diffraction and interference, quantization of angular momentum etc. How far
does this analogy go? The ultimate test of (apparent) quantumness of such
systems is a Bell-test. Here the premises of the Bell inequality are
re-investigated for particles accompanied by a pilot-wave, or more generally by
a resonant 'background' field. We find that two of these premises, namely
outcome independence and measurement independence, may not be generally valid
when such a background is present. Under this assumption the Bell inequality is
possibly (but not necessarily) violated. A class of hydrodynamic Bell
experiments is proposed that could test this claim. Such a Bell test on fluid
systems could provide a wealth of new insights on the different loopholes for
Bell's theorem. Finally, it is shown that certain properties of
background-based theories can be illustrated in Ising spin-lattices.
Usually the 'hidden variables' of Bell's theorem are supposed to describe the
pair of Bell particles. Here a semantic shift is proposed, namely to attach the
hidden variables to a stochastic medium or field in which the particles move.
It appears that under certain conditions one of the premises of Bell's theorem,
namely 'measurement independence', is not satisfied for such 'background-based'
theories, even if these only involve local interactions. Such theories
therefore do not fall under the restriction of Bell's no-go theorem. A simple
version of such background-based models are Ising models, which we investigate
here in the classical and quantum regime. We also propose to test
background-based models by a straightforward extension of existing experiments.
The present version corrects an error in the preceding version.
In a recent article Hensen et al. [Nature 526, 682 (2015)] report on a
sophisticated Bell experiment, simultaneously closing, for the first time,
loopholes for local hidden-variable theories (HVTs). The authors claim that
'local realism' has been refuted, under certain natural assumptions. The aim of
the present Comment is twofold. First, it is urged that the class of local HVTs
that is eliminated by the reported experiment should be specified in greater
detail than is done by the authors. Second, it is argued that the class of
local HVTs that still survives is wide and natural. For instance, hidden
variables describing a 'background' field can exploit the freedom-of-choice
loophole, which cannot be closed for this type of hidden variables. The
dynamics of such background-based theories can be illustrated by existing
systems, e.g. from fluid mechanics.
In a recent article Giustina et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015)]
report on an advanced Bell experiment, simultaneously closing loopholes for
local hidden-variable theories. The authors claim that 'local realism' has been
refuted, unless 'truly exotic hypotheses' are made. Here I argue that a
particularly wide and natural class of local hidden-variable theories survives,
for instance when the hidden variables describe a background field. Such
background-based theories exploit the freedom-of-choice loophole, which cannot
be closed for this type of hidden variables. The dynamics of such models can be
illustrated by existing systems, e.g. from fluid mechanics.
Recent experiments have shown that certain fluid-mechanical systems, namely
oil droplets bouncing on oil films, can mimic a wide range of quantum
phenomena, including double-slit interference, quantization of angular momentum
and Zeeman splitting. Here I investigate what can be learned from these systems
concerning no-go theorems as those of Bell and Kochen-Specker. In particular, a
model for the Bell experiment is proposed that includes variables describing a
'background' field or medium. This field mimics the surface wave that
accompanies the droplets in the fluid-mechanical experiments. It appears that
quite generally such a model can violate the Bell inequality and reproduce the
quantum statistics, even if it is based on local dynamics only. The reason is
that measurement independence is not valid in such models. This opens the door
for local 'background-based' theories, describing the interaction of particles
and analyzers with a background field, to complete quantum mechanics.
Experiments to test these ideas are also proposed.
In this PhD thesis the ancient question of determinism ('Does every event
have a cause ?') will be re-examined. In the philosophy of science and physics
communities the orthodox position states that the physical world is
indeterministic: quantum events would have no causes but happen by irreducible
chance. Arguably the clearest theorem that leads to this conclusion is Bell's
theorem. The commonly accepted 'solution' to the theorem is 'indeterminism', in
agreement with the Copenhagen interpretation. Here it is recalled that
indeterminism is not really a physical but rather a philosophical hypothesis,
and that it has counterintuitive and far-reaching implications. At the same
time another solution to Bell's theorem exists, often termed 'superdeterminism'
or 'total determinism'. Superdeterminism appears to be a philosophical position
that is centuries and probably millennia old: it is for instance Spinoza's
determinism. If Bell's theorem has both indeterministic and deterministic
solutions, choosing between determinism and indeterminism is a philosophical
question, not a matter of physical experimentation, as is widely believed. If
it is impossible to use physics for deciding between both positions, it is
legitimate to ask which philosophical theories are of help. Here it is argued
that probability theory - more precisely the interpretation of probability - is
instrumental for advancing the debate. It appears that the hypothesis of
determinism allows to answer a series of precise questions from probability
theory, while indeterminism remains silent for these questions. From this point
of view determinism appears to be the most reasonable assumption, after all.
Bell's theorem admits several interpretations or 'solutions', the standard
interpretation being 'indeterminism', a next one 'nonlocality'. In this article
two further solutions are investigated, termed here 'superdeterminism' and
'supercorrelation'. The former is especially interesting for philosophical
reasons, if only because it is always rejected on the basis of extra-physical
arguments. The latter, supercorrelation, will be studied here by investigating
model systems that can mimic it, namely spin lattices. It is shown that in
these systems the Bell inequality can be violated, even if they are local
according to usual definitions. Violation of the Bell inequality is retraced to
violation of 'measurement independence'. These results emphasize the importance
of studying the premises of the Bell inequality in realistic systems.
The aim of the article is to argue that the interpretations of quantum
mechanics and of probability are much closer than usually thought. Indeed, a
detailed analysis of the concept of probability (within the standard frequency
theory of R. von Mises) reveals that the latter concept always refers to an
observing system. The enigmatic role of the observer in the Copenhagen
interpretation therefore derives from a precise understanding of probability.
Besides explaining several elements of the Copenhagen interpretation, our model
also allows to reinterpret recent results from 'relational quantum mechanics',
and to question the premises of the 'subjective approach to quantum
In the following we revisit the frequency interpretation of probability of
Richard von Mises, in order to bring the essential implicit notions in focus.
Following von Mises, we argue that probability can only be defined for events
that can be repeated in similar conditions, and that exhibit 'frequency
stabilization'. The central idea of the present article is that the mentioned
'conditions' should be well-defined and 'partitioned'. More precisely, we will
divide probabilistic systems into object, environment, and probing subsystem,
and show that such partitioning allows to solve a wide variety of classic
paradoxes of probability theory. As a corollary, we arrive at the surprising
conclusion that at least one central idea of the orthodox interpretation of
quantum mechanics is a direct consequence of the meaning of probability. More
precisely, the idea that the "observer influences the quantum system" is
obvious if one realizes that quantum systems are probabilistic systems; it
holds for all probabilistic systems, whether quantum or classical.
For all Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-type experiments on deterministic systems the
Bell inequality holds, unless non-local interactions exist between certain
parts of the setup. Here we show that in nonlinear systems the Bell inequality
can be violated by non-local effects that are arbitrarily weak. Then we show
that the quantum result of the existing Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-type
experiments can be reproduced within deterministic models that include
arbitrarily weak non-local effects.