
Inference over tails is performed by applying only the results of extreme
value theory. Whilst such theory is well defined and flexible enough in the
univariate case, multivariate inferential methods often require the imposition
of arbitrary constraints not fully justifed by the underlying theory. In
contrast, our approach uses only the constraints imposed by theory. We build on
previous, theoretically justified work for marginal exceedances over a high,
unknown threshold, by combining it with flexible, semiparametric copulae
specifications to investigate extreme dependence. Whilst giving probabilistic
judgements about the extreme regime of all marginal variables, our approach
formally uses the full dataset and allows for a variety of patterns of
dependence, be them extremal or not. A new probabilistic criterion quantifying
the possibility that the data exhibits asymptotic independence is introduced
and its robustness empirically studied. Estimation of functions of interest in
extreme value analyses is performed via MCMC algorithms. Attention is also
devoted to the prediction of new extreme observations. Our approach is
evaluated through a series of simulations, applied to real data sets and
assessed against competing approaches. Evidence demonstrates that the bulk of
the data does not bias and improves the inferential process for the extremal
dependence.

Current decision support systems address domains that are heterogeneous in
nature and becoming progressively larger. Such systems often require the input
of expert judgement about a variety of different fields and an intensive
computational power to produce the scores necessary to rank the available
policies. Recently, integrating decision support systems have been introduced
to enable a formal Bayesian multiagent decision analysis to be distributed and
consequently efficient. In such systems, where different panels of experts
oversee disjoint but correlated vectors of variables, each expert group needs
to deliver only certain summaries of the variables under their jurisdiction to
properly derive an overall score for the available policies. Here we present an
algebraic approach that makes this methodology feasible for a wide range of
modelling contexts and that enables us to identify the summaries needed for
such a combination of judgements. We are also able to demonstrate that
coherence, in a sense we formalize here, is still guaranteed when panels only
share a partial specification of their model with other panel members. We
illustrate this algebraic approach by applying it to a specific class of
Bayesian networks and demonstrate how we can use it to derive closed form
formulae for the computations of the joint moments of variables that determine
the score of different policies.

Influence diagrams provide a compact graphical representation of decision
problems. Several algorithms for the quick computation of their associated
expected utilities are available in the literature. However, often they rely on
a full quantification of both probabilistic uncertainties and utility values.
For problems where all random variables and decision spaces are finite and
discrete, here we develop a symbolic way to calculate the expected utilities of
influence diagrams that does not require a full numerical representation.
Within this approach expected utilities correspond to families of polynomials.
After characterizing their polynomial structure, we develop an efficient
symbolic algorithm for the propagation of expected utilities through the
diagram and provide an implementation of this algorithm using a computer
algebra system. We then characterize many of the standard manipulations of
influence diagrams as transformations of polynomials. We also generalize the
decision analytic framework of these diagrams by defining asymmetries as
operations over the expected utility polynomials.

A variety of statistical graphical models have been defined to represent the
conditional independences underlying a random vector of interest. Similarly,
many different graphs embedding various types of preferential independences, as
for example conditional utility independence and generalized additive
independence, have more recently started to appear. In this paper we define a
new graphical model, called a directed expected utility network, whose edges
depict both probabilistic and utility conditional independences. These embed a
very flexible class of utility models, much larger than those usually conceived
in standard influence diagrams. Our graphical representation, and various
transformations of the original graph into a tree structure, are then used to
guide fast routines for the computation of a decision problem's expected
utilities. We show that our routines generalize those usually utilized in
standard influence diagrams' evaluations under much more restrictive
conditions. We then proceed with the construction of a directed expected
utility network to support decision makers in the domain of household food
security.

Sensitivity methods for the analysis of the outputs of discrete Bayesian
networks have been extensively studied and implemented in different software
packages. These methods usually focus on the study of sensitivity functions and
on the impact of a parameter change to the ChanDarwiche distance. Although not
fully recognized, the majority of these results heavily rely on the multilinear
structure of atomic probabilities in terms of the conditional probability
parameters associated with this type of network. By defining a statistical
model through the polynomial expression of its associated defining conditional
probabilities, we develop a unifying approach to sensitivity methods applicable
to a large suite of models including extensions of Bayesian networks, for
instance contextspecific and dynamic ones, and chain event graphs. By then
focusing on models whose defining polynomial is multilinear, our algebraic
approach enables us to prove that the ChanDarwiche distance is minimized for a
certain class of multiparameter contemporaneous variations when parameters are
proportionally covaried.

A subjective expected utility policy making centre, managing complex, dynamic
systems, needs to draw on the expertise of a variety of disparate panels of
experts and integrate this information coherently. To achieve this, diverse
supporting probabilistic models need to be networked together, the output of
one model providing the input to the next. In this paper we provide a
technology for designing an integrating decision support system and to enable
the centre to explore and compare the efficiency of different candidate
policies. We develop a formal statistical methodology to underpin this tool. In
particular, we derive sufficient conditions that ensure inference remains
coherent before and after relevant evidence is accommodated into the system.
The methodology is illustrated throughout using examples drawn from two
decision support systems: one designed for nuclear emergency crisis management
and the other to support policy makers in addressing the complex challenges of
food poverty in the UK.