
Let $\Omega$ be a Polish space with Borel $\sigma$field $\mathcal{F}$ and
countably generated sub $\sigma$field $\mathcal{G}\subset\mathcal{F}$. Denote
by $\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{F})$ the set of all bounded $\mathcal{F}$upper
semianalytic functions from $\Omega$ to the reals and by
$\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{G})$ the subset of $\mathcal{G}$upper semianalytic
functions. Let
$\mathcal{E}(\cdot\mathcal{G})\colon\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{F})\to\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{G})$
be a sublinear increasing functional which leaves $\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{G})$
invariant. It is shown that there exists a $\mathcal{G}$analytic setvalued
mapping $\mathcal{P}_{\mathcal{G}}$ from $\Omega$ to the set of probabilities
which are concentrated on atoms of $\mathcal{G}$ with compact convex values
such that $\mathcal{E}(X\mathcal{G})(\omega)=$
$\sup_{P\in\mathcal{P}_{\mathcal{G}}(\omega)} E_P[X]$ if and only if
$\mathcal{E}(\cdot \mathcal{G})$ is pointwise continuous from below and
continuous from above on the continuous functions. Further, given another
sublinear increasing functional
$\mathcal{E}(\cdot)\colon\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{F})\to\mathbb{R}$ which leaves
the constants invariant, the tower property
$\mathcal{E}(\cdot)=\mathcal{E}(\mathcal{E}(\cdot\mathcal{G}))$ is
characterized via a pasting property of the representing sets of probabilities,
and the importance of analytic functions is explained. Finally, it is
characterized when a nonlinear version of Fubini's theorem holds true and when
the product of a set of probabilities and a set of kernels is compact.

We introduce a new class of forward performance processes that are endogenous
and predictable with regards to an underlying market information set and,
furthermore, are updated at discrete times. We analyze in detail a binomial
model whose parameters are random and updated dynamically as the market
evolves. We show that the key step in the construction of the associated
predictable forward performance process is to solve a singleperiod inverse
investment problem, namely, to determine, periodbyperiod and conditionally on
the current market information, the endtime utility function from a given
initialtime value function. We reduce this inverse problem to solving a
functional equation and establish conditions for the existence and uniqueness
of its solutions in the class of inverse marginal functions.

Accounting for model uncertainty in risk management and option pricing leads
to infinite dimensional optimization problems which are both analytically and
numerically intractable. In this article we study when this hurdle can be
overcome for the socalled optimized certainty equivalent risk measure (OCE) 
including the average valueatrisk as a special case. First we focus on the
case where the uncertainty is modeled by a nonlinear expectation penalizing
distributions that are "far" in terms of optimaltransport distance
(Wasserstein distance for instance) from a given baseline distribution. It
turns out that the computation of the robust OCE reduces to a finite
dimensional problem, which in some cases can even be solved explicitly. This
principle also applies to the shortfall risk measure as well as for the pricing
of European options. Further, we derive convex dual representations of the
robust OCE for measurable claims without any assumptions on the set of
distributions. Finally, we give conditions on the latter set under which the
robust average valueatrisk is a tail risk measure.

We introduce a novel class of credit risk models in which the drift of the
survival process of a firm is a linear function of the factors. The prices of
defaultable bonds and credit default swaps (CDS) are linearrational in the
factors. The price of a CDS option can be uniformly approximated by polynomials
in the factors. Multiname models can produce simultaneous defaults, generate
positively as well as negatively correlated default intensities, and
accommodate stochastic interest rates. A calibration study illustrates the
versatility of these models by fitting CDS spread time series. A numerical
analysis validates the efficiency of the option price approximation method.

The financial crisis showed the importance of measuring, allocating and
regulating systemic risk. Recently, the systemic risk measures that can be
decomposed into an aggregation function and a scalar measure of risk, received
a lot of attention. In this framework, capital allocations are added after
aggregation and can represent bailout costs. More recently, a framework has
been introduced, where institutions are supplied with capital allocations
before aggregation. This yields an interpretation that is particularly useful
for regulatory purposes. In each framework, the set of all feasible capital
allocations leads to a multivariate risk measure. In this paper, we present
dual representations for scalar systemic risk measures as well as for the
corresponding multivariate risk measures concerning capital allocations. Our
results cover both frameworks: aggregating after allocating and allocating
after aggregation. As examples, we consider the aggregation mechanisms of the
EisenbergNoe model as well as those of the resource allocation and network
flow models.

We present a constructive and selfcontained approach to data driven infinite
partitionofunity copulas that were recently introduced in the literature. In
particular, we consider negative binomial and Poisson copulas and present a
solution to the problem of fitting such copulas to highly asymmetric data in
arbitrary dimensions.

We construct new multivariate copulas on the basis of a generalized infinite
partitionofunity approach. This approach allows  in contrast to finite
partitionofunity copulas  for taildependence as well as for asymmetry. A
possibility of fitting such copulas to real data from quantitative risk
management is also pointed out.

Determining risk contributions of unit exposures to portfoliowide economic
capital is an important task in financial risk management. Computing risk
contributions involves difficulties caused by rareevent simulations. In this
study, we address the problem of estimating risk contributions when the total
risk is measured by valueatrisk (VaR). Our proposed estimator of VaR
contributions is based on the MetropolisHasting (MH) algorithm, which is one
of the most prevalent Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods. Unlike existing
estimators, our MHbased estimator consists of samples from conditional loss
distribution given a rare event of interest. This feature enhances sample
efficiency compared with the crude Monte Carlo method. Moreover, our method has
the consistency and asymptotic normality, and is widely applicable to various
risk models having joint loss density. Our numerical experiments based on
simulation and realworld data demonstrate that in various risk models, even
those having highdimensional (approximately 500) inhomogeneous margins, our MH
estimator has smaller bias and mean squared error compared with existing
estimators.

It has been understood that the "local" existence of the Markowitz' optimal
portfolio or the solution to the localrisk minimization problem is guaranteed
by some specific mathematical structures on the underlying assets price
processes known in the literature as "{\it Structure Conditions}". In this
paper, we consider a semimartingale market model, and an arbitrary random time
that is not adapted to the information flow of the market model. This random
time may model the default time of a firm, the death time of an insured, or any
the occurrence time of an event that might impact the market model somehow. By
adding additional uncertainty to the market model, via this random time, the
{\it structures conditions} may fail and hence the Markowitz's optimal
portfolio and other quadraticoptimal portfolios might fail to exist. Our aim
is to investigate the impact of this random time on the structures conditions
from different perspectives. Our analysis allows us to conclude that under some
mild assumptions on the market model and the random time, these structures
conditions will remain valid on the one hand. Furthermore, we provide two
examples illustrating the importance of these assumptions. On the other hand,
we describe the random time models for which these structure conditions are
preserved for any market model. These results are elaborated separately for the
two contexts of stopping with the random time and incorporating totally a
specific class of random times respectively.

The aim of this paper is to quantify and manage systemic risk caused by
default contagion in the interbank market. We model the market as a random
directed network, where the vertices represent financial institutions and the
weighted edges monetary exposures between them. Our model captures the strong
degree of heterogeneity observed in empirical data and the parameters can
easily be fitted to real data sets. One of our main results allows us to
determine the impact of local shocks, where initially some banks default, to
the entire system and the wider economy. Here the impact is measured by some
index of total systemic importance of all eventually defaulted institutions. As
a central application, we characterize resilient and nonresilient cases. In
particular, for the prominent case where the network has a degree sequence
without second moment, we show that a small number of initially defaulted banks
can trigger a substantial default cascade. Our results complement and extend
significantly earlier findings derived in the configuration model where the
existence of a second moment of the degree distribution is assumed. As a second
main contribution, paralleling regulatory discussions, we determine minimal
capital requirements for financial institutions sufficient to make the network
resilient to small shocks. An appealing feature of these capital requirements
is that they can be determined locally by each institution without knowing the
complete network structure as they basically only depend on the institution's
exposures to its counterparties.

In a very highdimensional vector space, two randomlychosen vectors are
almost orthogonal with high probability. Starting from this observation, we
develop a statistical factor model, the random factor model, in which factors
are chosen at random based on the random projection method. Randomness of
factors has the consequence that covariance matrix is well preserved in a
linear factor representation. It also enables derivation of probabilistic
bounds for the accuracy of the random factor representation of timeseries,
their crosscorrelations and covariances. As an application, we analyze
reproduction of timeseries and their crosscorrelation coefficients in the
welldiversified Russell 3,000 equity index.

The utility of Potential Future Exposure (PFE) for counterparty trading
limits is being challenged by new market developments, notably widespread
regulatory Initial Margin (using 99% 10day exposure), and netting of trade and
collateral flows. However PFE has preexisting challenges w.r.t.
portfolios/distributions, collateralization, netting set seniority, and
overlaps with CVA. We introduce Potential Future Loss (PFL) which combines
expected shortfall (ES) and loss given default (LGD) as a replacement for PFE.
With two additional variants Adjusted PFL (aPFL) and Protected Adjusted PFL
(paPFL) these deal with both new and preexisting challenges. We provide a
theoretical background and numerical examples.

We derive bounds on the distribution function, therefore also on the
ValueatRisk, of $\varphi(\mathbf X)$ where $\varphi$ is an aggregation
function and $\mathbf X = (X_1,\dots,X_d)$ is a random vector with known
marginal distributions and partially known dependence structure. More
specifically, we analyze three types of available information on the dependence
structure: First, we consider the case where extreme value information, such as
the distributions of partial minima and maxima of $\mathbf X$, is available. In
order to include this information in the computation of ValueatRisk bounds,
we utilize a reduction principle that relates this problem to an optimization
problem over a standard Fr\'echet class, which can then be solved by means of
the rearrangement algorithm or using analytical results. Second, we assume that
the copula of $\mathbf X$ is known on a subset of its domain, and finally we
consider the case where the copula of $\mathbf X$ lies in the vicinity of a
reference copula as measured by a statistical distance. In order to derive
ValueatRisk bounds in the latter situations, we first improve the
Fr\'echetHoeffding bounds on copulas so as to include this additional
information on the dependence structure. Then, we translate the improved
Fr\'echetHoeffding bounds to bounds on the ValueatRisk using the socalled
improved standard bounds. In numerical examples we illustrate that the
additional information typically leads to a significant improvement of the
bounds compared to the marginalsonly case.

The Multi Variate Mixture Dynamics model is a tractable, dynamical,
arbitragefree multivariate model characterized by transparency on the
dependence structure, since closed form formulae for terminal correlations,
average correlations and copula function are available. It also allows for
complete decorrelation between assets and instantaneous variances. Each single
asset is modelled according to a lognormal mixture dynamics model, and this
univariate version is widely used in the industry due to its flexibility and
accuracy. The same property holds for the multivariate process of all assets,
whose density is a mixture of multivariate basic densities. This allows for
consistency of single asset and index/portfolio smile. In this paper, we
generalize the MVMD model by introducing shifted dynamics and we propose a
definition of implied correlation under this model. We investigate whether the
model is able to consistently reproduce the implied volatility of FX cross
rates once the single components are calibrated to univariate shifted lognormal
mixture dynamics models. We consider in particular the case of the Chinese
renminbi FX rate, showing that the shifted MVMD model correctly recovers the
CNY/EUR smile given the EUR/USD smile and the USD/CNY smile, thus highlighting
that the model can also work as an arbitrage free volatility smile
extrapolation tool for cross currencies that may not be liquid or fully
observable. We compare the performance of the shifted MVMD model in terms of
implied correlation with those of the shifted Simply Correlated Mixture
Dynamics model where the dynamics of the single assets are connected naively by
introducing correlation among their Brownian motions. Finally, we introduce a
model with uncertain volatilities and correlation. The Markovian projection of
this model is a generalization of the shifted MVMD model.

We quantify the sensitivity of the EisenbergNoe clearing vector to
estimation errors in the bilateral liabilities of a financial system in a
stylized setting. The interbank liabilities matrix is a crucial input to the
computation of the clearing vector. However, in practice central bankers and
regulators must often estimate this matrix because complete information on
bilateral liabilities is rarely available. As a result, the clearing vector may
suffer from estimation errors in the liabilities matrix. We quantify the
clearing vector's sensitivity to such estimation errors and show that its
directional derivatives are, like the clearing vector itself, solutions of
fixed point equations. We describe estimation errors utilizing a basis for the
space of matrices representing permissible perturbations and derive analytical
solutions to the maximal deviations of the EisenbergNoe clearing vector. This
allows us to compute upper bounds for the worst case perturbations of the
clearing vector in our simple setting. Moreover, we quantify the probability of
observing clearing vector deviations of a certain magnitude, for uniformly or
normally distributed errors in the relative liability matrix.
Applying our methodology to a dataset of European banks, we find that
perturbations to the relative liabilities can result in economically sizeable
differences that could lead to an underestimation of the risk of contagion. Our
results are a first step towards allowing regulators to quantify errors in
their simulations.

In our model, private actors with interbank cash flows similar to, but nore
general than (Carmona, Fouque, Sun, 2013) borrow from the outside economy at a
certain interest rate, controlled by the central bank, and invest in risky
assets. Each private actor aims to maximize its expected terminal logarithmic
utility. The central bank, in turn, aims to control the overall economy by
means of an exponential utility function. We solve all stochastic optimal
control problems explicitly. We are able to recreate occasions such as
liquidity trap. We study distribution of the number of defaults (net worth of a
private actor going below a certain threshold).

In this paper, we propose a novel investment strategy for portfolio
optimization problems. The proposed strategy maximizes the expected portfolio
value bounded within a targeted range, composed of a conservative lower target
representing a need for capital protection and a desired upper target
representing an investment goal. This strategy favorably shapes the entire
probability distribution of returns, as it simultaneously seeks a desired
expected return, cuts off downside risk and implicitly caps volatility and
higher moments. To illustrate the effectiveness of this investment strategy, we
study a multiperiod portfolio optimization problem with transaction costs and
develop a twostage regression approach that improves the classical least
squares Monte Carlo (LSMC) algorithm when dealing with difficult payoffs, such
as highly concave, abruptly changing or discontinuous functions. Our numerical
results show substantial improvements over the classical LSMC algorithm for
both the constant relative riskaversion (CRRA) utility approach and the
proposed skewed target range strategy (STRS). Our numerical results illustrate
the ability of the STRS to contain the portfolio value within the targeted
range. When compared with the CRRA utility approach, the STRS achieves a
similar meanvariance efficient frontier while delivering a better downside
riskreturn tradeoff.

We propose a novel credit default model that takes into account the impact of
macroeconomic information and contagion effect on the defaults of obligors. We
use a setvalued Markov chain to model the default process, which is the set of
all defaulted obligors in the group. We obtain analytic characterizations for
the default process, and use them to derive pricing formulas in explicit forms
for synthetic collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). Furthermore, we use
market data to calibrate the model and conduct numerical studies on the tranche
spreads of CDOs. We find evidence to support that systematic default risk
coupled with default contagion could have the leading component of the total
default risk.

We propose a robust risk measurement approach that minimizes the expectation
of overestimation plus underestimation costs. We consider uncertainty by taking
the supremum over a collection of probability measures, relating our approach
to dual sets in the representation of coherent risk measures. We provide
results that guarantee the existence of a solution and explore the properties
of minimizer and minimum as risk and deviation measures, respectively. An
empirical illustration is carried out to demonstrate the use of our approach in
capital determination.

We propose a new backtesting framework for Expected Shortfall that could be
used by the regulator. Instead of looking at the estimated capital reserve and
the realised cashflow separately, one could bind them into the secured
position, for which risk measurement is much easier. Using this simple concept
combined with monotonicity of Expected Shortfall with respect to its target
confidence level we introduce a natural and efficient backtesting framework.
Our test statistics is given by the biggest number of worst realisations for
the secured position that add up to a negative total. Surprisingly, this simple
quantity could be used to construct an efficient backtesting framework for
unconditional coverage of Expected Shortfall in a natural extension of the
regulatory trafficlight approach for ValueatRisk. While being easy to
calculate, the test statistic is based on the underlying duality between
coherent risk measures and scaleinvariant performance measures.

We study a class of backtests for forecast distributions in which the test
statistic depends on a spectral transformation that weights exceedance events
by a function of the modeled probability level. The weighting scheme is
specified by a kernel measure which makes explicit the user's priorities for
model performance. The class of spectral backtests includes tests of
unconditional coverage and tests of conditional coverage. We show how the class
embeds a wide variety of backtests in the existing literature, and further
propose novel variants which are easily implemented, wellsized and have good
power. In an empirical application, we backtest forecast distributions for the
overnight P&L of ten bank trading portfolios. For some portfolios, test results
depend materially on the choice of kernel.

Assessing systemic risk in financial markets is of great importance but it
often requires data that are unavailable or available at a very low frequency.
For this reason, systemic risk assessment with partial information is
potentially very useful for regulators and other stakeholders. In this paper we
consider systemic risk due to fire sales spillover and portfolio rebalancing by
using the risk metrics defined by Greenwood et al. (2015). By using the Maximum
Entropy principle we propose a method to assess aggregated and single bank's
systemicness and vulnerability and to statistically test for a change in these
variables when only the information on the size of each bank and the
capitalization of the investment assets are available. We prove the
effectiveness of our method on 20012013 quarterly data of US banks for which
portfolio composition is available.

Accounting for the nonnormality of asset returns remains challenging in
robust portfolio optimization. In this article, we tackle this problem by
assessing the risk of the portfolio through the "amount of randomness" conveyed
by its returns. We achieve this by using an objective function that relies on
the exponential of R\'enyi entropy, an informationtheoretic criterion that
precisely quantifies the uncertainty embedded in a distribution, accounting for
higherorder moments. Compared to Shannon entropy, R\'enyi entropy features a
parameter that can be tuned to play around the notion of uncertainty. A
GramCharlier expansion shows that it controls the relative contributions of
the central (variance) and tail (kurtosis) parts of the distribution in the
measure. We further rely on a nonparametric estimator of the exponential
R\'enyi entropy that extends a robust samplespacings estimator initially
designed for Shannon entropy. A portfolio selection application illustrates
that minimizing R\'enyi entropy yields portfolios that outperform
stateoftheart minimum variance portfolios in terms of riskreturnturnover
tradeoff.

This paper provides a general framework for modeling financial contagion in a
system with obligations in multiple illiquid assets (e.g., currencies). In so
doing, we develop a multilayered financial network that extends the single
network of Eisenberg and Noe (2001). In particular, we develop a financial
contagion model with fire sales that allows institutions to both buy and sell
assets to cover their liabilities in the different assets and act as utility
maximizers.
We prove that, under standard assumptions and without market impacts,
equilibrium portfolio holdings exist and are unique. However, with market
impacts, we prove that equilibrium portfolio holdings and market prices exist
which clear the multilayered financial system. In general, though, these
clearing solutions are not unique. We extend this result by considering the
t\^atonnement process to find the unique attained equilibrium. The attained
equilibrium need not be continuous with respect to the initial shock; these
points of discontinuity match those stresses in which a financial crisis
becomes a systemic crisis. We further provide mathematical formulations for
payment rules and utility functions satisfying the necessary conditions for
these existence and uniqueness results.
We demonstrate the value of our model through illustrative numerical case
studies. In particular, we study a counterfactual scenario on the event that
Greece reinstituted the drachma on a dataset from the European Banking
Authority.

This paper studies the optimal dividend problem with capital injection under
the constraint that the cumulative dividend strategy is absolutely continuous.
We consider an open problem of the general spectrally negative case and derive
the optimal solution explicitly using the fluctuation identities of the
refractedreflected L\'evy process. The optimal strategy as well as the value
function are concisely written in terms of the scale function. Numerical
results are also provided to confirm the analytical conclusions.