
In physics, biology and engineering, network systems abound. How does the
connectivity of a network system combine with the behavior of its individual
components to determine its collective function? We approach this question for
networks with linear timeinvariant dynamics by relating internal network
feedbacks to the statistical prevalence of connectivity motifs, a set of
surprisingly simple and local statistics of connectivity. This results in a
reduced order model of the network inputoutput dynamics in terms of motifs
structures. As an example, the new formulation dramatically simplifies the
classic ErdosRenyi graph, reducing the overall network behavior to one
proportional feedback wrapped around the dynamics of a single node. For general
networks, higherorder motifs systematically provide further layers and types
of feedback to regulate the network response. Thus, the local connectivity
shapes temporal and spectral processing by the network as a whole, and we show
how this enables robust, yet tunable, functionality such as extending the time
constant with which networks remember past signals. The theory also extends to
networks composed from heterogeneous nodes with distinct dynamics and
connectivity, and patterned input to (and readout from) subsets of nodes. These
statistical descriptions provide a powerful theoretical framework to understand
the functionality of realworld network systems, as we illustrate with examples
including the mouse brain connectome.

Stimulus from the environment that guides behavior and informs decisions is
encoded in the firing rates of neural populations. Each neuron in the
populations, however, does not spike independently: spike events are correlated
from cell to cell. To what degree does this apparent redundancy impact the
accuracy with which decisions can be made, and the computations that are
required to optimally decide? We explore these questions for two illustrative
models of correlation among cells. Each model is statistically identical at the
level of pairs cells, but differs in higherorder statistics that describe the
simultaneous activity of larger cell groups. We find that the presence of
correlations can diminish the performance attained by an ideal decision maker
to either a small or large extent, depending on the nature of the higherorder
interactions. Moreover, while this optimal performance can in some cases be
obtained via the standard integrationtobound operation, in others it requires
a nonlinear computation on incoming spikes. Overall, we conclude that a given
level of pairwise correlationseven when restricted to identical neural
populationsmay not always indicate redundancies that diminish decision making
performance.

A key step in many perceptual decision tasks is the integration of sensory
inputs over time, but fundamental questions remain about how this is
accomplished in neural circuits. One possibility is to balance decay modes of
membranes and synapses with recurrent excitation. To allow integration over
long timescales, however, this balance must be precise; this is known as the
fine tuning problem. The need for fine tuning can be overcome via a
ratchetlike mechanism, in which momentary inputs must be above a preset limit
to be registered by the circuit. The degree of this ratcheting embodies a
tradeoff between sensitivity to the input stream and robustness against
parameter mistuning.
The goal of our study is to analyze the consequences of this tradeoff for
decision making performance. For concreteness, we focus on the wellstudied
random dot motion discrimination task. For stimulus parameters constrained by
experimental data, we find that loss of sensitivity to inputs has surprisingly
little cost for decision performance. This leads robust integrators to
performance gains when feedback becomes mistuned. Moreover, we find that
substantially robust and mistuned integrator models remain consistent with
chronometric and accuracy functions found in experiments. We explain our
findings via sequential analysis of the momentary and integrated signals, and
discuss their implication: robust integrators may be surprisingly wellsuited
to subserve the basic function of evidence integration in many cognitive tasks.