• ### Correlation of AOT with Relative Frequency of Air Showers with energy 10^{15} - 10^{16} eV by Yakutsk Data(1703.01902)

March 2, 2017 hep-ex, astro-ph.IM
Long-term series of measurement of spectral transparency of the atmosphere (\lambda = 430 nm) and atmospheric optical thickness (AOT) measured by multimode photometer CE 318 in the region of Yakutsk array are analyzed. Correlation of AOT with intensity of air showers with small energies 10^{15} - 10^{16} eV is found. The variability of aerosol composition of the atmosphere during the registration period of the Cherenkov light should be taken into account since it may affect the quality of determining characteristics of air showers.
• ### Influence of wildfires in Yakutia on interannual variability of AOT on measurements at stations near Yakutsk(1612.08610)

Feb. 27, 2017 astro-ph.IM, astro-ph.HE
This paper presents data on the optical thickness AOT in the context of long-term observations, including in times of large-scale forest fires in Yakutia. Sudden changes in such features as the AOT point directly to the impact of fires on aerosol structure of the atmosphere during the summer.
• ### Search for Neutrino Generated Air Shower Candidates with Energy More than 5$\cdot$10$^{18}$ eV and Zenith Angle $\theta$ $\geq$ 50$^\circ$(1612.07892)

Dec. 28, 2016 astro-ph.HE
Neutrino air showers can be formed in any part of the atmosphere passing a long was in the matter due to its physical properties. In general, air showers produced by neutrinos are highly inclined and formed near the ground level, i.e. young showers. Therefore, one should expect a large number of peaks in the signal of such air showers [1, 2, 3]. The goal of our work is to search for air shower candidates produced by neutrino. For this purposes, we analyzed large amount of data from scintillation detectors with different area and energy thresholds [1, 2]. Preliminary analysis of Yakutsk array data indicated the absence of air shower produced by neutrino, but it does not mean that such air showers does not exist. It is going to need a further analysis of highly inclined showers. In order to do that improved methodology for recording and processing of air showers required.
• ### Radio Emission of Air Showers with Energy E$_0$ $\geq$ 10$^{19}$ eV by Yakutsk Array Data(1612.07891)

Dec. 23, 2016 astro-ph.HE
In this paper, we present results obtained from the measurements of radio emission at frequency of 32 MHz with energy more than 10$^{19}$ eV. Generalized formula that describe lateral distribution and depends on main characteristic of the air showers: energy E$_0$ and depth of maximum X$_{max}$ was derived. The formula has a good agreement with data at average and large distances from shower axis. Employing the ratio of radio emission amplitude at distances 175 m and 725 m we determined the depth of maximum X$_{max}$ for air shower with energy 3.7$\cdot$10$^{19}$ eV, which in our case is equal to X$_{max}$ = 769$\pm$34g$\cdot$cm$^{-2}$.
• ### Air shower registration algorithm and mathematical processing of showers with radio signal at the Yakutsk array(1309.7095)

Sept. 27, 2013 astro-ph.IM
The paper describes the techniques and method of registration of air shower radio emission at the Yakutsk array of extensive air showers at a frequency of 32 MHz. At this stage, emission registration involves two set of antennas, the distance between them is 500m. One set involves 8 antennas, second - 4 antennas. The antennas are perpendicularly crossed dipoles with radiation pattern North South,West East and raised 1.5 m above the ground. Each set of antennas connected to an industrial PC. The registration requires one of two triggers. First trigger are generated by scintillation detectors of Yakutsk array. Scintillation detectors cover area of 12 km^2 and registers air showers with energy more than 10^17 eV. The second trigger is generated by Small Cherenkov Array that covers area of 1 km^2 and registers air showers with energy 10^15 - 5*10^17 eV. Small Cherenkov Array is part of Yakutsk array and involve Cherenkov detectors located at a distance of 50, 100, 250 m. For further selection we are using an additional criterion the radio pulse must be localized in the area corresponding to the delay time on first and second triggers. In addition, descriptions of the algorithm and the flowcharts of the program for the air shower selection and further analysis are given. This method registers EAS radio emission with energy 10^16 - 10^19 eV. With the absolute calibration, the amplitudes of all antennas converted to a single value. Air shower radio emission dependences from zenith angle and shower energy are plotted.
• ### Lateral distribution of radio signal measured in showers with energy 5*10^16-10^18 eV at the Yakutsk EAS array(1309.6698)

Sept. 26, 2013 astro-ph.HE
We present of measurements of radio emission from EAS at the frequency 32 MHz performed in 2008-2012. Showers were selected by zenith and azimuth directions, sampled by energy. A mean lateral distribution function was fitted to the data each interval. The paper presents unied approximation formula for all three energy intervals of lateral distribution, using connection between equation (1) and (2) coefficients with energy and geomagnetic angle. Here we analyze the connection between the shape of lateral distribution and the depth of the maximum shower development Xmax too.
• ### Yakutsk array radio emission registration results in the energy range of 3*10^16-5*10^18 eV(1309.7041)

Sept. 26, 2013 astro-ph.HE
This paper presents the set of measurements of ultra-high energy air shower radio emission at frequency 32 MHz in period of 2008-2012. The showers are selected by geomagnetic and azimuth angles and then by the energy in three intervals: 3*10^16 3*10^17 eV, 3*10^17 6*10^17 eV and 6*10^17 5*10^18 eV. In each energy interval average lateral distribution function using mathematically averaged data from antennas with different directions are plotted. In the paper, using experimental data the dependence of radio signal averaged amplitude from geomagnetic angle, the shower axis distance and the energy are determined. Depth of maximum of cosmic ray showers Xmax for the given energy range is evaluated. The evaluation is made according QGSJET model calculations and average lateral distribution function shape.
• ### Air Shower Simulation and Hadronic Interactions(1306.6090)

June 25, 2013 astro-ph.HE
The aim of this report of the Working Group on Hadronic Interactions and Air Shower Simulation is to give an overview of the status of the field, emphasizing open questions and a comparison of relevant results of the different experiments. It is shown that an approximate overall understanding of extensive air showers and the corresponding hadronic interactions has been reached. The simulations provide a qualitative description of the bulk of the air shower observables. Discrepancies are however found when the correlation between measurements of the longitudinal shower profile are compared to that of the lateral particle distributions at ground. The report concludes with a list of important problems that should be addressed to make progress in understanding hadronic interactions and, hence, improve the reliability of air shower simulations.
• ### Mass Composition Working Group Report at UHECR-2012(1306.4430)

June 19, 2013 astro-ph.HE
We present a summary of the measurements of mass sensitive parameters at the highest cosmic ray energies done by several experiments. The Xmax distribution as a function of energy has been measured with fluorescence telescopes by the HiRes, TA and Auger experiments and with Cherenkov light detectors by Yakutsk. The <Xmax> or the average mass (<lnA>) has been also inferred using ground detectors, such as muon and water Cherenkov detectors. We discuss the different data analyses elaborated by each collaboration in order to extract the relevant information. Special attention is given to the different approaches used in the analysis of the data measured by fluorescence detectors in order to take into account detector biases. We present a careful analysis of the stability and performance of each analysis. The results of the different experiments will be compared and the discrepancies or agreements will be quantified.