
We investigate the constraints on the total neutrino mass in the scenario of
vacuum energy interacting with cold dark matter. We focus on two typical
interaction forms, i.e., $Q=\beta H\rho_{\rm c}$ and $Q=\beta H\rho_{\Lambda}$.
To avoid the occurrence of largescale instability in interacting dark energy
cosmology, we adopt the parameterized postFriedmann approach to calculate the
perturbation evolution of dark energy. We employ the observational data
including the Planck cosmic microwave background temperature and polarization
data, the baryon acoustic oscillation data, the JLA sample of type Ia
supernovae observation, the direct measurement of the Hubble constant, and the
redshift space distortions data. We find that, compared with those in the
$\Lambda$CDM model, much looser constraints on $\sum m_{\nu}$ are obtained in
the $Q=\beta H\rho_{\rm c}$ model, while slightly tighter constraints are
obtained in the $Q=\beta H\rho_{\Lambda}$ model. After considering the mass
hierarchies of neutrinos, the smallest upper limit results of $\sum m_{\nu}$
are given in the degenerate hierarchy case. By comparing the values of
$\chi^2_{\rm min}$, we find that the normal hierarchy case is more favored than
the inverted one. In particular, we find that the difference $\Delta
\chi^2_{\rm min} \equiv \chi^2_{\rm IH; min}\chi^2_{\rm NH; min}> 2$ in the
$Q=\beta H\rho_{\rm c}$ model. In addition, we find that $\beta=0$ is
consistent with the current observations in the $Q=\beta H\rho_{\rm c}$ model,
and $\beta < 0$ is favored at the more than $1\sigma$ level in the $Q=\beta
H\rho_{\Lambda}$ model.

We investigate the observational constraints on three typical brane inflation
models by considering the latest local measurement of the Hubble constant in
the global fit. We also employ other observational data, including the Planck
2015 CMB data, the BICEP2/Keck Array Bmode data, and the baryon acoustic
oscillations data, in our analysis. Previous studies have shown that the
addition of the latest local $H_{0}$ measurement favors a larger spectral
index, and can exert a significant influence on the model selection of
inflation. In this work, we investigate its impacts on the statuses of brane
inflation models. We find that, when the direct $H_{0}$ measurement is
considered, the prototype model of brane inflation is still in good agreement
with the current observational data at the $2\sigma$ level. For the KKLMMT
model, the consideration of the $H_{0}$ measurement allows the range of the
parameter $\beta$ to be amplified to ${\cal O}(10^{2})$, which slightly
alleviates the finetuning problem. For the IR DBI model, the addition of the
$H_{0}$ measurement does not provide a better fit. These results show that the
consideration of the new $H_{0}$ prior can exert a considerable influence on
the brane inflation models. At last, we show that, when $\beta \lesssim 0.7$,
the equilateral nonGaussianity in the IR DBI inflation model is compatible
with the current CMB data at the 1$\sigma$ level.

We revisit the constraints on inflation models by using the current
cosmological observations involving the latest local measurement of the Hubble
constant ($H_{0} = 73.00\pm 1.75$ km s $^{1}$ Mpc$^{1}$). We constrain the
primordial power spectra of both scalar and tensor perturbations with the
observational data including the Planck 2015 CMB full data, the BICEP2 and Keck
Array CMB Bmode data, the BAO data, and the direct measurement of $H_0$. In
order to relieve the tension between the local determination of the Hubble
constant and the other astrophysical observations, we consider the additional
parameter $N_{\rm eff}$ in the cosmological model. We find that, for the
$\Lambda$CDM+$r$+$N_{\rm eff}$ model, the scale invariance is only excluded at
the 3.3$\sigma$ level, and $\Delta N_{\rm eff}>0$ is favored at the 1.6$\sigma$
level. Comparing the obtained 1$\sigma$ and 2$\sigma$ contours of $(n_s,r)$
with the theoretical predictions of selected inflation models, we find that
both the convex and concave potentials are favored at 2$\sigma$ level, the
natural inflation model is excluded at more than 2$\sigma$ level, the
Starobinsky $R^2$ inflation model is only favored at around 2$\sigma$ level,
and the spontaneously broken SUSY inflation model is now the most favored
model.

We constrain the neutrino mass in the scenario of vacuum energy interacting
with cold dark matter by using current cosmological observations. To avoid the
largescale instability problem in interacting dark energy models, we employ
the parameterized postFriedmann (PPF) approach to do the calculation of
perturbation evolution, for the $Q=\beta H\rho_{\rm c}$ and $Q=\beta
H\rho_{\Lambda}$ models. The current observational data sets used in this work
include Planck (cosmic microwave background), BSH (baryon acoustic
oscillations, type Ia supernovae, and Hubble constant), and LSS (redshift space
distortions and weak lensing). According to the constraint results, we find
that $\beta>0$ at more than $1\sigma$ level for the $Q=\beta H\rho_{\rm c}$
model, which indicates that cold dark matter decays into vacuum energy; while
$\beta=0$ is consistent with the current data at $1\sigma$ level for the
$Q=\beta H\rho_{\Lambda}$ model. Taking the $\Lambda$CDM model as a baseline
model, we find that a smaller upper limit, $\sum m_{\nu}<0.11$ eV ($2\sigma$),
is induced by the latest BAO BOSS DR12 data and the Hubble constant measurement
$H_{0} = 73.00 \pm 1.75$ km~s$^{1}$~Mpc$^{1}$. For the $Q=\beta H\rho_{\rm
c}$ model, we obtain $\sum m_{\nu}<0.20$ eV ($2\sigma$) from Planck+BSH. For
the $Q=\beta H\rho_{\Lambda}$ model, $\sum m_{\nu}<0.10$ eV ($2\sigma$) and
$\sum m_{\nu}<0.14$ eV ($2\sigma$) are derived from Planck+BSH and
Planck+BSH+LSS, respectively. We show that these smaller upper limits on $\sum
m_{\nu}$ are affected more or less by the tension between $H_{0}$ and other
observational data.

Dark energy affects the Hubble expansion rate (namely, the expansion history)
$H(z)$ by an integral over $w(z)$. However, the usual observables are the
luminosity distances or the angular diameter distances, which measure the
distanceredshift relation. Actually, dark energy affects the distances (and
the growth factor) by a further integration over functions of $H(z)$. Thus, the
direct measurements of the Hubble parameter $H(z)$ at different redshifts are
of great importance for constraining the properties of dark energy. In this
paper, we show how the typical dark energy models, for example, the
$\Lambda$CDM, $w$CDM, CPL, and holographic dark energy (HDE) models, can be
constrained by the current direct measurements of $H(z)$ (31 data in total,
covering the redshift range of $z\in [0.07,2.34]$). In fact, the future
redshiftdrift observations (also referred to as the SandageLoeb test) can
also directly measure $H(z)$ at higher redshifts, covering the range of $z\in
[2,5]$. We thus discuss what role the redshiftdrift observations can play in
constraining dark energy with the Hubble parameter measurements. We show that
the constraints on dark energy can be improved greatly with the $H(z)$ data
from only a 10year observation of redshift drift.

We explore the impact of the SandageLoeb (SL) test on the precision of
cosmological constraints for $f(T)$ gravity theories. The SL test is an
important supplement to current cosmological observations because it measures
the redshift drift in the Lyman$\alpha$ forest in the spectra of distant
quasars, covering the "redshift desert" of $2 \lesssim z \lesssim5$. To avoid
data inconsistency, we use the bestfit models based on current combined
observational data as fiducial models to simulate 30 mock SL test data. We
quantify the impact of these SL test data on parameter estimation for $f(T)$
gravity theories. Two typical $f(T)$ models are considered, the powerlaw model
$f(T)_{PL}$ and the exponentialform model $f(T)_{EXP}$. The results show that
the SL test can effectively break the existing strong degeneracy between the
presentday matter density $\Omega_m$ and the Hubble constant $H_0$ in other
cosmological observations. For the considered $f(T)$ models, a 30year
observation of the SL test can improve the constraint precision of $\Omega_m$
and $H_0$ enormously but cannot effectively improve the constraint precision of
the model parameters.