
Here we consider some wellknown facts in syntax from a physics perspective,
allowing us to establish equivalences between both fields with many
consequences. Mainly, we observe that the operation MERGE, put forward by N.
Chomsky in 1995, can be interpreted as a physical information coarsegraining.
Thus, MERGE in linguistics entails information renormalization in physics,
according to different time scales. We make this point mathematically formal in
terms of language models. In this setting, MERGE amounts to a probability
tensor implementing a coarsegraining, akin to a probabilistic contextfree
grammar. The probability vectors of meaningful sentences are given by
stochastic tensor networks (TN) built from diagonal tensors and which are
mostly loopfree, such as Tree Tensor Networks and Matrix Product States, thus
being computationally very efficient to manipulate. We show that this implies
the polynomiallydecaying (longrange) correlations experimentally observed in
language, and also provides arguments in favour of certain types of neural
networks for language processing. Moreover, we show how to obtain such language
models from quantum states that can be efficiently prepared on a quantum
computer, and use this to find bounds on the perplexity of the probability
distribution of words in a sentence. Implications of our results are discussed
across several ambits.

On September 25, 2014 Murray GellMann was presented with the Helmholz Medal
of the Berlin Brandenburg Academy of Sciences and Humanities in a ceremony at
the Santa Fe Institute. The author, among others, was asked to speak for
fifteen minutes on Murray and his accomplishments. The following is an edited
transcription of the author's speaking text.

The teaching of modern physics often uses the history of physics as a
didactic tool. However, as in this process the history of physics is not
something studied but used, there is a danger that the history itself will be
distorted in, as Butterfield calls it, a "Whiggish" way, when the present
becomes the measure of the past. It is not surprising that reading today a
paper written more than a hundred years ago, we can extract much more of it
than was actually thought or dreamed by the author himself. We demonstrate this
Whiggish approach on the example of Woldemar Voigt's 1887 paper. From the
modern perspective, it may appear that this paper opens a way to both the
special relativity and to its anisotropic Finslerian generalization which came
into the focus only recently, in relation with the Cohen and Glashow's very
special relativity proposal. With a little imagination, one can connect Voigt's
paper to the notorious EinsteinPoincare priority dispute, which we believe is
a Whiggish late time artifact. We use the related historical circumstances to
give a broader view on special relativity, than it is usually anticipated.

In this essay I begin to lay out a conceptual scheme for: (i) analysing
dualities as cases of theoretical equivalence; (ii) assessing when cases of
theoretical equivalence are also cases of physical equivalence. The scheme is
applied to gauge/gravity dualities. I expound what I argue to be their
contribution to questions about: (iii) the nature of spacetime in quantum
gravity; (iv) broader philosophical and physical discussions of spacetime.
(i)(ii) proceed by analysing duality through four contrasts. A duality will be
a suitable isomorphism between models: and the four relevant contrasts are as
follows:
(a) Bare theory: a triple of states, quantities, and dynamics endowed with
appropriate structures and symmetries; vs. interpreted theory: which is endowed
with, in addition, a suitable pair of interpretative maps.
(b) Extendable vs. unextendable theories: which can, respectively cannot, be
extended as regards their domains of application.
(c) External vs. internal intepretations: which are constructed,
respectively, by coupling the theory to another interpreted theory vs. from
within the theory itself.
(d) Theoretical vs. physical equivalence: which contrasts formal equivalence
with the equivalence of fully interpreted theories.
I apply this scheme to answering questions (iii)(iv) for gauge/gravity
dualities. I argue that the things that are physically relevant are those that
stand in a bijective correspondence under duality: the common core of the two
models. I therefore conclude that most of the mathematical and physical
structures that we are familiar with, in these models, are largely, though
crucially never entirely, not part of that common core. Thus, the
interpretation of dualities for theories of quantum gravity compels us to
rethink the roles that spacetime, and many other tools in theoretical physics,
play in theories of spacetime.

The Transactional Interpretation has been subject at various times to a
challenge based on a type of thought experiment first proposed by Maudlin. It
has been argued by several authors that such experiments do not in fact
constitute a significant problem for the transactional picture. The purpose of
this work is to point out that, when the relativistic level of the
interpretation is considered, Maudlintype challenges cannot even be mounted,
since the putative 'slowmoving offer wave,' taken as subject to contingent
confirmation, does not exist. This is a consequence of the Davies relativistic
quantummechanical version of the directaction theory together with the
asymmetry between fermionic field sources and bosonic fields. The Maudlin
challenge therefore evaporates completely when the relativistic level of the
theory is taken into account.

We present a Bayesian analysis of the epistemology of analogue experiments
with particular reference to Hawking radiation. First, we prove that such
experiments can be confirmatory in Bayesian terms based upon appeal to
'universality arguments'. Second, we provide a formal model for the scaling
behaviour of the confirmation measure for multiple distinct realisations of the
analogue system and isolate a generic saturation feature. Finally, we
demonstrate that different potential analogue realisations could provide
different levels of confirmation. Our results provide a basis both to formalise
the epistemic value of analogue experiments that have been conducted and to
advise scientists as to the respective epistemic value of future analogue
experiments.

This work outlines the novel application of the empirical analysis of
causation, presented by Kutach, to the study of information theory and its role
in physics. The central thesis of this paper is that causation and information
are identical functional tools for distinguishing controllable correlations,
and that this leads to a consistent view, not only of information theory, but
also of statistical physics and quantum information. This approach comes
without the metaphysical baggage of declaring information a fundamental
ingredient in physical reality and exorcises many of the otherwise puzzling
problems that arise from this viewpoint, particularly obviating the problem of
`excess baggage' in quantum mechanics.

The principle of `information causality' can be used to derive an upper
boundknown as the `Tsirelson bound'on the strength of quantum mechanical
correlations, and has been conjectured to be a foundational principle of
nature. To date, however, it has not been sufficiently motivated to play such a
foundational role. The motivations that have so far been given are, as I argue,
either unsatisfactorily vague or appeal to little if anything more than
intuition. Thus in this paper I consider whether some way might be found to
successfully motivate the principle. And I propose that a compelling way of so
doing is to understand it as a generalisation of Einstein's principle of the
mutually independent existencethe `beingthus'of spatially distant
things. In particular I first describe an argument, due to Demopoulos, to the
effect that the socalled `nosignalling' condition can be viewed as a
generalisation of Einstein's principle that is appropriate for an irreducibly
statistical theory such as quantum mechanics. I then argue that a compelling
way to motivate information causality is to in turn consider it as a further
generalisation of the Einsteinian principle that is appropriate for a theory of
communication. I describe, however, some important conceptual obstacles that
must yet be overcome if the project of establishing information causality as a
foundational principle of nature is to succeed.

The Mayan calendar is proposed to derive from an arithmetical model of
nakedeye astronomy. The Palenque and Copan lunar equations, used during the
Maya Classic period (200 to 900 AD) are solution of the model and the results
are expressed as a function of the Xultun numbers, four enigmatic Long Count
numbers deciphered in the Maya ruins of Xultun, dating from the IX century AD,
providing strong arguments in favor of the use of the model by the Maya. The
different Mayan Calendar cycles can be derived from this model and the position
of the Calendar Round at the mythical date of creation 13(0).0.0.0.0 4 Ahau 8
Cumku is calculated. This study shows the high proficiency of Mayan mathematics
as applied to astronomy and timekeeping for divinatory purposes.

Without Niels Bohr, QBism would be nothing. But QBism is not Bohr. This paper
attempts to show that, despite a popular misconception, QBism is no minor tweak
to Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics. It is something quite distinct.
Along the way, we lay out three tenets of QBism in some detail: 1) The Born
Rulethe foundation of what quantum theory means for QBismis a normative
statement. It is about the decisionmaking behavior any individual agent should
strive for; it is not a descriptive "law of nature" in the usual sense. 2) All
probabilities, including all quantum probabilities, are so subjective they
never tell nature what to do. This includes probability1 assignments. Quantum
states thus have no "ontic hold" on the world. 3) Quantum measurement outcomes
just are personal experiences for the agent gambling upon them. Particularly,
quantum measurement outcomes are not, to paraphrase Bohr, instances of
"irreversible amplification in devices whose design is communicable in common
language suitably refined by the terminology of classical physics." Finally, an
explicit comparison is given between QBism and Bohr with regard to three
subjects: a) The issue of the "detached observer" as it arose in a debate
between Pauli and Bohr, b) Bohr's reply to Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, and
c) Bohr's mature notion of "quantum phenomena." At the end, we discuss how
Bohr's notion of phenomena may have something to offer the philosophy of
William James: A physics from which to further develop his vision of the
worldcall it an ontology if you willin which "new being comes in local
spots and patches."

In this work, resolutions will be given for commonly stated problems
associated with a model that assumes that space and time are discretized (i.e.,
atomized). This model is in contrast to the continuous spacetime model that is
used in all common physical theories and equations  a model that assumes that
spatial coordinates and time are continuous variables. The resolutions to the
problems are arrived at, not by proposing any new theories or postulates, but
by strictly adhering to: Ernst Mach's principle of nonabsolute space, the
tenets of logical positivism, quantum mechanics and general relativity. The
problems associated with discrete spacetime addressed in this paper include:
Lorentz contraction (time dilation) of the ostensibly smallest spatial
(temporal) interval, maintaining isotropy, violations of causality, and
conservation of energy and momentum. Importantly, this work yields
modifications to the standard formulae for time dilation and length
contraction, with these modifications preserving the quantums of space and time
and allowing for temporary travel at the speed of light. Also given are: a
resolution to Weyl's tile argument, a modification of the 2500 year old
Pythagoras's theorem, a reassessment of Henri Bergson's theory advocating a
distinction between the time durations measured by scientists and an immutable
"Time", and a discussion of whether Einstein's lightclocks are as ideal as
most scientist believe. Also included is a demonstration of how discrete space
imposes order upon John Wheeler's quantum foam such that the foam becomes a
gravity crystal permeating all space and producing measurable inertial
anomalies of astronomical bodies.

Since its inception Bohmian mechanics has been generally regarded as a
hiddenvariable theory aimed at providing an objective description of quantum
phenomena. To date, this rather narrow conception of Bohm's proposal has caused
it more rejection than acceptance. Now, after 65 years of Bohmian mechanics,
should still be such an interpretational aspect the prevailing appraisal? Why
not favoring a more pragmatic view, as a legitimate picture of quantum
mechanics, on equal footing in all respects with any other more conventional
quantum picture? These questions are used here to introduce a discussion on an
alternative way to deal with Bohmian mechanics at present, enhancing its aspect
as an efficient and useful picture or formulation to tackle, explore, describe
and explain quantum phenomena where phase and correlation (entanglement) are
key elements. This discussion is presented through two complementary blocks.
The first block is aimed at briefly revisiting the historical context that gave
rise to the appearance of Bohmian mechanics, and how this approach or analogous
ones have been used in different physical contexts. This discussion is used to
emphasize a more pragmatic view to the detriment of the more conventional
hiddenvariable (ontological) approach that has been a leitmotif within the
quantum foundations. The second block focuses on some particular formal aspects
of Bohmian mechanics supporting the view presented here, with special emphasis
on the physical meaning of the local phase field and the associated velocity
field encoded within the wave function. As an illustration, a simple model of
Young's twoslit experiment is considered. The simplicity of this model allows
to understand in an easy manner how the information conveyed by the Bohmian
formulation relates to other more conventional concepts in quantum mechanics.
This sort of pedagogical application is also aimed at ...

I see no good reason to prefer (any version I know of) the `holonomy
interpretation' to the `potential interpretation' of the AharonovBohm effect.
Everyone agrees that the inverse image $[A]=[A+d\lambda]_{\lambda}=d^{1}F$ of
the electromagnetic field $F$ is a class, full of individuals; and that the
circulation $\small{\textsf{C}}$ of the electromagnetic potential $A$ around a
loop $\sigma_0$ encircling the solenoid is common to the whole class $[A]$, and
to the homotopy class or \emph{hoop} $[\sigma_0]$. If picking individuals out
of classes is the problem, picking an individual potential out of $[A]$ should
be no worse than picking an individual loop out of $[\sigma_0]$. The
individuals of $[A]$ can moreover be transcendedpunctually, without
integration around loopsby an appropriate version of the electromagnetic
connection.

Some of the strategies which have been put forward in order to deal with the
inconsistency between quantum mechanics and special relativity are examined.
The EPR correlations are discussed as a simple example of quantum mechanical
macroscopic effects with spacelike separation from their causes. It is shown
that they can be used to convey information, whose reliability can be estimated
by means of Bayes' theorem. Some of the current reasons advanced to deny that
quantum mechanics contradicts special relativity are refuted, and an historical
perspective is provided on the issue.

We consider the motion of small bodies in general relativity. The key result
captures a sense in which such bodies follow timelike geodesics (or, in the
case of charged bodies, Lorentzforce curves). This result clarifies the
relationship between approaches that model such bodies as distributions
supported on a curve, and those that employ smooth fields supported in small
neighborhoods of a curve. This result also applies to "bodies" constructed from
wave packets of Maxwell or KleinGordon fields. There follows a simple and
precise formulation of the optical limit for Maxwell fields.

This paper deals with the question of whether uncertainty regarding model
structure, especially in climate modeling, exhibits a kind of "chaos." Do small
changes in model structure, in other words, lead to large variations in
ensemble predictions? More specifically, does model error destroy forecast
skill faster than the ordinary or "classical" chaos inherent in the realworld
attractor? In some cases, the answer to this question seems to be "yes." But
how common is this state of affairs? And are there precise mathematical results
that can help us answer this question? We examine some efforts in the
literature to answer this last question in the affirmative and find them to be
unconvincing.

The physics literature contains many claims that ultrashortlived unstable
particles, such as a Higgs boson, have been observed. These claims are a matter
of applying the $5\sigma$convention in particle physics. This paper, however,
shows that by applying this $5\sigma$convention a category mistake is made, by
which a pure reasoning is passed off as an observation. Not only are these two
fundamentally different primitive notions at the very basis of science, but the
pure reasoning in question is also weaker than an observation: what we have in
each case is that the existence of the ultrashortlived unstable particle is
inferred to the best explanation, but that does absolutely not merit the
stronger claim that the particle in question has been "observed". Consequently,
the observational claims in question will thus have to be dismissed as
overstatements. On a general note, this demonstrates that the empirical support
for the Standard Model of particle physics is significantly less than hitherto
thought.

It was first suggested by David Z. Albert that the existence of a real,
physical nonunitary process (i.e., "collapse") at the quantum level would
yield a complete explanation for the Second Law of Thermodynamics (i.e., the
increase in entropy over time). The contribution of such a process would be to
provide a physical basis for the ontological indeterminacy needed to derive the
irreversible Second Law against a backdrop of otherwise reversible,
deterministic physical laws. An alternative understanding of the source of this
possible quantum "collapse" or nonunitarity is presented herein, in terms of
the Transactional Interpretation (TI). The present model provides a specific
physical justification for Boltzmann's oftencriticized assumption of molecular
randomness (Stosszahlansatz), thereby changing its status from an ad hoc
postulate to a theoretically grounded result, without requiring any change to
the basic quantum theory. In addition, it is argued that TI provides an elegant
way of reconciling, via indeterministic collapse, the timereversible Liouville
evolution with the timeirreversible evolution inherent in socalled "master
equations" that specify the changes in occupation of the various possible
states in terms of the transition rates between them. The present model is
contrasted with the GhirardiRiminiWeber (GRW) "spontaneous collapse" theory
previously suggested for this purpose by Albert.

I sketch a line of thought about consciousness and physics that gives some
motivation for the hypothesis that conscious observers deviate  perhaps only
very subtly and slightly  from quantum dynamics. Although it is hard to know
just how much credence to give this line of thought, it does motivate a
stronger and more comprehensive programme of quantum experiments involving
quantum observers.

In 1931, Dirac advanced a startling prediction about the existence of a new
elementary particle, characterized by a magnetic charge of a single polarity:
the magnetic monopole. This prediction, that was not based on experimental
reasons but on mathematical consistency considerations and the generalization
of the formalism of quantum mechanics, illustrates emblematically the Dirac
conception of the relationship between physics and mathematics.

Nel 1931 Dirac avanz\`o una sorprendente previsione circa l'esistenza di una
nuova particella elementare, caratterizzata da una carica magnetica di un'unica
polarit\`a: il monopolo magnetico. Questa previsione, che non era fondata su
ragioni sperimentali ma su considerazioni di consistenza matematica e sulla
generalizzazione del formalismo della meccanica quantistica, illustra
emblematicamente la concezione di Dirac del rapporto tra fisica e matematica.

A verse in book I of Rigveda mentions a cosmic tree with ropelike aerial
roots held up in the sky. Such an imagery might have ensued from the appearance
of a comet having `tree stem' like tail, with branched out portions resembling
aerial roots. Interestingly enough, a comet referred to as `heavenly tree' was
seen in 162 BC, as reported by old Chinese records. Because of weak surface
gravity, cometary appendages may possibly assume strange shapes depending on
factors like rotation, structure and composition of the comet as well as solar
wind pattern. Varahamihira and Ballala Sena listed several comets having
strange forms as reported originally by ancient seers such as Parashara,
Vriddha Garga, Narada and Garga.
Mahabharata speaks of a mortal king Nahusha who ruled the heavens when Indra,
king of gods, went into hiding. Nahusha became luminous and egoistic after
absorbing radiance from gods and seers. When he kicked Agastya (southern star
Canopus), the latter cursed him to become a serpent and fall from the sky. We
posit arguments to surmise that this Mahabharata lore is a mythical recounting
of a cometary event wherein a comet crossed Ursa Major, moved southwards with
an elongated tail in the direction of Canopus and eventually went out of sight.
In order to check whether such a conjecture is feasible, a preliminary list of
comets (that could have or did come close to Canopus) drawn from various
historical records is presented and discussed.

A simple and natural introduction to the concept and formalism of spontaneous
wave function collapse can and should be based on textbook knowledge of
standard quantum state collapse and monitoring. This approach explains the
origin of noise driving the paradigmatic stochastic Schr\"odinger equations of
spontaneous localization of the wave function $\Psi$. It reveals, on the other
hand, that these equations are empirically redundant and the master equations
of the noiseaveraged state $\hat\rho$ are the only empirically testable
dynamics in current spontaneous collapse theories.

One of the most important philosophers in history, the German Friedrich
Nietzsche, is almost ignored by physicists. This author who declared the death
of God in the 19th century was a science enthusiast, especially in the second
period of his work. With the aid of the physical concept of force, Nietzsche
created his concept of will to power. After thinking about energy conservation,
the German philosopher had some inspiration for creating his concept of eternal
recurrence. In this article, some influences of physics on Nietzsche are
pointed out, and the topicality of his epistemological position$$the
perspectivism$$is discussed. Considering the concept of will to power, I
propose that the perspectivism leads to an interpretation where physics and
science in general are viewed as a game.

We discuss a less known aspect of Feynman's multifaceted scientific work,
centered about his interest in molecular biology, which came out around 1959
and lasted for several years. After a quick historical reconstruction about the
birth of molecular biology, we focus on Feynman's work on genetics with Robert
S. Edgar in the laboratory of Max Delbruck, which was later quoted by Francis
Crick and others in relevant papers, as well as in Feynman's lectures given at
the Hughes Aircraft Company on biology, organic chemistry and microbiology,
whose notes taken by the attendee John Neer are available. An intriguing
perspective comes out about one of the most interesting scientists of the XX
century.

We show that the expected lifetime of white holes formed as remnants of
evaporated black holes is consistent with their production at reheating. We
give a simple quantum description of these objects and argue that a quantum
superposition of black and white holes with large interiors is stable, because
it is protected by the existence of a minimal eigenvalue of the area, predicted
by Loop Quantum Gravity. These two results support the hypothesis that a
component of dark matter could be formed by small black hole remnants.