
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three twopoint
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxyshear crosscorrelation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three twopoint
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{0.022}$, and
$w=0.80^{+0.20}_{0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 bestfit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...

We present two galaxy shape catalogues from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1
data set, covering 1500 square degrees with a median redshift of $0.59$. The
catalogues cover two main fields: Stripe 82, and an area overlapping the South
Pole Telescope survey region. We describe our data analysis process and in
particular our shape measurement using two independent shear measurement
pipelines, METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE. The METACALIBRATION catalogue uses a
Gaussian model with an innovative internal calibration scheme, and was applied
to $riz$bands, yielding 34.8M objects. The IM3SHAPE catalogue uses a
maximumlikelihood bulge/disc model calibrated using simulations, and was
applied to $r$band data, yielding 21.9M objects. Both catalogues pass a suite
of null tests that demonstrate their fitness for use in weak lensing science.
We estimate the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties in multiplicative shear calibration to
be $0.013$ and $0.025$ for the METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE catalogues,
respectively.

We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape
catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant
measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain
cosmological parameters in both the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM models, while
also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust
using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration
methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a
3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} =
0.782^{+0.027}_{0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over
the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In
$w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}
= 0.777^{+0.036}_{0.038}$ and a dark energy equationofstate
$w=0.95^{+0.33}_{0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous
cosmic shear constraints in $\sigma_8$  $\Omega_m$, and see no evidence for
disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find
no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne 1$. We expect further
significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more
than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective
integrated exposure time per galaxy.

We present weak lensing (WL) mass constraints for a sample of massive galaxy
clusters detected by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) via the SunyaevZeldovich
effect (SZE). We use $griz$ imaging data obtained from the Science Verification
(SV) phase of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) to fit the WL shear signal of 33
clusters in the redshift range $0.25 \le z \le 0.8$ with NFW profiles and to
constrain a fourparameter SPT massobservable relation. To account for biases
in WL masses, we introduce a WL mass to true mass scaling relation described by
a mean bias and an intrinsic, lognormal scatter. We allow for correlated
scatter within the WL and SZE massobservable relations and use simulations to
calibrate priors on nuisance parameters related to bias and scatter from WL. We
constrain the normalization of the $\zetaM_{500}$ relation,
$A_\mathrm{SZ}=12.0_{6.7}^{+2.6}$ when using a prior on the mass slope
$B_\mathrm{SZ}$ from the latest SPT cluster cosmology analysis. Without this
prior, we recover $A_\mathrm{SZ}=10.8_{5.2}^{+2.3}$ and
$B_\mathrm{SZ}=1.30_{0.44}^{+0.22}$. Results in both cases imply lower cluster
masses than measured in previous work with and without WL, although the
uncertainties are large. The WL derived value of $B_\mathrm{SZ}$ is $\approx
20\%$ lower than the value preferred by the most recent SPT cluster cosmology
analysis. The method demonstrated in this work is designed to constrain cluster
masses and cosmological parameters simultaneously and will be used for
subsequent studies that employ the full SPT cluster sample together with the
DES data.

Mapping the underlying density field, including nonvisible dark matter,
using weak gravitational lensing measurements is now a standard tool in
cosmology. Due to its importance to the science results of current and upcoming
surveys, the quality of the convergence reconstruction methods should be well
understood. We compare three different mass map reconstruction methods:
KaiserSquires (KS), Wiener filter, and GLIMPSE. KS is a direct inversion
method, taking no account of survey masks or noise. The Wiener filter is well
motivated for Gaussian density fields in a Bayesian framework. The GLIMPSE
method uses sparsity, with the aim of reconstructing nonlinearities in the
density field. We compare these methods with a series of tests on the public
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data and on realistic DES
simulations. The Wiener filter and GLIMPSE methods offer substantial
improvement on the standard smoothed KS with a range of metrics. For both the
Wiener filter and GLIMPSE convergence reconstructions we present a 12%
improvement in Pearson correlation with the underlying truth from simulations.
To compare the mapping methods' abilities to find mass peaks, we measure the
difference between peak counts from simulated {\Lambda}CDM shear catalogues and
catalogues with no mass fluctuations. This is a standard data vector when
inferring cosmology from peak statistics. The maximum signaltonoise value of
these peak statistic data vectors was increased by a factor of 3.5 for the
Wiener filter and by a factor of 9 using GLIMPSE. With simulations we measure
the reconstruction of the harmonic phases, showing that the concentration of
the phase residuals is improved 17% by GLIMPSE and 18% by the Wiener filter. We
show that the correlation between the reconstructions from data and the
foreground redMaPPer clusters is increased 18% by the Wiener filter and 32% by
GLIMPSE. [Abridged]

We construct the largest curvedsky galaxy weak lensing mass map to date from
the DES firstyear (DES Y1) data. The map, about 10 times larger than previous
work, is constructed over a contiguous $\approx1,500 $deg$^2$, covering a
comoving volume of $\approx10 $Gpc$^3$. The effects of masking, sampling, and
noise are tested using simulations. We generate weak lensing maps from two DES
Y1 shear catalogs, Metacalibration and Im3shape, with sources at redshift
$0.2<z<1.3,$ and in each of four bins in this range. In the highest
signaltonoise map, the ratio between the mean signaltonoise in the Emode
and the Bmode map is $\sim$1.5 ($\sim$2) when smoothed with a Gaussian filter
of $\sigma_{G}=30$ (80) arcminutes. The second and third moments of the
convergence $\kappa$ in the maps are in agreement with simulations. We also
find no significant correlation of $\kappa$ with maps of potential systematic
contaminants. Finally, we demonstrate two applications of the mass maps: (1)
crosscorrelation with different foreground tracers of mass and (2) exploration
of the largest peaks and voids in the maps.

We use a suite of simulated images based on Year 1 of the Dark Energy Survey
to explore the impact of galaxy neighbours on shape measurement and shear
cosmology. The hoopoe image simulations include realistic blending, galaxy
positions, and spatial variations in depth and PSF properties. Using the
im3shape maximumlikelihood shape measurement code, we identify four mechanisms
by which neighbours can have a nonnegligible influence on shear estimation.
These effects, if ignored, would contribute a net multiplicative bias of $m
\sim 0.03  0.09$ in the DES Y1 im3shape catalogue, though the precise impact
will be dependent on both the measurement code and the selection cuts applied.
This can be reduced to percentage level or less by removing objects with close
neighbours, at a cost to the effective number density of galaxies
$n_\mathrm{eff}$ of 30%. We use the cosmological inference pipeline of DES Y1
to explore the cosmological implications of neighbour bias and show that
omitting blending from the calibration simulation for DES Y1 would bias the
inferred clustering amplitude $S_8\equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega _\mathrm{m}
/0.3)^{0.5}$ by $2 \sigma$ towards low values. Finally, we use the hoopoe
simulations to test the effect of neighbourinduced spatial correlations in the
multiplicative bias. We find the impact on the recovered $S_8$ of ignoring such
correlations to be subdominant to statistical error at the current level of
precision.

We present the first constraints on cosmology from the Dark Energy Survey
(DES), using weak lensing measurements from the preliminary Science
Verification (SV) data. We use 139 square degrees of SV data, which is less
than 3\% of the full DES survey area. Using cosmic shear 2point measurements
over three redshift bins we find $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.81
\pm 0.06$ (68\% confidence), after marginalising over 7 systematics parameters
and 3 other cosmological parameters. We examine the robustness of our results
to the choice of data vector and systematics assumed, and find them to be
stable. About $20$\% of our error bar comes from marginalising over shear and
photometric redshift calibration uncertainties. The current stateoftheart
cosmic shear measurements from CFHTLenS are mildly discrepant with the
cosmological constraints from Planck CMB data; our results are consistent with
both datasets. Our uncertainties are $\sim$30\% larger than those from CFHTLenS
when we carry out a comparable analysis of the two datasets, which we attribute
largely to the lower number density of our shear catalogue. We investigate
constraints on dark energy and find that, with this small fraction of the full
survey, the DES SV constraints make negligible impact on the Planck
constraints. The moderate disagreement between the CFHTLenS and Planck values
of $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}$ is present regardless of the value of
$w$.

We use weaklensing shear measurements to determine the mean mass of
optically selected galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification
data. In a blinded analysis, we split the sample of more than 8,000 redMaPPer
clusters into 15 subsets, spanning ranges in the richness parameter $5 \leq
\lambda \leq 180$ and redshift $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.8$, and fit the averaged mass
density contrast profiles with a model that accounts for seven distinct sources
of systematic uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors;
clustermember contamination; miscentering; deviations from the NFW halo
profile; halo triaxiality; and lineofsight projections. We combine the
inferred cluster masses to estimate the joint scaling relation between mass,
richness and redshift, $\mathcal{M}(\lambda,z) \varpropto M_0 \lambda^{F}
(1+z)^{G}$. We find $M_0 \equiv \langle
M_{200\mathrm{m}}\,\,\lambda=30,z=0.5\rangle=\left[ 2.35 \pm 0.22\ \rm{(stat)}
\pm 0.12\ \rm{(sys)} \right] \cdot 10^{14}\ M_\odot$, with $F =
1.12\,\pm\,0.20\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.06\ \rm{(sys)}$ and $G = 0.18\,\pm\,
0.75\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.24\ \rm{(sys)}$. The amplitude of the massrichness
relation is in excellent agreement with the weaklensing calibration of
redMaPPer clusters in SDSS by Simet et al. (2016) and with the Saro et al.
(2015) calibration based on abundance matching of SPTdetected clusters. Our
results extend the redshift range over which the massrichness relation of
redMaPPer clusters has been calibrated with weak lensing from $z\leq 0.3$ to
$z\leq0.8$. Calibration uncertainties of shear measurements and photometric
redshift estimates dominate our systematic error budget and require substantial
improvements for forthcoming studies.

Cosmic shear is sensitive to fluctuations in the cosmological matter density
field, including on small physical scales, where matter clustering is affected
by baryonic physics in galaxies and galaxy clusters, such as star formation,
supernovae feedback and AGN feedback. While muddying any cosmological
information that is contained in small scale cosmic shear measurements, this
does mean that cosmic shear has the potential to constrain baryonic physics and
galaxy formation. We perform an analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES)
Science Verification (SV) cosmic shear measurements, now extended to smaller
scales, and using the Mead et al. 2015 halo model to account for baryonic
feedback. While the SV data has limited statistical power, we demonstrate using
a simulated likelihood analysis that the final DES data will have the
statistical power to differentiate among baryonic feedback scenarios. We also
explore some of the difficulties in interpreting the small scales in cosmic
shear measurements, presenting estimates of the size of several other
systematic effects that make inference from small scales difficult, including
uncertainty in the modelling of intrinsic alignment on nonlinear scales,
`lensing bias', and shape measurement selection effects. For the latter two, we
make use of novel image simulations. While future cosmic shear datasets have
the statistical power to constrain baryonic feedback scenarios, there are
several systematic effects that require improved treatments, in order to make
robust conclusions about baryonic feedback.

We present measurements of weak gravitational lensing cosmic shear twopoint
statistics using Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. We demonstrate
that our results are robust to the choice of shear measurement pipeline, either
ngmix or im3shape, and robust to the choice of twopoint statistic, including
both real and Fourierspace statistics. Our results pass a suite of null tests
including tests for Bmode contamination and direct tests for any dependence of
the twopoint functions on a set of 16 observing conditions and galaxy
properties, such as seeing, airmass, galaxy color, galaxy magnitude, etc. We
furthermore use a large suite of simulations to compute the covariance matrix
of the cosmic shear measurements and assign statistical significance to our
null tests. We find that our covariance matrix is consistent with the halo
model prediction, indicating that it has the appropriate level of halo sample
variance. We compare the same jackknife procedure applied to the data and the
simulations in order to search for additional sources of noise not captured by
the simulations. We find no statistically significant extra sources of noise in
the data. The overall detection significance with tomography for our highest
source density catalog is 9.7sigma. Cosmological constraints from the
measurements in this work are presented in a companion paper (DES et al. 2015).

We measure the redshift evolution of galaxy bias for a magnitudelimited
galaxy sample by combining the galaxy density maps and weak lensing shear maps
for a $\sim$116 deg$^{2}$ area of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science
Verification data. This method was first developed in Amara et al. (2012) and
later reexamined in a companion paper (Pujol et al. 2016) with rigorous
simulation tests and analytical treatment of tomographic measurements. In this
work we apply this method to the DES SV data and measure the galaxy bias for a
i$<$22.5 galaxy sample. We find the galaxy bias and 1$\sigma$ error bars in 4
photometric redshift bins to be 1.12$\pm$0.19 (z=0.20.4), 0.97$\pm$0.15
(z=0.40.6), 1.38$\pm$0.39 (z=0.60.8)), and 1.45$\pm$0.56 (z=0.81.0). These
measurements are consistent at the 2$\sigma$ level with measurements on the
same dataset using galaxy clustering and crosscorrelation of galaxies with CMB
lensing, with most of the redshift bins consistent within the 1{\sigma} error
bars. In addition, our method provides the only $\sigma_8$independent
constraint among the three. We forwardmodel the main observational effects
using mock galaxy catalogs by including shape noise, photoz errors and masking
effects. We show that our bias measurement from the data is consistent with
that expected from simulations. With the forthcoming full DES data set, we
expect this method to provide additional constraints on the galaxy bias
measurement from more traditional methods. Furthermore, in the process of our
measurement, we build up a 3D mass map that allows further exploration of the
dark matter distribution and its relation to galaxy evolution.

We present weak lensing shear catalogues for 139 square degrees of data taken
during the Science Verification (SV) time for the new Dark Energy Camera
(DECam) being used for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We describe our object
selection, point spread function estimation and shear measurement procedures
using two independent shear pipelines, IM3SHAPE and NGMIX, which produce
catalogues of 2.12 million and 3.44 million galaxies respectively. We detail a
set of null tests for the shear measurements and find that they pass the
requirements for systematic errors at the level necessary for weak lensing
science applications using the SV data. We also discuss some of the planned
algorithmic improvements that will be necessary to produce sufficiently
accurate shear catalogues for the full 5year DES, which is expected to cover
5000 square degrees.

Shear peak statistics has gained a lot of attention recently as a practical
alternative to the two point statistics for constraining cosmological
parameters. We perform a shear peak statistics analysis of the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data, using weak gravitational lensing
measurements from a 139 deg$^2$ field. We measure the abundance of peaks
identified in aperture mass maps, as a function of their signaltonoise ratio,
in the signaltonoise range $0<\mathcal S / \mathcal N<4$. To predict the peak
counts as a function of cosmological parameters we use a suite of $N$body
simulations spanning 158 models with varying $\Omega_{\rm m}$ and $\sigma_8$,
fixing $w = 1$, $\Omega_{\rm b} = 0.04$, $h = 0.7$ and $n_s=1$, to which we
have applied the DES SV mask and redshift distribution. In our fiducial
analysis we measure $\sigma_{8}(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.6}=0.77 \pm 0.07$, after
marginalising over the shear multiplicative bias and the error on the mean
redshift of the galaxy sample. We introduce models of intrinsic alignments,
blending, and source contamination by cluster members. These models indicate
that peaks with $\mathcal S / \mathcal N>4$ would require significant
corrections, which is why we do not include them in our analysis. We compare
our results to the cosmological constraints from the two point analysis on the
SV field and find them to be in good agreement in both the central value and
its uncertainty. We discuss prospects for future peak statistics analysis with
upcoming DES data.

We measure the crosscorrelation between weak lensing of galaxy images and of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The effects of gravitational lensing on
different sources will be correlated if the lensing is caused by the same mass
fluctuations. We use galaxy shape measurements from 139 deg$^{2}$ of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification data and overlapping CMB lensing from
the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. The DES source galaxies have a
median redshift of $z_{\rm med} {\sim} 0.7$, while the CMB lensing kernel is
broad and peaks at $z{\sim}2$. The resulting crosscorrelation is maximally
sensitive to mass fluctuations at $z{\sim}0.44$. Assuming the Planck 2015
bestfit cosmology, the amplitude of the DES$\times$SPT crosspower is found to
be $A = 0.88 \pm 0.30$ and that from DES$\times$Planck to be $A = 0.86 \pm
0.39$, where $A=1$ corresponds to the theoretical prediction. These are
consistent with the expected signal and correspond to significances of $2.9
\sigma$ and $2.2 \sigma$ respectively. We demonstrate that our results are
robust to a number of important systematic effects including the shear
measurement method, estimator choice, photometric redshift uncertainty and CMB
lensing systematics. Significant intrinsic alignment of galaxy shapes would
increase the crosscorrelation signal inferred from the data; we calculate a
value of $A = 1.08 \pm 0.36$ for DES$\times$SPT when we correct the
observations with a simple IA model. With three measurements of this
crosscorrelation now existing in the literature, there is not yet reliable
evidence for any deviation from the expected LCDM level of crosscorrelation,
given the size of the statistical uncertainties and the significant impact of
systematic errors, particularly IAs. We provide forecasts for the expected
signaltonoise of the combination of the fiveyear DES survey and SPT3G.

We measure the weak lensing shear around galaxy troughs, i.e. the radial
alignment of background galaxies relative to underdensities in projections of
the foreground galaxy field over a wide range of redshift in Science
Verification data from the Dark Energy Survey. Our detection of the shear
signal is highly significant (10 to 15$\sigma$ for the smallest angular scales)
for troughs with the redshift range z in [0.2,0.5] of the projected galaxy
field and angular diameters of 10 arcmin...1{\deg}. These measurements probe
the connection between the galaxy, matter density, and convergence fields. By
assuming galaxies are biased tracers of the matter density with Poissonian
noise, we find agreement of our measurements with predictions in a fiducial
Lambda cold dark matter model. The prediction for the lensing signal on large
trough scales is virtually independent of the details of the underlying model
for the connection of galaxies and matter. Our comparison of the shear around
troughs with that around cylinders with large galaxy counts is consistent with
a symmetry between galaxy and matter over and underdensities. In addition, we
measure the twopoint angular correlation of troughs with galaxies which, in
contrast to the lensing signal, is sensitive to galaxy bias on all scales. The
lensing signal of troughs and their clustering with galaxies is therefore a
promising probe of the statistical properties of matter underdensities and
their connection to the galaxy field.

We present photometric redshift estimates for galaxies used in the weak
lensing analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification (DES SV) data.
Four model or machine learningbased photometric redshift methods  ANNZ2,
BPZ calibrated against BCCUfig simulations, SkyNet, and TPZ  are analysed.
For training, calibration, and testing of these methods, we construct a
catalogue of spectroscopically confirmed galaxies matched against DES SV data.
The performance of the methods is evaluated against the matched spectroscopic
catalogue, focusing on metrics relevant for weak lensing analyses, with
additional validation against COSMOS photozs. From the galaxies in the DES SV
shear catalogue, which have mean redshift $0.72\pm0.01$ over the range
$0.3<z<1.3$, we construct three tomographic bins with means of $z=\{0.45, 0.67,
1.00\}$. These bins each have systematic uncertainties $\delta z \lesssim 0.05$
in the mean of the fiducial SkyNet photoz $n(z)$. We propagate the errors in
the redshift distributions through to their impact on cosmological parameters
estimated with cosmic shear, and find that they cause shifts in the value of
$\sigma_8$ of approx. 3%. This shift is within the one sigma statistical errors
on $\sigma_8$ for the DES SV shear catalog. We further study the potential
impact of systematic differences on the critical surface density,
$\Sigma_{\mathrm{crit}}$, finding levels of bias safely less than the
statistical power of DES SV data. We recommend a final Gaussian prior for the
photoz bias in the mean of $n(z)$ of width $0.05$ for each of the three
tomographic bins, and show that this is a sufficient bias model for the
corresponding cosmology analysis.

We present a mass map reconstructed from weak gravitational lensing shear
measurements over 139 sq. deg from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science
Verification data. The mass map probes both luminous and dark matter, thus
providing a tool for studying cosmology. We find good agreement between the
mass map and the distribution of massive galaxy clusters identified using a
redsequence cluster finder. Potential candidates for superclusters and voids
are identified using these maps. We measure the crosscorrelation between the
mass map and a magnitudelimited foreground galaxy sample and find a detection
at the 57 sigma level on a large range of scales. These measurements are
consistent with simulated galaxy catalogs based on LCDM Nbody simulations,
suggesting low systematics uncertainties in the map. We summarize our key
findings in this letter; the detailed methodology and tests for systematics are
presented in a companion paper.

Weak gravitational lensing allows one to reconstruct the spatial distribution
of the projected mass density across the sky. These "mass maps" provide a
powerful tool for studying cosmology as they probe both luminous and dark
matter. In this paper, we present a weak lensing mass map reconstructed from
shear measurements in a 139 sq. deg area from the Dark Energy Survey (DES)
Science Verification (SV) data. We compare the distribution of mass with that
of the foreground distribution of galaxies and clusters. The overdensities in
the reconstructed map correlate well with the distribution of optically
detected clusters. We demonstrate that candidate superclusters and voids along
the line of sight can be identified, exploiting the tight scatter of the
cluster photometric redshifts. We crosscorrelate the mass map with a
foreground magnitudelimited galaxy sample from the same data. Our measurement
gives results consistent with mock catalogs from Nbody simulations that
include the primary sources of statistical uncertainties in the galaxy,
lensing, and photoz catalogs. The statistical significance of the
crosscorrelation is at the 6.8sigma level with 20 arcminute smoothing. A
major goal of this study is to investigate systematic effects arising from a
variety of sources, including PSF and photoz uncertainties. We make maps
derived from twenty variables that may characterize systematics and find the
principal components. We find that the contribution of systematics to the
lensing mass maps is generally within measurement uncertainties. In this work,
we analyze less than 3% of the final area that will be mapped by the DES; the
tools and analysis techniques developed in this paper can be applied to
forthcoming larger datasets from the survey.

We measure the weaklensing masses and galaxy distributions of four massive
galaxy clusters observed during the Science Verification phase of the Dark
Energy Survey. This pathfinder study is meant to 1) validate the DECam imager
for the task of measuring weaklensing shapes, and 2) utilize DECam's large
field of view to map out the clusters and their environments over 90 arcmin. We
conduct a series of rigorous tests on astrometry, photometry, image quality,
PSF modeling, and shear measurement accuracy to single out flaws in the data
and also to identify the optimal data processing steps and parameters. We find
Science Verification data from DECam to be suitable for the lensing analysis
described in this paper. The PSF is generally wellbehaved, but the modeling is
rendered difficult by a fluxdependent PSF width and ellipticity. We employ
photometric redshifts to distinguish between foreground and background
galaxies, and a redsequence cluster finder to provide cluster richness
estimates and clustergalaxy distributions. By fitting NFW profiles to the
clusters in this study, we determine weaklensing masses that are in agreement
with previous work. For Abell 3261, we provide the first estimates of redshift,
weaklensing mass, and richness. In addition, the clustergalaxy distributions
indicate the presence of filamentary structures attached to 1E 065756 and RXC
J2248.74431, stretching out as far as 1 degree (approximately 20 Mpc),
showcasing the potential of DECam and DES for detailed studies of degreescale
features on the sky.

The study of exoplanetary atmospheres epitomises a continuous quest for
higher accuracy measurements. Systematic effects and noise associated with both
the stellar activity and the instrument can bias the results and thus limit the
precision of the analysis. To reach a high photometric and spectroscopic
precision, it is therefore essential to correct for these effects. We present
here a novel nonparametric approach, named Gaussian Process method for Star
Characterization (GPSC), to remove effects of stellar activity and instrumental
systematics on planetary signals, with a view to preserve the atmospheric
contribution which can be as small as 10$^{4}$ or even 10$^{5}$ the flux of
the star. We applied our method to data recorded with Kepler, focussing on a
sample of lightcurves with different effective temperatures and flux
modulations. We found that GPSC can very effectively correct for the short and
long term stellar activity and instrumental systematics. Additionally we run
the GPSC on both real and simulated transit data, finding transit depths
consistent with the original ones. Consequently we considered 10 hours of
continuous observations: daily, every other day and weekly, and we used the
GPSC to reconstruct the lightcurves. When data are recorded more frequently
than once every five days we found that our approach is able to extrapolate the
stellar flux at the 10$^{4}$ level compared to the full stellar flux. These
results show a great potential of GPSC to isolate the relevant astrophysical
signal and achieve the precision needed for the correction of short and long
term stellar activity.

In this paper we present results from the weak lensing shape measurement
GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Galaxy Challenge. This
marks an order of magnitude step change in the level of scrutiny employed in
weak lensing shape measurement analysis. We provide descriptions of each method
tested and include 10 evaluation metrics over 24 simulation branches. GREAT10
was the first shape measurement challenge to include variable fields; both the
shear field and the Point Spread Function (PSF) vary across the images in a
realistic manner. The variable fields enable a variety of metrics that are
inaccessible to constant shear simulations including a direct measure of the
impact of shape measurement inaccuracies, and the impact of PSF size and
ellipticity, on the shear power spectrum. To assess the impact of shape
measurement bias for cosmic shear we present a general pseudoCl formalism,
that propagates spatially varying systematics in cosmic shear through to power
spectrum estimates. We also show how onepoint estimators of bias can be
extracted from variable shear simulations. The GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
received 95 submissions and saw a factor of 3 improvement in the accuracy
achieved by shape measurement methods. The best methods achieve subpercent
average biases. We find a strong dependence in accuracy as a function of
signaltonoise, and indications of a weak dependence on galaxy type and size.
Some requirements for the most ambitious cosmic shear experiments are met above
a signaltonoise ratio of 20. These results have the caveat that the simulated
PSF was a groundbased PSF. Our results are a snapshot of the accuracy of
current shape measurement methods and are a benchmark upon which improvement
can continue. This provides a foundation for a better understanding of the
strengths and limitations of shape measurement methods.