• Electrostatic Deflector, one of the key components of SFC accelerator at IMP, is easily activated in the long-term running of HIRFL due to the bombardment with losing ions. The level of residual radioactivity induced in main components and dust contained in the electrostatic deflector enclosure have been investigated using gamma-ray spectrometry and Fluke 451p ionization chamber. The results indicate that the activated electrostatic deflector represent a significant radiological hazard for workers during maintenance operation, and the waste disposal difficulties should be encountered after decommissioning.
  • The monolithic integration of electronics and photonics has attracted enormous attention due to its potential applications. However, the realization of such hybrid circuits has remained a challenge because it requires optical communication at nanometer scales. A major challenge to this integration is the identification of a suitable material. After discussing the material aspect of the challenge, we identified atomically thin transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) as a perfect material platform to implement the circuit. The selection of TMDs is based on their very distinct property: monolayer TMDs are able to emit and absorb light at the same wavelength determined by direct exciton transitions. To prove the concept, we fabricated simple devices consisting of silver nanowires as plasmonic waveguides and monolayer TMDs as active optoelectronic media. Using photoexcitation, direct optical imaging and spectral analysis, we demonstrated generation and detection of surface plasmon polaritons by monolayer TMDs. Regarded as novel materials for electronics and photonics, transition metal dichalcogenides are expected to find new applications in next generation integrated circuits.
  • It has been the standard teaching of today that backward stability analysis is taught as absolute, just as in Newtonian physics time is taught absolute time. We will prove it is not true in general. It depends on algorithms. We will prove that forward and mixed stability anlaysis are absolutely invalid stability analysis in the sense that they have absolutely wrong reference points for detecting huge element growth of any algoritms(if any), even an "ideal" or "desirable" backward stability analysis is not so "ideal" or "desirable" in general. Any of forward stable, backward stable and mixed stable algorihms as in Demmel, Kahan , Parlett and other's papers and text books, see Demmel(6) and Higham(8)may not be really stable at all because they may fail to detect and expose any potential instabilities of the algorithm in corresponding stability analysis. Therefore, it is impossible to prove an algorithm is stable according to the standard teachin of today, just as it is impossible to prove a mathematical equuation(Maxwell's) is a law of physics according to the standard teaching in Newtonian physics.