• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • Adaptive beam loading compensation in room temperature bunching cavities (1803.09036)

    J. P. Edelen, B. E. Chase, E. Cullerton, P. Varghese (Fermilab, Batavia, IL)
    March 24, 2018 physics.acc-ph
    In this paper we present the design, simulation, and proof of principle results of an optimization based adaptive feed-forward algorithm for beam-loading compensation in a high impedance room temperature cavity. We begin with an overview of prior developments in beam loading compensation. Then we discuss different techniques for adaptive beam loading compensation and why the use of Newton's Method is of interest for this application. This is followed by simulation and initial experimental results of this method.
  • The Mu2e Calorimeter Final Technical Design Report (1802.06341)

    N. Atanov, F. Cervelli, Y. Davydov, R. Donghia, F. Grancagnolo, S. Miscetti, G. Pezzullo, M. Ricci, G. Tassielli Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati dell INFN, Frascati, Italy California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States Fermi National Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA INFN Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy)
    Feb. 18, 2018 hep-ex, physics.ins-det
    Since the first version of the Mu2e TDR released at the beginning of 2015, the Mu2e Calorimeter system has undergone a long list of changes to arrive to its final design. These changes were primarily caused by two reasons: (i) the technology choice between the TDR proposed solution of BaF2 crystals readout with solar blind Avalanche Photodiodes (APDs) and the backup option of CsI crystals readout with Silicon Photomultipliers (SiPM) has been completed and (ii) the channels numbering, the mechanical system and the readout electronics were substantially modified while proceeding with engineering towards the final project. This document updates the description of the calorimeter system adding the most recent engineering drawings and tecnical progresses.
  • Design and status of the Mu2e crystal calorimeter (1802.06346)

    N. Atanov, V. Glagolev, S. Di Falco, G. Pezzullo, G. Corradi, F. Happacher, I. Sarra, F. Porter Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna, Russia INFN Sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati dell'INFN, Frascati, Italy INFN Sezione di Lecce, Lecce, Italy Fermi National Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois, USA)
    Feb. 18, 2018 hep-ex, physics.ins-det
    The Mu2e experiment at Fermilab searches for the charged-lepton flavour violating (CLFV) conversion of a negative muon into an electron in the field of an aluminum nucleus, with a distinctive signature of a mono-energetic electron of energy slightly below the muon rest mass (104.967 MeV). The Mu2e goal is to improve by four orders of magnitude the search sensitivity with respect to the previous experiments. Any observation of a CLFV signal will be a clear indication of new physics. The Mu2e detector is composed of a tracker, an electro- magnetic calorimeter and an external veto for cosmic rays surrounding the solenoid. The calorimeter plays an important role in providing particle identification capabilities, a fast online trigger filter, a seed for track reconstruction while working in vacuum, in the presence of 1 T axial magnetic field and in an harsh radiation environment. The calorimeter requirements are to provide a large acceptance for 100 MeV electrons and reach at these energies: (a) a time resolution better than 0.5 ns; (b) an energy resolution < 10% and (c) a position resolution of 1 cm. The calorimeter design consists of two disks, each one made of 674 undoped CsI crystals read by two large area arrays of UV-extended SiPMs. We report here the construction and test of the Module-0 prototype. The Module-0 has been exposed to an electron beam in the energy range around 100 MeV at the Beam Test Facility in Frascati. Preliminary results of timing and energy resolution at normal incidence are shown. A discussion of the technical aspects of the calorimeter engineering is also reported in this paper.
  • Automated Parton-Shower Variations in Pythia 8 (1605.08352)

    S. Mrenna Computing Division, Fermilab, Batavia, IL USA School of Physics, Astronomy, Monash University, Victoria, Australia)
    May 26, 2016 hep-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    In the era of precision physics measurements at the LHC, efficient and exhaustive estimations of theoretical uncertainties play an increasingly crucial role. In the context of Monte Carlo (MC) event generators, the estimation of such uncertainties traditionally requires independent MC runs for each variation, for a linear increase in total run time. In this work, we report on an automated evaluation of the dominant (renormalization-scale and non-singular) perturbative uncertainties in the PYTHIA 8 event generator, with only a modest computational overhead. Each generated event is accompanied by a vector of alternative weights (one for each uncertainty variation), with each set separately preserving the total cross section. Explicit scale-compensating terms can be included, reflecting known coefficients of higher-order splitting terms and reducing the effect of the variations. The formalism also allows for the enhancement of rare partonic splittings, such as $g \to b \bar{b}$ and $q\to q \gamma$, to obtain weighted samples enriched in these splittings while preserving the correct physical Sudakov factors.
  • The Eleventh and Twelfth Data Releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Final Data from SDSS-III (1501.00963)

    Shadab Alam, F. Anders, Eric Armengaud, Rachael L. Beaton Andreas A. Berlind, Jonathan C. Bird, Michael R. Blanton, Adam S. Bolton, D. E. Brauer, Joel R. Brownstein, Zheng Cai, Ricardo Carrera, S. Drew Chojnowski, Johan Comparat, Katia Cunha, James R. A. Davenport, Timothée Delubac, Tom Dwelly, Edward M. Edmondson, Massimiliano Esposito, Diane Feuillet, Alexis Finoguenov, Andreu Font-Ribera, J. G. Galbraith-Frew, Ana E. García Pérez, R. Génova-Santos, Daniel Goddard, Jonay I. González Hernández, Nolan Grieves, Sten Hasselquist, Shirley Ho, Jon A. Holtzman, Linhua Jiang, Francisco Kitaura, Xavier P. Koenig, Pierre Laurent, Khee-Gan Lee, Daniel C. Long, Diego Lorenzo-Oliveira, Claude E. Mack III, Marcio A. G. Maia, Viktor Malanushenko, Qingqing Mao, Daniel Margala, Cameron K. McBride, Richard G. McMahon, Marie-Luise Menzel, Adam A. Miller, Antonio D. Montero-Dorta, Heather L. Morrison, Mark Neyrinck, David L. Nidever, Julia E. O'Connell, Ricardo L. C. Ogando, Daniel J. Oravetz, Deborah L. Padgett, Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille, Changbom Park, M. Pellejero-Ibanez, Ismael Pérez-Fournon, Patrick Petitjean, Gustavo F. Porto de Mello, Adrian M. Price-Whelan, Beth A. Reid, Constance M. Rockosi, Sergio Rodríguez-Rottes, Graziano Rossi, Eli S. Rykoff, Lado Samushia, Basílio Santiago, David J. Schlegel, Mathias Schultheis, Hee-Jong Seo, Matthew Shetrone, Anže Slosar, Keivan G. Stassun, Michael A. Strauss, Jonathan C. Tan, Daniel Thomas, Rita Tojeiro, Jose A. Vazquez, Nicole P. Vogt, David H. Weinberg, John C. Wilson, Christophe Yèche, Gail Zasowski, Zheng Zheng ( Bruce, Astrid McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA, Instituto de Física Teórica, , Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain, Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/Vía Láctea, s/n, E-38200, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain, Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38206, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain, Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA, Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, PITT PACC, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, 3941 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA, CEA, Centre de Saclay, Irfu/SPP, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, APC, University of Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, CEA/IRFU, Observatoire de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75205 Paris, France, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4325, USA, Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA, Department of Physics, JINA Center for the Evolution of the Elements, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA, Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics, 525 Davey Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, Center for Exoplanets, Habitable Worlds, 525 Davey Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, VU Station 1807, Nashville, TN 37235, USA, Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349, USA, Department of Astronomy, MSC 4500, New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physics, Astronomy, 219 S. 33rd St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, Center for Cosmology, Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA, Rider University, 2083 Lawrenceville Road, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA, Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA, Institute for Gravitation, the Cosmos, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, George P., Cynthia Woods Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics, Astronomy, Texas A., M. University, Department of Physics, Astronomy, 4242 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA, Institute of Cosmology, Gravitation, Dennis Sciama Building, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3FX, UK, Observatório Nacional, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - 20921-400, Brazil, Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia, - LIneA, Rua Gal.José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - 20921-400, Brazil, Steward Observatory, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA, Department of Statistics, Bruce, Astrid McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA, Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, Postfach 1312, Giessenbachstr. D-85741 Garching, Germany, Lowell Observatory, 1400 W. Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff AZ 86001, Western Washington University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, 516 High Street, Bellingham WA 98225, Institut de Ciències del Cosmos, Universitat de Barcelona/IEEC, Barcelona E-08028, Spain, Yale Center for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA, Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, Bryant Space Science Center, Gainesville, FL 32611-2055, USA, Department of Physics, Geology, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Observatório do Valongo, Ladeira do Pedro Antônio 43, 20080-090 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 59072-970, Natal, RN, Brazil., Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, E-13288 Marseille, France, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge MA 02138, USA, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Astronomy, Space Sciences, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey., Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, UPMC-CNRS, UMR7095, 98 bis Boulevard Arago, F-75014, Paris, France, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki FI-00140, Finland, Department of Astronomy, Van Vleck Observatory, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA, Computer Sciences Corporation, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Texas Christian University, 2800 South University Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76129, USA, Center for Astrophysical Sciences, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA, INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy., Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Mönchhofstr. 12--14, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany, Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, Department of Astronomy, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA, Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Center for Cosmology, Astro-Particle Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Kavli Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, CNRS-Université de Provence, 38 rue F. Joliot-Curie, F-13388 Marseille cedex 13, France, Department of Astronomy, Yale University, P.O. Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520-8101, USA, Kavli Institute for the Physics, Mathematics of the Universe, Todai Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, 277-8583, Japan., Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany, Department of Astronomy, Space Science Chungnam National University Daejeon 305-764, Repulic of Korea., Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 475 North Charter Street, Madison WI 53703, USA, School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia, IPAC, MS 220-6, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK., Kavli Institute for Cosmology, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK., Alfred P. Sloan fellow., ELTE Gothard Astrophysical Observatory, H-9704 Szombathely, Szent Imre herceg st. 112, Hungary, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA, Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona E-08010, Spain, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA, Dunlap Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3H4, Canada., Dept. of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA, Department of Chemistry, Physics, King's College, Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711, USA, NASA/GSFC, Code 665, Greenbelt, MC 20770, USA, Department of Physics, Yale University, 260 Whitney Ave, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA, School of Physics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 85 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-722, Republic of Korea, INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, I-34131 Trieste, Italy., Department of Physics, Lehigh University, 16 Memorial Drive East, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA, Departament d'Astronomia i Meteorologia, Facultat de Física, Universitat de Barcelona, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain, A*MIDEX, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LAM (Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille) UMR 7326, F-13388 Marseille cedex 13, France, Campus of International Excellence UAM+CSIC, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain, , Glorieta de la Astronomía, E-18080 Granada, Spain, Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA, Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Université de Franche-Comté, Institut Utinam, UMR CNRS 6213, OSU Theta, Besançon, F-25010, France, Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 2, I-35122 Padova, Italy, Department of Physics, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, Department of Astronomy, Space Science, Sejong University, Seoul, 143-747, Korea, Universitäts-Sternwarte München, Scheinerstrasse 1, D-81679 Munich, Germany, Cluster of Excellence, Boltzmannstraße 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany, Department of Physics, Kansas State University, 116 Cardwell Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA, National Abastumani Astrophysical Observatory, Ilia State University, 2A Kazbegi Ave., GE-1060 Tbilisi, Georgia, Instituto de Física, UFRGS, Caixa Postal 15051, Porto Alegre, RS - 91501-970, Brazil, Gemini Observatory, 670 N. A'Ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA, Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, IC2, Liverpool Science Park, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de Côte d'Azur, Laboratoire Lagrange, BP 4229, F-06304 Nice Cedex 4, France, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Ohio University, 251B Clippinger Labs, Athens, OH 45701, USA, University of Texas at Austin, Hobby-Eberly Telescope, 32 Fowlkes Rd, McDonald Observatory, TX 79734-3005, USA, Indian Institute of Astrophysics, II Block, Koramangala, Bangalore 560 034, India., Brookhaven National Laboratory, Bldg 510, Upton, NY 11973, USA, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA, Department of Physics, Fisk University, 1000 17th Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37208, USA, The Penn State Astrobiology Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, School of Physics, Astronomy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS, UK, Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway, INFN/National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Via Valerio 2, I-34127 Trieste, Italy., H.L. Dodge Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA, Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics, the Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China, Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China)
    May 21, 2015 astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.SR, astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The third generation of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-III) took data from 2008 to 2014 using the original SDSS wide-field imager, the original and an upgraded multi-object fiber-fed optical spectrograph, a new near-infrared high-resolution spectrograph, and a novel optical interferometer. All the data from SDSS-III are now made public. In particular, this paper describes Data Release 11 (DR11) including all data acquired through 2013 July, and Data Release 12 (DR12) adding data acquired through 2014 July (including all data included in previous data releases), marking the end of SDSS-III observing. Relative to our previous public release (DR10), DR12 adds one million new spectra of galaxies and quasars from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) over an additional 3000 sq. deg of sky, more than triples the number of H-band spectra of stars as part of the Apache Point Observatory (APO) Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE), and includes repeated accurate radial velocity measurements of 5500 stars from the Multi-Object APO Radial Velocity Exoplanet Large-area Survey (MARVELS). The APOGEE outputs now include measured abundances of 15 different elements for each star. In total, SDSS-III added 2350 sq. deg of ugriz imaging; 155,520 spectra of 138,099 stars as part of the Sloan Exploration of Galactic Understanding and Evolution 2 (SEGUE-2) survey; 2,497,484 BOSS spectra of 1,372,737 galaxies, 294,512 quasars, and 247,216 stars over 9376 sq. deg; 618,080 APOGEE spectra of 156,593 stars; and 197,040 MARVELS spectra of 5,513 stars. Since its first light in 1998, SDSS has imaged over 1/3 of the Celestial sphere in five bands and obtained over five million astronomical spectra.
  • Characterisation of the muon beams for the Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment (1306.1509)

    The MICE Collaboration: D. Adams, A. Alekou (19, c), M. Apollonio, P. Barclay, R. Bertoni, M. Bogomilov, T. W. Bradshaw, T. Carlisle, N. Collomb, L. M. Cremaldi, S. Fayer, R. Fletcher, A. Gallagher, J. S. Graulich, G. G. Hanson, C. Heidt, S. Ishimoto, D. Kolev, M. Leonova, G. Lucchini, J. Martyniak, I. Mullacrane, R. Nicholson, P. Owens, C. Pidcott, S. Ramberger, T. J. Roberts, P. Rubinov, E. Santos, F. J. P. Soler, J. Tarrant, C. D. Tunnell, M. Vretenar, C. G. Whyte Department of Atomic Physics, St. Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria Institute for Cryogenic, Superconductivity Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, PR China Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca, Dipartimento di Fisica G. Occhialini, Milano, Italy Sezione INFN Napoli, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università Federico II, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, Napoli, Italy Sezione INFN Pavia, Dipartimento di Fisica Nucleare e Teorica, Pavia, Italy Sezione INFN Roma Tre e Dipartimento di Fisica, Roma, Italy Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute, Osaka, Japan Osaka University, Graduate School of Science, Department of Physics, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Institute of Particle, Nuclear Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan CERN, Geneva, Switzerland DPNC, Section de Physique, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Science, Innovation Centre, Daresbury, Cheshire, UK STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, UK School of Physics, Astronomy, Kelvin Building, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK Department of Physics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Department of Physics, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London, UK Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Oxford, UK Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK Department of Physics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Fermilab, Batavia, IL, USA Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA, USA University of California, Riverside, CA, USA Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA Now at Fermilab, Batavia, IL, USA Now at Diamond Light Source, Harwell Science, Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK Also at Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Permanent address Institute of Physics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Also at University of Oslo, Norway Now at DPNC, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
    Oct. 11, 2013 physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    A novel single-particle technique to measure emittance has been developed and used to characterise seventeen different muon beams for the Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment (MICE). The muon beams, whose mean momenta vary from 171 to 281 MeV/c, have emittances of approximately 1.5--2.3 \pi mm-rad horizontally and 0.6--1.0 \pi mm-rad vertically, a horizontal dispersion of 90--190 mm and momentum spreads of about 25 MeV/c. There is reasonable agreement between the measured parameters of the beams and the results of simulations. The beams are found to meet the requirements of MICE.
  • Characterisation of the muon beams for the Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment (1306.1509)

    The MICE Collaboration: D. Adams, A. Alekou (19, c), M. Apollonio, P. Barclay, R. Bertoni, M. Bogomilov, T. W. Bradshaw, T. Carlisle, N. Collomb, L. M. Cremaldi, S. Fayer, R. Fletcher, A. Gallagher, J. S. Graulich, G. G. Hanson, C. Heidt, S. Ishimoto, D. Kolev, M. Leonova, G. Lucchini, J. Martyniak, I. Mullacrane, R. Nicholson, P. Owens, C. Pidcott, S. Ramberger, T. J. Roberts, P. Rubinov, E. Santos, F. J. P. Soler, J. Tarrant, C. D. Tunnell, M. Vretenar, C. G. Whyte Department of Atomic Physics, St. Kliment Ohridski University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria Institute for Cryogenic, Superconductivity Technology, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, PR China Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca, Dipartimento di Fisica G. Occhialini, Milano, Italy Sezione INFN Napoli, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università Federico II, Complesso Universitario di Monte S. Angelo, Napoli, Italy Sezione INFN Pavia, Dipartimento di Fisica Nucleare e Teorica, Pavia, Italy Sezione INFN Roma Tre e Dipartimento di Fisica, Roma, Italy Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute, Osaka, Japan Osaka University, Graduate School of Science, Department of Physics, Toyonaka, Osaka, Japan High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Institute of Particle, Nuclear Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan CERN, Geneva, Switzerland DPNC, Section de Physique, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury Science, Innovation Centre, Daresbury, Cheshire, UK STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Oxford, Didcot, UK School of Physics, Astronomy, Kelvin Building, The University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK Department of Physics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK Department of Physics, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London, UK Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Oxford, UK Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK Department of Physics, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK Fermilab, Batavia, IL, USA Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA, USA University of California, Riverside, CA, USA Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY, USA Now at Fermilab, Batavia, IL, USA Now at Diamond Light Source, Harwell Science, Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK Also at Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Permanent address Institute of Physics, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium Also at University of Oslo, Norway Now at DPNC, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
    Oct. 11, 2013 physics.acc-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    A novel single-particle technique to measure emittance has been developed and used to characterise seventeen different muon beams for the Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment (MICE). The muon beams, whose mean momenta vary from 171 to 281 MeV/c, have emittances of approximately 1.5--2.3 \pi mm-rad horizontally and 0.6--1.0 \pi mm-rad vertically, a horizontal dispersion of 90--190 mm and momentum spreads of about 25 MeV/c. There is reasonable agreement between the measured parameters of the beams and the results of simulations. The beams are found to meet the requirements of MICE.
  • Snowmass Energy Frontier Simulations using the Open Science Grid (A Snowmass 2013 whitepaper) (1308.0843)

    A. Avetisyan, J. Hirschauer, M. Rynge Boston University, Boston, USA University of California, San Diego, USA Fermi National Accelerator Lab, Batavia, USA University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA
    Oct. 2, 2013 hep-ex, cs.DC
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Snowmass is a US long-term planning study for the high-energy community by the American Physical Society's Division of Particles and Fields. For its simulation studies, opportunistic resources are harnessed using the Open Science Grid infrastructure. Late binding grid technology, GlideinWMS, was used for distributed scheduling of the simulation jobs across many sites mainly in the US. The pilot infrastructure also uses the Parrot mechanism to dynamically access CvmFS in order to ascertain a homogeneous environment across the nodes. This report presents the resource usage and the storage model used for simulating large statistics Standard Model backgrounds needed for Snowmass Energy Frontier studies.
  • Role of internal gases and creep of Ag in controlling the critical current density of Ag-sheathed Bi2Sr2CaCu2Ox wires (1301.5341)

    T. Shen Technical Division, Fermi National Accelerator Lab, Batavia, IL, Superconducting Magnet Division, Brookhaven National Lab, Brookhaven, NY, Applied Superconductivity Center, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL)
    March 25, 2013 cond-mat.supr-con
    High engineering critical current density JE of >500 A/mm2 at 20 T and 4.2 K can be regularly achieved in Ag-sheathed multifilamentary Bi2Sr2CaCu2Ox (Bi-2212) round wire when the sample length is several centimeters. However, JE(20 T) in Bi-2212 wires of several meters length, as well as longer pieces wound in coils, rarely exceeds 200 A/mm2. Moreover, long-length wires often exhibit signs of Bi-2212 leakage after melt processing that are rarely found in short, open-end samples. We studied the length dependence of JE of state-of-the-art powder-in-tube (PIT) Bi-2212 wires and gases released by them during melt processing using mass spectroscopy, confirming that JE degradation with length is due to wire swelling produced by high internal gas pressures at elevated temperatures [1,2]. We further modeled the gas transport in Bi-2212 wires and examined the wire expansion at critical stages of the melt processing of as-drawn PIT wires and the wires that received a degassing treatment or a cold-densification treatment before melt processing. These investigations showed that internal gas pressure in long-length wires drives creep of the Ag sheath during the heat treatment, causing wire to expand, lowering the density of Bi-2212 filaments, and therefore degrading the wire JE; the creep rupture of silver sheath naturally leads to the leakage of Bi-2212 liquid. Our work shows that proper control of such creep is the key to preventing Bi-2212 leakage and achieving high JE in long-length Bi-2212 conductors and coils.
  • Transit Timing Observations from Kepler: VII. Confirmation of 27 planets in 13 multiplanet systems via Transit Timing Variations and orbital stability (1208.3499)

    Jason H. Steffen, Eric B. Ford, Jack J. Lissauer, Douglas A. Caldwell, Paul Robertson, Joseph D. Twicken Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics, Batavia, IL, UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Astronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, McDonald Observatory, The University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, USA, SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA)
    Aug. 16, 2012 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We confirm 27 planets in 13 planetary systems by showing the existence of statistically significant anti-correlated transit timing variations (TTVs), which demonstrates that the planet candidates are in the same system, and long-term dynamical stability, which places limits on the masses of the candidates---showing that they are planetary. %This overall method of planet confirmation was first applied to \kepler systems 23 through 32. All of these newly confirmed planetary systems have orbital periods that place them near first-order mean motion resonances (MMRs), including 6 systems near the 2:1 MMR, 5 near 3:2, and one each near 4:3, 5:4, and 6:5. In addition, several unconfirmed planet candidates exist in some systems (that cannot be confirmed with this method at this time). A few of these candidates would also be near first order MMRs with either the confirmed planets or with other candidates. One system of particular interest, Kepler-56 (KOI-1241), is a pair of planets orbiting a 12th magnitude, giant star with radius over three times that of the Sun and effective temperature of 4900 K---among the largest stars known to host a transiting exoplanetary system.
  • Transit Timing Observations from Kepler: VI. Potentially interesting candidate systems from Fourier-based statistical tests (1201.1873)

    Jason H. Steffen, Daniel C. Fabrycky, William J. Borucki, Douglas A. Caldwell, David G. Koch, Joseph D. Twicken Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics, Batavia, IL, Astronomy Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, Hubble Fellow, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, NASA Exoplanet Science Institute/California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Aarhus University, Denmark, Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics, Villanova University, Villanova, PA)
    July 31, 2012 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We analyze the deviations of transit times from a linear ephemeris for the Kepler Objects of Interest (KOI) through Quarter six (Q6) of science data. We conduct two statistical tests for all KOIs and a related statistical test for all pairs of KOIs in multi-transiting systems. These tests identify several systems which show potentially interesting transit timing variations (TTVs). Strong TTV systems have been valuable for the confirmation of planets and their mass measurements. Many of the systems identified in this study should prove fruitful for detailed TTV studies.
  • Transit Timing Observations from Kepler: III. Confirmation of 4 Multiple Planet Systems by a Fourier-Domain Study of Anti-correlated Transit Timing Variations (1201.5412)

    Jason H. Steffen, Joshua A. Carter, Matthew J. Holman, Jason F. Rowe, William J. Borucki, Douglas A. Caldwell, William D. Cochran, Thomas N. Gautier III, Jon M. Jenkins, Todd C. Klaus, Philip Lucas, Sean McCauliff, Fergal R. Mullally, Avi Shporer, Joseph D. Twicken Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics, Batavia, IL UCO/Lick Observatory, University of California, Santa Cruz Astronomy Department, University of Florida, NASA Ames Research Center, NASA Exoplanet Science Institute/California Institute of Technology, Astronomy Department, San Diego State University, Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology, Centre for Astrophysics Research, University of Hertfordshire, University of California, Berkeley, Bay Area Environmental Research Institute/NASA Ames Research Center, Department of Physics, Southern Connecticut State University, Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen University, McDonald Observatory, The University of Texas, Orbital Sciences Corporation/NASA Ames Research Center)
    Jan. 25, 2012 astro-ph.EP
    We present a method to confirm the planetary nature of objects in systems with multiple transiting exoplanet candidates. This method involves a Fourier-Domain analysis of the deviations in the transit times from a constant period that result from dynamical interactions within the system. The combination of observed anti-correlations in the transit times and mass constraints from dynamical stability allow us to claim the discovery of four planetary systems Kepler-25, Kepler-26, Kepler-27, and Kepler-28, containing eight planets and one additional planet candidate.
  • Search for a Standard Model Higgs boson decaying to b quarks and produced in association with Z/W bosons with the CMS detector (1201.4611)

    Michele De Gruttola (University of Florida, Institute for High Energy Physics, Astrophysics, Department of Physics, Gainesville, FL USA, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, IL USA)
    Jan. 22, 2012 hep-ex
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    A search for the standard model Higgs boson is performed in a data sample corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 1.1 fb$^{-1}$, recorded by the CMS detector in proton-proton collisions at the LHC with a 7 TeV center-of-mass energy. The following modes are studied: W($\mu \nu$)H, W(e$\nu$)H, Z($\mu \mu$)H, Z(ee)H and Z($\nu \nu$)H, with the Higgs decaying to bb pairs. 95% C.L. upper limits on the VH production cross section are derived for a Higgs mass between 110 and 135 GeV. The expected (observed) upper limit at 115 GeV is found to be 5.7 (8.3) times the standard model expectation.
  • Experimental test of airplane boarding methods (1108.5211)

    Jason H. Steffen Fermilab Center for Particle Astrophysics, Batavia, IL, Hotchkiss Industries, Sherman Oaks, CA)
    Aug. 25, 2011 physics.soc-ph, astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We report the results of an experimental comparison of different airplane boarding methods. This test was conducted in a mock 757 fuselage, located on a Southern California soundstage, with 12 rows of six seats and a single aisle. Five methods were tested using 72 passengers of various ages. We found a significant reduction in the boarding times of optimized methods over traditional methods. These improved methods, if properly implemented, could result in a significant savings to airline companies.
  • On the escape of particles from cosmic ray modified shocks (0807.4259)

    D. Caprioli SNS, Scuola Normale Superiore, Pisa, Italy, INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Firenze, Italy, Fermilab, Center for Particle Astrophysics, Batavia, IL, USA)
    Feb. 2, 2009 astro-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Stationary solutions to the problem of particle acceleration at shock waves in the non-linear regime, when the dynamical reaction of the accelerated particles on the shock cannot be neglected, are known to show a prominent energy flux escaping from the shock towards upstream infinity. On physical grounds, the escape of particles from the upstream region of a shock has to be expected in all those situations in which the maximum momentum of accelerated particles, $p_{max}$, decreases with time, as is the case for the Sedov-Taylor phase of expansion of a shell Supernova Remnant, when both the shock velocity and the cosmic ray induced magnetization decrease. In this situation, at each time $t$, particles with momenta larger than $p_{max}(t)$ leave the system from upstream, carrying away a large fraction of the energy if the shock is strongly modified by the presence of cosmic rays. This phenomenon is of crucial importance for explaining the cosmic ray spectrum detected at Earth. In this paper we discuss how this escape flux appears in the different approaches to non-linear diffusive shock acceleration, and especially in the quasi-stationary semi-analytical kinetic ones. We apply our calculations to the Sedov-Taylor phase of a typical supernova remnant, including in a self-consistent way particle acceleration, magnetic field amplification and the dynamical reaction on the shock structure of both particles and fields. Within this framework we calculate the temporal evolution of the maximum energy reached by the accelerated particles and of the escape flux towards upstream infinity. The latter quantity is directly related to the cosmic ray spectrum detected at Earth.
  • Dynamical Feedback of Self-generated Magnetic Fields in Cosmic Ray Modified Shocks (0807.4261)

    D. Caprioli INAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Firenze, Italy, Fermilab, Center for Particle Astrophysics, Batavia, IL, USA)
    Feb. 2, 2009 astro-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We present a semi-analytical kinetic calculation of the process of non-linear diffusive shock acceleration (NLDSA) which includes the magnetic field amplification due to cosmic ray induced streaming instability, the dynamical reaction of the amplified magnetic field and the possible effects of turbulent heating. The approach is specialized to parallel shock waves and the parameters we chose are the ones appropriate to forward shocks in Supernova Remnants. Our calculation allows us to show that the net effect of the amplified magnetic field is to enhance the maximum momentum of accelerated particles while reducing the concavity of the spectra, with respect to the standard predictions of NLDSA. This is mainly due to the dynamical reaction of the amplified field on the shock, which noticeably reduces the modification of the shock precursor. The total compression factors which are obtained for parameters typical of supernova remnants are $R_{tot}\sim 7-10$, in good agreement with the values inferred from observations. The strength of the magnetic field produced through excitation of streaming instability is found in good agreement with the values inferred for several remnants if the thickness of the X-ray rims are interpreted as due to severe synchrotron losses of high energy electrons. We also discuss the relative role of turbulent heating and magnetic dynamical reaction in driving the reduction of the precursor modification.
  • Measurement of the Inclusive Isolated Photon Cross Section at CDF (0810.0553)

    C. Deluca (for the CDF Collaboration) FNAL, Batavia, IL, USA)
    Oct. 15, 2008 hep-ex
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We present preliminary results on inclusive direct photon production in $p\bar{p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=1.96 TeV, using data collected with the upgraded Collider Detector at Fermilab in Run II, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 451 pb$^{-1}$. Measurements are performed as a function of the photon transverse momentum for photons with $p_{T}>$30 GeV and $|\eta|<$1.0. Photons are required to be isolated in the calorimeter. The measurement is corrected to the hadron level and compared to NLO pQCD predictions.
  • A Hierarchy of Voids (astro-ph/0404397)

    Rien van de Weygaert Kapteyn Institute, University of Groningen, the Netherlands, Dept. of Phys. & Astron., Univ. Pittsburgh, U.S.A., NASA/Fermilab Astrophysics Group, Batavia, U.S.A.)
    April 20, 2004 astro-ph
    We present a model for the distribution of void sizes and its evolution within the context of hierarchical scenarios of gravitational structure formation. For a proper description of the hierarchical buildup of the system of voids in the matter distribution, not only the "void-in-void" problem should be taken into account, but also that of the "void-in-cloud" issue. Within the context of the excursion set formulation of an evolving void hierarchy is one involving a "two-barrier" excursion problem, unlike the "one-barrier" problem for the dark halo evolution. This leads to voids having a peaked size distribution at any cosmic epoch, centered on a characteristic void size that evolves self-similarly in time, this in distinct contrast to the distribution of virialized halo masses which do not have a small-scale cut-off.
  • Correlation Analysis of SFI Peculiar Velocities (astro-ph/9908155)

    S. Borgani, M. Haynes INFN, Trieste, Italy; Fermilab, Batavia, IL, USA; Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA;
    Aug. 14, 1999 astro-ph
    We present results of a statistical analysis of the SFI catalog of peculiar velocities, a recently completed survey of spiral field galaxies with I-band Tully-Fisher distances (Haynes et al. 1999). The velocity field statistic utilized is the velocity correlation function, $\psi_1(r)$ (Gorski et al. 1989). The analysis is performed in redshift space, so as to circumvent potential ambiguities connected with inhomogeneous Malmquist bias corrections. The results from the SFI sample are compared with linear-theory predictions. We generate a large set of mock samples, extracted from N-body simulations, which are used to assess the reliability of our analysis and to estimate the associated uncertainties. Defining $\eta_8=\sigma_8\Omega_0^{0.6}$, we find that the measured $\psi_1(r)$ implies a degenerate constraint in the $\eta_8-\Gamma$ plane, with $\eta_8=(0.3 +/- 0.1) (\Gamma/0.2)^{0.5}$, at the $2\sigma$ level, for the inverse Tully-Fisher (ITF) calibration presented in this paper. Model constraints are quite sensitive to the ITF calibration. The other ITF calibrations by Giovanelli et al. (1997) and da Costa et al. (1998) both give, for $\Gamma=0.2$, $\eta_8\simeq 0.6$ as the best-fitting value.
  • Search for the Top Quark at D0 using Multivariate Methods (hep-ex/9507007)

    Pushpalatha C. Bhat (Fermilab, Batavia, IL, U.S.A., D0 Collaboration)
    July 16, 1995 hep-ex
    We report on the search for the top quark in proton-antiproton collisions at the Fermilab Tevatron in the di-lepton and lepton+jets channels using multivariate methods. An H-matrix analysis of the e-mu data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of about 13.5 pb-1 yields one event with a likelihood to be a top event (assuming top mass of 180 GeV/c**2) that is 10 times more than WW and 18 times more than Z -> tau tau. A neural network analysis of e+jets channel with about 48 pb-1 of data shows an excess of events in the signal region and yields a cross-section for top-antitop production of 6.7 +/- 2.3(stat.) pb, assuming a top mass of 200 GeV/c**2. A PDE analysis of e+jets data gives results consistent with the above.