
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three twopoint
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxyshear crosscorrelation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three twopoint
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{0.022}$, and
$w=0.80^{+0.20}_{0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 bestfit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...

We present two galaxy shape catalogues from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1
data set, covering 1500 square degrees with a median redshift of $0.59$. The
catalogues cover two main fields: Stripe 82, and an area overlapping the South
Pole Telescope survey region. We describe our data analysis process and in
particular our shape measurement using two independent shear measurement
pipelines, METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE. The METACALIBRATION catalogue uses a
Gaussian model with an innovative internal calibration scheme, and was applied
to $riz$bands, yielding 34.8M objects. The IM3SHAPE catalogue uses a
maximumlikelihood bulge/disc model calibrated using simulations, and was
applied to $r$band data, yielding 21.9M objects. Both catalogues pass a suite
of null tests that demonstrate their fitness for use in weak lensing science.
We estimate the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties in multiplicative shear calibration to
be $0.013$ and $0.025$ for the METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE catalogues,
respectively.

We present galaxygalaxy lensing measurements from 1321 sq. deg. of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 (Y1) data. The lens sample consists of a selection
of 660,000 red galaxies with highprecision photometric redshifts, known as
redMaGiC, split into five tomographic bins in the redshift range $0.15 < z <
0.9$. We use two different source samples, obtained from the Metacalibration
(26 million galaxies) and Im3shape (18 million galaxies) shear estimation
codes, which are split into four photometric redshift bins in the range $0.2 <
z < 1.3$. We perform extensive testing of potential systematic effects that can
bias the galaxygalaxy lensing signal, including those from shear estimation,
photometric redshifts, and observational properties. Covariances are obtained
from jackknife subsamples of the data and validated with a suite of lognormal
simulations. We use the shearratio geometric test to obtain independent
constraints on the mean of the source redshift distributions, providing
validation of those obtained from other photo$z$ studies with the same data.
We find consistency between the galaxy bias estimates obtained from our
galaxygalaxy lensing measurements and from galaxy clustering, therefore
showing the galaxymatter crosscorrelation coefficient $r$ to be consistent
with one, measured over the scales used for the cosmological analysis. The
results in this work present one of the three twopoint correlation functions,
along with galaxy clustering and cosmic shear, used in the DES cosmological
analysis of Y1 data, and hence the methodology and the systematics tests
presented here provide a critical input for that study as well as for future
cosmological analyses in DES and other photometric galaxy surveys.

We measure the clustering of DES Year 1 galaxies that are intended to be
combined with weak lensing samples in order to produce precise cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of largescale structure and lensing
correlations. Twopoint correlation functions are measured for a sample of $6.6
\times 10^{5}$ luminous red galaxies selected using the \textsc{redMaGiC}
algorithm over an area of $1321$ square degrees, in the redshift range $0.15 <
z < 0.9$, split into five tomographic redshift bins. The sample has a mean
redshift uncertainty of $\sigma_{z}/(1+z) = 0.017$. We quantify and correct
spurious correlations induced by spatially variable survey properties, testing
their impact on the clustering measurements and covariance. We demonstrate the
sample's robustness by testing for stellar contamination, for potential biases
that could arise from the systematic correction, and for the consistency
between the twopoint auto and crosscorrelation functions. We show that the
corrections we apply have a significant impact on the resultant measurement of
cosmological parameters, but that the results are robust against arbitrary
choices in the correction method. We find the linear galaxy bias in each
redshift bin in a fiducial cosmology to be $b(z$=$0.24)=1.40 \pm 0.08$,
$b(z$=$0.38)=1.61 \pm 0.05$, $b(z$=$0.53)=1.60 \pm 0.04$ for galaxies with
luminosities $L/L_*>$$0.5$, $b(z$=$0.68)=1.93 \pm 0.05$ for $L/L_*>$$1$ and
$b(z$=$0.83)=1.99 \pm 0.07$ for $L/L_*$$>1.5$, broadly consistent with
expectations for the redshift and luminosity dependence of the bias of red
galaxies. We show these measurements to be consistent with the linear bias
obtained from tangential shear measurements.

Splashback refers to the process of matter that is accreting onto a dark
matter halo reaching its first orbital apocenter and turning around in its
orbit. The clustercentric radius at which this process occurs, r_sp, defines a
halo boundary that is connected to the dynamics of the cluster. A rapid decline
in the halo profile is expected near r_sp. We measure the galaxy number density
and weak lensing mass profiles around redMaPPer galaxy clusters in the first
year Dark Energy Survey (DES) data. For a cluster sample with mean M_200m mass
~2.5 x 10^14 M_sun, we find strong evidence of a splashbacklike steepening of
the galaxy density profile and measure r_sp=1.13 +/ 0.07 Mpc/h, consistent
with earlier SDSS measurements of More et al. (2016) and Baxter et al. (2017).
Moreover, our weak lensing measurement demonstrates for the first time the
existence of a splashbacklike steepening of the matter profile of galaxy
clusters. We measure r_sp=1.34 +/ 0.21 Mpc/h from the weak lensing data, in
good agreement with our galaxy density measurements. For different cluster and
galaxy samples, we find that consistent with LCDM simulations, r_sp scales with
R_200m and does not evolve with redshift over the redshift range of 0.30.6.
We also find that potential systematic effects associated with the redMaPPer
algorithm may impact the location of r_sp. We discuss progress needed to
understand the systematic uncertainties and fully exploit forthcoming data from
DES and future surveys, emphasizing the importance of more realistic mock
catalogs and independent cluster samples.

We derive cosmological constraints from the probability distribution function
(PDF) of evolved largescale matter density fluctuations. We do this by
splitting lines of sight by density based on their count of tracer galaxies,
and by measuring both gravitational shear around and countsincells in
overdense and underdense lines of sight, in Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Year
and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Our analysis uses a perturbation
theory model (see companion paper Friedrich at al.) and is validated using
Nbody simulation realizations and lognormal mocks. It allows us to constrain
cosmology, bias and stochasticity of galaxies w.r.t. matter density and, in
addition, the skewness of the matter density field.
From a Bayesian model comparison, we find that the data weakly prefer a
connection of galaxies and matter that is stochastic beyond Poisson
fluctuations on <=20 arcmin angular smoothing scale. The two stochasticity
models we fit yield DES constraints on the matter density
$\Omega_m=0.26^{+0.04}_{0.03}$ and $\Omega_m=0.28^{+0.05}_{0.04}$ that are
consistent with each other. These values also agree with the DES analysis of
galaxy and shear twopoint functions (3x2pt) that only uses second moments of
the PDF. Constraints on $\sigma_8$ are model dependent
($\sigma_8=0.97^{+0.07}_{0.06}$ and $0.80^{+0.06}_{0.07}$ for the two
stochasticity models), but consistent with each other and with the 3x2pt
results if stochasticity is at the low end of the posterior range.
As an additional test of gravity, counts and lensing in cells allow to
compare the skewness $S_3$ of the matter density PDF to its LCDM prediction. We
find no evidence of excess skewness in any model or data set, with better than
25 per cent relative precision in the skewness estimate from DES alone.

We describe the derivation and validation of redshift distribution estimates
and their uncertainties for the galaxies used as weak lensing sources in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 cosmological analyses. The Bayesian Photometric
Redshift (BPZ) code is used to assign galaxies to four redshift bins between
z=0.2 and 1.3, and to produce initial estimates of the lensingweighted
redshift distributions $n^i_{PZ}(z)$ for bin i. Accurate determination of
cosmological parameters depends critically on knowledge of $n^i$ but is
insensitive to bin assignments or redshift errors for individual galaxies. The
cosmological analyses allow for shifts $n^i(z)=n^i_{PZ}(z\Delta z^i)$ to
correct the mean redshift of $n^i(z)$ for biases in $n^i_{\rm PZ}$. The $\Delta
z^i$ are constrained by comparison of independently estimated 30band
photometric redshifts of galaxies in the COSMOS field to BPZ estimates made
from the DES griz fluxes, for a sample matched in fluxes, preseeing size, and
lensing weight to the DES weaklensing sources. In companion papers, the
$\Delta z^i$ are further constrained by the angular clustering of the source
galaxies around red galaxies with secure photometric redshifts at 0.15<z<0.9.
This paper details the BPZ and COSMOS procedures, and demonstrates that the
cosmological inference is insensitive to details of the $n^i(z)$ beyond the
choice of $\Delta z^i$. The clustering and COSMOS validation methods produce
consistent estimates of $\Delta z^i$, with combined uncertainties of
$\sigma_{\Delta z^i}=$0.015, 0.013, 0.011, and 0.022 in the four bins. We
marginalize over these in all analyses to follow, which does not diminish the
constraining power significantly. Repeating the photoz procedure using the
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF) algorithm instead of BPZ, or using the
$n^i(z)$ directly estimated from COSMOS, yields no discernible difference in
cosmological inferences.

We describe the creation, content, and validation of the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) internal yearone cosmology data set, Y1A1 GOLD, in support of upcoming
cosmological analyses. The Y1A1 GOLD data set is assembled from multiple epochs
of DES imaging and consists of calibrated photometric zeropoints, object
catalogs, and ancillary data products  e.g., maps of survey depth and
observing conditions, stargalaxy classification, and photometric redshift
estimates  that are necessary for accurate cosmological analyses. The Y1A1
GOLD widearea object catalog consists of ~137 million objects detected in
coadded images covering ~1800 deg$^2$ in the DES grizY filters. The 10{\sigma}
limiting magnitude for galaxies is g = 23.4, r = 23.2, i = 22.5, z = 21.8, and
Y = 20.1. Photometric calibration of Y1A1 GOLD was performed by combining
nightly zeropoint solutions with stellarlocus regression, and the absolute
calibration accuracy is better than 2% over the survey area. DES Y1A1 GOLD is
the largest photometric data set at the achieved depth to date, enabling
precise measurements of cosmic acceleration at z $\lesssim$ 1.

We constrain the massrichness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational
lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $\lambda$ and
redshift $z$ for $\lambda\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the
mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling
the scaling relation as $\langle M_{\rm 200m}\lambda,z\rangle = M_0
(\lambda/40)^F ((1+z)/1.35)^G$, we constrain the normalization of the scaling
relation at the 5.0 per cent level as $M_0 = [3.081 \pm 0.075 ({\rm stat}) \pm
0.133 ({\rm sys})] \cdot 10^{14}\ {\rm M}_\odot$ at $\lambda=40$ and $z=0.35$.
The richness scaling index is constrained to be $F=1.356 \pm 0.051\ ({\rm
stat})\pm 0.008\ ({\rm sys})$ and the redshift scaling index $G=0.30\pm 0.30\
({\rm stat})\pm 0.06\ ({\rm sys})$. These are the tightest measurements of the
normalization and richness scaling index made to date. We use a semianalytic
covariance matrix to characterize the statistical errors in the recovered weak
lensing profiles. Our analysis accounts for the following sources of systematic
error: shear and photometric redshift errors, cluster miscentering, cluster
member dilution of the source sample, systematic uncertainties in the modeling
of the halomass correlation function, halo triaxiality, and projection
effects. We discuss prospects for reducing this systematic error budget, which
dominates the uncertainty on $M_0$. Our result is in excellent agreement with,
but has significantly smaller uncertainties than, previous measurements in the
literature, and augurs well for the power of the DES cluster survey as a tool
for precision cosmology and upcoming galaxy surveys such as LSST, Euclid and
WFIRST.

We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape
catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant
measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain
cosmological parameters in both the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM models, while
also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust
using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration
methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a
3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} =
0.782^{+0.027}_{0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over
the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In
$w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}
= 0.777^{+0.036}_{0.038}$ and a dark energy equationofstate
$w=0.95^{+0.33}_{0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous
cosmic shear constraints in $\sigma_8$  $\Omega_m$, and see no evidence for
disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find
no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne 1$. We expect further
significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more
than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective
integrated exposure time per galaxy.

We present density split statistics, a framework that studies lensing and
countsincells as a function of foreground galaxy density, thereby providing a
largescale measurement of both 2point and 3point statistics. Our method
extends our earlier work on trough lensing and is summarized as follows: given
a foreground (low redshift) population of galaxies, we divide the sky into
subareas of equal size but distinct galaxy density. We then measure lensing
around uniformly spaced points separately in each of these subareas, as well as
countsincells statistics (CiC). The lensing signals trace the matter density
contrast around regions of fixed galaxy density. Through the CiC measurements
this can be related to the density profile around regions of fixed matter
density. Together, these measurements constitute a powerful probe of cosmology,
the skewness of the density field and the connection of galaxies and matter.
In this paper we show how to model both the density split lensing signal and
CiC from basic ingredients: a nonlinear power spectrum, clustering hierarchy
coefficients from perturbation theory and a parametric model for galaxy bias
and shotnoise. Using Nbody simulations, we demonstrate that this model is
sufficiently accurate for a cosmological analysis on year 1 data from the Dark
Energy Survey.

We have selected a sample of eleven massive clusters of galaxies observed by
the Hubble Space Telescope in order to study the impact of the dynamical state
on the IntraCluster Light (ICL) fraction, the ratio of total integrated ICL to
the total galaxy member light. With the exception of the Bullet cluster, the
sample is drawn from the Cluster Lensing and Supernova Survey and the Frontier
Fields program, containing five relaxed and six merging clusters. The ICL
fraction is calculated in three optical filters using the CHEFs IntraCluster
Light Estimator, a robust and accurate algorithm free of a priori assumptions.
We find that the ICL fraction in the three bands is, on average, higher for the
merging clusters, ranging between $\sim723\%$, compared with the $\sim 211\%$
found for the relaxed systems. We observe a nearly constant value (within the
error bars) in the ICL fraction of the regular clusters at the three
wavelengths considered, which would indicate that the colors of the ICL and the
cluster galaxies are, on average, coincident and, thus, their stellar
populations. However, we find a higher ICL fraction in the F606W filter for the
merging clusters, consistent with an excess of lowermetallicity/younger stars
in the ICL, which could have migrated violently from the outskirts of the
infalling galaxies during the merger event.

Clusters of galaxies gravitationally lens the cosmic microwave background
(CMB) radiation, resulting in a distinct imprint in the CMB on arcminute
scales. Measurement of this effect offers a promising way to constrain the
masses of galaxy clusters, particularly those at high redshift. We use CMB maps
from the South Pole Telescope SunyaevZel'dovich (SZ) survey to measure the CMB
lensing signal around galaxy clusters identified in optical imaging from first
year observations of the Dark Energy Survey. The cluster catalog used in this
analysis contains 3697 members with mean redshift of $\bar{z} = 0.45$. We
detect lensing of the CMB by the galaxy clusters at $8.1\sigma$ significance.
Using the measured lensing signal, we constrain the amplitude of the relation
between cluster mass and optical richness to roughly $17\%$ precision, finding
good agreement with recent constraints obtained with galaxy lensing. The error
budget is dominated by statistical noise but includes significant contributions
from systematic biases due to the thermal SZ effect and cluster miscentering.

Optical imaging surveys measure both the galaxy density and the gravitational
lensinginduced shear fields across the sky. Recently, the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) collaboration used a joint fit to twopoint correlations between these
observables to place tight constraints on cosmology (DES Collaboration et al.
2017). In this work, we develop the methodology to extend the DES Collaboration
et al. (2017) analysis to include crosscorrelations of the optical survey
observables with gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB)
as measured by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. Using simulated
analyses, we show how the resulting set of five twopoint functions increases
the robustness of the cosmological constraints to systematic errors in galaxy
lensing shear calibration. Additionally, we show that contamination of the
SPT+Planck CMB lensing map by the thermal SunyaevZel'dovich effect is a
potentially large source of systematic error for twopoint function analyses,
but show that it can be reduced to acceptable levels in our analysis by masking
clusters of galaxies and imposing angular scale cuts on the twopoint
functions. The methodology developed here will be applied to the analysis of
data from the DES, the SPT, and Planck in a companion work.

We present weak lensing (WL) mass constraints for a sample of massive galaxy
clusters detected by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) via the SunyaevZeldovich
effect (SZE). We use $griz$ imaging data obtained from the Science Verification
(SV) phase of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) to fit the WL shear signal of 33
clusters in the redshift range $0.25 \le z \le 0.8$ with NFW profiles and to
constrain a fourparameter SPT massobservable relation. To account for biases
in WL masses, we introduce a WL mass to true mass scaling relation described by
a mean bias and an intrinsic, lognormal scatter. We allow for correlated
scatter within the WL and SZE massobservable relations and use simulations to
calibrate priors on nuisance parameters related to bias and scatter from WL. We
constrain the normalization of the $\zetaM_{500}$ relation,
$A_\mathrm{SZ}=12.0_{6.7}^{+2.6}$ when using a prior on the mass slope
$B_\mathrm{SZ}$ from the latest SPT cluster cosmology analysis. Without this
prior, we recover $A_\mathrm{SZ}=10.8_{5.2}^{+2.3}$ and
$B_\mathrm{SZ}=1.30_{0.44}^{+0.22}$. Results in both cases imply lower cluster
masses than measured in previous work with and without WL, although the
uncertainties are large. The WL derived value of $B_\mathrm{SZ}$ is $\approx
20\%$ lower than the value preferred by the most recent SPT cluster cosmology
analysis. The method demonstrated in this work is designed to constrain cluster
masses and cosmological parameters simultaneously and will be used for
subsequent studies that employ the full SPT cluster sample together with the
DES data.

In this paper the effect of weak lensing magnification on galaxy number
counts is studied by crosscorrelating the positions of two galaxy samples,
separated by redshift, using data from the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification dataset. The analysis is carried out for two
photometricallyselected galaxy samples, with mean photometric redshifts in the
$0.2 < z < 0.4$ and $0.7 < z < 1.0$ ranges, in the riz bands. A signal is
detected with a $3.5\sigma$ significance level in each of the bands tested, and
is compatible with the magnification predicted by the $\Lambda$CDM model. After
an extensive analysis, it cannot be attributed to any known systematic effect.
The detection of the magnification signal is robust to estimated uncertainties
in the outlier rate of the pho tometric redshifts, but this will be an
important issue for use of photometric redshifts in magnification mesurements
from larger samples. In addition to the detection of the magnification signal,
a method to select the sample with the maximum signaltonoise is proposed and
validated with data.

Mapping the underlying density field, including nonvisible dark matter,
using weak gravitational lensing measurements is now a standard tool in
cosmology. Due to its importance to the science results of current and upcoming
surveys, the quality of the convergence reconstruction methods should be well
understood. We compare three different mass map reconstruction methods:
KaiserSquires (KS), Wiener filter, and GLIMPSE. KS is a direct inversion
method, taking no account of survey masks or noise. The Wiener filter is well
motivated for Gaussian density fields in a Bayesian framework. The GLIMPSE
method uses sparsity, with the aim of reconstructing nonlinearities in the
density field. We compare these methods with a series of tests on the public
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data and on realistic DES
simulations. The Wiener filter and GLIMPSE methods offer substantial
improvement on the standard smoothed KS with a range of metrics. For both the
Wiener filter and GLIMPSE convergence reconstructions we present a 12%
improvement in Pearson correlation with the underlying truth from simulations.
To compare the mapping methods' abilities to find mass peaks, we measure the
difference between peak counts from simulated {\Lambda}CDM shear catalogues and
catalogues with no mass fluctuations. This is a standard data vector when
inferring cosmology from peak statistics. The maximum signaltonoise value of
these peak statistic data vectors was increased by a factor of 3.5 for the
Wiener filter and by a factor of 9 using GLIMPSE. With simulations we measure
the reconstruction of the harmonic phases, showing that the concentration of
the phase residuals is improved 17% by GLIMPSE and 18% by the Wiener filter. We
show that the correlation between the reconstructions from data and the
foreground redMaPPer clusters is increased 18% by the Wiener filter and 32% by
GLIMPSE. [Abridged]

We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/nearinfrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
InterAmerican Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES widearea
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered pointspread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.

We construct the largest curvedsky galaxy weak lensing mass map to date from
the DES firstyear (DES Y1) data. The map, about 10 times larger than previous
work, is constructed over a contiguous $\approx1,500 $deg$^2$, covering a
comoving volume of $\approx10 $Gpc$^3$. The effects of masking, sampling, and
noise are tested using simulations. We generate weak lensing maps from two DES
Y1 shear catalogs, Metacalibration and Im3shape, with sources at redshift
$0.2<z<1.3,$ and in each of four bins in this range. In the highest
signaltonoise map, the ratio between the mean signaltonoise in the Emode
and the Bmode map is $\sim$1.5 ($\sim$2) when smoothed with a Gaussian filter
of $\sigma_{G}=30$ (80) arcminutes. The second and third moments of the
convergence $\kappa$ in the maps are in agreement with simulations. We also
find no significant correlation of $\kappa$ with maps of potential systematic
contaminants. Finally, we demonstrate two applications of the mass maps: (1)
crosscorrelation with different foreground tracers of mass and (2) exploration
of the largest peaks and voids in the maps.

Using $\sim 100$ Xray selected clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification data, we constrain the luminosity function (LF) of cluster red
sequence galaxies as a function of redshift. This is the first homogeneous
optical/Xray sample large enough to constrain the evolution of the luminosity
function simultaneously in redshift ($0.1<z<1.05$) and cluster mass ($13.5 \le
\rm{log_{10}}(M_{200crit}) \sim< 15.0$). We pay particular attention to
completeness issues and the detection limit of the galaxy sample. We then apply
a hierarchical Bayesian model to fit the cluster galaxy LFs via a Schecter
function, including its characteristic break ($m^*$) to a faint end powerlaw
slope ($\alpha$). Our method enables us to avoid known issues in similar
analyses based on stacking or binning the clusters. We find weak and
statistically insignificant ($\sim 1.9 \sigma$) evolution in the faint end
slope $\alpha$ versus redshift. We also find no dependence in $\alpha$ or $m^*$
with the Xray inferred cluster masses. However, the amplitude of the LF as a
function of cluster mass is constrained to $\sim 20\%$ precision. As a
byproduct of our algorithm, we utilize the correlation between the LF and
cluster mass to provide an improved estimate of the individual cluster masses
as well as the scatter in true mass given the Xray inferred masses. This
technique can be applied to a larger sample of Xray or optically selected
clusters from the Dark Energy Survey, significantly improving the sensitivity
of the analysis.

We present a measurement of galaxygalaxy lensing around a magnitudelimited
($i_{AB} < 22.5$) sample of galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification (DESSV) data. We split these lenses into three
photometricredshift bins from 0.2 to 0.8, and determine the product of the
galaxy bias $b$ and crosscorrelation coefficient between the galaxy and dark
matter overdensity fields $r$ in each bin, using scales above 4 Mpc/$h$
comoving, where we find the linear bias model to be valid given our current
uncertainties. We compare our galaxy bias results from galaxygalaxy lensing
with those obtained from galaxy clustering (Crocce et al. 2016) and CMB lensing
(Giannantonio et al. 2016) for the same sample of galaxies, and find our
measurements to be in good agreement with those in Crocce et al. (2016), while,
in the lowest redshift bin ($z\sim0.3$), they show some tension with the
findings in Giannantonio et al. (2016). We measure $b\cdot r$ to be $0.87\pm
0.11$, $1.12 \pm 0.16$ and $1.24\pm 0.23$, respectively for the three redshift
bins of width $\Delta z = 0.2$ in the range $0.2<z <0.8$, defined with the
photometricredshift algorithm BPZ. Using a different code to split the lens
sample, TPZ, leads to changes in the measured biases at the 1020\% level, but
it does not alter the main conclusion of this work: when comparing with Crocce
et al. (2016) we do not find strong evidence for a crosscorrelation parameter
significantly below one in this galaxy sample, except possibly at the lowest
redshift bin ($z\sim 0.3$), where we find $r = 0.71 \pm 0.11$ when using TPZ,
and $0.83 \pm 0.12$ with BPZ.

We use numerical simulations to characterize the performance of a
clusteringbased method to calibrate photometric redshift biases. In
particular, we crosscorrelate the weak lensing (WL) source galaxies from the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) sample with redMaGiC galaxies (luminous red
galaxies with secure photometric redshifts) to estimate the redshift
distribution of the former sample. The recovered redshift distributions are
used to calibrate the photometric redshift bias of standard photo$z$ methods
applied to the same source galaxy sample. We apply the method to three
photo$z$ codes run in our simulated data: Bayesian Photometric Redshift (BPZ),
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF), and Random Forestbased photo$z$ (RF).
We characterize the systematic uncertainties of our calibration procedure, and
find that these systematic uncertainties dominate our error budget. The
dominant systematics are due to our assumption of unevolving bias and
clustering across each redshift bin, and to differences between the shapes of
the redshift distributions derived by clustering vs photo$z$'s. The systematic
uncertainty in the mean redshift bias of the source galaxy sample is $\Delta z
\lesssim 0.02$, though the precise value depends on the redshift bin under
consideration. We discuss possible ways to mitigate the impact of our dominant
systematics in future analyses.

We use a suite of simulated images based on Year 1 of the Dark Energy Survey
to explore the impact of galaxy neighbours on shape measurement and shear
cosmology. The hoopoe image simulations include realistic blending, galaxy
positions, and spatial variations in depth and PSF properties. Using the
im3shape maximumlikelihood shape measurement code, we identify four mechanisms
by which neighbours can have a nonnegligible influence on shear estimation.
These effects, if ignored, would contribute a net multiplicative bias of $m
\sim 0.03  0.09$ in the DES Y1 im3shape catalogue, though the precise impact
will be dependent on both the measurement code and the selection cuts applied.
This can be reduced to percentage level or less by removing objects with close
neighbours, at a cost to the effective number density of galaxies
$n_\mathrm{eff}$ of 30%. We use the cosmological inference pipeline of DES Y1
to explore the cosmological implications of neighbour bias and show that
omitting blending from the calibration simulation for DES Y1 would bias the
inferred clustering amplitude $S_8\equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega _\mathrm{m}
/0.3)^{0.5}$ by $2 \sigma$ towards low values. Finally, we use the hoopoe
simulations to test the effect of neighbourinduced spatial correlations in the
multiplicative bias. We find the impact on the recovered $S_8$ of ignoring such
correlations to be subdominant to statistical error at the current level of
precision.

Galaxy crosscorrelations with highfidelity redshift samples hold the
potential to precisely calibrate systematic photometric redshift uncertainties
arising from the unavailability of complete and representative training and
validation samples of galaxies. However, application of this technique in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) is hampered by the relatively low number density,
small area, and modest redshift overlap between photometric and spectroscopic
samples. We propose instead using photometric catalogs with reliable
photometric redshifts for photoz calibration via crosscorrelations. We verify
the viability of our proposal using redMaPPer clusters from the Sloan Digital
Sky Survey (SDSS) to successfully recover the redshift distribution of SDSS
spectroscopic galaxies. We demonstrate how to combine photoz with
crosscorrelation data to calibrate photometric redshift biases while
marginalizing over possible clustering bias evolution in either the calibration
or unknown photometric samples. We apply our method to DES Science Verification
(DES SV) data in order to constrain the photometric redshift distribution of a
galaxy sample selected for weak lensing studies, constraining the mean of the
tomographic redshift distributions to a statistical uncertainty of $\Delta z
\sim \pm 0.01$. We forecast that our proposal can in principle control
photometric redshift uncertainties in DES weak lensing experiments at a level
near the intrinsic statistical noise of the experiment over the range of
redshifts where redMaPPer clusters are available. Our results provide strong
motivation to launch a program to fully characterize the systematic errors from
bias evolution and photoz shapes in our calibration procedure.

We present accurate photometric redshifts for galaxies observed by the
Cluster Lensing and Supernova survey with Hubble (CLASH). CLASH observed 25
massive galaxy cluster cores with the Hubble Space Telescope in 16 filters
spanning 0.2  1.7 $\mu$m. Photometry in such crowded fields is challenging.
Compared to our previously released catalogs, we make several improvements to
the photometry, including smaller apertures, ICL subtraction, PSF matching, and
empirically measured uncertainties. We further improve the Bayesian Photometric
Redshift (BPZ) estimates by adding a redder elliptical template and by
inflating the photometric uncertainties of the brightest galaxies. The
resulting photometric redshift accuracies are dz/(1+z) $\sim$ 0.8\%, 1.0\%, and
2.0\% for galaxies with Iband F814W AB magnitudes $<$ 18, 20, and 23,
respectively. These results are consistent with our expectations. They improve
on our previously reported accuracies by a factor of 4 at the bright end and a
factor of 2 at the faint end. Our new catalog includes 1257 spectroscopic
redshifts, including 382 confirmed cluster members. We also provide stellar
mass estimates. Finally, we include lensing magnification estimates of
background galaxies based on our public lens models. Our new catalog of all 25
CLASH clusters is available via MAST. The analysis techniques developed here
will be useful in other surveys of crowded fields, including the Frontier
Fields and surveys carried out with JPAS and JWST.