• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • Effects of NII and H$\alpha$ Line Blending on the WFIRST Galaxy Redshift Survey (1804.08061)

    Daniel Martens, Xiao Fang, M.A. Troxel, Joe DeRose, Christopher M. Hirata, Risa H. Wechsler, Yun Wang
    April 22, 2018 astro-ph.CO
    The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) will conduct a range of observational programs, including a galaxy redshift survey using the redshifted H$\alpha$ emission line as the primary feature for spectroscopic redshift determination. Due to the finite spectroscopic resolution of the WFIRST grism, the H$\alpha$ line and the neighboring NII lines are not separately resolved, leading to a potential bias in the redshift that depends on the NII/H$\alpha$ ratio. We investigate how this bias propagates into the redshift-space correlation functions and measurements of cosmic expansion and growth of structure obtained from the WFIRST redshift survey. Using the Buzzard simulation of mock galaxies, we explore the effect of line blending and mass (hence environment)-dependent NII/H$\alpha$ ratio on redshift-space distortion (RSD) and baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements. We measured the BAO shift parameters $\alpha_{\parallel}$ and $\alpha_{\perp}$, as well as the growth of structure parameter $f_{v}$, and calculated their errors based on the correlations between the NII/H$\alpha$ ratio and large-scale structure. We found that $\Delta\alpha_{\parallel} = 0.31 \pm 0.23 \%$ ($0.26\pm0.17\%$), $\Delta\alpha_{\perp} = -0.10\pm0.10\%$ ($-0.12 \pm 0.11 \%$), and $\Delta f_{v} = 0.17\pm0.33\%$ ($-0.20 \pm 0.30\%$) for the redshift 1.355--1.994 (0.700--1.345) bins, which would use approximately 18$\%$, 9$\%$, and 7$\%$ of the systematic error budget in a root-sum-square sense. These errors may be small enough that even without mitigation they are tolerable, and we discuss mitigations that may further reduce this error.
  • Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: The Impact of Galaxy Neighbours on Weak Lensing Cosmology with im3shape (1708.01534)

    S. Samuroff, S.L. Bridle, J. Zuntz, M.A. Troxel, D. Gruen, R.P. Rollins, G.M. Bernstein, T.F. Eifler, E.M. Huff, T. Kacprzak, E. Krause, N. MacCrann, F.B. Abdalla, S. Allam, J. Annis, K. Bechtol, A. Benoit-Levy, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, M. Crocce, C.B. D'Andrea, L.N. da Costa, C. Davis, S. Desai, P. Doel, A. Fausti Neto, B. Flaugher, P. Fosalba, J. Frieman, J. Garcia-Bellido, D.W. Gerdes, R.A. Gruendl, J. Gschwend, G. Gutierrez, K. Honscheid, D.J. James, M. Jarvis, T. Jeltema, D. Kirk, K. Kuehn, S. Kuhlmann, T.S. Li, M. Lima, M.A.G. Maia, M. March, J.L. Marshall, P. Martini, P. Melchior, F. Menanteau, R. Miquel, B. Nord, R.L.C. Ogando, A.A. Plazas, A. Roodman, E. Sanchez, V. Scarpine, R. Schindler, M. Schubnell, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, E. Sheldon, M. Smith, M. Soares-Santos, F. Sobreira, E. Suchyta, G. Tarle, D. Thomas, D.L. Tucker
    Aug. 4, 2017 astro-ph.CO
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We use a suite of simulated images based on Year 1 of the Dark Energy Survey to explore the impact of galaxy neighbours on shape measurement and shear cosmology. The hoopoe image simulations include realistic blending, galaxy positions, and spatial variations in depth and PSF properties. Using the im3shape maximum-likelihood shape measurement code, we identify four mechanisms by which neighbours can have a non-negligible influence on shear estimation. These effects, if ignored, would contribute a net multiplicative bias of $m \sim 0.03 - 0.09$ in the DES Y1 im3shape catalogue, though the precise impact will be dependent on both the measurement code and the selection cuts applied. This can be reduced to percentage level or less by removing objects with close neighbours, at a cost to the effective number density of galaxies $n_\mathrm{eff}$ of 30%. We use the cosmological inference pipeline of DES Y1 to explore the cosmological implications of neighbour bias and show that omitting blending from the calibration simulation for DES Y1 would bias the inferred clustering amplitude $S_8\equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega _\mathrm{m} /0.3)^{0.5}$ by $2 \sigma$ towards low values. Finally, we use the hoopoe simulations to test the effect of neighbour-induced spatial correlations in the multiplicative bias. We find the impact on the recovered $S_8$ of ignoring such correlations to be subdominant to statistical error at the current level of precision.