We improve our description of pion-pion scattering data by imposing additional requirements to our previous fits, in the form of once-subtracted Roy-like equations, while extending our analysis up to 1100 MeV. We provide simple and ready to use parametrizations of the amplitude. In addition, we present a detailed description and derivation of these once-subtracted dispersion relations that, in the 450 to 1100 MeV region, provide an additional constraint which is much stronger than our previous requirements of Forward Dispersion Relations and standard Roy equations. The ensuing constrained amplitudes describe the existing data with rather small uncertainties in the whole region from threshold up to 1100 MeV, while satisfying very stringent dispersive constraints. For the S0 wave, this requires an improved matching of the low and high energy parametrizations. Also for this wave we have considered the latest low energy Kl4 decay results, including their isospin violation correction, and we have removed some controversial data points. These changes on the data translate into better determinations of threshold and subthreshold parameters which remove almost all disagreement with previous Chiral Perturbation Theory and Roy equation calculations below 800 MeV. Finally, our results favor the dip structure of the S0 inelasticity around the controversial 1000 MeV region.

We report our progress on the data analysis of $\pi\pi$ scattering data in terms of Forward Dispersion Relations (FDR), as well as Roy equations (RE) and their once-subtracted counterpart, GKPY equations. The first part of the analysis consists of independent fits to the different $\pi\pi$ channels. The GKPY equations provide a more stringent consistency check for the parametrizations of the S0-wave data in the region from 400 to 1100 MeV, In the second part we present our preliminary analysis where the fits are constrained to satisfy all dispersion relations within errors, including the new GKPY Eqs., thus providing a very precise and model independent description of data using just analyticity, causality and crossing.

This talk is dedicated to the memory of Paco Yndurain, the original speaker in the conference. After a short account of his scientific career, we briefly review our ongoing collaboration to determine precisely the $\pi\pi$ scattering amplitude including the most recent data by means of Forward Dispersion Relations and Roy Equations. A remarkable improvement in precision over the intermediate energy region is obtained by using once-subtracted Roy Equations in addition to the standard twice-subtracted ones.

We present a set of once subtracted dispersion relations which implement crossing symmetry conditions for the $\pi\pi$ scattering amplitudes below 1 GeV. We compare and discuss the results obtained for the once and twice subtracted dispersion relations, known as Roy's equations, for three $\pi\pi$ partial JI waves, S0, P and S2. We also show that once subtracted dispersion relations provide a stringent test of crossing and analyticity for $\pi\pi$ partial wave amplitudes, remarkably precise in the 400 to 1.1 GeV region, where the resulting uncertainties are significantly smaller than those coming from standard Roy's equations, given the same input.

We complete and improve the fits to experimental $\pi\pi$ scattering amplitudes, both at low and high energies, that we performed in the previous papers of this series. We then verify that the corresponding amplitudes satisfy analyticity requirements, in the form of partial wave analyticity at low energies, forward dispersion relations (FDR) at all energies, and Roy equations below$\bar{K}K$ threshold; the first by construction, the last two, inside experimental errors. Then we repeat the fits including as constraints FDR and Roy equations. The ensuing central values of the various scattering amplitudes verify very accurately FDR and, especially, Roy equations, and change very little from what we found by just fitting data, with the exception of the D2 wave phase shift, for which one parameter moves by $1.5 \sigma$. These improved parametrizations therefore provide a reliable representation of pion-pion amplitudes with which one can test various physical relations. We also present a list of low energy parameters and other observables. In particular, we find $a_0^{(0)}=0.223\pm0.009 M^{-1}_\pi$, $a_0^{(2)}=-0.0444\pm0.0045 M^{-1}_\pi$ and $\delta_0^{(0)}(m^2_K)-\delta_0^{(2)}(m^2_K)=50.9\pm1.2^{\rm o}$.

\noindent 1. Generalities\hfil\break 2. Lie groups and Lie algebras\hfil\break 3. The unitary groups\hfil\break 4. Representations of the SU(n) groups (and of their algebras)\hfil\break 5. The tensor method for unitary groups, and\hb the permutation group\hfil\break 6. Relativistic invariance. The Lorentz group\hfil\break 7. General representation of relativistic states

The experimental results obtained in the last few years on kaon decays (K$\to2\pi$ and, above all, Ke4 decays) allow a reliable, model independent determination of low energy $\pi\pi$ scattering in the S0 wave. Using them and, eventually, other sets of data, it is possible to give a precise parametrization of the S0 wave as well as to find the scattering length and effective range parameter. One can also perform an extrapolation to the pole of the "$\sigma$ resonance" [$f_0(600)$]. We obtain the results $$a_0^{(0)}=0.233\pm0.013 M^{-1}_\pi,\quad b_0^{(0)}=0.285\pm0.012 M^{-3}_\pi$$ and, for the $\sigma$ pole, $$M_\sigma=484\pm17 \mev,\quad\gammav_\sigma/2= 255\pm10 {\rm MeV}.$$

We consider the sum rule proposed by one of us (SLA), obtained by taking the expectation value of an axial vector commutator in a state with one pion. The sum rule relates the pion decay constant to integrals of pion-pion cross sections, with one pion off the mass shell. We remark that recent data on pion-pion scattering allow a precise evaluation of the sum rule. We also discuss the related Adler--Weisberger sum rule (obtained by taking the expectation value of the same commutator in a state with one nucleon), especially in connection with the problem of extrapolation of the pion momentum off its mass shell. We find, with current data, that both the pion-pion and pion-nucleon sum rules are satisfied to better than six percent, and we give detailed estimates of the experimental and extrapolation errors in the closure discrepancies.

We consider the Olsson sum rule, i.e., the forward dispersion relation for pion-pion scattering with exchange of isospin unity at threshold. We show that, if using the S0, S2 and P wave expressions of Colangelo, Gasser and Leutwyler, then either the sum rule is not satisfied or, if adjusting the residue of the rho exchange Regge amplitude to have the sum rule satisfied (as recently proposed by Caprini, Colangelo and Leutwyler) then the subsequent high energy amplitude is in disagreement with experimental pi-pi cross sections.

We review results of an analysis of pipi interactions in S, P and D waves for two-pion effective mass from threshold to about 1.4 GeV. In particular we show a recent improvement of this analysis above the K anti-K threshold using more data for phase shifts and including the S0 wave inelasticity from pipi -> K anti-K. In addition, we have improved the fit to the f2(1270) resonance and used a more flexible P wave parametrization above the K anti-K threshold and included an estimation of the D2 wave inelasticity. The better accuracy thus achieved also required a refinement of the Regge analysis above 1.42 GeV. We have checked that the pipi scattering amplitudes obtained in this approach satisfy remarkably well forward dispersion relations and Roy's equations.

We improve, in the energy region between $\bar{K}K$ threshold and $\sim~1.4$ GeV, the energy-dependent phase shift analysis of $\pi\pi$ scattering presented in a previous paper. For the S0 wave we have included more data above $\bar{K}K$ threshold and we have taken into account systematically the elasticity data on the reaction $\pi\pi\to\bar{K}K$. We here made a coupled channel fit. For the D0 wave we have considered information on low energy parameters, and imposed a better fit to the $f_2$ resonance. For both waves the expressions we now find are substantially more precise than the previous ones. We also provide slightly improved D2 and P waves, including the estimated inelasticity for the first, and a more flexible parametrization between 1 and 1.42 GeV for the second. The accuracy of our amplitudes is now such that it requires a refinement of the Regge analysis, for $s^{1/2}\geq1.42$ GeV, which we also carry out. We show that this more realistic input produces $\pi\pi$ scattering amplitudes that satisfy better forward dispersion relations, particularly for $\pi^0\pi^0$ scattering.

The pion scalar radius is given by $<r^2_S>=(6/\pi)\int_{4M^2_\pi}^\infty{\rm d}t \delta_S(t)/t^2$, with $\delta_S$ the phase of the scalar form factor. Below $\bar{K}K$ threshold, $\delta_S=\delta_0$, $\delta_0$ being the isoscalar, S-wave $\pi\pi$ phase shift. Between $\bar{K}K$ threshold and $t^{1/2}\sim 1.5 {\rm GeV}$ I argued, in two previous letters, that one can approximate $\delta_S\sim\delta_0$, because inelasticity is small, compared with the errors. This gives $<r^2_S>=0.75\pm0.07 {\rm fm}^2$ and the value $\bar{l}_4=5.4\pm0.5$ for the one-loop chiral perturbation theory constant, compared with the values given by Leutwyler and collaborators, $<r^2_S>=0.61\pm0.04 {\rm fm}^2$ and $\bar{l}_4=4.4\pm0.3$. At high energy, $t^{1/2}>1.5 {\rm GeV}$, I remarked that the value of $\delta_S$ that follows from perturbative QCD agrees with my interpolation and disagrees with that of Leutwyler and collaborators. In a recent article, Caprini, Colangelo and Leutwyler claim that my estimate of the asymptotic phase $\delta_S$ is incorrect as it neglects higher twist contributions. Here I remark that, when correctly calculated, higher twist contributions are likely negligible. I also show that chiral perturbation theory gives $\bar{l}_4=6.60\pm0.43$, compatible with my estimate but widely off the value $\bar{l}_4=4.4\pm0.3$ of Leutwyler and collaborators.

We present a new, completely revised calculation of the muon anomalous magnetic moment, $a_\mu=(g_{\mu}-2)/2$, comparing it with the more recent experimental determination of this quantity; this furnishes an important test of theories of strong, weak and electromagnetic interactions. These theoretical and experimental determinations give the very precise numbers, $$10^{11}\times a_\mu=\cases{116 591 806\pm50\pm10 ({\rm rad.})\pm30 (\ell\times\ell)\quad\hbox{[Th., no $\tau$]}\cr 116 591 889\pm49\pm10 ({\rm rad.})\pm30 (\ell\times\ell)\quad\hbox{[Theory, $\tau$]}\cr 116 592 080\pm60\quad\hbox{[Experiment]}.\cr}$$ In the theoretical evaluations, the first quantity does not, and the second one does, use information from $\tau$ decay. The first errors for the theoretical evaluations include statistical plus systematic errors; the other ones are the estimated errors due to incomplete treatment of radiative corrections and the estimated error in the light-by-light scattering contribution. We thus have a significant mismatch between theory and experiment. We also use part of the theoretical calculations to give a precise evaluation of the electromagnetic coupling on the $Z$, $\bar{\alpha}_{\rm Q.E.D.}(M^2_{Z})$, of the masses and widths of the (charged and neutral) rho resonances, of the scattering length and effective range for the P wave in $\pi\pi$ scattering, and of the quadratic radius and second coefficient of the pion form factor.

The pion scalar radius is given by $<r^2_S>=(6/\pi)\int_{4M^2_\pi}^\infty{\rm d}s \delta_S(s)/s^2$, with $\delta_S$ the phase of the scalar form factor. Below $\bar{K}K$ threshold, $\delta_S=\delta_\pi$, $\delta_\pi$ being the isoscalar, S-wave $\pi\pi$ phase shift. At high energy, $s>2 {\rm GeV}^2$, $\delta_S$ is given by perturbative QCD. In between I argued, in a previous letter, that one can interpolate $\delta_S\sim\delta_\pi$, because inelasticity is small, compared with the errors. This gives $<r^2_S>=0.75\pm0.07 {\rm fm}^2$. Recently, Ananthanarayan, Caprini, Colangelo, Gasser and Leutwyler (ACCGL) have claimed that this is incorrect and one should have instead $\delta_S\simeq\delta_\pi-\pi$; then $<r^2_S>=0.61\pm0.04 {\rm fm}^2$. Here I show that the ACCGL phase $\delta_S$ is pathological in that it is discontinuous for small inelasticity, does not coincide with what perturbative QCD suggests at high energy, and only occurs because these authors take a value for $\delta_\pi(4m^2_K)$ different from what experiment indicates. If one uses the value for $\delta_\pi(4m^2_K)$ favoured by experiment, the ensuing phase $\delta_S$ is continuous, agrees with perturbative QCD expectations, and satisfies $\delta_S\simeq\delta_\pi$, thus confirming the correctness of my previous estimate, $<r^2_S>=0.75\pm0.07 {\rm fm}^2$.

We obtain reliable $\pi\pi$ scattering amplitudes consistent with experimental data, both at low and high energies, and fulfilling appropriate analyticity properties. We do this by first fitting experimental low energy ($s^{1/2}\leq1.42 {\rm GeV}$) phase shifts and inelasticities with expressions that incorporate analyticity and unitarity. In particular, for the S wave with isospin~0, we discuss in detail several sets of experimental data. This provides low energy partial wave amplitudes that summarize the known experimental information. Then, we impose Regge behaviour as follows from factorization and experimental data for the imaginary parts of the scattering amplitudes at higher energy, and check fulfillment of dispersion relations up to 0.925 GeV. This allows us to improve our fits. The ensuing $\pi\pi$ scattering amplitudes are then shown to verify dispersion relations up to 1.42 GeV, as well as $s - t - u$ crossing sum rules and other consistency conditions. The improved parametrizations therefore provide a reliable representation of pion-pion amplitudes with which one can test chiral perturbation theory calculations, pionium decays, or use as input for CP-violating $K$ decays. In this respect, we find $[a_0^{(0)}-a_0^{(2)}]^2=(0.077\pm0.008) M^{-1}_\pi$ and $\delta_0^{(0)}(m^2_K)-\delta_0^{(2)}(m^2_K)=52.9\pm1.6^{\rm o}$.

We consider the $\pi\pi$ scattering amplitude obtained by Colangelo, Gasser and Leutwyler (CGL), using dispersion relations and chiral perturbation theory to two loops. We point out that the input used by CGL for energies above 1.42 GeV is incompatible with a number of experimental results. Moreover, the error they adscribe to the $\delta_0^{(0)}$ phase at 0.8 GeV, an important part of their input, is much underestimated, and its central value is probably displaced. Then, we compare CGL results with direct fits to experimental $\pi\pi$ data; the outcome of this test is mismatch of the CGL amplitude, for several quantities by as much as 4 standard deviations. We also evaluate forward dispersion relations with the CGL amplitudes. We find that these dispersion relations are fulfilled less and less well as the energy increases towards 0.8 GeV. Moreover, the size that the experimental results for $\pi\pi$ scattering indicates for the two loop corrections in a chiral perturbation theory analysis is less than those required by CGL, which suggests that at least some of the CGL corrections are so large to cover biases in their $\pi\pi$ amplitude and in the evaluation of the scalar form factor of the pion. We conclude on the necessity of repeating the analysis of CGL with correct high energy amplitudes and a more realistic input for the $\delta_0^{(0)}$ phase at 0.8 GeV.

We show that a generalized Regge behaviour, $$Im F(s,t)\simeq \Phi(t)(\log s/\hat{s})^{\nu(t)}(s/\hat{s})^{\alpha_P(t)},\quad{\rm for} |t|<|t_0|, s\to\infty$$ where $\Phi(t)\simeq e^{bt}$, $\alpha_P(t)\simeq \alpha_P(0)+\alpha'_P(0)t$, and $t_0$ is the first zero of $\alpha_P(t)$, $\alpha_P(t_0)=0$, implies that the corresponding cross section is bounded by $$\sigma_{\rm tot}(s)<({\rm Const.})\times\log s/\hat{s}.$$ This growth, however, is not sufficient to fit the experimental cross sections. If, instead of this, we assume saturation of the improved Froissart bound, i.e., a behaviour $$Im F(s,0)\simeq A(s/\hat{s})\log^2{{s}\over{s_1\log^{7/2} s/s_2}}, $$ a good fit is obtained to $\pi\pi$, $\pi N$, $KN$ and $NN$ cross sections from c.m. kinetic energy $E_{\rm kin}\simeq1 $ GeV to 30 TeV (producing a cross section of $108\pm6$ mb at LHC energy). This suggests that the Regge-type behaviour only holds for values of the momentum transfer very near zero.

We consider the quadratic scalar radius of the pion, $<r^2_{{\rm S},\pi}>$, and the mixed $K-\pi$ scalar radius, $<r^2_{{\rm S},K\pi}>$. With respect to the second, we point out that the more recent (post-1974) experimental results in $K_{l3}$ decays imply a value, $<r^2_{{\rm S},K\pi}>=0.31\pm0.06 {\rm fm}^2$, which is about $2 \sigma$ above estimates based on chiral perturbation theory. On the other hand, we show that this value of $<r^2_{{\rm S},K\pi}>$ suggests the existence of a low mass S$\tfrac{1}{2}$ $K\pi$ resonance. With respect to $<r^2_{{\rm S},\pi}>$, we contest the central value and accuracy of current evaluations, that give $<r^2_{{\rm S},\pi}>=0.61\pm0.04 {\rm fm}^2$. Based on experiment, we find a robust lower bound of $<r^2_{{\rm S},\pi}>\geq0.70\pm0.06 {\rm fm}^2$ and a reliable estimate, $<r^2_{{\rm S},\pi}>=0.75\pm0.07 {\rm fm}^2$, where the error bars are attainable. This implies, in particular, that the chiral result for $<r^2_{{\rm S},\pi}>$ is $1.4 \sigma$ away from experiment. We also comment on implications about the chiral parameter $\bar{l}_4$, very likely substantially larger (and with larger errors) than usually assumed.

In these notes we present an introductory review on various topics about low energy pion physics (some kaon physics is discussed as well). Among these, we include the uses of analyticity and unitarity to describe partial wave amplitudes (for which we give accurate and economical parametrizations) and form factors; (forward) dispersion relations; and the use of the Froissart--Gribov representation to evaluate accurately the low energy parameters (scattering lengths and effective ranges) for higher ($l\geq1$) waves. Finally, we describe some pion physics in QCD and then pass on to study the nonlinear sigma model, and the chiral perturbation theory approach to low energy pion interactions.\hb \indent Most of the results presented here are well known, but we also give a set of state of the art, precise determinations of some scattering lengths as well as an independent calculation of three of the parameters $\bar{l}_2$, $\bar{l}_4$, $\bar{l}_6$ (to one loop), and one $\bar{f}_2$, to two loops, that appear in chiral perturbation theory. The S waves are discussed and compared with chiral perturbation theory expectations, and the same is done for larger $l$ scattering lengths and effective range parameters. Also new is the evaluation of some electromagnetic corrections.

We calculate the combination $2a_0^{(0)}-5a_0^{(2)}$ (the Olsson sum rule) and the scattering lengths and effective ranges $a_1$, $a_2^{(I)}$ and $b_1$, $b_2^{(I)}$ dispersively (with the Froissart--Gribov representation) using, at low energy, the phase shifts for $\pi\pi$ scattering obtained by Colangelo, Gasser and Leutwyler (CGL) from the Roy equations and chiral perturbation theory, plus experiment and Regge behaviour at high energy, or directly, using the CGL parameters for $a$s and $b$s. We find mismatch, both among the CGL phases themselves and with the results obtained from the pion form factor. This reaches the level of several (2 to 5) standard deviations, and is essentially independent of the details of the intermediate energy region ($0.82\leq E\leq 1.42$ GeV) and, in some cases, of the high energy behaviour assumed. We discuss possible reasons for this mismatch, in particular in connection with an alternate set of phase shifts.

We present a review of the masses (except for neutrino masses) and interaction strengths in the standard model. Special emphasis is put on quantities that have been determined with significantly improved precision in the last few years. In particular, a number of determinations of $\alpha_s$ and the electromagnetic coupling on the $Z$, $\alpha_{\rm QED}(M_Z^2)$ are presented and their implications for the Higgs mass discussed; the best prediction that results for this last quantity being $$M_H=102^{+54}_{-36} GeV/c^2.$$ Besides this, we also discuss a few extra precision tests of the standard model: the electron magnetic moment and dipole moment, and the muon magnetic moment.

We perform a new calculation of the hadronic contributions, $a({\rm Hadronic})$ to the anomalous magnetic moment of the muon, $a_\mu$. For the low energy contributions of order $\alpha^2$ we carry over an analysis of the pion form factor $F_\pi(t)$ using recent data both on $e^+e^-\to\pi^+\pi^-$ and $\tau^+\to \bar{\nu}_\tau \pi^+\pi^0$. In this analysis we take into account that the phase of the form factor is equal to that of $\pi\pi$ scattering. This allows us to profit fully from analyticity properties so we can use also experimental information on $F_\pi(t)$ at spacelike $t$. At higher energy we use QCD to supplement experimental data, including the recent measurements of $e^+e^-\to {\rm hadrons}$ both around 1 GeV and near the $\bar{c}c$ threshold. This yields a precise determination of the $O(\alpha^2)$ and $O(\alpha^2)+O(\alpha^3)$ hadronic part of the photon vacuum polarization pieces, $$10^{11}\times a^{(2)}({\rm h.v.p.})=6 909\pm64;\quad 10^{11}\times a^{(2+3)}({\rm h.v.p.})=7 002\pm66$$ As byproducts we also get the masses and widths of the $\rho^0, \rho^+$, and very accurate values for the charge radius and second coefficient of the pion. Adding the remaining order $\alpha^3$ hadronic contributions we find $$10^{11}\times a^{\rm theory}(\hbox{Hadronic})= 6 993\pm69\quad(e^+e^- + \tau + {\rm spacel.})$$ The figures given are obtained including $\tau$ decay data. This is to be compared with the recent experimental value, $$10^{11}\times a^{\rm exp.}(\hbox{Hadronic})=7 174\pm150.$$

We perform a new, detailed calculation of the hadronic contributions to the running electromagnetic coupling, $\bar{\alpha}$, defined on the Z particle (91 GeV). We find for the hadronic contribution, including radiative corrections, $$10^5\times \deltav_{\rm had.}\alpha(M_Z^2)= 2740\pm12,$$ or, excluding the top quark contribution, $$10^5\times \deltav_{\rm had.}\alpha^{(5)}(M_Z^2)= 2747\pm12.$$ Adding the pure QED corrections we get a value for the running electromagnetic coupling of $$\bar{\alpha}_{\rm Q.E.D.}(M_Z^2)= {{1}\over{128.965\pm0.017}}.$$

We present a summary of the results of two recent precise calculations of the muon anomalous magnetic moment ($g_{\mu}-2$) and the electromagnetic coupling on the $Z$ ($\bar{\alpha}_{\rm Q.E.D.}(M^2_{Z})$). The main sources of uncertainty are underlined.

We remark that the precision of recent determinations of $\alpha_s(M^2_Z)$ is such that one can get bounds on supersymmetric partner masses (squark and gluino) by requiring consistency of determinations of $\alpha_s$ at "low" energies, where those particles do not contribute, and on the $Z$ peak. For approximately degenerate squarks and gluinos with mass $\widetilde{m}$, we find the bound $\widetilde{m}\geq 173$ GeV, at the $2\sigma$ level. At the $2.5\sigma$ level, $\widetilde{m}\geq 121$ GeV.