
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three twopoint
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxyshear crosscorrelation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three twopoint
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{0.022}$, and
$w=0.80^{+0.20}_{0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 bestfit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...

We present two galaxy shape catalogues from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1
data set, covering 1500 square degrees with a median redshift of $0.59$. The
catalogues cover two main fields: Stripe 82, and an area overlapping the South
Pole Telescope survey region. We describe our data analysis process and in
particular our shape measurement using two independent shear measurement
pipelines, METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE. The METACALIBRATION catalogue uses a
Gaussian model with an innovative internal calibration scheme, and was applied
to $riz$bands, yielding 34.8M objects. The IM3SHAPE catalogue uses a
maximumlikelihood bulge/disc model calibrated using simulations, and was
applied to $r$band data, yielding 21.9M objects. Both catalogues pass a suite
of null tests that demonstrate their fitness for use in weak lensing science.
We estimate the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties in multiplicative shear calibration to
be $0.013$ and $0.025$ for the METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE catalogues,
respectively.

We present galaxygalaxy lensing measurements from 1321 sq. deg. of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 (Y1) data. The lens sample consists of a selection
of 660,000 red galaxies with highprecision photometric redshifts, known as
redMaGiC, split into five tomographic bins in the redshift range $0.15 < z <
0.9$. We use two different source samples, obtained from the Metacalibration
(26 million galaxies) and Im3shape (18 million galaxies) shear estimation
codes, which are split into four photometric redshift bins in the range $0.2 <
z < 1.3$. We perform extensive testing of potential systematic effects that can
bias the galaxygalaxy lensing signal, including those from shear estimation,
photometric redshifts, and observational properties. Covariances are obtained
from jackknife subsamples of the data and validated with a suite of lognormal
simulations. We use the shearratio geometric test to obtain independent
constraints on the mean of the source redshift distributions, providing
validation of those obtained from other photo$z$ studies with the same data.
We find consistency between the galaxy bias estimates obtained from our
galaxygalaxy lensing measurements and from galaxy clustering, therefore
showing the galaxymatter crosscorrelation coefficient $r$ to be consistent
with one, measured over the scales used for the cosmological analysis. The
results in this work present one of the three twopoint correlation functions,
along with galaxy clustering and cosmic shear, used in the DES cosmological
analysis of Y1 data, and hence the methodology and the systematics tests
presented here provide a critical input for that study as well as for future
cosmological analyses in DES and other photometric galaxy surveys.

We measure the clustering of DES Year 1 galaxies that are intended to be
combined with weak lensing samples in order to produce precise cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of largescale structure and lensing
correlations. Twopoint correlation functions are measured for a sample of $6.6
\times 10^{5}$ luminous red galaxies selected using the \textsc{redMaGiC}
algorithm over an area of $1321$ square degrees, in the redshift range $0.15 <
z < 0.9$, split into five tomographic redshift bins. The sample has a mean
redshift uncertainty of $\sigma_{z}/(1+z) = 0.017$. We quantify and correct
spurious correlations induced by spatially variable survey properties, testing
their impact on the clustering measurements and covariance. We demonstrate the
sample's robustness by testing for stellar contamination, for potential biases
that could arise from the systematic correction, and for the consistency
between the twopoint auto and crosscorrelation functions. We show that the
corrections we apply have a significant impact on the resultant measurement of
cosmological parameters, but that the results are robust against arbitrary
choices in the correction method. We find the linear galaxy bias in each
redshift bin in a fiducial cosmology to be $b(z$=$0.24)=1.40 \pm 0.08$,
$b(z$=$0.38)=1.61 \pm 0.05$, $b(z$=$0.53)=1.60 \pm 0.04$ for galaxies with
luminosities $L/L_*>$$0.5$, $b(z$=$0.68)=1.93 \pm 0.05$ for $L/L_*>$$1$ and
$b(z$=$0.83)=1.99 \pm 0.07$ for $L/L_*$$>1.5$, broadly consistent with
expectations for the redshift and luminosity dependence of the bias of red
galaxies. We show these measurements to be consistent with the linear bias
obtained from tangential shear measurements.

We derive cosmological constraints from the probability distribution function
(PDF) of evolved largescale matter density fluctuations. We do this by
splitting lines of sight by density based on their count of tracer galaxies,
and by measuring both gravitational shear around and countsincells in
overdense and underdense lines of sight, in Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Year
and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Our analysis uses a perturbation
theory model (see companion paper Friedrich at al.) and is validated using
Nbody simulation realizations and lognormal mocks. It allows us to constrain
cosmology, bias and stochasticity of galaxies w.r.t. matter density and, in
addition, the skewness of the matter density field.
From a Bayesian model comparison, we find that the data weakly prefer a
connection of galaxies and matter that is stochastic beyond Poisson
fluctuations on <=20 arcmin angular smoothing scale. The two stochasticity
models we fit yield DES constraints on the matter density
$\Omega_m=0.26^{+0.04}_{0.03}$ and $\Omega_m=0.28^{+0.05}_{0.04}$ that are
consistent with each other. These values also agree with the DES analysis of
galaxy and shear twopoint functions (3x2pt) that only uses second moments of
the PDF. Constraints on $\sigma_8$ are model dependent
($\sigma_8=0.97^{+0.07}_{0.06}$ and $0.80^{+0.06}_{0.07}$ for the two
stochasticity models), but consistent with each other and with the 3x2pt
results if stochasticity is at the low end of the posterior range.
As an additional test of gravity, counts and lensing in cells allow to
compare the skewness $S_3$ of the matter density PDF to its LCDM prediction. We
find no evidence of excess skewness in any model or data set, with better than
25 per cent relative precision in the skewness estimate from DES alone.

We describe the derivation and validation of redshift distribution estimates
and their uncertainties for the galaxies used as weak lensing sources in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 cosmological analyses. The Bayesian Photometric
Redshift (BPZ) code is used to assign galaxies to four redshift bins between
z=0.2 and 1.3, and to produce initial estimates of the lensingweighted
redshift distributions $n^i_{PZ}(z)$ for bin i. Accurate determination of
cosmological parameters depends critically on knowledge of $n^i$ but is
insensitive to bin assignments or redshift errors for individual galaxies. The
cosmological analyses allow for shifts $n^i(z)=n^i_{PZ}(z\Delta z^i)$ to
correct the mean redshift of $n^i(z)$ for biases in $n^i_{\rm PZ}$. The $\Delta
z^i$ are constrained by comparison of independently estimated 30band
photometric redshifts of galaxies in the COSMOS field to BPZ estimates made
from the DES griz fluxes, for a sample matched in fluxes, preseeing size, and
lensing weight to the DES weaklensing sources. In companion papers, the
$\Delta z^i$ are further constrained by the angular clustering of the source
galaxies around red galaxies with secure photometric redshifts at 0.15<z<0.9.
This paper details the BPZ and COSMOS procedures, and demonstrates that the
cosmological inference is insensitive to details of the $n^i(z)$ beyond the
choice of $\Delta z^i$. The clustering and COSMOS validation methods produce
consistent estimates of $\Delta z^i$, with combined uncertainties of
$\sigma_{\Delta z^i}=$0.015, 0.013, 0.011, and 0.022 in the four bins. We
marginalize over these in all analyses to follow, which does not diminish the
constraining power significantly. Repeating the photoz procedure using the
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF) algorithm instead of BPZ, or using the
$n^i(z)$ directly estimated from COSMOS, yields no discernible difference in
cosmological inferences.

We describe the creation, content, and validation of the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) internal yearone cosmology data set, Y1A1 GOLD, in support of upcoming
cosmological analyses. The Y1A1 GOLD data set is assembled from multiple epochs
of DES imaging and consists of calibrated photometric zeropoints, object
catalogs, and ancillary data products  e.g., maps of survey depth and
observing conditions, stargalaxy classification, and photometric redshift
estimates  that are necessary for accurate cosmological analyses. The Y1A1
GOLD widearea object catalog consists of ~137 million objects detected in
coadded images covering ~1800 deg$^2$ in the DES grizY filters. The 10{\sigma}
limiting magnitude for galaxies is g = 23.4, r = 23.2, i = 22.5, z = 21.8, and
Y = 20.1. Photometric calibration of Y1A1 GOLD was performed by combining
nightly zeropoint solutions with stellarlocus regression, and the absolute
calibration accuracy is better than 2% over the survey area. DES Y1A1 GOLD is
the largest photometric data set at the achieved depth to date, enabling
precise measurements of cosmic acceleration at z $\lesssim$ 1.

We constrain the massrichness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational
lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $\lambda$ and
redshift $z$ for $\lambda\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the
mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling
the scaling relation as $\langle M_{\rm 200m}\lambda,z\rangle = M_0
(\lambda/40)^F ((1+z)/1.35)^G$, we constrain the normalization of the scaling
relation at the 5.0 per cent level as $M_0 = [3.081 \pm 0.075 ({\rm stat}) \pm
0.133 ({\rm sys})] \cdot 10^{14}\ {\rm M}_\odot$ at $\lambda=40$ and $z=0.35$.
The richness scaling index is constrained to be $F=1.356 \pm 0.051\ ({\rm
stat})\pm 0.008\ ({\rm sys})$ and the redshift scaling index $G=0.30\pm 0.30\
({\rm stat})\pm 0.06\ ({\rm sys})$. These are the tightest measurements of the
normalization and richness scaling index made to date. We use a semianalytic
covariance matrix to characterize the statistical errors in the recovered weak
lensing profiles. Our analysis accounts for the following sources of systematic
error: shear and photometric redshift errors, cluster miscentering, cluster
member dilution of the source sample, systematic uncertainties in the modeling
of the halomass correlation function, halo triaxiality, and projection
effects. We discuss prospects for reducing this systematic error budget, which
dominates the uncertainty on $M_0$. Our result is in excellent agreement with,
but has significantly smaller uncertainties than, previous measurements in the
literature, and augurs well for the power of the DES cluster survey as a tool
for precision cosmology and upcoming galaxy surveys such as LSST, Euclid and
WFIRST.

We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape
catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant
measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain
cosmological parameters in both the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM models, while
also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust
using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration
methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a
3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} =
0.782^{+0.027}_{0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over
the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In
$w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}
= 0.777^{+0.036}_{0.038}$ and a dark energy equationofstate
$w=0.95^{+0.33}_{0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous
cosmic shear constraints in $\sigma_8$  $\Omega_m$, and see no evidence for
disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find
no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne 1$. We expect further
significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more
than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective
integrated exposure time per galaxy.

We present density split statistics, a framework that studies lensing and
countsincells as a function of foreground galaxy density, thereby providing a
largescale measurement of both 2point and 3point statistics. Our method
extends our earlier work on trough lensing and is summarized as follows: given
a foreground (low redshift) population of galaxies, we divide the sky into
subareas of equal size but distinct galaxy density. We then measure lensing
around uniformly spaced points separately in each of these subareas, as well as
countsincells statistics (CiC). The lensing signals trace the matter density
contrast around regions of fixed galaxy density. Through the CiC measurements
this can be related to the density profile around regions of fixed matter
density. Together, these measurements constitute a powerful probe of cosmology,
the skewness of the density field and the connection of galaxies and matter.
In this paper we show how to model both the density split lensing signal and
CiC from basic ingredients: a nonlinear power spectrum, clustering hierarchy
coefficients from perturbation theory and a parametric model for galaxy bias
and shotnoise. Using Nbody simulations, we demonstrate that this model is
sufficiently accurate for a cosmological analysis on year 1 data from the Dark
Energy Survey.

Mapping the underlying density field, including nonvisible dark matter,
using weak gravitational lensing measurements is now a standard tool in
cosmology. Due to its importance to the science results of current and upcoming
surveys, the quality of the convergence reconstruction methods should be well
understood. We compare three different mass map reconstruction methods:
KaiserSquires (KS), Wiener filter, and GLIMPSE. KS is a direct inversion
method, taking no account of survey masks or noise. The Wiener filter is well
motivated for Gaussian density fields in a Bayesian framework. The GLIMPSE
method uses sparsity, with the aim of reconstructing nonlinearities in the
density field. We compare these methods with a series of tests on the public
Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data and on realistic DES
simulations. The Wiener filter and GLIMPSE methods offer substantial
improvement on the standard smoothed KS with a range of metrics. For both the
Wiener filter and GLIMPSE convergence reconstructions we present a 12%
improvement in Pearson correlation with the underlying truth from simulations.
To compare the mapping methods' abilities to find mass peaks, we measure the
difference between peak counts from simulated {\Lambda}CDM shear catalogues and
catalogues with no mass fluctuations. This is a standard data vector when
inferring cosmology from peak statistics. The maximum signaltonoise value of
these peak statistic data vectors was increased by a factor of 3.5 for the
Wiener filter and by a factor of 9 using GLIMPSE. With simulations we measure
the reconstruction of the harmonic phases, showing that the concentration of
the phase residuals is improved 17% by GLIMPSE and 18% by the Wiener filter. We
show that the correlation between the reconstructions from data and the
foreground redMaPPer clusters is increased 18% by the Wiener filter and 32% by
GLIMPSE. [Abridged]

We describe the first public data release of the Dark Energy Survey, DES DR1,
consisting of reduced single epoch images, coadded images, coadded source
catalogs, and associated products and services assembled over the first three
years of DES science operations. DES DR1 is based on optical/nearinfrared
imaging from 345 distinct nights (August 2013 to February 2016) by the Dark
Energy Camera mounted on the 4m Blanco telescope at Cerro Tololo
InterAmerican Observatory in Chile. We release data from the DES widearea
survey covering ~5,000 sq. deg. of the southern Galactic cap in five broad
photometric bands, grizY. DES DR1 has a median delivered pointspread function
of g = 1.12, r = 0.96, i = 0.88, z = 0.84, and Y = 0.90 arcsec FWHM, a
photometric precision of < 1% in all bands, and an astrometric precision of 151
mas. The median coadded catalog depth for a 1.95" diameter aperture at S/N = 10
is g = 24.33, r = 24.08, i = 23.44, z = 22.69, and Y = 21.44 mag. DES DR1
includes nearly 400M distinct astronomical objects detected in ~10,000 coadd
tiles of size 0.534 sq. deg. produced from ~39,000 individual exposures.
Benchmark galaxy and stellar samples contain ~310M and ~ 80M objects,
respectively, following a basic object quality selection. These data are
accessible through a range of interfaces, including query web clients, image
cutout servers, jupyter notebooks, and an interactive coadd image visualization
tool. DES DR1 constitutes the largest photometric data set to date at the
achieved depth and photometric precision.

We construct the largest curvedsky galaxy weak lensing mass map to date from
the DES firstyear (DES Y1) data. The map, about 10 times larger than previous
work, is constructed over a contiguous $\approx1,500 $deg$^2$, covering a
comoving volume of $\approx10 $Gpc$^3$. The effects of masking, sampling, and
noise are tested using simulations. We generate weak lensing maps from two DES
Y1 shear catalogs, Metacalibration and Im3shape, with sources at redshift
$0.2<z<1.3,$ and in each of four bins in this range. In the highest
signaltonoise map, the ratio between the mean signaltonoise in the Emode
and the Bmode map is $\sim$1.5 ($\sim$2) when smoothed with a Gaussian filter
of $\sigma_{G}=30$ (80) arcminutes. The second and third moments of the
convergence $\kappa$ in the maps are in agreement with simulations. We also
find no significant correlation of $\kappa$ with maps of potential systematic
contaminants. Finally, we demonstrate two applications of the mass maps: (1)
crosscorrelation with different foreground tracers of mass and (2) exploration
of the largest peaks and voids in the maps.

Spatially resolved kinematics of nearby galaxies has shown that the ratio of
dynamical to stellar populationbased estimates of the mass of a galaxy
($M_*^{\rm JAM}/M_*$) correlates with $\sigma_e$, if $M_*$ is estimated using
the same IMF for all galaxies and the stellar M/L ratio within each galaxy is
constant. This correlation may indicate that, in fact, the IMF is more
dwarfrich for galaxies with large $\sigma$. We use this correlation to
estimate a dynamical or IMFcorrected stellar mass, $M_*^{\rm \alpha_{JAM}}$,
from $M_{*}$ and $\sigma_e$ for a sample of $6 \times 10^5$ SDSS galaxies for
which spatially resolved kinematics is not available. We also compute the
`virial' mass estimate $k(n,R)\,R_e\,\sigma_R^2/G$, where $n$ is the Sersic
index, in the SDSS and ATLAS$^{\rm 3D}$ samples. We show that an $n$dependent
correction must be applied to the $k(n,R)$ values provided by Prugniel & Simien
(1997). Our analysis also shows that the shape of the velocity dispersion
profile in the ATLAS$^{\rm 3D}$ sample varies weakly with $n$:
$(\sigma_R/\sigma_e) = (R/R_e)^{\gamma(n)}$. The resulting stellar mass
functions, based on $M_*^{\rm \alpha_{JAM}}$ and the recalibrated virial mass,
are in good agreement. If the $M_*^{\rm \alpha_{JAM}}/M_*  \sigma_e$
correlation is indeed due to the IMF, and stellar M/L gradients can be ignored,
then our $\phi(M_*^{\rm \alpha_{JAM}})$ is an estimate of the stellar mass
function in which $\sigma_e$dependent variations in the IMF across the
population have been accounted for. Using a Fundamental Plane based
observational proxy for $\sigma_e$ produces comparable results. By
demonstrating that cheaper proxies are sufficiently accurate, our analysis
should enable a more reliable census of the mass in stars for large galaxy
samples, at a fraction of the cost. Our results are provided in tabular form.

We present the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) discovery of the optical
counterpart of the first binary neutron star merger detected through
gravitational wave emission, GW170817. Our observations commenced 10.5 hours
postmerger, as soon as the localization region became accessible from Chile.
We imaged 70 deg$^2$ in the $i$ and $z$ bands, covering 93\% of the initial
integrated localization probability, to a depth necessary to identify likely
optical counterparts (e.g., a kilonova). At 11.4 hours postmerger we detected
a bright optical transient located $10.6''$ from the nucleus of NGC\,4993 at
redshift $z=0.0098$, consistent (for $H_0 = 70$\, km s$^{1}$ Mpc$^{1}$) with
the distance of $40 \pm 8$\, Mpc reported by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration
and the Virgo Collaboration (LVC). At detection the transient had magnitudes
$i\approx 17.30$ and $z\approx 17.45$, and thus an absolute magnitude of $M_i =
15.7$, in the luminosity range expected for a kilonova. We identified 1,500
potential transient candidates. Applying simple selection criteria aimed at
rejecting background events such as supernovae, we find the transient
associated with NGC\,4993 as the only remaining plausible counterpart, and
reject chance coincidence at the 99.5\% confidence level. We therefore conclude
that the optical counterpart we have identified near NGC\,4993 is associated
with GW170817. This discovery ushers in the era of multimessenger astronomy
with gravitational waves, and demonstrates the power of DECam to identify the
optical counterparts of gravitationalwave sources.

We present UV, optical, and NIR photometry of the first electromagnetic
counterpart to a gravitational wave source from Advanced LIGO/Virgo, the binary
neutron star merger GW170817. Our data set extends from the discovery of the
optical counterpart at $0.47$ days to $18.5$ days postmerger, and includes
observations with the Dark Energy Camera (DECam), GeminiSouth/FLAMINGOS2
(GS/F2), and the {\it Hubble Space Telescope} ({\it HST}). The spectral energy
distribution (SED) inferred from this photometry at $0.6$ days is well
described by a blackbody model with $T\approx 8300$ K, a radius of $R\approx
4.5\times 10^{14}$ cm (corresponding to an expansion velocity of $v\approx
0.3c$), and a bolometric luminosity of $L_{\rm bol}\approx 5\times10^{41}$ erg
s$^{1}$. At $1.5$ days we find a multicomponent SED across the optical and
NIR, and subsequently we observe rapid fading in the UV and blue optical bands
and significant reddening of the optical/NIR colors. Modeling the entire data
set we find that models with heating from radioactive decay of $^{56}$Ni, or
those with only a single component of opacity from $r$process elements, fail
to capture the rapid optical decline and red optical/NIR colors. Instead,
models with two components consistent with lanthanidepoor and lanthaniderich
ejecta provide a good fit to the data, the resulting "blue" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.01$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{blue}\approx 0.3$c, and the "red" component has
$M_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.04$ M$_\odot$ and
$v_\mathrm{ej}^\mathrm{red}\approx 0.1$c. These ejecta masses are broadly
consistent with the estimated $r$process production rate required to explain
the Milky Way $r$process abundances, providing the first evidence that BNS
mergers can be a dominant site of $r$process enrichment.

The detection of GW170817 in both gravitational waves and electromagnetic
waves heralds the age of gravitationalwave multimessenger astronomy. On 17
August 2017 the Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors observed GW170817, a strong
signal from the merger of a binary neutronstar system. Less than 2 seconds
after the merger, a gammaray burst (GRB 170817A) was detected within a region
of the sky consistent with the LIGOVirgoderived location of the
gravitationalwave source. This sky region was subsequently observed by optical
astronomy facilities, resulting in the identification of an optical transient
signal within $\sim 10$ arcsec of the galaxy NGC 4993. These multimessenger
observations allow us to use GW170817 as a standard siren, the
gravitationalwave analog of an astronomical standard candle, to measure the
Hubble constant. This quantity, which represents the local expansion rate of
the Universe, sets the overall scale of the Universe and is of fundamental
importance to cosmology. Our measurement combines the distance to the source
inferred purely from the gravitationalwave signal with the recession velocity
inferred from measurements of the redshift using electromagnetic data. This
approach does not require any form of cosmic "distance ladder;" the
gravitational wave analysis can be used to estimate the luminosity distance out
to cosmological scales directly, without the use of intermediate astronomical
distance measurements. We determine the Hubble constant to be
$70.0^{+12.0}_{8.0} \, \mathrm{km} \, \mathrm{s}^{1} \, \mathrm{Mpc}^{1}$
(maximum a posteriori and 68% credible interval). This is consistent with
existing measurements, while being completely independent of them. Additional
standardsiren measurements from future gravitationalwave sources will provide
precision constraints of this important cosmological parameter.

We present the calibration of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) weak
lensing source galaxy redshift distributions from clustering measurements. By
crosscorrelating the positions of source galaxies with luminous red galaxies
selected by the redMaGiC algorithm we measure the redshift distributions of the
source galaxies as placed into different tomographic bins. These measurements
constrain any such shifts to an accuracy of $\sim0.02$ and can be computed even
when the clustering measurements do not span the full redshift range. The
highestredshift source bin is not constrained by the clustering measurements
because of the minimal redshift overlap with the redMaGiC galaxies. We compare
our constraints with those obtained from $\texttt{COSMOS}$ 30band photometry
and find that our two very different methods produce consistent constraints.

We use numerical simulations to characterize the performance of a
clusteringbased method to calibrate photometric redshift biases. In
particular, we crosscorrelate the weak lensing (WL) source galaxies from the
Dark Energy Survey Year 1 (DES Y1) sample with redMaGiC galaxies (luminous red
galaxies with secure photometric redshifts) to estimate the redshift
distribution of the former sample. The recovered redshift distributions are
used to calibrate the photometric redshift bias of standard photo$z$ methods
applied to the same source galaxy sample. We apply the method to three
photo$z$ codes run in our simulated data: Bayesian Photometric Redshift (BPZ),
Directional Neighborhood Fitting (DNF), and Random Forestbased photo$z$ (RF).
We characterize the systematic uncertainties of our calibration procedure, and
find that these systematic uncertainties dominate our error budget. The
dominant systematics are due to our assumption of unevolving bias and
clustering across each redshift bin, and to differences between the shapes of
the redshift distributions derived by clustering vs photo$z$'s. The systematic
uncertainty in the mean redshift bias of the source galaxy sample is $\Delta z
\lesssim 0.02$, though the precise value depends on the redshift bin under
consideration. We discuss possible ways to mitigate the impact of our dominant
systematics in future analyses.

Galaxy crosscorrelations with highfidelity redshift samples hold the
potential to precisely calibrate systematic photometric redshift uncertainties
arising from the unavailability of complete and representative training and
validation samples of galaxies. However, application of this technique in the
Dark Energy Survey (DES) is hampered by the relatively low number density,
small area, and modest redshift overlap between photometric and spectroscopic
samples. We propose instead using photometric catalogs with reliable
photometric redshifts for photoz calibration via crosscorrelations. We verify
the viability of our proposal using redMaPPer clusters from the Sloan Digital
Sky Survey (SDSS) to successfully recover the redshift distribution of SDSS
spectroscopic galaxies. We demonstrate how to combine photoz with
crosscorrelation data to calibrate photometric redshift biases while
marginalizing over possible clustering bias evolution in either the calibration
or unknown photometric samples. We apply our method to DES Science Verification
(DES SV) data in order to constrain the photometric redshift distribution of a
galaxy sample selected for weak lensing studies, constraining the mean of the
tomographic redshift distributions to a statistical uncertainty of $\Delta z
\sim \pm 0.01$. We forecast that our proposal can in principle control
photometric redshift uncertainties in DES weak lensing experiments at a level
near the intrinsic statistical noise of the experiment over the range of
redshifts where redMaPPer clusters are available. Our results provide strong
motivation to launch a program to fully characterize the systematic errors from
bias evolution and photoz shapes in our calibration procedure.

We present the methodology for and detail the implementation of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) 3x2pt DES Year 1 (Y1) analysis, which combines
configurationspace twopoint statistics from three different cosmological
probes: cosmic shear, galaxygalaxy lensing, and galaxy clustering, using data
from the first year of DES observations. We have developed two independent
modeling pipelines and describe the code validation process. We derive
expressions for analytical realspace multiprobe covariances, and describe
their validation with numerical simulations. We stresstest the inference
pipelines in simulated likelihood analyses that vary 67 cosmology parameters
plus 20 nuisance parameters and precisely resemble the analysis to be presented
in the DES 3x2pt analysis paper, using a variety of simulated input data
vectors with varying assumptions.
We find that any disagreement between pipelines leads to changes in assigned
likelihood $\Delta \chi^2 \le 0.045$ with respect to the statistical error of
the DES Y1 data vector. We also find that angular binning and survey mask do
not impact our analytic covariance at a significant level. We determine lower
bounds on scales used for analysis of galaxy clustering (8 Mpc$~h^{1}$) and
galaxygalaxy lensing (12 Mpc$~h^{1}$) such that the impact of modeling
uncertainties in the nonlinear regime is well below statistical errors, and
show that our analysis choices are robust against a variety of systematics.
These tests demonstrate that we have a robust analysis pipeline that yields
unbiased cosmological parameter inferences for the flagship 3x2pt DES Y1
analysis. We emphasize that the level of independent code development and
subsequent code comparison as demonstrated in this paper is necessary to
produce credible constraints from increasingly complex multiprobe analyses of
current data.

We present the first constraints on cosmology from the Dark Energy Survey
(DES), using weak lensing measurements from the preliminary Science
Verification (SV) data. We use 139 square degrees of SV data, which is less
than 3\% of the full DES survey area. Using cosmic shear 2point measurements
over three redshift bins we find $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.81
\pm 0.06$ (68\% confidence), after marginalising over 7 systematics parameters
and 3 other cosmological parameters. We examine the robustness of our results
to the choice of data vector and systematics assumed, and find them to be
stable. About $20$\% of our error bar comes from marginalising over shear and
photometric redshift calibration uncertainties. The current stateoftheart
cosmic shear measurements from CFHTLenS are mildly discrepant with the
cosmological constraints from Planck CMB data; our results are consistent with
both datasets. Our uncertainties are $\sim$30\% larger than those from CFHTLenS
when we carry out a comparable analysis of the two datasets, which we attribute
largely to the lower number density of our shear catalogue. We investigate
constraints on dark energy and find that, with this small fraction of the full
survey, the DES SV constraints make negligible impact on the Planck
constraints. The moderate disagreement between the CFHTLenS and Planck values
of $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}$ is present regardless of the value of
$w$.

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey pipeline photometry underestimates the
brightnesses of the most luminous galaxies. This is mainly because (i) the SDSS
overestimates the sky background and (ii) single or twocomponent Sersicbased
models better fit the surface brightness profile of galaxies, especially at
high luminosities, than does the de Vaucouleurs model used by the SDSS
pipeline. We use the PyMorph photometric reductions to isolate effect (ii) and
show that it is the same in the full sample as in small group environments, and
for satellites in the most massive clusters as well. None of these are expected
to be significantly affected by intracluster light (ICL). We only see an
additional effect for centrals in the most massive halos, but we argue that
even this is not dominated by ICL. Hence, for the vast majority of galaxies,
the differences between PyMorph and SDSS pipeline photometry cannot be ascribed
to the semantics of whether or not one includes the ICL when describing the
stellar mass of massive galaxies. Rather, they likely reflect differences in
star formation or assembly histories. Failure to account for the SDSS
underestimate has significantly biased most previous estimates of the SDSS
luminosity and stellar mass functions, and therefore Halo Model estimates of
the z ~ 0.1 relation between the mass of a halo and that of the galaxy at its
center. We also show that when one studies correlations, at fixed group mass,
with a quantity which was not used to define the groups, then selection effects
appear. We show why such effects arise, and should not be mistaken for physical
effects.

We quantify the systematic effects on the stellar mass function which arise
from assumptions about the stellar population, as well as how one fits the
light profiles of the most luminous galaxies at z ~ 0.1. When comparing results
from the literature, we are careful to separate out these effects. Our analysis
shows that while systematics in the estimated comoving number density which
arise from different treatments of the stellar population remain of order < 0.5
dex, systematics in photometry are now about 0.1 dex, despite recent claims in
the literature. Compared to these more recent analyses, previous work based on
Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) pipeline photometry leads to underestimates of
rho_*(> M_*) by factors of 310 in the mass range 10^11  10^11.6 M_Sun, but up
to a factor of 100 at higher stellar masses. This impacts studies which match
massive galaxies to dark matter halos. Although systematics which arise from
different treatments of the stellar population remain of order < 0.5 dex, our
finding that systematics in photometry now amount to only about 0.1 dex in the
stellar mass density is a significant improvement with respect to a decade ago.
Our results highlight the importance of using the same stellar population and
photometric models whenever low and high redshift samples are compared.

Measurements of the galaxy stellar mass function are crucial to understand
the formation of galaxies in the Universe. In a hierarchical clustering
paradigm it is plausible that there is a connection between the properties of
galaxies and their environments. Evidence for environmental trends has been
established in the local Universe. The Dark Energy Survey (DES) provides large
photometric datasets that enable further investigation of the assembly of mass.
In this study we use ~3.2 million galaxies from the (South Pole Telescope)
SPTEast field in the DES science verification (SV) dataset. From grizY
photometry we derive galaxy stellar masses and absolute magnitudes, and
determine the errors on these properties using MonteCarlo simulations using
the full photometric redshift probability distributions. We compute galaxy
environments using a fixed conical aperture for a range of scales. We construct
galaxy environment probability distribution functions and investigate the
dependence of the environment errors on the aperture parameters. We compute the
environment components of the galaxy stellar mass function for the redshift
range 0.15<z<1.05. For z<0.75 we find that the fraction of massive galaxies is
larger in high density environment than in low density environments. We show
that the low density and high density components converge with increasing
redshift up to z~1.0 where the shapes of the mass function components are
indistinguishable. Our study shows how high density structures build up around
massive galaxies through cosmic time.