The third edition of the "international - Traveling Workshop on Interactions between Sparse models and Technology" (iTWIST) took place in Aalborg, the 4th largest city in Denmark situated beautifully in the northern part of the country, from the 24th to 26th of August 2016. The workshop venue was at the Aalborg University campus. One implicit objective of this biennial workshop is to foster collaboration between international scientific teams by disseminating ideas through both specific oral/poster presentations and free discussions. For this third edition, iTWIST'16 gathered about 50 international participants and features 8 invited talks, 12 oral presentations, and 12 posters on the following themes, all related to the theory, application and generalization of the "sparsity paradigm": Sparsity-driven data sensing and processing (e.g., optics, computer vision, genomics, biomedical, digital communication, channel estimation, astronomy); Application of sparse models in non-convex/non-linear inverse problems (e.g., phase retrieval, blind deconvolution, self calibration); Approximate probabilistic inference for sparse problems; Sparse machine learning and inference; "Blind" inverse problems and dictionary learning; Optimization for sparse modelling; Information theory, geometry and randomness; Sparsity? What's next? (Discrete-valued signals; Union of low-dimensional spaces, Cosparsity, mixed/group norm, model-based, low-complexity models, ...); Matrix/manifold sensing/processing (graph, low-rank approximation, ...); Complexity/accuracy tradeoffs in numerical methods/optimization; Electronic/optical compressive sensors (hardware).

In this paper we propose a new Bayesian estimation method to solve linear inverse problems in signal and image restoration and reconstruction problems which has the property to be scale invariant. In general, Bayesian estimators are {\em nonlinear} functions of the observed data. The only exception is the Gaussian case. When dealing with linear inverse problems the linearity is sometimes a too strong property, while {\em scale invariance} often remains a desirable property. As everybody knows one of the main difficulties with using the Bayesian approach in real applications is the assignment of the direct (prior) probability laws before applying the Bayes' rule. We discuss here how to choose prior laws to obtain scale invariant Bayesian estimators. In this paper we discuss and propose a familly of generalized exponential probability distributions functions for the direct probabilities (the prior $p(\xb)$ and the likelihood $p(\yb|\xb)$), for which the posterior $p(\xb|\yb)$, and, consequently, the main posterior estimators are scale invariant. Among many properties, generalized exponential can be considered as the maximum entropy probability distributions subject to the knowledge of a finite set of expectation values of some knwon functions.

We present a technique for the blind separation of components in CMB data. The method uses a spectral EM algorithm which recovers simultaneously component templates, their emission law as a function of wavelength, and noise levels. We test the method on Planck HFI simulated observations featuring 3 astrophysical components.