• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • Probing black hole accretion in quasar pairs at high redshift (1803.08508)

    C. Vignali, R. Gilli INAF - Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di Bologna, Italy, INAF - Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri, Firenze, Italy, Department of Physics, University of California, USA, Max-Planck-Institut fur Astronomie, Heidelberg, Germany, Dipartimento di Fisica "G. Occhialini", Universita` di Milano-Bicocca, Italy, Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA, Center for Cosmology, Astro-Particle Physics
    March 22, 2018 astro-ph.GA
    Models and observations suggest that luminous quasar activity is triggered by mergers, so it should preferentially occur in the most massive primordial dark matter haloes, where the frequency of mergers is expected to be the highest. Since the importance of galaxy mergers increases with redshift, we identify the high-redshift Universe as the ideal laboratory for studying dual AGN. Here we present the X-ray properties of two systems of dual quasars at z=3.0-3.3 selected from the SDSS-DR6 at separations of 6-8 arcsec (43-65kpc) and observed by Chandra for 65ks each. Both members of each pair are detected with good photon statistics to allow us to constrain the column density, spectral slope and intrinsic X-ray luminosity. We also include a recently discovered dual quasar at z=5 (separation of 21 arcsec, 136kpc) for which XMM-Newton archival data allow us to detect the two components separately. Using optical spectra we derived bolometric luminosities, BH masses and Eddington ratios that were compared to those of luminous SDSS quasars in the same redshift ranges. We find that the brighter component of both pairs at z=3.0-3.3 has high luminosities compared to the distribution of SDSS quasars at similar redshift, with J1622A having an order magnitude higher luminosity than the median. This source lies at the luminous end of the z~3.3 quasar luminosity function. While we cannot conclusively state that the unusually high luminosities of our sources are related to their having a close companion, for J1622A there is only a 3% probability that it is by chance.
  • IN-SYNC. V. Stellar kinematics and dynamics in the Orion A Molecular Cloud (1702.04113)

    Nicola Da Rio, Michiel Cottaar, John J. Tobin, Keivan G. Stassun, Steve Majewski, Kaike Pan Department of Physics, University of Florida, University of Oxford, Steward Observatory, University of Virginia, Ohio State University, Center for Cosmology, Astro-Particle Physics The Ohio State University, Apache Point Observatory, New Mexico State University)
    Aug. 2, 2017 astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.SR
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The kinematics and dynamics of young stellar populations enable us to test theories of star formation. With this aim, we continue our analysis of the SDSS-III/APOGEE IN-SYNC survey, a high resolution near infrared spectroscopic survey of young clusters. We focus on the Orion A star-forming region, for which IN-SYNC obtained spectra of $\sim2700$ stars. In Paper IV we used these data to study the young stellar population. Here we study the kinematic properties through radial velocities ($v_r$). The young stellar population remains kinematically associated with the molecular gas, following a $\sim10\:{\rm{km\:s}}^{-1}$ gradient along filament. However, near the center of the region, the $v_r$ distribution is slightly blueshifted and asymmetric; we suggest that this population, which is older, is slightly in foreground. We find evidence for kinematic subclustering, detecting statistically significant groupings of co-located stars with coherent motions. These are mostly in the lower-density regions of the cloud, while the ONC radial velocities are smoothly distributed, consistent with it being an older, more dynamically evolved cluster. The velocity dispersion $\sigma_v$ varies along the filament. The ONC appears virialized, or just slightly supervirial, consistent with an old dynamical age. Here there is also some evidence for on-going expansion, from a $v_r$--extinction correlation. In the southern filament, $\sigma_v$ is $\sim2$--$3$ times larger than virial in the L1641N region, where we infer a superposition along the line of sight of stellar sub-populations, detached from the gas. On the contrary, $\sigma_v$ decreases towards L1641S, where the population is again in agreement with a virial state.
  • Variable classification in the LSST era: Exploring a model for quasi-periodic light curves (1612.04834)

    J. C. Zinn, A. Udalski, K. Ulaczyk, J. Skowron Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, Center for Cosmology, AstroParticle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, Warsaw University Observatory, Warszawa, Poland, Department of Physics, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK)
    Dec. 14, 2016 astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    LSST is expected to yield ~10^7 light curves over the course of its mission, which will require a concerted effort in automated classification. Stochastic processes provide one means of quantitatively describing variability with the potential advantage over simple light curve statistics that the parameters may be physically meaningful. Here, we survey a large sample of periodic, quasi-periodic, and stochastic OGLE-III variables using the damped random walk (DRW, CARMA(1,0)) and quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO, CARMA(2,1)) stochastic process models. The QPO model is described by an amplitude, a period, and a coherence time-scale, while the DRW has only an amplitude and a time-scale. We find that the periodic and quasi-periodic stellar variables are generally better described by a QPO than a DRW, while quasars are better described by the DRW model. There are ambiguities in interpreting the QPO coherence time due to non-sinusoidal light curve shapes, signal-to-noise, error mischaracterizations, and cadence. Higher-order implementations of the QPO model that better capture light curve shapes are necessary for the coherence time to have its implied physical meaning. Independent of physical meaning, the extra parameter of the QPO model successfully distinguishes most of the classes of periodic and quasi-periodic variables we consider.
  • Diffuse Low-Ionization Gas in the Galactic Halo Casts Doubts on $z\simeq 0.03$ WHIM Detections (1602.03533)

    F. Nicastro, Y. Krongold Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma - INAF, Roma, Italy, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, USA, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA, Columbus State Community college, Columbus, OH, USA, Center for Cosmology, Astro-Particle Physics Instituto de Astronomia, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico, Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali - INAF, Roma, Italy)
    Feb. 10, 2016 astro-ph.GA
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    In this Letter we demonstrate that the two claims of $z\simeq 0.03$ OVII K$\alpha$ absorption lines from Warm Hot Intergalactic Medium (WHIM) along the lines of sight to the blazars H~2356-309 (Buote et al., 2009; Fang et al., 2010) and Mkn~501 (Ren, Fang \& Buote, 2014) are likely misidentifications of the $z=0$ OII K$\beta$ line produced by a diffuse Low-Ionization Metal Medium in the Galaxy's Interstellar and Circum-Galactic mediums. We perform detailed modeling of all the available high signal-to-noise Chandra LETG and XMM-Newton RGS spectra of H 2356-309 and Mkn 501 and demonstrate that the $z\simeq 0.03$ WHIM absorption along these two sightlines is statistically not required. Our results, however, do not rule out a small contribution from the $z\simeq 0.03$ OVII K$\alpha$ absorber along the line of sight to H~2356-309. In our model the temperature of the putative $z = 0.031$ WHIM filament is T$= 3\times 10^5$ K and the OVII column density is N$_{OV II} \le 4\times 10^{15}$ cm$^{-2}$, twenty times smaller than the OVII column density previously reported, and now more consistent with the expectations from cosmological hydrodynamical simulations.
  • X-Ray Detection of Warm Ionized Matter in the Galactic Halo (1512.03611)

    F. Nicastro, M. Guainazzi Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma - INAF, Monte Porzio Catone, RM, Italy, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, USA, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece, Universita' degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy, Columbus State Community College, Columbus, OH, USA, European Space Astronomy Center of ESA, Madrid, Spain, Center for Cosmology, Astro-particle Physics, Columbus, OH, USA, Instituto de Astronomia Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico, Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali - INAF, Roma, Italy)
    Dec. 11, 2015 astro-ph.GA
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We report on a systematic investigation of the cold and mildly ionized gaseous baryonic metal components of our Galaxy, through the analysis of high resolution Chandra and XMM-Newton spectra of two samples of Galactic and extragalactic sources. The comparison between lines of sight towards sources located in the disk of our Galaxy and extragalactic sources, allows us for the first time to clearly distinguish between gaseous metal components in the disk and halo of our Galaxy. We find that a Warm Ionized Metal Medium (WIMM) permeates a large volume above and below the Galaxy's disk, perhaps up to the Circum-Galactic space (CGM). This halo-WIMM imprints virtually the totality of the OI and OII absorption seen in the spectra of our extragalactic targets, has a temperature of T(Halo-WIMM)=2900 +/- 900 K, a density <n_H>(Halo-WIMM) = 0.023 +/- 0.009 cm-3 and a metallicity Z(Halo-WIMM) = (0.4 +/- 0.1) Z_Solar. Consistently with previous works, we also confirm that the disk of the Galaxy contains at least two distinct gaseous metal components, one cold and neutral (the CNMM: Cold Neutral Metal Medium) and one warm and mildly ionized, with the same temperature of the Halo-WIMM, but higher density (<n_H>(Disk-WIMM) = 0.09 +/- 0.03 cm-3) and metallicity (Z(Disk-WIMM) = 0.8 +/- 0.1$ Z_Solar). By adopting a simple disk+sphere geometry for the Galaxy, we estimates masses of the CNMM and the total (disk + halo) WIMM of M(CNMM) <~ 8e8 Solar masses and M(WIMM) ~ 8.2e9 Solar masses.
  • The Eleventh and Twelfth Data Releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Final Data from SDSS-III (1501.00963)

    Shadab Alam, F. Anders, Eric Armengaud, Rachael L. Beaton Andreas A. Berlind, Jonathan C. Bird, Michael R. Blanton, Adam S. Bolton, D. E. Brauer, Joel R. Brownstein, Zheng Cai, Ricardo Carrera, S. Drew Chojnowski, Johan Comparat, Katia Cunha, James R. A. Davenport, Timothée Delubac, Tom Dwelly, Edward M. Edmondson, Massimiliano Esposito, Diane Feuillet, Alexis Finoguenov, Andreu Font-Ribera, J. G. Galbraith-Frew, Ana E. García Pérez, R. Génova-Santos, Daniel Goddard, Jonay I. González Hernández, Nolan Grieves, Sten Hasselquist, Shirley Ho, Jon A. Holtzman, Linhua Jiang, Francisco Kitaura, Xavier P. Koenig, Pierre Laurent, Khee-Gan Lee, Daniel C. Long, Diego Lorenzo-Oliveira, Claude E. Mack III, Marcio A. G. Maia, Viktor Malanushenko, Qingqing Mao, Daniel Margala, Cameron K. McBride, Richard G. McMahon, Marie-Luise Menzel, Adam A. Miller, Antonio D. Montero-Dorta, Heather L. Morrison, Mark Neyrinck, David L. Nidever, Julia E. O'Connell, Ricardo L. C. Ogando, Daniel J. Oravetz, Deborah L. Padgett, Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille, Changbom Park, M. Pellejero-Ibanez, Ismael Pérez-Fournon, Patrick Petitjean, Gustavo F. Porto de Mello, Adrian M. Price-Whelan, Beth A. Reid, Constance M. Rockosi, Sergio Rodríguez-Rottes, Graziano Rossi, Eli S. Rykoff, Lado Samushia, Basílio Santiago, David J. Schlegel, Mathias Schultheis, Hee-Jong Seo, Matthew Shetrone, Anže Slosar, Keivan G. Stassun, Michael A. Strauss, Jonathan C. Tan, Daniel Thomas, Rita Tojeiro, Jose A. Vazquez, Nicole P. Vogt, David H. Weinberg, John C. Wilson, Christophe Yèche, Gail Zasowski, Zheng Zheng ( Bruce, Astrid McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA, Instituto de Física Teórica, , Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain, Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/Vía Láctea, s/n, E-38200, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain, Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38206, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain, Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA, Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, PITT PACC, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, 3941 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA, CEA, Centre de Saclay, Irfu/SPP, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, APC, University of Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, CEA/IRFU, Observatoire de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75205 Paris, France, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4325, USA, Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA, Department of Physics, JINA Center for the Evolution of the Elements, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA, Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics, 525 Davey Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, Center for Exoplanets, Habitable Worlds, 525 Davey Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, VU Station 1807, Nashville, TN 37235, USA, Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349, USA, Department of Astronomy, MSC 4500, New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physics, Astronomy, 219 S. 33rd St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, Center for Cosmology, Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA, Rider University, 2083 Lawrenceville Road, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA, Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA, Institute for Gravitation, the Cosmos, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, George P., Cynthia Woods Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics, Astronomy, Texas A., M. University, Department of Physics, Astronomy, 4242 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA, Institute of Cosmology, Gravitation, Dennis Sciama Building, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3FX, UK, Observatório Nacional, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - 20921-400, Brazil, Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia, - LIneA, Rua Gal.José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - 20921-400, Brazil, Steward Observatory, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA, Department of Statistics, Bruce, Astrid McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA, Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, Postfach 1312, Giessenbachstr. D-85741 Garching, Germany, Lowell Observatory, 1400 W. Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff AZ 86001, Western Washington University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, 516 High Street, Bellingham WA 98225, Institut de Ciències del Cosmos, Universitat de Barcelona/IEEC, Barcelona E-08028, Spain, Yale Center for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA, Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, Bryant Space Science Center, Gainesville, FL 32611-2055, USA, Department of Physics, Geology, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Observatório do Valongo, Ladeira do Pedro Antônio 43, 20080-090 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 59072-970, Natal, RN, Brazil., Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, E-13288 Marseille, France, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge MA 02138, USA, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Astronomy, Space Sciences, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey., Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, UPMC-CNRS, UMR7095, 98 bis Boulevard Arago, F-75014, Paris, France, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki FI-00140, Finland, Department of Astronomy, Van Vleck Observatory, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA, Computer Sciences Corporation, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Texas Christian University, 2800 South University Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76129, USA, Center for Astrophysical Sciences, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA, INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy., Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Mönchhofstr. 12--14, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany, Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, Department of Astronomy, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA, Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Center for Cosmology, Astro-Particle Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Kavli Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, CNRS-Université de Provence, 38 rue F. Joliot-Curie, F-13388 Marseille cedex 13, France, Department of Astronomy, Yale University, P.O. Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520-8101, USA, Kavli Institute for the Physics, Mathematics of the Universe, Todai Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, 277-8583, Japan., Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany, Department of Astronomy, Space Science Chungnam National University Daejeon 305-764, Repulic of Korea., Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 475 North Charter Street, Madison WI 53703, USA, School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia, IPAC, MS 220-6, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK., Kavli Institute for Cosmology, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK., Alfred P. Sloan fellow., ELTE Gothard Astrophysical Observatory, H-9704 Szombathely, Szent Imre herceg st. 112, Hungary, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA, Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona E-08010, Spain, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA, Dunlap Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3H4, Canada., Dept. of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA, Department of Chemistry, Physics, King's College, Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711, USA, NASA/GSFC, Code 665, Greenbelt, MC 20770, USA, Department of Physics, Yale University, 260 Whitney Ave, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA, School of Physics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 85 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-722, Republic of Korea, INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, I-34131 Trieste, Italy., Department of Physics, Lehigh University, 16 Memorial Drive East, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA, Departament d'Astronomia i Meteorologia, Facultat de Física, Universitat de Barcelona, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain, A*MIDEX, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LAM (Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille) UMR 7326, F-13388 Marseille cedex 13, France, Campus of International Excellence UAM+CSIC, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain, , Glorieta de la Astronomía, E-18080 Granada, Spain, Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA, Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Université de Franche-Comté, Institut Utinam, UMR CNRS 6213, OSU Theta, Besançon, F-25010, France, Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 2, I-35122 Padova, Italy, Department of Physics, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, Department of Astronomy, Space Science, Sejong University, Seoul, 143-747, Korea, Universitäts-Sternwarte München, Scheinerstrasse 1, D-81679 Munich, Germany, Cluster of Excellence, Boltzmannstraße 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany, Department of Physics, Kansas State University, 116 Cardwell Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA, National Abastumani Astrophysical Observatory, Ilia State University, 2A Kazbegi Ave., GE-1060 Tbilisi, Georgia, Instituto de Física, UFRGS, Caixa Postal 15051, Porto Alegre, RS - 91501-970, Brazil, Gemini Observatory, 670 N. A'Ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA, Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, IC2, Liverpool Science Park, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de Côte d'Azur, Laboratoire Lagrange, BP 4229, F-06304 Nice Cedex 4, France, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Ohio University, 251B Clippinger Labs, Athens, OH 45701, USA, University of Texas at Austin, Hobby-Eberly Telescope, 32 Fowlkes Rd, McDonald Observatory, TX 79734-3005, USA, Indian Institute of Astrophysics, II Block, Koramangala, Bangalore 560 034, India., Brookhaven National Laboratory, Bldg 510, Upton, NY 11973, USA, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA, Department of Physics, Fisk University, 1000 17th Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37208, USA, The Penn State Astrobiology Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, School of Physics, Astronomy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS, UK, Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway, INFN/National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Via Valerio 2, I-34127 Trieste, Italy., H.L. Dodge Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA, Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics, the Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China, Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China)
    May 21, 2015 astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.SR, astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The third generation of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-III) took data from 2008 to 2014 using the original SDSS wide-field imager, the original and an upgraded multi-object fiber-fed optical spectrograph, a new near-infrared high-resolution spectrograph, and a novel optical interferometer. All the data from SDSS-III are now made public. In particular, this paper describes Data Release 11 (DR11) including all data acquired through 2013 July, and Data Release 12 (DR12) adding data acquired through 2014 July (including all data included in previous data releases), marking the end of SDSS-III observing. Relative to our previous public release (DR10), DR12 adds one million new spectra of galaxies and quasars from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) over an additional 3000 sq. deg of sky, more than triples the number of H-band spectra of stars as part of the Apache Point Observatory (APO) Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE), and includes repeated accurate radial velocity measurements of 5500 stars from the Multi-Object APO Radial Velocity Exoplanet Large-area Survey (MARVELS). The APOGEE outputs now include measured abundances of 15 different elements for each star. In total, SDSS-III added 2350 sq. deg of ugriz imaging; 155,520 spectra of 138,099 stars as part of the Sloan Exploration of Galactic Understanding and Evolution 2 (SEGUE-2) survey; 2,497,484 BOSS spectra of 1,372,737 galaxies, 294,512 quasars, and 247,216 stars over 9376 sq. deg; 618,080 APOGEE spectra of 156,593 stars; and 197,040 MARVELS spectra of 5,513 stars. Since its first light in 1998, SDSS has imaged over 1/3 of the Celestial sphere in five bands and obtained over five million astronomical spectra.
  • The Eleventh and Twelfth Data Releases of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Final Data from SDSS-III (1501.00963)

    Shadab Alam, F. Anders, Eric Armengaud, Rachael L. Beaton Andreas A. Berlind, Jonathan C. Bird, Michael R. Blanton, Adam S. Bolton, D. E. Brauer, Joel R. Brownstein, Zheng Cai, Ricardo Carrera, S. Drew Chojnowski, Johan Comparat, Katia Cunha, James R. A. Davenport, Timothée Delubac, Tom Dwelly, Edward M. Edmondson, Massimiliano Esposito, Diane Feuillet, Alexis Finoguenov, Andreu Font-Ribera, J. G. Galbraith-Frew, Ana E. García Pérez, R. Génova-Santos, Daniel Goddard, Jonay I. González Hernández, Nolan Grieves, Sten Hasselquist, Shirley Ho, Jon A. Holtzman, Linhua Jiang, Francisco Kitaura, Xavier P. Koenig, Pierre Laurent, Khee-Gan Lee, Daniel C. Long, Diego Lorenzo-Oliveira, Claude E. Mack III, Marcio A. G. Maia, Viktor Malanushenko, Qingqing Mao, Daniel Margala, Cameron K. McBride, Richard G. McMahon, Marie-Luise Menzel, Adam A. Miller, Antonio D. Montero-Dorta, Heather L. Morrison, Mark Neyrinck, David L. Nidever, Julia E. O'Connell, Ricardo L. C. Ogando, Daniel J. Oravetz, Deborah L. Padgett, Nathalie Palanque-Delabrouille, Changbom Park, M. Pellejero-Ibanez, Ismael Pérez-Fournon, Patrick Petitjean, Gustavo F. Porto de Mello, Adrian M. Price-Whelan, Beth A. Reid, Constance M. Rockosi, Sergio Rodríguez-Rottes, Graziano Rossi, Eli S. Rykoff, Lado Samushia, Basílio Santiago, David J. Schlegel, Mathias Schultheis, Hee-Jong Seo, Matthew Shetrone, Anže Slosar, Keivan G. Stassun, Michael A. Strauss, Jonathan C. Tan, Daniel Thomas, Rita Tojeiro, Jose A. Vazquez, Nicole P. Vogt, David H. Weinberg, John C. Wilson, Christophe Yèche, Gail Zasowski, Zheng Zheng ( Bruce, Astrid McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Department of Physics, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA, Instituto de Física Teórica, , Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain, Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/Vía Láctea, s/n, E-38200, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain, Departamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38206, La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain, Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik Potsdam Department of Astronomy, University of Washington, Box 351580, Seattle, WA 98195, USA, Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University, 140 West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, PITT PACC, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh, 3941 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA, CEA, Centre de Saclay, Irfu/SPP, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France, APC, University of Paris Diderot, CNRS/IN2P3, CEA/IRFU, Observatoire de Paris, Sorbonne Paris Cité, F-75205 Paris, France, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, One Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Department of Astronomy, University of Virginia, P.O. Box 400325, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4325, USA, Observatories of the Carnegie Institution of Washington, 813 Santa Barbara Street, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA, Department of Physics, JINA Center for the Evolution of the Elements, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA, Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics, 525 Davey Laboratory, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, Center for Exoplanets, Habitable Worlds, 525 Davey Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, VU Station 1807, Nashville, TN 37235, USA, Apache Point Observatory, P.O. Box 59, Sunspot, NM 88349, USA, Department of Astronomy, MSC 4500, New Mexico State University, P.O. Box 30001, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA, University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physics, Astronomy, 219 S. 33rd St., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, Center for Cosmology, Particle Physics, Department of Physics, New York University, 4 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA, Rider University, 2083 Lawrenceville Road, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA, Institute for Advanced Study, Einstein Drive, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA, Institute for Gravitation, the Cosmos, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, George P., Cynthia Woods Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics, Astronomy, Texas A., M. University, Department of Physics, Astronomy, 4242 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843, USA, Institute of Cosmology, Gravitation, Dennis Sciama Building, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 3FX, UK, Observatório Nacional, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - 20921-400, Brazil, Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia, - LIneA, Rua Gal.José Cristino 77, Rio de Janeiro, RJ - 20921-400, Brazil, Steward Observatory, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA, Department of Statistics, Bruce, Astrid McWilliams Center for Cosmology, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA, Max-Planck-Institut für Extraterrestrische Physik, Postfach 1312, Giessenbachstr. D-85741 Garching, Germany, Lowell Observatory, 1400 W. Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff AZ 86001, Western Washington University, Department of Physics & Astronomy, 516 High Street, Bellingham WA 98225, Institut de Ciències del Cosmos, Universitat de Barcelona/IEEC, Barcelona E-08028, Spain, Yale Center for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA, Department of Astronomy, University of Florida, Bryant Space Science Center, Gainesville, FL 32611-2055, USA, Department of Physics, Geology, Northern Kentucky University, Highland Heights, KY 41099, USA, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Observatório do Valongo, Ladeira do Pedro Antônio 43, 20080-090 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, 59072-970, Natal, RN, Brazil., Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille, Aix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, E-13288 Marseille, France, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge MA 02138, USA, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Astronomy, Space Sciences, Erciyes University, 38039 Kayseri, Turkey., Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, UPMC-CNRS, UMR7095, 98 bis Boulevard Arago, F-75014, Paris, France, Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, Gustaf Hällströmin katu 2, Helsinki FI-00140, Finland, Department of Astronomy, Van Vleck Observatory, Wesleyan University, Middletown, CT 06459, Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA, Computer Sciences Corporation, 3700 San Martin Dr, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Texas Christian University, 2800 South University Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76129, USA, Center for Astrophysical Sciences, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA, INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 5, I-35122 Padova, Italy., Astronomisches Rechen-Institut, Zentrum für Astronomie der Universität Heidelberg, Mönchhofstr. 12--14, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany, Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, Department of Astronomy, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA, Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Center for Cosmology, Astro-Particle Physics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA, Kavli Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, CNRS-Université de Provence, 38 rue F. Joliot-Curie, F-13388 Marseille cedex 13, France, Department of Astronomy, Yale University, P.O. Box 208101, New Haven, CT 06520-8101, USA, Kavli Institute for the Physics, Mathematics of the Universe, Todai Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, 277-8583, Japan., Max-Planck-Institut für Astronomie, Königstuhl 17, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany, Department of Astronomy, Space Science Chungnam National University Daejeon 305-764, Repulic of Korea., Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 475 North Charter Street, Madison WI 53703, USA, School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia, IPAC, MS 220-6, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK., Kavli Institute for Cosmology, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK., Alfred P. Sloan fellow., ELTE Gothard Astrophysical Observatory, H-9704 Szombathely, Szent Imre herceg st. 112, Hungary, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA, Department of Astronomy, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA, Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona E-08010, Spain, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071, USA, Dunlap Institute for Astronomy, Astrophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 3H4, Canada., Dept. of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, 48104, USA, Department of Chemistry, Physics, King's College, Wilkes-Barre, PA 18711, USA, NASA/GSFC, Code 665, Greenbelt, MC 20770, USA, Department of Physics, Yale University, 260 Whitney Ave, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA, School of Physics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, 85 Hoegiro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 130-722, Republic of Korea, INAF, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via G. B. Tiepolo 11, I-34131 Trieste, Italy., Department of Physics, Lehigh University, 16 Memorial Drive East, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA, Departament d'Astronomia i Meteorologia, Facultat de Física, Universitat de Barcelona, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain, A*MIDEX, Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LAM (Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille) UMR 7326, F-13388 Marseille cedex 13, France, Campus of International Excellence UAM+CSIC, Cantoblanco, E-28049 Madrid, Spain, , Glorieta de la Astronomía, E-18080 Granada, Spain, Department of Astronomy, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA, Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA, Université de Franche-Comté, Institut Utinam, UMR CNRS 6213, OSU Theta, Besançon, F-25010, France, Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Padova, Vicolo dell'Osservatorio 2, I-35122 Padova, Italy, Department of Physics, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, Department of Astronomy, Space Science, Sejong University, Seoul, 143-747, Korea, Universitäts-Sternwarte München, Scheinerstrasse 1, D-81679 Munich, Germany, Cluster of Excellence, Boltzmannstraße 2, D-85748 Garching, Germany, Department of Physics, Kansas State University, 116 Cardwell Hall, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA, National Abastumani Astrophysical Observatory, Ilia State University, 2A Kazbegi Ave., GE-1060 Tbilisi, Georgia, Instituto de Física, UFRGS, Caixa Postal 15051, Porto Alegre, RS - 91501-970, Brazil, Gemini Observatory, 670 N. A'Ohoku Place, Hilo, HI 96720, USA, Astrophysics Research Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, IC2, Liverpool Science Park, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis, CNRS, Observatoire de Côte d'Azur, Laboratoire Lagrange, BP 4229, F-06304 Nice Cedex 4, France, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Ohio University, 251B Clippinger Labs, Athens, OH 45701, USA, University of Texas at Austin, Hobby-Eberly Telescope, 32 Fowlkes Rd, McDonald Observatory, TX 79734-3005, USA, Indian Institute of Astrophysics, II Block, Koramangala, Bangalore 560 034, India., Brookhaven National Laboratory, Bldg 510, Upton, NY 11973, USA, National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA, Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA, Department of Physics, Fisk University, 1000 17th Avenue North, Nashville, TN 37208, USA, The Penn State Astrobiology Research Center, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA, School of Physics, Astronomy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, KY16 9SS, UK, Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics, University of Oslo, 0315 Oslo, Norway, INFN/National Institute for Nuclear Physics, Via Valerio 2, I-34127 Trieste, Italy., H.L. Dodge Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019, USA, Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics, the Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, 5640 South Ellis Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637, USA, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China, Key Laboratory of Optical Astronomy, National Astronomical Observatories, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100012, China)
    May 21, 2015 astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.SR, astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The third generation of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-III) took data from 2008 to 2014 using the original SDSS wide-field imager, the original and an upgraded multi-object fiber-fed optical spectrograph, a new near-infrared high-resolution spectrograph, and a novel optical interferometer. All the data from SDSS-III are now made public. In particular, this paper describes Data Release 11 (DR11) including all data acquired through 2013 July, and Data Release 12 (DR12) adding data acquired through 2014 July (including all data included in previous data releases), marking the end of SDSS-III observing. Relative to our previous public release (DR10), DR12 adds one million new spectra of galaxies and quasars from the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) over an additional 3000 sq. deg of sky, more than triples the number of H-band spectra of stars as part of the Apache Point Observatory (APO) Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE), and includes repeated accurate radial velocity measurements of 5500 stars from the Multi-Object APO Radial Velocity Exoplanet Large-area Survey (MARVELS). The APOGEE outputs now include measured abundances of 15 different elements for each star. In total, SDSS-III added 2350 sq. deg of ugriz imaging; 155,520 spectra of 138,099 stars as part of the Sloan Exploration of Galactic Understanding and Evolution 2 (SEGUE-2) survey; 2,497,484 BOSS spectra of 1,372,737 galaxies, 294,512 quasars, and 247,216 stars over 9376 sq. deg; 618,080 APOGEE spectra of 156,593 stars; and 197,040 MARVELS spectra of 5,513 stars. Since its first light in 1998, SDSS has imaged over 1/3 of the Celestial sphere in five bands and obtained over five million astronomical spectra.
  • Multifrequency Studies of the Peculiar Quasar 4C +21.35 During the 2010 Flaring Activity (1403.7534)

    M. Ackermann, G. Barbiellini, E. Bissaldi, R. Buehler, P. A. Caraveo, A. Chekhtman, R. Claus, F. D'Ammando, E. do Couto e Silva, W. B. Focke, F. Gargano, F. Giordano, S. Guiriec, R. E. Hughes, M. Kuss, F. Longo, M. Mayer, T. Mizuno, S. Murgia, E. Orlando, G. Pivato, A. Reimer, C. Sgrò, L. Stawarz, J. B. Thayer, G. Tosti, V. Vasileiou, B. L. Winer, (the Fermi Large Area Telescope Collaboration), J. Aleksic, P. Antoranz, J. A. Barrio, E. Bernardini, S. Bonnefoy, E. Carmona, E. Colombo, P. Da Vela, B. De Lotto, D. Dominis Prester, D. Eisenacher, L. Font, M. Garczarczyk, N. Godinovic, A. Herrero, W. Idec, K. Kodani, A. La Barbera, S. Lombardi, E. Lorenz, N. Mankuzhiyil, M. Mariotti, M. Meucci, P. Munar-Adrover K. Nilsson, S. Paiano, J. M. Paredes, F. Prada, I. Puljak, J. Rodriguez Garcia, K. Saito, V. Scapin, A. Sillanpaa, F. Spanier, J. Storz, F. Tavecchio, M. Teshima, P. Vogler, (the MAGIC Collaboration), M. F. Aller, S. G. Djorgovski, M. A. Gurwell, Y. Y. Kovalev, V. M. Larionov, E. Ros . Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, USA, W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics, Cosmology, Department of Physics, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, USA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Perugia, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Italy, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trieste, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, Italy, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "G. Galilei", Università di Padova, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Università di Trieste, Italy, Dipartimento di Fisica "M. Merlin" dell'Università e del Politecnico di Bari, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Italy, Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, Ecole polytechnique, CNRS/IN2P3, Palaiseau, France, INAF-Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica, Milano, Italy, Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, Italy, Laboratoire AIM, CEA-IRFU/CNRS/Université Paris Diderot, Service d'Astrophysique, CEA Saclay, France, Center for Earth Observing, Space Research, College of Science, George Mason University, resident at Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, USA, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Italy, Laboratoire Univers et Particules de Montpellier, Universitè Montpellier, CNRS/IN2P3, France, The Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm, Sweden, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Research Fellow, funded by a grant from the K. A. Wallenberg Foundation, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden, Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, USA, Center for Research, Exploration in Space Science, Technology, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA, Department of Physics, Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, USA, Department of Physical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA, NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellow, USA, Department of Physics, Center for Cosmology, Astro-Particle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Trieste, Italy, CNRS, IRAP, Toulouse, France, GAHEC, Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, IRAP, Toulouse, France, Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, Sweden, Hiroshima Astrophysical Science Center, Hiroshima University, Japan, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma "Tor Vergata", Italy, Center for Cosmology, Physics, Astronomy Department, University of California, Irvine, USA, Funded by contract FIRB-2012-RBFR12PM1F from the Italian Ministry of Education, University, Research Institut fur Astro- und Teilchenphysik, Institut fur Theoretische Physik, Leopold-Franzens-Universitat Innsbruck, Austria, Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany, NYCB Real-Time Computing Inc., Lattingtown, NY, USA, Institute of Space, Astronautical Science, JAXA, Japan, Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland, , Barcelona, Spain, , Barcelona, Spain, , Torino, Italy, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma, Italy, Praxis Inc., Alexandria, resident at Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, USA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Udine, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Italy, INAF National Institute for Astrophysics, Rome, Italy, Università di Siena, INFN Pisa, Italy, Croatian MAGIC Consortium, Rudjer Boskovic Institute, University of Rijeka, University of Split, Zagreb, Croatia, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain, Inst. de Astrofisica de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain, Universitat Wurzburg, Germany, Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, Madrid, Spain, Technische Universitat Dortmund, Germany, , Granada, Spain, Unitat de Fisica de les Radiacions, Departament de Fisica, CERES-IEEC, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain, Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Finland, Japanese MAGIC Consortium, Division of Physics, Astronomy, Kyoto University, Japan, Inst. for Nucl. Research, Nucl. Energy, Sofia, Bulgaria, Università di Pisa, INFN Pisa, Italy, Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne Department of Physics, Astronomy, UC Riverside, USA, , University of Turku, Finland, also at Instituto de Fisica Teorica, UAM/CSIC, Madrid, Spain, Stockholm University, Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm, Sweden, GRAPPA Institute, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands, Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA, Pulkovo Observatory, St. Petersburg, Russia, Cahill Center for Astronomy, Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA, Astronomical Institute, St. Petersburg State University, Russia, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, USA, Department of Physics, Denison University, Granville, USA, School of Cosmic Physics, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Ireland, Astro Space Center of the Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia, Abastumani Observatory, Georgia, Engelhardt Astronomical Observatory, Kazan Federal University, Tatarstan, Russia, Aalto University Metsahovi Radio Observatory, Kylmala, Finland, Isaac Newton Institute of Chile, St. Petersburg Branch, St. Petersburg, Russia, Department of Physics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA, Finnish Centre for Astronomy with ESO
    June 27, 2014 astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.HE
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The discovery of rapidly variable Very High Energy (VHE; E > 100 GeV) gamma-ray emission from 4C +21.35 (PKS 1222+216) by MAGIC on 2010 June 17, triggered by the high activity detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) in high energy (HE; E > 100 MeV) gamma-rays, poses intriguing questions on the location of the gamma-ray emitting region in this flat spectrum radio quasar. We present multifrequency data of 4C +21.35 collected from centimeter to VHE during 2010 to investigate the properties of this source and discuss a possible emission model. The first hint of detection at VHE was observed by MAGIC on 2010 May 3, soon after a gamma-ray flare detected by Fermi-LAT that peaked on April 29. The same emission mechanism may therefore be responsible for both the HE and VHE emission during the 2010 flaring episodes. Two optical peaks were detected on 2010 April 20 and June 30, close in time but not simultaneous with the two gamma-ray peaks, while no clear connection was observed between the X-ray an gamma-ray emission. An increasing flux density was observed in radio and mm bands from the beginning of 2009, in accordance with the increasing gamma-ray activity observed by Fermi-LAT, and peaking on 2011 January 27 in the mm regime (230 GHz). We model the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of 4C +21.35 for the two periods of the VHE detection and a quiescent state, using a one-zone model with the emission coming from a very compact region outside the broad line region. The three SEDs can be fit with a combination of synchrotron self-Compton and external Compton emission of seed photons from a dust torus, changing only the electron distribution parameters between the epochs. The fit of the optical/UV part of the spectrum for 2010 April 29 seems to favor an inner disk radius of <6 gravitational radii, as one would expect from a prograde-rotating Kerr black hole.
  • Multifrequency Studies of the Peculiar Quasar 4C +21.35 During the 2010 Flaring Activity (1403.7534)

    M. Ackermann, G. Barbiellini, E. Bissaldi, R. Buehler, P. A. Caraveo, A. Chekhtman, R. Claus, F. D'Ammando, E. do Couto e Silva, W. B. Focke, F. Gargano, F. Giordano, S. Guiriec, R. E. Hughes, M. Kuss, F. Longo, M. Mayer, T. Mizuno, S. Murgia, E. Orlando, G. Pivato, A. Reimer, C. Sgrò, L. Stawarz, J. B. Thayer, G. Tosti, V. Vasileiou, B. L. Winer, (the Fermi Large Area Telescope Collaboration), J. Aleksic, P. Antoranz, J. A. Barrio, E. Bernardini, S. Bonnefoy, E. Carmona, E. Colombo, P. Da Vela, B. De Lotto, D. Dominis Prester, D. Eisenacher, L. Font, M. Garczarczyk, N. Godinovic, A. Herrero, W. Idec, K. Kodani, A. La Barbera, S. Lombardi, E. Lorenz, N. Mankuzhiyil, M. Mariotti, M. Meucci, P. Munar-Adrover K. Nilsson, S. Paiano, J. M. Paredes, F. Prada, I. Puljak, J. Rodriguez Garcia, K. Saito, V. Scapin, A. Sillanpaa, F. Spanier, J. Storz, F. Tavecchio, M. Teshima, P. Vogler, (the MAGIC Collaboration), M. F. Aller, S. G. Djorgovski, M. A. Gurwell, Y. Y. Kovalev, V. M. Larionov, E. Ros . Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, USA, W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli Institute for Particle Astrophysics, Cosmology, Department of Physics, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University, USA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Perugia, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Italy, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Trieste, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Padova, Italy, Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia "G. Galilei", Università di Padova, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Pisa, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Università di Trieste, Italy, Dipartimento di Fisica "M. Merlin" dell'Università e del Politecnico di Bari, Italy, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Bari, Italy, Laboratoire Leprince-Ringuet, Ecole polytechnique, CNRS/IN2P3, Palaiseau, France, INAF-Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica, Milano, Italy, Agenzia Spaziale Italiana, Italy, Laboratoire AIM, CEA-IRFU/CNRS/Université Paris Diderot, Service d'Astrophysique, CEA Saclay, France, Center for Earth Observing, Space Research, College of Science, George Mason University, resident at Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, USA, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica - Osservatorio Astronomico di Roma, Italy, Laboratoire Univers et Particules de Montpellier, Universitè Montpellier, CNRS/IN2P3, France, The Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm, Sweden, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences Research Fellow, funded by a grant from the K. A. Wallenberg Foundation, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm, Sweden, Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, USA, Center for Research, Exploration in Space Science, Technology, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA, Department of Physics, Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, USA, Department of Physical Sciences, Hiroshima University, Japan, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA, NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellow, USA, Department of Physics, Center for Cosmology, Astro-Particle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA, Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Istituto Nazionale di Astrofisica, Trieste, Italy, CNRS, IRAP, Toulouse, France, GAHEC, Université de Toulouse, UPS-OMP, IRAP, Toulouse, France, Department of Astronomy, Stockholm University, Sweden, Hiroshima Astrophysical Science Center, Hiroshima University, Japan, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Roma "Tor Vergata", Italy, Center for Cosmology, Physics, Astronomy Department, University of California, Irvine, USA, Funded by contract FIRB-2012-RBFR12PM1F from the Italian Ministry of Education, University, Research Institut fur Astro- und Teilchenphysik, Institut fur Theoretische Physik, Leopold-Franzens-Universitat Innsbruck, Austria, Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik, Heidelberg, Germany, NYCB Real-Time Computing Inc., Lattingtown, NY, USA, Institute of Space, Astronautical Science, JAXA, Japan, Astronomical Observatory, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland, , Barcelona, Spain, , Barcelona, Spain, , Torino, Italy, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma, Italy, Praxis Inc., Alexandria, resident at Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, USA, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Udine, Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sezione di Trieste, Gruppo Collegato di Udine, Italy, INAF National Institute for Astrophysics, Rome, Italy, Università di Siena, INFN Pisa, Italy, Croatian MAGIC Consortium, Rudjer Boskovic Institute, University of Rijeka, University of Split, Zagreb, Croatia, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain, Inst. de Astrofisica de Canarias, Tenerife, Spain, Universitat Wurzburg, Germany, Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas, Madrid, Spain, Technische Universitat Dortmund, Germany, , Granada, Spain, Unitat de Fisica de les Radiacions, Departament de Fisica, CERES-IEEC, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain, Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Finland, Japanese MAGIC Consortium, Division of Physics, Astronomy, Kyoto University, Japan, Inst. for Nucl. Research, Nucl. Energy, Sofia, Bulgaria, Università di Pisa, INFN Pisa, Italy, Ecole polytechnique federale de Lausanne Department of Physics, Astronomy, UC Riverside, USA, , University of Turku, Finland, also at Instituto de Fisica Teorica, UAM/CSIC, Madrid, Spain, Stockholm University, Oskar Klein Centre for Cosmoparticle Physics, Stockholm, Sweden, GRAPPA Institute, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands, Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA, Pulkovo Observatory, St. Petersburg, Russia, Cahill Center for Astronomy, Astrophysics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA, Astronomical Institute, St. Petersburg State University, Russia, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, USA, Department of Physics, Denison University, Granville, USA, School of Cosmic Physics, Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Ireland, Astro Space Center of the Lebedev Physical Institute, Moscow, Russia, Abastumani Observatory, Georgia, Engelhardt Astronomical Observatory, Kazan Federal University, Tatarstan, Russia, Aalto University Metsahovi Radio Observatory, Kylmala, Finland, Isaac Newton Institute of Chile, St. Petersburg Branch, St. Petersburg, Russia, Department of Physics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA, Finnish Centre for Astronomy with ESO
    June 27, 2014 astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.GA, astro-ph.HE
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The discovery of rapidly variable Very High Energy (VHE; E > 100 GeV) gamma-ray emission from 4C +21.35 (PKS 1222+216) by MAGIC on 2010 June 17, triggered by the high activity detected by the Fermi Large Area Telescope (LAT) in high energy (HE; E > 100 MeV) gamma-rays, poses intriguing questions on the location of the gamma-ray emitting region in this flat spectrum radio quasar. We present multifrequency data of 4C +21.35 collected from centimeter to VHE during 2010 to investigate the properties of this source and discuss a possible emission model. The first hint of detection at VHE was observed by MAGIC on 2010 May 3, soon after a gamma-ray flare detected by Fermi-LAT that peaked on April 29. The same emission mechanism may therefore be responsible for both the HE and VHE emission during the 2010 flaring episodes. Two optical peaks were detected on 2010 April 20 and June 30, close in time but not simultaneous with the two gamma-ray peaks, while no clear connection was observed between the X-ray an gamma-ray emission. An increasing flux density was observed in radio and mm bands from the beginning of 2009, in accordance with the increasing gamma-ray activity observed by Fermi-LAT, and peaking on 2011 January 27 in the mm regime (230 GHz). We model the spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of 4C +21.35 for the two periods of the VHE detection and a quiescent state, using a one-zone model with the emission coming from a very compact region outside the broad line region. The three SEDs can be fit with a combination of synchrotron self-Compton and external Compton emission of seed photons from a dust torus, changing only the electron distribution parameters between the epochs. The fit of the optical/UV part of the spectrum for 2010 April 29 seems to favor an inner disk radius of <6 gravitational radii, as one would expect from a prograde-rotating Kerr black hole.
  • 3D stellar kinematics at the Galactic center: measuring the nuclear star cluster spatial density profile, black hole mass, and distance (1311.0886)

    T. Do, J. Bullock K. Phifer University of California, Irvine, The Oskar Klein Center, Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii, Center for Cosmology, Astro-Particle Physics, Department of Physics, Ohio State University, Department of Astronomy, Ohio State University)
    Nov. 4, 2013 astro-ph.GA
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We present 3D kinematic observations of stars within the central 0.5 pc of the Milky Way nuclear star cluster using adaptive optics imaging and spectroscopy from the Keck telescopes. Recent observations have shown that the cluster has a shallower surface density profile than expected for a dynamically relaxed cusp, leading to important implications for its formation and evolution. However, the true three dimensional profile of the cluster is unknown due to the difficulty in de-projecting the stellar number counts. Here, we use spherical Jeans modeling of individual proper motions and radial velocities to constrain for the first time, the de-projected spatial density profile, cluster velocity anisotropy, black hole mass ($M_\mathrm{BH}$), and distance to the Galactic center ($R_0$) simultaneously. We find that the inner stellar density profile of the late-type stars, $\rho(r)\propto r^{-\gamma}$ to have a power law slope $\gamma=0.05_{-0.60}^{+0.29}$, much more shallow than the frequently assumed Bahcall $\&$ Wolf slope of $\gamma=7/4$. The measured slope will significantly affect dynamical predictions involving the cluster, such as the dynamical friction time scale. The cluster core must be larger than 0.5 pc, which disfavors some scenarios for its origin. Our measurement of $M_\mathrm{BH}=5.76_{-1.26}^{+1.76}\times10^6$ $M_\odot$ and $R_0=8.92_{-0.55}^{+0.58}$ kpc is consistent with that derived from stellar orbits within 1$^{\prime\prime}$ of Sgr A*. When combined with the orbit of S0-2, the uncertainty on $R_0$ is reduced by 30% ($8.46_{-0.38}^{+0.42}$ kpc). We suggest that the MW NSC can be used in the future in combination with stellar orbits to significantly improve constraints on $R_0$.
  • The growth of galactic bulges through mergers in LCDM haloes revisited. I. Present-day properties (1204.0516)

    Jesus Zavala, Michael Boylan-Kolchin Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Instituto de Astronomia-UNAM, Center for Cosmology, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of California)
    Sept. 7, 2012 astro-ph.CO
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We use the Millennium I and II cosmological simulations to revisit the impact of mergers in the growth of bulges in central galaxies in the LCDM scenario. We seed galaxies within the growing CDM haloes using semi-empirical relations to assign stellar and gaseous masses, and an analytic treatment to estimate the transfer of stellar mass to the bulge of the remnant after a galaxy merger. We find that this model roughly reproduces the observed correlation between the bulge-to-total (B/T) mass ratio and stellar mass in present-day central galaxies as well as their observed demographics, although low-mass B/T<0.1 (bulgeless) galaxies might be scarce relative to the observed abundance. In our merger-driven scenario, bulges have a composite population made of (i) stars acquired from infalling satellites, (ii) stars transferred from the primary disc due to merger-induced perturbations, and (iii) newly formed stars in starbursts triggered by mergers. We find that (i) and (ii) are the main channels of mass assembly, with the first being dominant for massive galaxies, creating large bulges with different stellar populations than those of the inner discs, while the second is dominant for intermediate/low-mass galaxies creating small bulges with similar stellar populations to the inner discs. We associate the dominion of the first (second) channel to classical (pseudo) bulges, and compare the predicted fractions to observations. We remark that our treatment does not include other mechanisms of bulge growth such as intrinsic secular disc instabilities or misaligned gas accretion. We find that the evolution of the stellar and gaseous contents of the satellite as it moves towards the central galaxy is a key ingredient in setting the morphology of the remnant, and that a good match to the observed bulge demographics occurs when this evolution proceeds closely to that of the central galaxy.
  • On Absorption by Circumstellar Dust, With the Progenitor of SN2012aw as a Case Study (1208.4111)

    C.S. Kochanek Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Center for Cosmology, AstroParticle Physics, The Ohio State University, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Oklahoma)
    Aug. 20, 2012 astro-ph.SR
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We use the progenitor of SN2012aw to illustrate the consequences of modeling circumstellar dust using Galactic (interstellar) extinction laws that (1) ignore dust emission in the near-IR and beyond; (2) average over dust compositions, and (3) mis-characterize the optical/UV absorption by assuming that scattered photons are lost to the observer. The primary consequences for the progenitor of SN2012aw are that both the luminosity and the absorption are significantly over-estimated. In particular, the stellar luminosity is most likely in the range 10^4.8 < L/Lsun < 10^5.0 and the star was not extremely massive for a Type IIP progenitor, with M < 15Msun. Given the properties of the circumstellar dust and the early X-ray/radio detections of SN2012aw, the star was probably obscured by an on-going wind with Mdot ~ 10^-5.5 to 10^-5.0 Msun/year at the time of the explosion, roughly consistent with the expected mass loss rates for a star of its temperature (T_* ~ 3600K) and luminosity. In the spirit of Galactic extinction laws, we supply simple interpolation formulas for circumstellar extinction by dusty graphitic and silicate shells as a function of wavelength (>0.3 micron) and total (absorption plus scattering) V-band optical depth (tau < 20). These do not include the contributions of dust emission, but provide a simple, physical alternative to incorrectly using interstellar extinction laws.
  • SN2002bu -- Another SN2008S-like Transient (1208.2688)

    D. M. Szczygiel Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Center for Cosmology, AstroParticle Physics, The Ohio State University, Department of Physics, Astronomy, University of Oklahoma)
    Aug. 13, 2012 astro-ph.SR
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We observed SN2002bu in the near-IR with the Hubble Space Telescope, the mid-IR with the Spitzer Space Telescope and in X-rays with Swift 10 years after the explosion. If the faint L_H\sim100 Lsun HST near-IR source at the transient position is the near-IR counterpart of SN2002bu, then the source has dramatically faded between 2004 and 2012, from L\sim10^6.0 Lsun to L\sim10^4.5 Lsun. It is still heavily obscured, tau_V\sim5 in graphitic dust models, with almost all the energy radiated in the mid-IR. The radius of the dust emission is increasing as R\simt^(0.7+/-0.4) and the optical depth is dropping as tau_V\simt^(-1.3+/-0.4). The evolution expected for an expanding shell of material, tau_V\sim1/t^2, is ruled out at approximately 2 sigma while the tau_V\simt^(-0.8) to t^(-1) optical depth scaling for a shock passing through a pre-existing wind is consistent with the data. If the near-IR source is a chance superposition, the present day source can be moderately more luminous, significantly more obscured and evolving more slowly. While we failed to detect X-ray emission, the X-ray flux limits are consistent with the present day emissions being powered by an expanding shock wave. SN2002bu is clearly a member of the SN2008S class of transients, but continued monitoring of the evolution of the spectral energy distribution is needed to conclusively determine the nature of the transient.
  • The Magellanic Quasars Survey. II. Confirmation of 144 New Active Galactic Nuclei Behind the Southern Edge of the Large Magellanic Cloud (1106.3110)

    Szymon Kozlowski, A. Udalski, I. Soszynski, P. Pietrukowicz Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, USA, Center for Cosmology, Astroparticle Physics, The Ohio State University, USA, Departamento de Fisica, Universidad de Concepcion, Chile, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, UK)
    Nov. 4, 2011 astro-ph.CO
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We quadruple the number of quasars known behind the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) from 55 (42 in the LMC fields of the third phase of the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment (OGLE)) to 200 by spectroscopically confirming 169 (144 new) quasars from a sample of 845 observed candidates in four ~3 deg^2 Anglo-Australian Telescope/AAOmega fields south of the LMC center. The candidates were selected based on their Spitzer mid-infrared colors, X-ray emission, and/or optical variability properties in the database of the OGLE microlensing survey. The contaminating sources can be divided into 115 young stellar objects (YSOs), 17 planetary nebulae (PNe), 39 Be and 24 blue stars, 68 red stars, and 12 objects classed as either YSO/PN or blue star/YSO. There are also 402 targets with either featureless spectra or too low signal-to-noise ratio for source classification. Our quasar sample is 50% (30%) complete at I = 18.6 mag (19.3 mag). The newly discovered active galactic nuclei (AGNs) provide many additional reference points for proper motion studies of the LMC, and the sample includes 10 bright AGNs (I < 18 mag) potentially suitable for absorption line studies. Their primary use, however, is for detailed studies of quasar variability, as they all have long-term, high cadence, continuously growing light curves from the microlensing surveys of the LMC. Completing the existing Magellanic Quasars Survey fields in the LMC and Small Magellanic Cloud should yield a sample of ~700 well-monitored AGNs, and expanding it to the larger regions covered by the OGLE-IV survey should yield a sample of ~3600 AGNs.
  • Convergence of Galaxy Properties with Merger Tree Temporal Resolution (1107.4098)

    Andrew J. Benson, Gabriella De Lucia California Institute of Technology, Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universita, Sezione de Astronomia, Italy, Isservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Italy, Department of Physics, Astronomy, Center for Cosmology, University of California)
    July 20, 2011 astro-ph.CO
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Dark matter halo merger trees are now routinely extracted from cosmological simulations of structure formation. These trees are frequently used as inputs to semi-analytic models of galaxy formation to provide the backbone within which galaxy formation takes place. By necessity, these merger trees are constructed from a finite set of discrete "snapshots" of the N-body simulation and so have a limited temporal resolution. To date, there has been little consideration of how this temporal resolution affects the properties of galaxies formed within these trees. In particular, the question of how many snapshots are needed to achieve convergence in galaxy properties has not be answered. Therefore, we study the convergence in the stellar and total baryonic masses of galaxies, distribution of merger times, stellar mass functions and star formation rates in the Galacticus model of galaxy formation as a function of the number of "snapshot" times used to represent dark matter halo merger trees. When utilizing snapshots between z=20 and z=0, we find that at least 128 snapshots are required to achieve convergence to within 5% for galaxy masses. This convergence is obtained for mean quantities averaged over large samples of galaxies - significant variance for individual galaxies remains even when using very large numbers of snapshots. We find only weak dependence of the rate of convergence on the distribution of snapshots in time - snapshots spaced uniformly in the expansion factor, uniformly in the logarithm of expansion factor or uniformly in the logarithm of critical overdensity for collapse work equally well in almost all cases. We provide input parameters to Galacticus which allow this type of convergence study to be tuned to other simulations and to be carried out for other galaxy properties.
  • Calibration biases in measurements of weak lensing (1103.5923)

    Matthias Bartelmann, Björn M. Schäfer Zentrum für Astronomie, ITA, U. Heidelberg, Germany, Center for Cosmology, Astro-Particle Physics, OSU, Columbus, USA, Department of Physics, OSU, Columbus, USA)
    March 30, 2011 astro-ph.CO
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    As recently shown by Viola et al., the common (KSB) method for measuring weak gravitational shear creates a non-linear relation between the measured and the true shear of objects. We investigate here what effect such a non-linear calibration relation may have on cosmological parameter estimates from weak lensing if a simpler, linear calibration relation is assumed. We show that the non-linear relation introduces a bias in the shear-correlation amplitude and thus a bias in the cosmological parameters Omega_matter and sigma_8. Its direction and magnitude depends on whether the point-spread function is narrow or wide compared to the galaxy images from which the shear is measured. Substantial over- or underestimates of the cosmological parameters are equally possible, depending also on the variant of the KSB method. Our results show that for trustable cosmological-parameter estimates from measurements of weak lensing, one must verify that the method employed is free from ellipticity-dependent biases or monitor that the calibration relation inferred from simulations is applicable to the survey at hand.
  • COSEBIs: Extracting the full E-/B-mode information from cosmic shear correlation functions (1002.2136)

    Peter Schneider Argelander-Institut fuer Astronomie, Univ. Bonn, Center for Cosmology, Particle Physics, Ohio State University, California Institute of Technology, Dept. of Astronomy)
    Sept. 20, 2010 astro-ph.CO
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Cosmic shear is considered one of the most powerful methods for studying the properties of Dark Energy in the Universe. As a standard method, the two-point correlation functions $xi_\pm(theta)$ of the cosmic shear field are used as statistical measures for the shear field. In order to separate the observed shear into E- and B-modes, the latter being most likely produced by remaining systematics in the data set and/or intrinsic alignment effects, several statistics have been defined before. Here we aim at a complete E-/B-mode decomposition of the cosmic shear information contained in the $xi_\pm$ on a finite angular interval. We construct two sets of such E-/B-mode measures, namely Complete Orthogonal Sets of E-/B-mode Integrals (COSEBIs), characterized by weight functions between the $xi_\pm$ and the COSEBIs which are polynomials in $theta$ or polynomials in $ln(theta)$, respectively. Considering the likelihood in cosmological parameter space, constructed from the COSEBIs, we study their information contents. We show that the information grows with the number of COSEBI modes taken into account, and that an asymptotic limit is reached which defines the maximum available information in the E-mode component of the $xi_\pm$. We show that this limit is reached the earlier (i.e., for a smaller number of modes considered) the narrower the angular range is over which $xi_\pm$ are measured, and it is reached much earlier for logarithmic weight functions. For example, for $xi_\pm$ on the interval $1'\le \theta\le 400'$, the asymptotic limit for the parameter pair $(Omega_m, sigma_8)$ is reached for $\sim 25$ modes in the linear case, but already for 5 modes in the logarithmic case. The COSEBIs form a natural discrete set of quantities, which we suggest as method of choice in future cosmic shear likelihood analyses.
  • Quantifying Quasar Variability As Part of a General Approach To Classifying Continuously Varying Sources (0909.1326)

    Szymon Kozlowski, L. Wyrzykowski, G. Pietrzynski Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, USA, Center for Cosmology, Astroparticle Physics, The Ohio State University, USA, The OGLE collaboration, Warsaw University Observatory, Poland, Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, UK, Universidad de Concepcion, Departamento de Fisica, Chile)
    Nov. 30, 2009 astro-ph.CO
    Robust fast methods to classify variable light curves in large sky surveys are becoming increasingly important. While it is relatively straightforward to identify common periodic stars and particular transient events (supernovae, novae, microlensing), there is no equivalent for non-periodic continuously varying sources (quasars, aperiodic stellar variability). In this paper we present a fast method for modeling and classifying such sources. We demonstrate the method using ~ 86,000 variable sources from the OGLE-II survey of the LMC and ~ 2,700 mid-IR selected quasar candidates from the OGLE-III survey of the LMC and SMC. We discuss the location of common variability classes in the parameter space of the model. In particular we show that quasars occupy a distinct region of variability space, providing a simple quantitative approach to the variability selection of quasars.
  • Active Galactic Nuclei in Groups and Clusters of Galaxies: Detection and Host Morphology (0911.0392)

    Timothy J. Arnold, Angela Berti Department of Astronomy, Center for Cosmology, Astroparticle Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH, Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA, UCO/Lick Observatories, Santa Cruz CA)
    Nov. 2, 2009 astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.GA
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The incidence and properties of Active Galactic Nuclei (AGN) in the field, groups, and clusters can provide new information about how these objects are triggered and fueled, similar to how these environments have been employed to study galaxy evolution. We have obtained new XMM-Newton observations of seven X-ray selected groups and poor clusters with 0.02 < z < 0.06 for comparison with previous samples that mostly included rich clusters and optically-selected groups. Our final sample has ten groups and six clusters in this low-redshift range (split at a velocity dispersion of $\sigma = 500$ km/s). We find that the X-ray selected AGN fraction increases from $f_A(L_X>10^{41}; M_R<M_R^*+1) = 0.047^{+0.023}_{-0.016}$ in clusters to $0.091^{+0.049}_{-0.034}$ for the groups (85% significance), or a factor of two, for AGN above an 0.3-8keV X-ray luminosity of $10^{41}$ erg/s hosted by galaxies more luminous than $M_R^*+1$. The trend is similar, although less significant, for a lower-luminosity host threshold of $M_R = -20$ mag. For many of the groups in the sample we have also identified AGN via standard emission-line diagnostics and find that these AGN are nearly disjoint from the X-ray selected AGN. Because there are substantial differences in the morphological mix of galaxies between groups and clusters, we have also measured the AGN fraction for early-type galaxies alone to determine if the differences are directly due to environment, or indirectly due to the change in the morphological mix. We find that the AGN fraction in early-type galaxies is also lower in clusters $f_{A,n>2.5}(L_X>10^{41}; M_R<M_R^*+1) = 0.048^{+0.028}_{-0.019}$ compared to $0.119^{+0.064}_{-0.044}$ for the groups (92% significance), a result consistent with the hypothesis that the change in AGN fraction is directly connected to environment.
  • Discovery of 5000 Active Galactic Nuclei behind the Magellanic Clouds (0904.1740)

    Szymon Kozlowski Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, Center for Cosmology, Astroparticle Physics, The Ohio State University)
    July 24, 2009 astro-ph.CO
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We show that using mid-IR color selection to find active galactic nuclei (AGN) is as effective in dense stellar fields such as the Magellanic Clouds as it is in extragalactic fields with low stellar densities using comparisons between the Spitzer Deep, Wide-Field Survey data for the NOAO Deep Wide Field Survey Bootes region and the SAGE Survey of the Large Magellanic Cloud. We use this to build high purity catalogs of ~ 5000 AGN candidates behind the Magellanic Clouds. Once confirmed, these quasars will expand the available astrometric reference sources for the Clouds and the numbers of quasars with densely sampled, long-term (>decade) monitoring light curves by well over an order of magnitude and potentially identify sufficiently bright quasars for absorption line studies of the interstellar medium of the Clouds.
  • The Sizes of the X-ray and Optical Emission Regions of RXJ1131-1231 (0906.4342)

    X. Dai, C.W. Morgan Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Department of Astronomy, Center for Cosmology, Astroparticle Physics, The Ohio State University, Department of Astronomy, Astrophysics, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Physics, United States Naval Academy, Department of Astronomy, University of Washington)
    June 23, 2009 astro-ph.HE
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We use gravitational microlensing of the four images of the z=0.658 quasar RXJ1131-1231 to measure the sizes of the optical and X-ray emission regions of the quasar. The (face-on) scale length of the optical disk at rest frame 400 nm is 1.3 10^15cm, while the half-light radius of the rest frame 0.3-17 keV X-ray emission is 2.3 10^14cm. The formal uncertainties are factors of 1.6 and 2.0, respectively. With the exception of the lower limit on the X-ray size, the results are very stable against any changes in the priors used in the analysis. Based on the Hbeta line-width, we estimate that the black hole mass is ~10^8 Msun, which corresponds to a gravitational radius of r_g~2 10^13 cm. Thus, the X-ray emission is emerging on scales of ~10r_g and the 400 nm emission on scales of ~70 r_g. A standard thin disk of this size should be significantly brighter than observed. Possible solutions are to have a flatter temperature profile or to scatter a large fraction of the optical flux on larger scales after it is emitted. While our calculations were not optimized to constrain the dark matter fraction in the lens galaxy, dark matter dominated models are favored. With well-sampled optical and X-ray light curves over a broad range of frequencies there will be no difficulty in extending our analysis to completely map the structure of the accretion disk as a function of wavelength.