
This work is on the Physics of the B Factories. Part A of this book contains
a brief description of the SLAC and KEK B Factories as well as their detectors,
BaBar and Belle, and data taking related issues. Part B discusses tools and
methods used by the experiments in order to obtain results. The results
themselves can be found in Part C.
Please note that version 3 on the archive is the auxiliary version of the
Physics of the B Factories book. This uses the notation alpha, beta, gamma for
the angles of the Unitarity Triangle. The nominal version uses the notation
phi_1, phi_2 and phi_3. Please cite this work as Eur. Phys. J. C74 (2014) 3026.

The discovery by the ATLAS and CMS experiments of a new boson with mass
around 125 GeV and with measured properties compatible with those of a
StandardModel Higgs boson, coupled with the absence of discoveries of
phenomena beyond the Standard Model at the TeV scale, has triggered interest in
ideas for future Higgs factories. A new circular e+e collider hosted in a 80
to 100 km tunnel, TLEP, is among the most attractive solutions proposed so far.
It has a clean experimental environment, produces high luminosity for
topquark, Higgs boson, W and Z studies, accommodates multiple detectors, and
can reach energies up to the ttbar threshold and beyond. It will enable
measurements of the Higgs boson properties and of Electroweak SymmetryBreaking
(EWSB) parameters with unequalled precision, offering exploration of physics
beyond the Standard Model in the multiTeV range. Moreover, being the natural
precursor of the VHELHC, a 100 TeV hadron machine in the same tunnel, it
builds up a longterm vision for particle physics. Altogether, the combination
of TLEP and the VHELHC offers, for a great cost effectiveness, the best
precision and the best search reach of all options presently on the market.
This paper presents a first appraisal of the salient features of the TLEP
physics potential, to serve as a baseline for a more extensive design study.

The paper arXiv:1308.0735 questions some of the technical assumptions made by
the TLEP Steering Group when estimating in arXiv:1305.6498 the power
requirement for the very high energy e+e storage ring collider TLEP. We show
that our assumptions are based solidly on CERN experience with LEP and the LHC,
as well accelerators elsewhere, and confirm our earlier baseline estimate of
the TLEP power consumption.

The discovery of H(126) has renewed interest in circular e+e colliders that
can operate as Higgs factories, which benefit from three unique
characteristics: i) high luminosity and reliability, ii) the availability of
several interaction points, iii) superior beam energy accuracy. TLEP is an e+e
storage ring of 80km circumference that can operate with very high luminosity
from the Z peak (90 GeV) to the top quark pair threshold (350 GeV). It can
achieve transverse beam polarization at the Z peak and WW threshold, giving it
unparalleled accuracy on the beam energy. A preliminary study indicates that an
80 km tunnel could be constructed around CERN. Such a tunnel would allow a 100
TeV protonproton collider to be established in the same ring (VHELHC),
offering a long term vision.

The recent discovery of a light Higgs boson has opened up considerable
interest in circular e+e Higgs factories around the world. We report on the
progress of the TLEP concept since last year. TLEP is an e+e circular collider
capable of very high luminosities in a wide centreofmass (ECM) spectrum from
90 to 350 GeV. TLEP could be housed in a new 80 to 100 km tunnel in the Geneva
region. The design can be adapted to different ring circumference (e.g. LEP3 in
the 27 km LHC tunnel). TLEP is an ideal complementary machine to the LHC thanks
to high luminosity, exquisite determination of ECM and the possibility of four
interaction points, both for precision measurements of the Higgs boson
properties and for precision tests of the closure of the Standard Model from
the Z pole to the top threshold.

This document was prepared as part of the briefing material for the Workshop
of the CERN Council Strategy Group, held in DESY Zeuthen from 2nd to 6th May
2006. It gives an overview of the physics issues and of the technological
challenges that will shape the future of the field, and incorporates material
presented and discussed during the Symposium on the European Strategy for
Particle Physics, held in Orsay from 30th January to 2nd February 2006,
reflecting the various opinions of the European community as recorded in
written submissions to the Strategy Group and in the discussions at the
Symposium.

We present a method to measure the weak phase 2beta+gamma in the threebody
decay B0 > D+ Ks pi+. These decays are mediated by interfering amplitudes
which are colorallowed and hence relatively large. In addition, the threebody
decay helps to resolve discrete ambiguities present in measurements of the weak
phase. The experimental implications are discussed, and the sensitivity of the
method is evaluated using a simulation.

Trying a global fit of the experimental branching ratios and CPasymmetries
of the charmless $B\to PV$ decays according to QCD factorization, we find it
impossible to reach a satisfactory agreement, the confidence level (CL) of the
best fit is smaller than .1 %. This failure reflects the difficulty to
accommodate several large experimental branching ratios of the strange
channels. Furthermore, experiment was not able to exclude a large direct CP
asymmetry in $\bar {B}^0\to\rho^+ \pi^$, which is predicted very small by QCD
factorization. Proposing a fit with QCD factorization complemented by a
charmingpenguin inspired model we reach a best fit which is not excluded by
experiment (CL of about 8 %) but is not fully convincing.
These negative results must be tempered by the remark that some of the
experimental data used are recent and might still evolve significantly.

We try a global fit of the experimental branching ratios and CPasymmetries
of the charmless $B\to PV$ decays according to QCD factorisation. We find it
impossible to reach a satisfactory agreement, the confidence level (CL) of the
best fit is smaller than .1 %.
The main reason for this failure is the difficulty to accomodate several
large experimental branching ratios of the strange channels. Furthermore,
experiment was not able to exclude a large direct CP asymmetry in $\bar
{B^0}\to\rho^+ \pi^$, which is predicted very small by QCD factorisation.
Trying a fit with QCD factorisation complemented by a charmingpenguin inspired
model we reach a best fit which is not excluded by experiment (CL of about 8 %)
but is not fully convincing.
These negative results must be tempered by the remark that some of the
experimental data used are recent and might still evolve significantly.

We propose the determination of the CKM matrix element $V_{ub}$ by the
measurement of the spectrum of $B \to D_s^+ X_u$, dominated by the spectator
quark model mechanism $\bar{b} \to D_s^{(*)+} \bar{u}$. The interest of
considering $B \to D_s^+X_u$ versus the semileptonic decay is that more than 50
% of the spectrum for $B \to D_s^+ X_u$ occurs above the kinematical limit for
$B \to D_s^+ X_c$, while most of the spectrum $B \to l \nu X_u$ occurs below
the $B \to l \nu X_c$ one. Furthermore, the measure of the hadronic mass $M_X$
is easier in the presence of an identified $D_s$ than when a $\nu$ has been
produced. As a consistency check, we point out that the rate $\bar{b} \to
D_s^{(*)+} \bar{c}$ (including QCD corrections that we present elsewhere) is
consistent with the measured $BR (B \to D_s^{\pm} X)$. Although the hadronic
complications may be more severe in the mode that we propose than in the
semileptonic inclusive decay, the end of the spectrum in $B \to l \nu X_u$ is
not well understood on theoretical grounds. We argue that, in our case, the
excited $D_s^{**}$, decaying into $D K$, do not contribute and, if there is
tagging of the $B$ meson, the other mechanisms to produce a $D_s$ of the right
sign are presumably small, of $O(10^{2})$ relative to the spectator amplitude,
or can be controlled by kinematical cuts. In the absence of tagging, other
hadronic backgrounds deserve careful study. We present a feasability study with
the BaBar detector.

We compute the inclusive decay rates $b \to D_s^(D^{*}_s) c$ including
lowest order QCD corrections on the quark legs, and compare with existing data.
Unlike the short distance QCD corrections, that are of higher order, these
corrections are of order $\alpha_s$. In the onshell renormalization scheme and
for $\alpha_s(m_b) \cong 0.2$ we find a correction of 10% to the inclusive
rate computed using factorization. This gives a total rate $BR(b \to
D_s^(D^{*}_s)c) \cong 8%$ consistent within $1\sigma$ with the measured value
$BR(B \to D_s^{\pm}X) = (10.0 \pm 2.5)%$. The general formulae given here
include the case of vanishing mass for the final quark $b \to
D_s^(D_s^{*})u$. The radiative correction to this rate is 17%. We show in
another place that this process can be useful for the measurement of the CKM
matrix element $V_{ub}$. We also give the renormalized vertex at the
interesting values $q^2 = 0$ and $q^2 = q_{max}^2$, and compare with existing
literature.

A major problem in the determination of the the CP angle $\alpha$, that
should be measured through modes of the type $B_d, \bar{B}_d \to \pi \pi ,
\cdots ,$ is the uncertainty coming from Penguin diagrams. We consider the
different ground state modes $\pi \pi$, $\pi \rho$, $\rho \rho$, and, assuming
the FSI phases to be negligible, we investigate the amount of uncertainty
coming from Penguins that can be parametrized by a dilution factor $D$ and an
angle shift $\Delta \alpha$. The parameter $D$ is either 1 or very close to 1
in all these modes, and it can be measured independently, up to a sign
ambiguity, by the $t$ dependence. Assuming factorization, we show that $\Delta
\alpha$ is much smaller for the modes $\rho \pi$ and $\rho \rho$ than for $\pi
\pi$, and we plot their allowed region as a function of $\alpha$ itself.
Moreover, we show that most of the modes contribute to the asymmetry with the
same sign, and define for their sum an effective $D_{eff}$ and an effective
$\Delta \alpha_{eff}$, an average of $\Delta \alpha$ for the different modes.
It turns out that $D_{eff}$ is of the order of 0.9, $\Delta \alpha_{eff}$ is
between 5 $\%$ and 10 $\%$ and, relative to $\pi \pi$, the statistical gain for
the sum is of about a factor 10. Finally, we compute the ratios $K\pi /\pi \pi
, \cdots$ that test the strength of the Penguins and depend on the CP angles,
as emphasized by Silva and Wolfenstein and by Deandrea et al.

We point out that current estimates of form factors fail to explain the
nonleptonic decays $B \to \psi K(K^{\ast})$ and that the combination of data
on the semileptonic decays $D \to K(K^{\ast})\ell \nu$ and on the nonleptonic
decays $B \to \psi K(K^{\ast})$ (in particular recent po\la\ri\za\tion
data) severely constrain the form (normalization and $q^2$ dependence) of the
heavytolight meson form factors, if we assume the factorization hypothesis
for the latter. From a simultaneous fit to \bpsi and \dk data we find that
strict heavy quark limit scaling laws applied to the form factors do not hold
when going from $D$ to $B$ and must have large corrections that make softer the
dependence on the masses. This is in contrast with the matrix elements
themselves which are found to need smaller $1/m_Q$ corrections to the
asymptotic heavy quark scaling laws. We also find that $A_1(q^2)$ should
increase slower with \qq than $A_2, V, f_+$. We propose a simple
parametrization of these corrections based on a quark model or on an extension
of the \hhs laws to the \hl case, complemented with an approximately constant
$A_1(q^2)$. This model may be viewed as assuming a precocious validity of
strict heavy quark scaling laws for the current matrix elements. Although this
model reproduces qualitatively the wanted features for mass and $q^2$
dependence, and thus reduces the discrepancy with data, it is insufficient to
reach a full agreement with the experiment. In our opinion the puzzle is still
there.

We point out that current estimates of form factors fail to explain the
nonleptonic decays $B \to \psi K(K^{\ast})$ and that the combination of data
on the semileptonic decays $D \to K(K^{\ast})\ell \nu$ and on the nonleptonic
decays $B \to \psi K(K^{\ast})$ (in particular recent po\la\ri\za\tion
data) severely constrain the form (normalization and $q^2$ dependence) of the
heavytolight meson form factors, if we assume the factorization hypothesis
for the latter. From a simultaneous fit to \bpsi and \dk data we find that
strict heavy quark limit scaling laws do not hold when going from $D$ to $B$
and must have large corrections that make softer the dependence on the masses.
We find that $A_1(q^2)$ should increase slower with \qq than $A_2, V, f_+$.
We propose a simple parametrization of these corrections based on a quark
model or on an extension of the \hhs laws to the \hl case, complemented with an
approximately constant $A_1(q^2)$. We analyze in the light of these data and
theoretical input various theoretical approaches (lattice calculations, QCD sum
rules, quark models) and point out the origin of the difficulties encountered
by most of these schemes. In particular we check the compatibility of several
quark models with the heavy quark scaling relations.

To help the difficult determination of the angle $\gamma$ of the unitarity
triangle, Aleksan, Dunietz and Kayser have proposed the modes of the type
$K^D^+_s$, common to $B_s$ and $\bar{B}_s$. We point out that it is possible
to gain in statistics by a sum over all modes with ground state mesons in the
final state, i.e. $K^D^+_s$, $K^{*}D_+^s$, $K^D^{*+}_s$, $K^{*}D^{*+}_s$.
The delicate point is the relative phase of these different contributions to
the dilution factor $D$ of the timedependent asymmetry. Each contribution to
$D$ is proportional to a product $F^{cb}$ $F^{ub}$ $f_{D_s}$ $f_K$ where $F$
denotes form factors and $f$ decay constants. Within a definite phase
convention, lattice calculations do not show any change in sign when
extrapolating to light quarks the form factors and decay constants. Then, we
can show that all modes contribute constructively to the dilution factor,
except the $P$wave $K^{*}D^{*+}_s$, which is small. Quark model arguments
based on wave function overlaps also confirm this stability in sign. By summing
over all these modes we find a gain of a factor 6 in statistics relatively to
$K^D^+_s$. The dilution factor for the sum $D_{tot}$ is remarkably stable for
theoretical schemes that are not in very strong conflict with data on $B \to
\psi K(K^*)$ or extrapolated from semileptonic charm form factors, giving
$D_{tot} \geq 0.6$, always close to $D(K^ D^+_s)$.

The heavy to light form factors in $B$ decays are discussed. Critical
discussion of theoretical approaches is made with special emphasis on their
failure to describe the $B \to K^{(\ast )}\psi$ data.

If the Standard Model explanation of CP violation is correct, then
measurements of CPviolating asymmetries in $B$ meson decays can in principle
determine the entire quark mixing matrix.

After reviewing techniques for extracting clean information on CPviolating
phase angles from $B$ decays, we explain the rules for finding decay modes that
can probe the phase angle $\gamma$ of the unitarity triangle. We identify the
more promising of these ``$\gamma$ modes,'' estimate their branching ratios,
and examine the degree to which they are theoretically clean. We then show that
when the quark mixing matrix is not approximated as usual, but is treated
exactly, none of the ``$\gamma$ modes'' actually measures $\gamma$. Rather,
each of them measures $\gamma$ plus some correction. In all modes, the
correction is small enough to be disregarded in firstgeneration experiments,
but in some of them, it may be large enough to be observed in secondgeneration
experiments. Our treatment of the $\gamma$ modes calls attention to the fact
that when the quark mixing matrix is treated exactly, there are six unitarity
triangles, rather than just one triangle. However, only four of the angles in
these six triangles are independent. Examining the role played by these four
angles, we discover that, in principle at least, measurements of nothing but
CPviolating asymmetries in $B$ decays are sufficient to determine the entire
quark mixing matrix.