
We reformulate the CorteelWilliams equations for the stationary state of the
two parameter Asymmetric Simple Exclusion Process (TASEP) as a linear map
$\mathcal{L}(\,\cdot\,)$, acting on a tensor algebra built from a rank two free
module with basis $\{e_1,e_2\}$. From this formulation we construct a pair of
sequences, $\{P_n(e_1)\}$ and $\{Q_m(e_2)\}$, of biorthogonal polynomials
(BiOPS), that is, they satisfy $\mathcal{L}(P_n(e_1)\otimes
Q_m(e_2))=\Lambda_n\delta_{n,m}$. The existence of the sequences arises from
the determinant of a Pascal triangle like matrix of polynomials. The
polynomials satisfy first order (uncoupled) recurrence relations. We show that
the two first moments $\mathcal{L}(P_n\, e_1\, Q_m)$ and $\mathcal{L}(P_n\,
e_2\, Q_m)$ give rise to a matrix representation of the ASEP diffusion algebra
and hence provide an understanding of the origin of the matrix product Ansatz.
The second moment $\mathcal{L}(P_n\, e_1 e_2\,Q_m )$ defines a tridiagonal
matrix which makes the connection with Chebyshevlike orthogonal polynomials.

The NASA Exoplanet Exploration Program's SAG15 group has solicited,
collected, and organized community input on highlevel science questions that
could be addressed with future direct imaging exoplanet missions and the type
and quality of data answering these questions will require. Input was solicited
through a variety of forums and the report draft was shared with the exoplanet
community continuously during the period of the report development (Nov 2015 
May 2017). The report benefitted from the input of over 50 exoplanet scientists
and from multiple openforum discussions at exoplanet and astrobiology
meetings. The SAG15 team has identified three group of highlevel questions,
those that focus on the properties of planetary systems (Questions A1A2),
those that focus on the properties of individual planets (Questions B1B4),
and questions that relate to planetary processes (Questions C1C4). The
questions in categories A, B, and C require different target samples and often
different observational approaches. For each questions we summarize the current
body of knowledge, the available and future observational approaches that can
directly or indirectly contribute to answering the question, and provide
examples and general considerations for the target sample required.

Exoplanet science promises a continued rapid accumulation of new observations
in the near future, energizing a drive to understand and interpret the
forthcoming wealth of data to identify signs of life beyond our Solar System.
The large statistics of exoplanet samples, combined with the ambiguity of our
understanding of universal properties of life and its signatures, necessitate a
quantitative framework for biosignature assessment Here, we introduce a
Bayesian framework for guiding future directions in life detection, which
permits the possibility of generalizing our search strategy beyond
biosignatures of known life. The Bayesian methodology provides a language to
define quantitatively the conditional probabilities and confidence levels of
future life detection and, importantly, may constrain the prior probability of
life with or without positive detection. We describe empirical and theoretical
work necessary to place constraints on the relevant likelihoods, including
those emerging from stellar and planetary context, the contingencies of
evolutionary history and the universalities of physics and chemistry. We
discuss how the Bayesian framework can guide our search strategies, including
determining observational wavelengths or deciding between targeted searches or
larger, lower resolution surveys. Our goal is to provide a quantitative
framework not entrained to specific definitions of life or its signatures,
which integrates the diverse disciplinary perspectives necessary to confidently
detect alien life.

Repeated computed tomography (CT) scans are required in some clinical
applications such as imageguided radiotherapy and followup observations over
a time period. To optimize the radiation dose utility, a normaldose (or
fulldose) CT scan is often first performed to set up reference, followed by a
series of lowdose scans. Using the previous normaldose scan to improve
followup lowdose scans reconstruction has drawn great interests recently,
such as the previous normaldose induced nonlocal means (ndiNLM) regularization
method. However, one major concern with this method is that whether it would
introduce false structures or miss true structures when the previous
normaldose image and current lowdose image have different structures (e.g., a
tumor could be present, grow, shrink or absent in either image). This study
aims to investigate the performance of the ndiNLM regularization method in the
above mentioned situations. A patient with lung nodule for biopsy was recruited
to this study. A normaldose scan was acquired to set up biopsy operation,
followed by a few lowdose scans during needle intervention toward the nodule.
We used different slices to mimic different possible cases wherein the previous
normaldose image and current lowdose image have different structures. The
experimental results characterize performance of our ndiNLM regularization
method.