• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • Characterizing K2 Candidate Planetary Systems Orbiting Low-Mass Stars III: A High Mass & Low Envelope Fraction for the Warm Neptune K2-55b (1804.05148)

    Courtney D. Dressing, Evan Sinukoff, Benjamin J. Fulton, Eric D. Lopez, Charles A. Beichman, Andrew W. Howard, Heather A. Knutson, Michael Werner, Björn Benneke, Ian J. M. Crossfield, Howard Isaacson, Jessica Krick, Varoujan Gorjian, John Livingston, Erik A. Petigura, Joshua E. Schlieder, Rachel L. Akeson, Konstantin Batygin, Jessie L.Christiansen, David R. Ciardi, Justin R. Crepp, Erica Gonzales, Kevin Hardegree-Ullman, Lea A. Hirsch, Molly Kosiarek, Lauren M. Weiss
    April 14, 2018 astro-ph.EP
    K2-55b is a Neptune-sized planet orbiting a K7 dwarf with a radius of $0.715^{+0.043}_{-0.040} R_\odot$, a mass of $0.688\pm0.069 M_\odot$, and an effective temperature of $4300^{+107}_{-100}$ K. Having characterized the host star using near-infrared spectra obtained at IRTF/SpeX, we observed a transit of K2-55b with Spitzer/IRAC and confirmed the accuracy of the original K2 ephemeris for future follow-up transit observations. Performing a joint fit to the Spitzer/IRAC and K2 photometry, we found a planet radius of $4.43^{+0.29}_{-0.32} R_\oplus$, an orbital period of $2.8492725_{- 6.6\times10^{-6}}^{+7 \times 10^{-6}}$ days, and an equilibrium temperature of roughly 900K. We then measured the planet mass by acquiring twelve radial velocity (RV) measurements of the system using HIRES on the 10-m Keck I Telescope. Our RV data set precisely constrains the mass of K2-55b to $44.0\pm 5.3 M_\oplus$, indicating that K2-55b has a bulk density of $2.8_{-0.6}^{+0.7}$ g cm$^{-3}$ and can be modeled as a rocky planet capped by a modest H/He envelope ($M_{\rm envelope} = 12\pm3\% M_p$). K2-55b is denser than most similarly sized planets, raising the question of whether the high planetary bulk density of K2-55b could be attributed to the high metallicity of K2-55. The absence of a substantial volatile envelope despite the large mass of K2-55b poses a challenge to current theories of gas giant formation. We posit that K2-55b may have escaped runaway accretion by migration, late formation, or inefficient core accretion or that K2-55b was stripped of its envelope by a late giant impact.
  • KELT-20b: A giant planet with a period of P~ 3.5 days transiting the V~ 7.6 early A star HD 185603 (1707.01518)

    Michael B. Lund, Joseph E. Rodriguez, George Zhou, B. Scott Gaudi, Keivan G. Stassun, Marshall C. Johnson, Allyson Bieryla, Ryan J. Oelkers, Daniel J. Stevens, Karen A. Collins, Kaloyan Penev, Samuel N. Quinn, David W. Latham, Steven Villanueva Jr., Jason D. Eastman, John F. Kielkopf, Thomas E. Oberst, Eric L. N. Jensen, David H. Cohen, Michael D. Joner, Denise C. Stephens, Howard Relles, Giorgio Corfini, Joao Gregorio, Roberto Zambelli, Gilbert A. Esquerdo, Michael L. Calkins, Perry Berlind, David R. Ciardi, Courtney Dressing, Rahul Patel, Patrick Gagnon, Erica Gonzales, Thomas G. Beatty, Robert J. Siverd, Jonathan Labadie-Bartz, Rudolf B. Kuhn, Knicole D. Colon, David James, Joshua Pepper, Benjamin J. Fulton, Kim K. McLeod, Christopher Stockdale, Sebastiano Calchi Novati, D. L. DePoy, Andrew Gould, Jennifer L. Marshall, Mark Trueblood, Patricia Trueblood
    July 5, 2017 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We report the discovery of KELT-20b, a hot Jupiter transiting a V~7.6 early A star with an orbital period of P~3.47 days. We identified the initial transit signal in KELT-North survey data. Archival and follow-up photometry, the Gaia parallax, radial velocities, Doppler tomography, and adaptive optics imaging were used to confirm the planetary nature of the companion and characterize the system. From global modeling we infer that the host star HD 185603 is a rapidly-rotating (VsinI~120 km/s) A2V star with an effective temperature of $T_{eff}$=8730K, mass of $M_{star}=1.76M_{sun}$, radius of $R_{star}=1.561R_{sun}$, surface gravity of logg=4.292, and age of <600 Myr. The planetary companion has a radius of $1.735^{+0.070}_{-0.075}~R_{J}$, a semimajor axis of $a=0.0542^{+0.0014}_{-0.0021}$AU, and a linear ephemeris of $BJD_{TDB}=2457503.120049 \pm 0.000190 + E(3.4741070\pm0.0000019)$. We place a $3\sigma$ upper limit of ~3.5 $M_{J}$ on the mass of the planet. The Doppler tomographic measurement indicates that the planetary orbit is well aligned with the projected spin-axis of the star ($\lambda= 3.4\pm {2.1}$ degrees). The inclination of the star is constrained to be $24.4<I_*<155.6$ degrees, implying a true (three-dimensional) spin-orbit alignment of $1.3<\psi<69.8$ degrees. The planet receives an insolation flux of $\sim 8\times 10^9~{\rm erg~s^{-1}~cm^{-2}}$, implying an equilibrium temperature of of ~ 2250 K, assuming zero albedo and complete heat redistribution. Due to the high stellar $T_{eff}$, the planet also receives an ultraviolet (wavelengths $d\le 91.2$~nm) insolation flux of $\sim 9.1\times 10^4~{\rm erg~s^{-1}~cm^{-2}}$, which may lead to significant ablation of the planetary atmosphere. Together with WASP-33, Kepler-13 A, HAT-P-57, KELT-17, and KELT-9, KELT-20 is the sixth A star host of a transiting giant planet, and the third-brightest host (in V) of a transiting planet.
  • K2-66b and K2-106b: Two extremely hot sub-Neptune-size planets with high densities (1705.03491)

    Evan Sinukoff, Andrew W. Howard, Erik A. Petigura, Benjamin J. Fulton, Ian J. M. Crossfield, Howard Isaacson, Erica Gonzales, Justin R. Crepp, John M. Brewer, Lea Hirsch, Lauren M. Weiss, David R. Ciardi, Joshua E. Schlieder, Bjoern Benneke, Jessie L. Christiansen, Courtney D. Dressing, Brad M. S. Hansen, Heather A. Knutson, Molly Kosiarek, John H. Livingston, Thomas P. Greene, Leslie A. Rogers, Sebastien Lepine
    May 9, 2017 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We report precise mass and density measurements of two extremely hot sub-Neptune-size planets from the K2 mission using radial velocities, K2 photometry, and adaptive optics imaging. K2-66 harbors a close-in sub-Neptune-sized (2.49$^{+0.34}_{-0.24} R_\oplus$) planet (K2-66b) with a mass of 21.3 $\pm$ 3.6 $M_\oplus$. Because the star is evolving up the sub-giant branch, K2-66b receives a high level of irradiation, roughly twice the main sequence value. K2-66b may reside within the so-called "photoevaporation desert", a domain of planet size and incident flux that is almost completely devoid of planets. Its mass and radius imply that K2-66b has, at most, a meager envelope fraction (< 5%) and perhaps no envelope at all, making it one of the largest planets without a significant envelope. K2-106 hosts an ultra-short-period planet ($P$ = 13.7 hrs) that is one of the hottest sub-Neptune-size planets discovered to date. Its radius (1.82$^{+0.20}_{-0.14} R_\oplus$) and mass (9.0 $\pm$ 1.6 $M_\oplus$) are consistent with a rocky composition, as are all other small ultra-short-period planets with well-measured masses. K2-106 also hosts a larger, longer-period planet (Rp = 2.77$^{+0.37}_{-0.23} R_\oplus$, $P$ = 13.3 days) with a mass less than 24.4 $M_\oplus$ at 99.7% confidence. K2-66b and K2-106b probe planetary physics in extreme radiation environments. Their high densities reflect the challenge of retaining a substantial gas envelope in such extreme environments.
  • Two Small Transiting Planets and a Possible Third Body Orbiting HD 106315 (1701.03811)

    Ian J. M. Crossfield, David R. Ciardi, Howard Isaacson, Andrew W. Howard, Erik A. Petigura, Lauren M. Weiss, Benjamin J. Fulton, Evan Sinukoff, Joshua E. Schlieder, Dimitri Mawet, Garreth Ruane, Imke de Pater, Katherine de Kleer, Ashley G. Davies, Jessie L. Christiansen, Courtney D. Dressing, Lea Hirsch, Björn Benneke, Justin R. Crepp, Molly Kosiarek, John Livingston, Erica Gonzales, Charles A. Beichman, Heather A. Knutson
    Feb. 16, 2017 astro-ph.SR, astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The masses, atmospheric makeups, spin-orbit alignments, and system architectures of extrasolar planets can be best studied when the planets orbit bright stars. We report the discovery of three bodies orbiting HD 106315, a bright (V = 8.97 mag) F5 dwarf targeted by our K2 survey for transiting exoplanets. Two small, transiting planets have radii of 2.23 (+0.30/-0.25) R_Earth and 3.95 (+0.42/-0.39) R_Earth and orbital periods of 9.55 d and 21.06 d, respectively. A radial velocity (RV) trend of 0.3 +/- 0.1 m/s/d indicates the likely presence of a third body orbiting HD 106315 with period >160 d and mass >45 M_Earth. Transits of this object would have depths of >0.1% and are definitively ruled out. Though the star has v sin i = 13.2 km/s, it exhibits short-timescale RV variability of just 6.4 m/s, and so is a good target for RV measurements of the mass and density of the inner two planets and the outer object's orbit and mass. Furthermore, the combination of RV noise and moderate v sin i makes HD 106315 a valuable laboratory for studying the spin-orbit alignment of small planets through the Rossiter-McLaughlin effect. Space-based atmospheric characterization of the two transiting planets via transit and eclipse spectroscopy should also be feasible. This discovery demonstrates again the power of K2 to find compelling exoplanets worthy of future study.
  • A Comparison of Spectroscopic versus Imaging Techniques for Detecting Close Companions to Kepler Objects of Interest (1508.06502)

    Johanna K. Teske, Mark E. Everett, Lea Hirsch, Elise Furlan, Elliott P. Horch, Steve B. Howell, David R. Ciardi, Erica Gonzales, Justin R. Crepp
    Aug. 26, 2015 astro-ph.SR, astro-ph.EP, astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    (Abbreviated) Kepler planet candidates require both spectroscopic and imaging follow-up observations to rule out false positives and detect blended stars. [...] In this paper, we examine a sample of 11 Kepler host stars with companions detected by two techniques -- near-infrared adaptive optics and/or optical speckle interferometry imaging, and a new spectroscopic deblending method. We compare the companion Teff and flux ratios (F_B/F_A, where A is the primary and B is the companion) derived from each technique, and find no cases where both companion parameters agree within 1sigma errors. In 3/11 cases the companion Teff values agree within 1sigma errors, and in 2/11 cases the companion F_B/F_A values agree within 1sigma errors. Examining each Kepler system individually considering multiple avenues (isochrone mapping, contrast curves, probability of being bound), we suggest two cases for which the techniques most likely agree in their companion detections (detect the same companion star). Overall, our results support the advantage the spectroscopic deblending technique has for finding very close-in companions ($\theta \lesssim$0.02-0.05") that are not easily detectable with imaging. However, we also specifically show how high-contrast AO and speckle imaging observations detect companions at larger separations ($\theta \geq$0.02-0.05") that are missed by the spectroscopic technique, provide additional information for characterizing the companion and its potential contamination (e.g., PA, separation, $\Delta$m), and cover a wider range of primary star effective temperatures. The investigation presented here illustrates the utility of combining the two techniques to reveal higher-order multiples in known planet-hosting systems.