-
We highlight the power of the Gaia DR2 in studying many fine structures of
the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram (HRD). Gaia allows us to present many different
HRDs, depending in particular on stellar population selections. We do not aim
here for completeness in terms of types of stars or stellar evolutionary
aspects. Instead, we have chosen several illustrative examples. We describe
some of the selections that can be made in Gaia DR2 to highlight the main
structures of the Gaia HRDs. We select both field and cluster (open and
globular) stars, compare the observations with previous classifications and
with stellar evolutionary tracks, and we present variations of the Gaia HRD
with age, metallicity, and kinematics. Late stages of stellar evolution such as
hot subdwarfs, post-AGB stars, planetary nebulae, and white dwarfs are also
analysed, as well as low-mass brown dwarf objects. The Gaia HRDs are
unprecedented in both precision and coverage of the various Milky Way stellar
populations and stellar evolutionary phases. Many fine structures of the HRDs
are presented. The clear split of the white dwarf sequence into hydrogen and
helium white dwarfs is presented for the first time in an HRD. The relation
between kinematics and the HRD is nicely illustrated. Two different populations
in a classical kinematic selection of the halo are unambiguously identified in
the HRD. Membership and mean parameters for a selected list of open clusters
are provided. They allow drawing very detailed cluster sequences, highlighting
fine structures, and providing extremely precise empirical isochrones that will
lead to more insight in stellar physics. Gaia DR2 demonstrates the potential of
combining precise astrometry and photometry for large samples for studies in
stellar evolution and stellar population and opens an entire new area for
HRD-based studies.
-
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric
Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides
the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated
using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We
investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by
means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax
and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations
within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the
internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects
of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of
the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are
still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of
least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster
parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with
earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the
Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that
discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the
cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether
those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the
clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters
far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership
assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows
the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly
increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
-
Among the multitude of intrinsic SDSS index vs. index diagrams the $(g-r) \
vs. \ (r-i)$ diagram is characterized by showing only minor $(g-r)$ variation
for the M dwarfs. The $(g-r) \ vs. \ (r-i)$ reddening vector has a slope almost
identical to the slope of the main sequence earlier than $\approx$M2, meaning
that dwarfs later than $\sim$M2 are not contaminated by reddened dwarfs of
earlier type. Chemical composition, stellar activity and evolution have only
minor effects on the location of the M2$-$M7 dwarfs in the $(g-r) \ vs. \
(r-i)$ diagram implying that reddening may be isolated in a rather unique way.
From $r$, $M_{r,(r-i)_0}$ and $E_{g-r}$ we may construct distance vs. $A_r$
diagrams. This purely photometric method is applied on SDSS DR8 data in the MBM
12 region. We derive individual stellar distances with a precision
$\approx20-26$%. For extinctions in the $r-band$ the estimate is better than
0.2 mag for $\approx 67%$ and between 0.3 and 0.4 for the remaining $\approx
33%$. The extinction discontinuities noticed in the distance vs. $A_r$ diagrams
suggest that MBM 12 is at $\approx$160 pc and MBM 16 at a somewhat smaller
distance $\approx$100 pc. The distance for which $\Delta (A_r)/\sigma
(\Delta(A_r))$ = 3, where $\Delta (A_r)$ refers to $\bar{A_{r, on}}-\bar{A_{r,
off}}$, may possibly be used as an indicator for the cloud distance as well:
For MBM 12 and 16 these distance estimates equal 160 and 100 pc, respectively
Context. The first Gaia Data Release contains the Tycho-Gaia Astrometric Solution (TGAS). This is a subset of about 2 million stars for which, besides the position and photometry, the proper motion and parallax are calculated using Hipparcos and Tycho-2 positions in 1991.25 as prior information. Aims. We investigate the scientific potential and limitations of the TGAS component by means of the astrometric data for open clusters. Methods. Mean cluster parallax and proper motion values are derived taking into account the error correlations within the astrometric solutions for individual stars, an estimate of the internal velocity dispersion in the cluster, and, where relevant, the effects of the depth of the cluster along the line of sight. Internal consistency of the TGAS data is assessed. Results. Values given for standard uncertainties are still inaccurate and may lead to unrealistic unit-weight standard deviations of least squares solutions for cluster parameters. Reconstructed mean cluster parallax and proper motion values are generally in very good agreement with earlier Hipparcos-based determination, although the Gaia mean parallax for the Pleiades is a significant exception. We have no current explanation for that discrepancy. Most clusters are observed to extend to nearly 15 pc from the cluster centre, and it will be up to future Gaia releases to establish whether those potential cluster-member stars are still dynamically bound to the clusters. Conclusions. The Gaia DR1 provides the means to examine open clusters far beyond their more easily visible cores, and can provide membership assessments based on proper motions and parallaxes. A combined HR diagram shows the same features as observed before using the Hipparcos data, with clearly increased luminosities for older A and F dwarfs.
Among the multitude of intrinsic SDSS index vs. index diagrams the $(g-r) \ vs. \ (r-i)$ diagram is characterized by showing only minor $(g-r)$ variation for the M dwarfs. The $(g-r) \ vs. \ (r-i)$ reddening vector has a slope almost identical to the slope of the main sequence earlier than $\approx$M2, meaning that dwarfs later than $\sim$M2 are not contaminated by reddened dwarfs of earlier type. Chemical composition, stellar activity and evolution have only minor effects on the location of the M2$-$M7 dwarfs in the $(g-r) \ vs. \ (r-i)$ diagram implying that reddening may be isolated in a rather unique way. From $r$, $M_{r,(r-i)_0}$ and $E_{g-r}$ we may construct distance vs. $A_r$ diagrams. This purely photometric method is applied on SDSS DR8 data in the MBM 12 region. We derive individual stellar distances with a precision $\approx20-26$%. For extinctions in the $r-band$ the estimate is better than 0.2 mag for $\approx 67%$ and between 0.3 and 0.4 for the remaining $\approx 33%$. The extinction discontinuities noticed in the distance vs. $A_r$ diagrams suggest that MBM 12 is at $\approx$160 pc and MBM 16 at a somewhat smaller distance $\approx$100 pc. The distance for which $\Delta (A_r)/\sigma (\Delta(A_r))$ = 3, where $\Delta (A_r)$ refers to $\bar{A_{r, on}}-\bar{A_{r, off}}$, may possibly be used as an indicator for the cloud distance as well: For MBM 12 and 16 these distance estimates equal 160 and 100 pc, respectively