
Cosmological parameter estimation is entering a new era. Large collaborations
need to coordinate highstakes analyses using multiple methods; furthermore
such analyses have grown in complexity due to sophisticated models of cosmology
and systematic uncertainties. In this paper we argue that modularity is the key
to addressing these challenges: calculations should be broken up into
interchangeable modular units with inputs and outputs clearly defined. We
present a new framework for cosmological parameter estimation, CosmoSIS,
designed to connect together, share, and advance development of inference tools
across the community. We describe the modules already available in CosmoSIS,
including CAMB, Planck, cosmic shear calculations, and a suite of samplers. We
illustrate it using demonstration code that you can run outofthebox with the
installer available at http://bitbucket.org/joezuntz/cosmosis

We perform a comparative analysis of constraints on sterile neutrinos from
the Planck experiment and from current and future neutrino oscillation
experiments (MINOS, IceCube, SBN). For the first time, we express the Planck
constraints on $N_{\rm eff}$ and $m_{\rm eff}^{\rm sterile}$ from the Cosmic
Microwave Background in the parameter space used by oscillation experiments
using both masssquared differences and mixing angles. In a model with a single
sterile neutrino species and using standard assumptions, we find that the
Planck data and the oscillation experiments measuring muonneutrino
disappearance have similar sensitivity.

We examine the level of agreement between low redshift weak lensing data and
the CMB using measurements from the CFHTLenS and Planck+WMAP polarization. We
perform an independent analysis of the CFHTLenS six bin tomography results of
Heymans et al. (2013). We extend their systematics treatment and find the
cosmological constraints to be relatively robust to the choice of nonlinear
modeling, extension to the intrinsic alignment model and inclusion of baryons.
We find that the 90% confidence contours of CFHTLenS and Planck+WP do not
overlap even in the full 6dimensional parameter space of $\Lambda$CDM, so the
two datasets are discrepant. Allowing a massive active neutrino or tensor modes
does not significantly resolve the disagreement in the full ndimensional
parameter space. Our results differ from some in the literature because we use
the full tomographic information in the weak lensing data and marginalize over
systematics. We note that adding a sterile neutrino to $\Lambda$CDM does bring
the 8dimensional 64% contours to overlap, mainly due to the extra effective
number of neutrino species, which we find to be 0.84 $\pm$ 0.35 (68%) greater
than standard on combining the datasets. We discuss why this is not a
completely satisfactory resolution, leaving open the possibility of other new
physics or observational systematics as contributing factors. We provide
updated cosmology fitting functions for the CFHTLenS constraints and discuss
the differences from ones used in the literature.

We provide an overview of the science benefits of combining information from
the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) and the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
(LSST). We first summarise the capabilities and timeline of the LSST and
overview its science goals. We then discuss the science questions in common
between the two projects, and how they can be best addressed by combining the
data from both telescopes. We describe how weak gravitational lensing and
galaxy clustering studies with LSST and SKA can provide improved constraints on
the causes of the cosmological acceleration. We summarise the benefits to
galaxy evolution studies of combining deep optical multiband imaging with
radio observations. Finally, we discuss the excellent match between one of the
most unique features of the LSST, its temporal cadence in the optical waveband,
and the time resolution of the SKA.

The GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 3 (GREAT3) challenge is the third
in a series of image analysis challenges, with a goal of testing and
facilitating the development of methods for analyzing astronomical images that
will be used to measure weak gravitational lensing. This measurement requires
extremely precise estimation of very small galaxy shape distortions, in the
presence of far larger intrinsic galaxy shapes and distortions due to the
blurring kernel caused by the atmosphere, telescope optics, and instrumental
effects. The GREAT3 challenge is posed to the astronomy, machine learning, and
statistics communities, and includes tests of three specific effects that are
of immediate relevance to upcoming weak lensing surveys, two of which have
never been tested in a community challenge before. These effects include
realistically complex galaxy models based on highresolution imaging from
space; spatially varying, physicallymotivated blurring kernel; and combination
of multiple different exposures. To facilitate entry by people new to the
field, and for use as a diagnostic tool, the simulation software for the
challenge is publicly available, though the exact parameters used for the
challenge are blinded. Sample scripts to analyze the challenge data using
existing methods will also be provided. See http://great3challenge.info and
http://great3.projects.phys.ucl.ac.uk/leaderboard/ for more information.

Cosmic shear is a powerful probe of cosmological parameters, but its
potential can be fully utilised only if galaxy shapes are measured with great
accuracy. Two major effects have been identified which are likely to account
for most of the bias for maximum likelihood methods in recent shear measurement
challenges. Model bias occurs when the true galaxy shape is not well
represented by the fitted model. Noise bias occurs due to the nonlinear
relationship between image pixels and galaxy shape. In this paper we
investigate the potential interplay between these two effects when an imperfect
model is used in the presence of high noise. We present analytical expressions
for this bias, which depends on the residual difference between the model and
real data. They can lead to biases not accounted for in previous calibration
schemes. By measuring the model bias, noise bias and their interaction, we
provide a complete statistical framework for measuring galaxy shapes with model
fitting methods from GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing (GREAT) like
images. We demonstrate the noise and model interaction bias using a simple toy
model, which indicates that this effect can potentially be significant. Using
real galaxy images from the Cosmological Evolution Survey (COSMOS) we quantify
the strength of the model bias, noise bias and their interaction. We find that
the interaction term is often a similar size to the model bias term, and is
smaller than the requirements of the current and shortly upcoming galaxy
surveys.

The combination of multiple cosmological probes can produce measurements of
cosmological parameters much more stringent than those possible with any
individual probe. We examine the combination of two highly correlated probes of
latetime structure growth: (i) weak gravitational lensing from a survey with
photometric redshifts and (ii) galaxy clustering and redshift space distortions
from a survey with spectroscopic redshifts. We choose generic survey designs so
that our results are applicable to a range of current and future photometric
redshift (e.g. KiDS, DES, HSC, Euclid) and spectroscopic redshift (e.g. DESI,
4MOST, Sumire) surveys. Combining the surveys greatly improves their power to
measure both dark energy and modified gravity. An independent, nonoverlapping
combination sees a dark energy figure of merit more than 4 times larger than
that produced by either survey alone. The powerful synergies between the
surveys are strongest for modified gravity, where their constraints are
orthogonal, producing a nonoverlapping joint figure of merit nearly 2 orders
of magnitude larger than either alone. Our projected angular power spectrum
formalism makes it easy to model the crosscorrelation observable when the
surveys overlap on the sky, producing a joint data vector and full covariance
matrix. We calculate a samesky improvement factor, from the inclusion of these
crosscorrelations, relative to nonoverlapping surveys. We find nearly a
factor of 4 for dark energy and more than a factor of 2 for modified gravity.
The exact forecast figures of merit and samesky benefits can be radically
affected by a range of forecasts assumption, which we explore methodically in a
sensitivity analysis. We show that that our fiducial assumptions produce robust
results which give a good average picture of the science return from combining
photometric and spectroscopic surveys.

We present and describe im3shape, a new publicly available galaxy shape
measurement code for weak gravitational lensing shear. im3shape performs a
maximum likelihood fit of a bulgeplusdisc galaxy model to noisy images,
incorporating an applied point spread function. We detail challenges faced and
choices made in its design and implementation, and then discuss various
limitations that affect this and other maximum likelihood methods. We assess
the bias arising from fitting an incorrect galaxy model using simple noisefree
images and find that it should not be a concern for current cosmic shear
surveys.
We test im3shape on the GREAT08 Challenge image simulations, and meet the
requirements for upcoming cosmic shear surveys in the case that the simulations
are encompassed by the fitted model, using a simple correction for image noise
bias. For the fiducial branch of GREAT08 we obtain a negligible additive shear
bias and subtwo percent level multiplicative bias, which is suitable for
analysis of current surveys. We fall short of the subpercent level requirement
for upcoming surveys, which we attribute to a combination of noise bias and the
mismatch between our galaxy model and the model used in the GREAT08
simulations. We meet the requirements for current surveys across all branches
of GREAT08, except those with small or high noise galaxies, which we would cut
from our analysis. Using the GREAT08 metric we we obtain a score of Q=717 for
the usable branches, relative to the goal of Q=1000 for future experiments. The
code is freely available from https://bitbucket.org/joezuntz/im3shape

The Arcminute Microkelvin Imager (AMI) is a telescope specifically designed
for high sensitivity measurements of lowsurfacebrightness features at
cmwavelength and has unique, important capabilities. It consists of two
interferometer arrays operating over 13.518 GHz that image structures on
scales of 0.510 arcmin with very low systematics. The Small Array (AMISA; ten
3.7m antennas) couples very well to SunyaevZel'dovich features from galaxy
clusters and to many Galactic features. The Large Array (AMILA; eight 13m
antennas) has a collecting area ten times that of the AMISA and longer
baselines, crucially allowing the removal of the effects of confusing radio
point sources from regions of low surfacebrightness, extended emission.
Moreover AMI provides fast, deep object surveying and allows monitoring of
large numbers of objects. In this White Paper we review the new science  both
Galactic and extragalactic  already achieved with AMI and outline the
prospects for much more.

Telescope Point Spread Function (PSF) quality is critical for realising the
potential of cosmic weak lensing observations to constrain dark energy and test
General Relativity. In this paper we use quantitative weak gravitational
lensing measures to inform the precision of lens optical alignment, with
specific reference to the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We compute optics spot
diagrams and calculate the shear and flexion of the PSF as a function of
position on the focal plane. For perfect optical alignment we verify the high
quality of the DES optical design, finding a maximum PSF contribution to the
weak lensing shear of 0.04 near the edge of the focal plane. However this can
be increased by a factor of approximately three if the lenses are only just
aligned within their maximum specified tolerances. We calculate the E and
Bmode shear and flexion variance as a function of decentre or tilt of each
lens in turn. We find tilt accuracy to be a few times more important than
decentre, depending on the lens considered. Finally we consider the compound
effect of decentre and tilt of multiple lenses simultaneously, by sampling
from a plausible range of values of each parameter. We find that the compound
effect can be around twice as detrimental as when considering any one lens
alone. Furthermore, this combined effect changes the conclusions about which
lens is most important to align accurately. For DES, the tilt of the first two
lenses is the most important.

Weak gravitational lensing has the potential to constrain cosmological
parameters to high precision. However, as shown by the Shear TEsting Programmes
(STEP) and GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing (GREAT) Challenges, measuring
galaxy shears is a nontrivial task: various methods introduce different
systematic biases which have to be accounted for. We investigate how pixel
noise on the image affects the bias on shear estimates from a
MaximumLikelihood forward modelfitting approach using a sum of coelliptical
S\'{e}rsic profiles, in complement to the theoretical approach of an an
associated paper. We evaluate the bias using a simple but realistic galaxy
model and find that the effects of noise alone can cause biases of order 110%
on measured shears, which is significant for current and future lensing
surveys. We evaluate a simulationbased calibration method to create a bias
model as a function of galaxy properties and observing conditions. This model
is then used to correct the simulated measurements. We demonstrate that this
method can effectively reduce noise bias so that shear measurement reaches the
level of accuracy required for estimating cosmic shear in upcoming lensing
surveys.

Weak lensing experiments are a powerful probe of cosmology through their
measurement of the mass distribution of the universe. A challenge for this
technique is to control systematic errors that occur when measuring the shapes
of distant galaxies. In this paper we investigate noise bias, a systematic
error that arises from second order noise terms in the shape measurement
process. We first derive analytical expressions for the bias of general Maximum
Likelihood Estimators (MLEs) in the presence of additive noise. We then find
analytical expressions for a simplified toy model in which galaxies are modeled
and fitted with a Gaussian with its size as a single free parameter. Even for
this very simple case we find a significant effect. We also extend our analysis
to a more realistic 6parameter elliptical Gaussian model. We find that the
noise bias is generically of the order of the inversesquared signaltonoise
ratio (SNR) of the galaxies and is thus of the order of a percent for galaxies
of SNR of 10, i.e. comparable to the weak lensing shear signal. This is nearly
two orders of magnitude greater than the systematics requirements for future
allsky weak lensing surveys. We discuss possible ways to circumvent this
effect, including a calibration method using simulations discussed in an
associated paper.

We present an analysis of observations made with the Arcminute Microkelvin
Imager (AMI) and the CanadaFranceHawaii Telescope (CFHT) of six galaxy
clusters in a redshift range of 0.160.41. The cluster gas is modelled using
the SunyaevZel'dovich (SZ) data provided by AMI, while the total mass is
modelled using the lensing data from the CFHT. In this paper, we: i) find very
good agreement between SZ measurements (assuming largescale virialisation and
a gasfraction prior) and lensing measurements of the total cluster masses out
to r_200; ii) perform the first multiplecomponent weaklensing analysis of
A115; iii) confirm the unusual separation between the gas and mass components
in A1914; iv) jointly analyse the SZ and lensing data for the relaxed cluster
A611, confirming our use of a simulationderived masstemperature relation for
parameterizing measurements of the SZ effect.

We consider the effect of galaxy intrinsic alignments (IAs) on dark energy
constraints from weak gravitational lensing. We summarise the latest version of
the linear alignment model of IAs, following the brief note of Hirata & Seljak
(2010) and further interpretation in Laszlo et al. (2011). We show the
cosmological bias on the dark energy equation of state parameters w0 and wa
that would occur if IAs were ignored. We find that w0 and wa are both
catastrophically biased, by an absolute value of just greater than unity under
the Fisher matrix approximation. This contrasts with a bias several times
larger for the earlier IA implementation. Therefore there is no doubt that IAs
must be taken into account for future Stage III experiments and beyond. We use
a flexible grid of IA and galaxy bias parameters as used in previous work, and
investigate what would happen if the universe used the latest IA model, but we
assumed the earlier version. We find that despite the large difference between
the two IA models, the grid flexibility is sufficient to remove cosmological
bias and recover the correct dark energy equation of state. In an appendix, we
compare observed shear power spectra to those from a popular previous
implementation and explain the differences.

GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) is a public image
analysis challenge aimed at the development of algorithms to analyze
astronomical images. Specifically, the challenge is to measure varying image
distortions in the presence of a variable convolution kernel, pixelization and
noise. This is the second in a series of challenges set to the astronomy,
computer science and statistics communities, providing a structured environment
in which methods can be improved and tested in preparation for planned
astronomical surveys. GREAT10 extends upon previous work by introducing
variable fields into the challenge. The "Galaxy Challenge" involves the precise
measurement of galaxy shape distortions, quantified locally by two parameters
called shear, in the presence of a known convolution kernel. Crucially, the
convolution kernel and the simulated gravitational lensing shape distortion
both now vary as a function of position within the images, as is the case for
real data. In addition, we introduce the "Star Challenge" that concerns the
reconstruction of a variable convolution kernel, similar to that in a typical
astronomical observation. This document details the GREAT10 Challenge for
potential participants. Continually updated information is also available from
http://www.greatchallenges.info.

We consider how upcoming photometric large scale structure surveys can be
optimized to measure the properties of dark energy and possible cosmic scale
modifications to General Relativity in light of realistic astrophysical and
instrumental systematic uncertainities. In particular we include flexible
descriptions of intrinsic alignments, galaxy bias and photometric redshift
uncertainties in a Fisher Matrix analysis of shear, position and positionshear
correlations, including complementary cosmological constraints from the CMB. We
study the impact of survey tradeoffs in depth versus breadth, and redshift
quality. We parameterise the results in terms of the Dark Energy Task Force
figure of merit, and deviations from General Relativity through an analagous
Modified Gravity figure of merit. We find that intrinsic alignments weaken the
dependence of figure of merit on area and that, for a fixed observing time, a
fiducial Stage IV survey plateaus above roughly 10,000deg2 for DE and peaks at
about 5,000deg2 as the relative importance of IAs at low redshift penalises
wide, shallow surveys. While reducing photometric redshift scatter improves
constraining power, the dependence is shallow. The variation in constraining
power is stronger once IAs are included and is slightly more pronounced for MG
constraints than for DE. The inclusion of intrinsic alignments and galaxy
position information reduces the required prior on photometric redshift
accuracy by an order of magnitude for both the fiducial Stage III and IV
surveys, equivalent to a factor of 100 reduction in the number of spectroscopic
galaxies required to calibrate the photometric sample.

We consider the impact of key astrophysical and measurement systematics on
constraints on dark energy and modifications to gravity on cosmic scales. We
focus on upcoming photometric "Stage III" and "Stage IV" large scale structure
surveys such as DES, SuMIRe, Euclid, LSST and WFIRST. We illustrate the
different redshift dependencies of gravity modifications compared to intrinsic
alignments, the main astrophysical systematic. The way in which systematic
uncertainties, such as galaxy bias and intrinsic alignments, are modelled can
change dark energy equation of state and modified gravity figures of merit by a
factor of four. The inclusion of crosscorrelations of cosmic shear and galaxy
position measurements helps reduce the loss of constraining power from the
lensing shear surveys. When forecasts for Planck CMB and Stage IV surveys are
combined, constraints on the dark energy equation of state and modified gravity
model are recovered, relative to those from shear data with no systematic
uncertainties, if fewer than 36 free parameters in total are used to describe
the galaxy bias and intrinsic alignment models as a function of scale and
redshift. To facilitate future investigations, we also provide a fitting
function for the matter power spectrum arising from the phenomenological
modified gravity model we consider.

We investigate potential constraints from cosmic shear on the dark matter
particle mass, assuming all dark matter is made up of light thermal relic
particles. Given the theoretical uncertainties involved in making cosmological
predictions in such warm dark matter scenarios we use analytical fits to linear
warm dark matter power spectra and compare (i) the halo model using a mass
function evaluated from these linear power spectra and (ii) an analytical fit
to the nonlinear evolution of the linear power spectra. We optimistically
ignore the competing effect of baryons for this work. We find approach (ii) to
be conservative compared to approach (i). We evaluate cosmological constraints
using these methods, marginalising over four other cosmological parameters.
Using the more conservative method we find that a Euclidlike weak lensing
survey together with constraints from the Planck cosmic microwave background
mission primary anisotropies could achieve a lower limit on the particle mass
of 2.5 keV.

Correlations between the intrinsic shapes of galaxy pairs, and between the
intrinsic shapes of galaxies and the largescale density field, may be induced
by tidal fields. These correlations, which have been detected at low redshifts
(z<0.35) for bright red galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), and
for which upper limits exist for blue galaxies at z~0.1, provide a window into
galaxy formation and evolution, and are also an important contaminant for
current and future weak lensing surveys. Measurements of these alignments at
intermediate redshifts (z~0.6) that are more relevant for cosmic shear
observations are very important for understanding the origin and redshift
evolution of these alignments, and for minimising their impact on weak lensing
measurements. We present the first such intermediateredshift measurement for
blue galaxies, using galaxy shape measurements from SDSS and spectroscopic
redshifts from the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey. Our null detection allows us to
place upper limits on the contamination of weak lensing measurements by blue
galaxy intrinsic alignments that, for the first time, do not require
significant modeldependent extrapolation from the z~0.1 SDSS observations.
Also, combining the SDSS and WiggleZ constraints gives us a long redshift
baseline with which to constrain intrinsic alignment models and contamination
of the cosmic shear power spectrum. Assuming that the alignments can be
explained by linear alignment with the smoothed local density field, we find
that a measurement of \sigma_8 in a bluegalaxy dominated, CFHTLSlike survey
would be contaminated by at most +/0.02 (95% confidence level, SDSS and
WiggleZ) or +/0.03 (WiggleZ alone) due to intrinsic alignments. [Abridged]

Constraints on cosmology from recent cosmic shear observations are becoming
increasingly sophisticated in their treatment of potential systematic effects.
Here we present cosmological constraints which include modelling of intrinsic
alignments. We demonstrate how the results are changed for three different
intrinsic alignment models, and for two different models of the cosmic shear
galaxy population. We find that intrinsic alignments can either reduce or
increase measurements of the fluctuation amplitude parameter sigma_8 depending
on these decisions, and depending on the cosmic shear survey properties. This
is due to the interplay between the two types of intrinsic alignment, II and
GI. It has been shown that future surveys must make a careful treatment of
intrinsic alignments to avoid significant biases, and that simultaneous
constraints from shearshear and shearposition correlation functions can
mitigate the effects. For the first time we here combine constraints from
cosmic shear surveys (shearshear correlations) with those from "GI" intrinsic
alignment data sets (shearposition correlations). We produce updated
constraints on cosmology marginalised over two free parameters in the halo
model for intrinsic alignments. We find that the additional freedom is well
compensated by the additional information, in that the constraints are very
similar indeed to those obtained when intrinsic alignments are ignored, both in
terms of best fit values and uncertainties.

We present the results of the GREAT08 Challenge, a blind analysis challenge
to infer weak gravitational lensing shear distortions from images. The primary
goal was to stimulate new ideas by presenting the problem to researchers
outside the shear measurement community. Six GREAT08 Team methods were
presented at the launch of the Challenge and five additional groups submitted
results during the 6 month competition. Participants analyzed 30 million
simulated galaxies with a range in signal to noise ratio, pointspread function
ellipticity, galaxy size, and galaxy type. The large quantity of simulations
allowed shear measurement methods to be assessed at a level of accuracy
suitable for currently planned future cosmic shear observations for the first
time. Different methods perform well in different parts of simulation parameter
space and come close to the target level of accuracy in several of these. A
number of fresh ideas have emerged as a result of the Challenge including a
reexamination of the process of combining information from different galaxies,
which reduces the dependence on realistic galaxy modelling. The image
simulations will become increasingly sophisticated in future GREAT challenges,
meanwhile the GREAT08 simulations remain as a benchmark for additional
developments in shear measurement algorithms.

The GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2008 (GREAT08) Challenge focuses
on a problem that is of crucial importance for future observations in
cosmology. The shapes of distant galaxies can be used to determine the
properties of dark energy and the nature of gravity, because light from those
galaxies is bent by gravity from the intervening dark matter. The observed
galaxy images appear distorted, although only slightly, and their shapes must
be precisely disentangled from the effects of pixelisation, convolution and
noise. The worldwide gravitational lensing community has made significant
progress in techniques to measure these distortions via the Shear TEsting
Program (STEP). Via STEP, we have run challenges within our own community, and
come to recognise that this particular image analysis problem is ideally
matched to experts in statistical inference, inverse problems and computational
learning. Thus, in order to continue the progress seen in recent years, we are
seeking an infusion of new ideas from these communities. This document details
the GREAT08 Challenge for potential participants. Please visit
http://www.great08challenge.info for the latest information.

We measure the ellipticity of isolated clusters of galaxies in the Sloan
Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) using gravitational lensing. We stack the clusters,
rotating so that the major axes of the ellipses determined by the positions of
cluster member galaxies are aligned. We exclude the signal from the central 0.5
h^1 Mpc to avoid problems with stacking alignment and cluster member
contamination. We fit an elliptical NFW profile and find an axis ratio for the
dark matter of f = b/a = 0.48+0.140.09 (1 sigma), and rule out f=1 at 99.6 per
cent confidence thus ruling out a spherical halo. We find that the ellipticity
of the cluster galaxy distribution is consistent with being equal to the dark
matter ellipticity. The results are similar if we change the isolation
criterion by 50 per cent in either direction.

Correlations between intrinsic ellipticities of galaxies are a potentially
important systematic error when constraining dark energy properties from weak
gravitational lensing (cosmic shear) surveys. In the absence of perfectly known
galaxy redshifts some modeling of the galaxy intrinsic alignments is likely to
be required to extract the lensing signal to sufficient accuracy. We present a
new model based on the placement of galaxies into dark matter halos. The
central galaxy ellipticity follows the large scale potential and, in the
simplest case, the satellite galaxies point at the halo center. The twohalo
term is then dominated by the linear alignment model and the onehalo term
provides a motivated extension of intrinsic alignment models to small scales.
We provide fitting formulae for the spatial projected source power spectra for
both intrinsicintrinsic (II) and shearintrinsic (GI) correlations. We
illustrate the potential impact of ignoring intrinsic alignments on
cosmological parameter constraints from nontomographic surveys, finding that
sigma_8 could be underestimated by up to the size of the current 1sigma error
bar from cosmic shear if very small scales are included in the analysis.
Finally, we highlight areas of interest for numerical simulations of dark
matter clustering and galaxy formation that can further constrain the intrinsic
alignment signal.

Cosmic shear constrains cosmology by exploiting the apparent alignments of
pairs of galaxies due to gravitational lensing by intervening mass clumps.
However galaxies may become (intrinsically) aligned with each other, and with
nearby mass clumps, during their formation. This effect needs to be
disentangled from the cosmic shear signal to place constraints on cosmology. We
use the linear intrinsic alignment model as a base and compare it to an
alternative model and data. If intrinsic alignments are ignored then the dark
energy equation of state is biased by ~50 per cent. We examine how the number
of tomographic redshift bins affects uncertainties on cosmological parameters
and find that when intrinsic alignments are included two or more times as many
bins are required to obtain 80 per cent of the available information. We
investigate how the degradation in the dark energy figure of merit depends on
the photometric redshift scatter. Previous studies have shown that lensing does
not place stringent requirements on the photometric redshift uncertainty, so
long as the uncertainty is well known. However, if intrinsic alignments are
included the requirements become a factor of three tighter. These results are
quite insensitive to the fraction of catastrophic outliers, assuming that this
fraction is well known. We show the effect of uncertainties in photometric
redshift bias and scatter. Finally we quantify how priors on the intrinsic
alignment model would improve dark energy constraints.