
This white paper addresses the hypothesis of light sterile neutrinos based on
recent anomalies observed in neutrino experiments and the latest astrophysical
data.

Cosmological and astrophysical measurements provide powerful constraints on
neutrino masses complementary to those from accelerators and reactors. Here we
provide a guide to these different probes, for each explaining its physical
basis, underlying assumptions, current and future reach.

We derive cosmological limits on twocomponent hot dark matter consisting of
neutrinos and axions. We restrict the largescale structure data to the safely
linear regime, excluding the Lymanalpha forest. We derive Bayesian credible
regions in the twoparameter space consisting of m_a and sum(m_nu).
Marginalizing over sum(m_nu) provides m_a<1.02 eV (95% CL). In the absence of
axions the same data and methods give sum(m_nu)< 0.63 eV (95% CL).

We comment on the recent paper by A. D. Dolgov, S. H. Hansen, S. Pastor and
D. V. Semikoz (DHPS) [Astropart. Phys. {\bf 14}, 79 (2000)] on the generation
of neutrino asymmetries from activesterile neutrino oscillations. We
demonstrate that the approximate asymmetry evolution equation obtained therein
is an expansion, up to a minor discrepancy, of the wellestablished static
approximation equation, valid only when the supposedly new higher order
correction term is small. In the regime where this socalled ``backreaction''
term is large and artificially terminates the asymmetry growth, their evolution
equation ceases to be a faithful approximation to the Quantum Kinetic Equations
(QKEs) simply because pure MikheyevSmirnovWolfenstein (MSW) transitions have
been neglected. At low temperatures the MSW effect is the dominant asymmetry
amplifier. Neither the static nor the DHPS approach contains this important
physics. Therefore we conclude that the DHPS results have sufficient veracity
at the onset of explosive asymmetry generation, but are invalid in the ensuing
low temperature epoch where MSW conversions are able to enhance the asymmetry
to values of order $0.2  0.37$. DHPS do claim to find a significant final
asymmetry for very large $\delta m^2$ values. However, for this regime the
effective potential they employed is not valid.