• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • The Exoplanet Mass-Ratio Function from the MOA-II Survey: Discovery of a Break and Likely Peak at a Neptune Mass (1612.03939)

    D.Suzuki, D.P.Bennett, T.Sumi, I.A.Bond, L.A.Rogers, F.Abe, Y.Asakura, A.Bhattacharya, M.Donachie, M.Freeman, A.Fukui, Y.Hirao, Y.Itow, N.Koshimoto, M.C.A.Li, C.H.Ling, K.Masuda, Y.Matsubara, Y.Muraki, M.Nagakane, K.Onishi, H.Oyokawa, N.Rattenbury, To.Saito, A.Sharan, H.Shibai, D.J.Sullivan, P.J.Tristram, A.Yonehara
    Dec. 12, 2016 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We report the results of the statistical analysis of planetary signals discovered in MOA-II microlensing survey alert system events from 2007 to 2012. We determine the survey sensitivity as a function of planet-star mass ratio, $q$, and projected planet-star separation, $s$, in Einstein radius units. We find that the mass ratio function is not a single power-law, but has a change in slope at $q \sim 10^{-4}$, corresponding to $\sim 20 M_{\oplus}$ for the median host star mass of $\sim 0.6 M_{\odot}$. We find significant planetary signals in 23 of the 1474 alert events that are well characterized by the MOA-II survey data alone. Data from other groups are used only to characterize planetary signals that have been identified in the MOA data alone. The distribution of mass ratios and separations of the planets found in our sample are well fit by a broken power-law model of the form $dN_{\rm pl}/(d{\rm log} q\ d{\rm log} s) = A (q/q_{\rm br})^n s^m \, {\rm dex}^{-2}$ for $q > q_{\rm br}$ and $dN_{\rm pl}/(d{\rm log} q\ d{\rm log} s) = A (q/q_{\rm br})^p s^m \, {\rm dex}^{-2}$ for $q < q_{\rm br}$, where $q_{\rm br}$ is the mass ratio of the break. We also combine this analysis with the previous analyses of Gould et al. and Cassan et al., bringing the total sample to 30 planets. This combined analysis yields $A = 0.61^{+0.21}_{-0.16}$, $n =-0.93\pm 0.13$, $m = 0.49_{-0.49}^{+0.47}$ and $p = 0.6^{+0.5}_{-0.4}$ for $q_{\rm br}\equiv 1.7\times 10^{-4}$. The unbroken power law model is disfavored with a $p$-value of 0.0022, which corresponds to a Bayes factor of 27 favoring the broken power-law model. These results imply that cold Neptunes are likely to be the most common type of planets beyond the snow line.
  • MOA-2010-BLG-328Lb: a sub-Neptune orbiting very late M dwarf ? (1309.7714)

    K.Furusawa, A.Udalski, T.Sumi, D.P.Bennett, I.A.Bond, A.Gould, U.G.Jorgensen, C.Snodgrass, D.Dominis Prester, M.D.Albrow, F.Abe, C.S.Botzler, P.Chote, M.Freeman, A.Fukui, P.Harris, Y.Itow, C.H.Ling, K.Masuda, Y.Matsubara, N.Miyake, Y.Muraki, K.Ohnishi, N.J.Rattenbury, To.Saito, D.J.Sullivan, D.Suzuki, W.L.Sweatman, P.J.Tristram, K.Wada, P.C.M.Yock, M.K.Szymanski, I.Soszynski, M.Kubiak, R.Poleski, K.Ulaczyk, G.Pietrzynski, L.Wyrzykowski, J.Y.Choi, G.W.Christie, D.L.DePoy, S.Dong, J.Drummond, B.S.Gaudi, C.Han, L.-W.Hung, Y.-K.Jung, C.-U.Lee, J.McCormick, D.Moorhouse, T.Natusch, M.Nola, E.Ofek, B.G. Park, H.Park, R.W.Pogge, I.-G.Shin, J.Skowron, G.Thornley, J.C.Yee, K.A.Alsubai, V.Bozza, P.Browne, M.J.Burgdorf, S.Calchi Novati, P.Dodds, M.Dominik, F.Finet, T.Gerner, S.Hardis, K.Harpsoe, T.C.Hinse, M.Hundertmark, N.Kains, E.Kerins, C.Liebig, L.Mancini, M.Mathiasen, M.T.Penny, S.Proft, S.Rahvar, D.Ricci, G.Scarpetta, S.Schafer, F.Schonebeck, J.Southworth, J.Surdej, J.Wambsganss, R.A.Street, D.M.Bramich, I.A.Steele, Y.Tsapras, K.Horne, J.Donatowicz, K.C.Sahu, E.Bachelet, V.Batista, T.G.Beatty, J.-P.Beaulieu, C.S.Bennett, C.Black, R.Bowens-Rubin, S.Brillant, J.A.R.Caldwell, A.Cassan, A.A.Cole, E.Corrales, C.Coutures, S.Dieters, P.Fouque, J.Greenhill, C.B.Henderson, D.Kubas, J.-B.Marquette, R.Martin, J.W.Menzies, B.Shappee, A.Williams, D.Wouters, J.van Saders, R.Zellem, M.Zub
    Oct. 10, 2013 astro-ph.EP
    We analyze the planetary microlensing event MOA-2010-BLG-328. The best fit yields host and planetary masses of Mh = 0.11+/-0.01 M_{sun} and Mp = 9.2+/-2.2M_Earth, corresponding to a very late M dwarf and sub-Neptune-mass planet, respectively. The system lies at DL = 0.81 +/- 0.10 kpc with projected separation r = 0.92 +/- 0.16 AU. Because of the host's a-priori-unlikely close distance, as well as the unusual nature of the system, we consider the possibility that the microlens parallax signal, which determines the host mass and distance, is actually due to xallarap (source orbital motion) that is being misinterpreted as parallax. We show a result that favors the parallax solution, even given its close host distance. We show that future high-resolution astrometric measurements could decisively resolve the remaining ambiguity of these solutions.
  • Scintillation-only Based Pulse Shape Discrimination for Nuclear and Electron Recoils in Liquid Xenon (1106.2209)

    K.Ueshima, K.Abe, K.Hiraide, S.Hirano, Y.Kishimoto, K.Kobayashi, Y.Koshio, J.Liu, K.Martens, S.Moriyama, M.Nakahata, H.Nishiie, H.Ogawa, H.Sekiya, A.Shinozaki, Y.Suzuki, A.Takeda, M.Yamashita, K.Fujii, I.Murayama, S.Nakamura, K.Otsuka, Y.Takeuchi, Y.Fukuda, K.Nishijima, D.Motoki, Y.Itow, K.Masuda, Y.Nishitani, H.Uchida, S.Tasaka, H.Ohsumi, Y.D.Kim, Y.H.Kim, K.B.Lee, M.K.Lee, J.S.Lee the XMASS Collaboration
    June 11, 2011 hep-ex, nucl-ex, physics.ins-det
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    In a dedicated test setup at the Kamioka Observatory we studied pulse shape discrimination (PSD) in liquid xenon (LXe) for dark matter searches. PSD in LXe was based on the observation that scintillation light from electron events was emitted over a longer period of time than that of nuclear recoil events, and our method used a simple ratio of early to total scintillation light emission in a single scintillation event. Requiring an efficiency of 50% for nuclear recoil retention we reduced the electron background to 7.7\pm1.1(stat)\pm1.2 0.6(sys)\times10-2 at energies between 4.8 and 7.2 keVee and to 7.7\pm2.8(stat)\pm2.5 2.8(sys)\times10-3 at energies between 9.6 and 12 keVee for a scintillation light yield of 20.9 p.e./keV. Further study was done by masking some of that light to reduce this yield to 4.6 p.e./keV, the same method results in an electron event reduction of 2.4\pm0.2(stat)\pm0.3 0.2(sys)\times10-1 for the lower of the energy regions above. We also observe that in contrast to nuclear recoils the fluctuations in our early to total ratio for electron events are larger than expected from statistical fluctuations.
  • MOA-cam3: a wide-field mosaic CCD camera for a gravitational microlensing survey in New Zealand (0804.0653)

    T.Sako, T.Sekiguchi, M.Sasaki, K.Okajima, F.Abe, I.A.Bond, J.B.Hearnshaw, Y.Itow, K.Kamiya, P.M.Kilmartin, K.Masuda, Y.Matsubara, Y.Muraki, N.J.Rattenbury, D.J.Sullivan, T.Sumi, P.Tristram, T.Yanagisawa, P.C.M.Yock
    April 4, 2008 astro-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We have developed a wide-field mosaic CCD camera, MOA-cam3, mounted at the prime focus of the Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics (MOA) 1.8-m telescope. The camera consists of ten E2V CCD4482 chips, each having 2kx4k pixels, and covers a 2.2 deg^2 field of view with a single exposure. The optical system is well optimized to realize uniform image quality over this wide field. The chips are constantly cooled by a cryocooler at -80C, at which temperature dark current noise is negligible for a typical 1-3 minute exposure. The CCD output charge is converted to a 16-bit digital signal by the GenIII system (Astronomical Research Cameras Inc.) and readout is within 25 seconds. Readout noise of 2--3 ADU (rms) is also negligible. We prepared a wide-band red filter for an effective microlensing survey and also Bessell V, I filters for standard astronomical studies. Microlensing studies have entered into a new era, which requires more statistics, and more rapid alerts to catch exotic light curves. Our new system is a powerful tool to realize both these requirements.
  • Discovery of a Jupiter/Saturn Analog with Gravitational Microlensing (0802.1920)

    B.S.Gaudi, D.P.Bennett, A.Udalski, A.Gould, G.W.Christie, D.Maoz, S.Dong, J.McCormick, M.K.Szymanski, P.J.Tristram, S.Nikolaev, B.Paczynski, M.Kubiak, G.Pietrzynski, I.Soszynski, O.Szewczyk, K.Ulaczyk, L.Wyrzykowski, D.L.DePoy, C.Han, S.Kaspi, C.-U.Lee, F.Mallia, T.Natusch, R.W.Pogge, B.-G.Park, F.Abe, I.A.Bond, C.S.Botzler, A.Fukui, J.B.Hearnshaw, Y.Itow, K.Kamiya, A.V.Korpela, P.M.Kilmartin, W.Lin, K.Masuda, Y.Matsubara, M.Motomura, Y.Muraki, S.Nakamura, T.Okumura, K.Ohnishi, N.J.Rattenbury, T.Sako, To.Saito, S.Sato, L.Skuljan, D.J.Sullivan, T.Sumi, W.L.Sweatman, P.C.M.Yock, M.D.Albrow, A.Allan, J.-P.Beaulieu, M.J.Burgdorf, K.H.Cook, C.Coutures, M.Dominik, S.Dieters, P.Fouque, J.Greenhill, K.Horne, I.Steele, Y.Tsapras, B.Chaboyer, A.Crocker, S.Frank, B.Macintosh (OGLE, MicroFUN, MOA, PLANET/RoboNET)
    March 19, 2008 astro-ph
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Searches for extrasolar planets have uncovered an astonishing diversity of planetary systems, yet the frequency of solar system analogs remains unknown. The gravitational microlensing planet search method is potentially sensitive to multiple-planet systems containing analogs of all the solar system planets except Mercury. We report the detection of a multiple-planet system with microlensing. We identify two planets with masses of ~0.71 and ~0.27 times the mass of Jupiter and orbital separations of ~2.3 and ~4.6 astronomical units orbiting a primary star of mass ~0.50 solar masses at a distance of ~1.5 kiloparsecs. This system resembles a scaled version of our solar system in that the mass ratio, separation ratio, and equilibrium temperatures of the planets are similar to those of Jupiter and Saturn. These planets could not have been detected with other techniques; their discovery from only six confirmed microlensing planet detections suggests that solar system analogs may be common.
  • On Planetary Companions to the MACHO-98-BLG-35 Microlens Star (astro-ph/9905151)

    S.H.Rhie, D.P.Bennett, A.C.Becker, B.A.Peterson, P.C.Fragile, B.R.Johnson, J.L.Quinn, A.Crouch, J.Gray, L.King, B.Messenger, S.Thomson, I.A.Bond, F.Abe, B.S.Carter, R.J.Dodd, J.B.Hearnshaw, M.Honda, J.Jugaku, S.Kabe, P.M.Kilmartin, B.S.Koribalski, K.Masuda, Y.Matsubara, Y.Muraki, T.Nakamura, G.R.Nankivell, S.Noda, N.J.Rattenbury, M.Reid, N.J.Rumsey, To.Saito, H.Sato, S.Sato, M.Sekiguchi, D.J.Sullivan, T.Sumi, Y.Watase, T.Yanagisawa, P.C.M.Yock, M.Yoshizawa
    Jan. 25, 2000 astro-ph
    We present observations of microlensing event MACHO-98-BLG-35 which reached a peak magnification factor of almost 80. These observations by the Microlensing Planet Search (MPS) and the MOA Collaborations place strong constraints on the possible planetary system of the lens star and show intriguing evidence for a low mass planet with a mass fraction $4\times 10^{-5} \leq \epsilon \leq 2\times 10^{-4}$. A giant planet with $\epsilon = 10^{-3}$ is excluded from 95% of the region between 0.4 and 2.5 $R_E$ from the lens star, where $R_E$ is the Einstein ring radius of the lens. This exclusion region is more extensive than the generic "lensing zone" which is $0.6 - 1.6 R_E$. For smaller mass planets, we can exclude 57% of the "lensing zone" for $\epsilon = 10^{-4}$ and 14% of the lensing zone for $\epsilon = 10^{-5}$. The mass fraction $\epsilon = 10^{-5}$ corresponds to an Earth mass planet for a lensing star of mass $\sim 0.3 \msun$. A number of similar events will provide statistically significant constraints on the prevalence of Earth mass planets. In order to put our limits in more familiar terms, we have compared our results to those expected for a Solar System clone averaging over possible lens system distances and orientations. We find that such a system is ruled out at the 90% confidence level. A copy of the Solar System with Jupiter replaced by a second Saturn mass planet can be ruled out at 70% confidence. Our low mass planetary signal (few Earth masses to Neptune mass) is significant at the $4.5\sigma$ confidence level. If this planetary interpretation is correct, the MACHO-98-BLG-35 lens system constitutes the first detection of a low mass planet orbiting an ordinary star without gas giant planets.