• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • Gravitational-Wave Detection using Multivariate Analysis (1305.5714)

    Thomas S. Adams, Duncan Meacher, James Clark, Patrick J. Sutton, Gareth Jones, Ariana Minot
    Sept. 8, 2013 gr-qc, astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Searches for gravitational-wave bursts (transient signals, typically of unknown waveform) require identification of weak signals in background detector noise. The sensitivity of such searches is often critically limited by non-Gaussian noise fluctuations which are difficult to distinguish from real signals, posing a key problem for transient gravitational-wave astronomy. Current noise rejection tests are based on the analysis of a relatively small number of measured properties of the candidate signal, typically correlations between detectors. Multivariate analysis (MVA) techniques probe the full space of measured properties of events in an attempt to maximise the power to accurately classify events as signal or background. This is done by taking samples of known background events and (simulated) signal events to train the MVA classifier, which can then be applied to classify events of unknown type. We apply the boosted decision tree (BDT) MVA technique to the problem of detecting gravitational-wave bursts associated with gamma-ray bursts. We find that BDTs are able to increase the sensitive distance reach of the search by as much as 50%, corresponding to a factor of ~3 increase in sensitive volume. This improvement is robust against trigger sky position, large sky localisation error, poor data quality, and the simulated signal waveforms that are used. Critically, we find that the BDT analysis is able to detect signals that have different morphologies to those used in the classifier training and that this improvement extends to false alarm probabilities beyond the 3{\sigma} significance level. These findings indicate that MVA techniques may be used for the robust detection of gravitational-wave bursts with a priori unknown waveform.
  • A Rule of Thumb for the Detectability of Gravitational-Wave Bursts (1304.0210)

    Patrick J. Sutton
    March 31, 2013 gr-qc
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We derive a simple relationship between the energy emitted in gravitational waves for a narrowband source and the distance to which that emission can be detected by a single detector. We consider linearly polarized, elliptically polarized, and unpolarized gravitational waves, and emission patterns appropriate for each of these cases. We ignore cosmological effects.
  • Performance of an externally triggered gravitational-wave burst search (1201.5599)

    Michal Was, Patrick J. Sutton, Gareth Jones, Isabel Leonor
    July 19, 2012 gr-qc, physics.data-an
    We present the performance of searches for gravitational wave bursts associated with external astrophysical triggers as a function of the search sky region. We discuss both the case of Gaussian noise and real noise of gravitational wave detectors for arbitrary detector networks. We demonstrate the ability to reach Gaussian limited sensitivity in real non-Gaussian data, and show the conditions required to attain it. We find that a single sky position search is ~20% more sensitive than an all-sky search of the same data.
  • Multimessenger astronomy with the Einstein Telescope (1004.1964)

    Eric Chassande-Mottin, Martin Hendry, Patrick J. Sutton, Szabolcs Márka
    May 11, 2010 gr-qc
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Gravitational waves (GWs) are expected to play a crucial role in the development of multimessenger astrophysics. The combination of GW observations with other astrophysical triggers, such as from gamma-ray and X-ray satellites, optical/radio telescopes, and neutrino detectors allows us to decipher science that would otherwise be inaccessible. In this paper, we provide a broad review from the multimessenger perspective of the science reach offered by the third generation interferometric GW detectors and by the Einstein Telescope (ET) in particular. We focus on cosmic transients, and base our estimates on the results obtained by ET's predecessors GEO, LIGO, and Virgo.
  • Search for gravitational-wave bursts associated with gamma-ray bursts using data from LIGO Science Run 5 and Virgo Science Run 1 (0908.3824)

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration, Virgo Collaboration: B. P. Abbott, R. Abbott, F. Acernese, R. Adhikari, P. Ajith, B. Allen, G. Allen, M. Alshourbagy, R. S. Amin, S. B. Anderson, W. G. Anderson, F. Antonucci, S. Aoudia, M. A. Arain, M. Araya, H. Armandula, P. Armor, K. G. Arun, Y. Aso, S. Aston, P. Astone, P. Aufmuth, C. Aulbert, S. Babak, P. Baker, G. Ballardin, S. Ballmer, C. Barker, D. Barker, F. Barone, B. Barr, P. Barriga, L. Barsotti, M. Barsuglia, M. A. Barton, I. Bartos, R. Bassiri, M. Bastarrika, Th. S. Bauer, B. Behnke, M. Beker, M. Benacquista, J. Betzwieser, P. T. Beyersdorf, S. Bigotta, I. A. Bilenko, G. Billingsley, S. Birindelli, R. Biswas, M. A. Bizouard, E. Black, J. K. Blackburn, L. Blackburn, D. Blair, B. Bland, C. Boccara, T. P. Bodiya, L. Bogue, F. Bondu, L. Bonelli, R. Bork, V. Boschi, S. Bose, L. Bosi, S. Braccini, C. Bradaschia, P. R. Brady, V. B. Braginsky, J. E. Brau, D. O. Bridges, A. Brillet, M. Brinkmann, V. Brisson, C. Van Den Broeck, A. F. Brooks, D. A. Brown, A. Brummit, G. Brunet, R. Budzyński, T. Bulik, A. Bullington, H. J. Bulten, A. Buonanno, O. Burmeister, D. Buskulic, R. L. Byer, L. Cadonati, G. Cagnoli, E. Calloni, J. B. Camp, E. Campagna, J. Cannizzo, K. C. Cannon, B. Canuel, J. Cao, F. Carbognani, L. Cardenas, S. Caride, G. Castaldi, S. Caudill, M. Cavaglià, F. Cavalier, R. Cavalieri, G. Cella, C. Cepeda, E. Cesarini, T. Chalermsongsak, E. Chalkley, P. Charlton, E. Chassande-Mottin, S. Chatterji, S. Chelkowski, Y. Chen, A. Chincarini, N. Christensen, C. T. Y. Chung, D. Clark, J. Clark, J. H. Clayton, F. Cleva, E. Coccia, T. Cokelaer, C. N. Colacino, J. Colas, A. Colla, M. Colombini, R. Conte, D. Cook, T. R. C. Corbitt, C. Corda, N. Cornish, A. Corsi, J.-P. Coulon, D. Coward, D. C. Coyne, J. D. E. Creighton, T. D. Creighton, A. M. Cruise, R. M. Culter, A. Cumming, L. Cunningham, E. Cuoco, S. L. Danilishin, S. D'Antonio, K. Danzmann, A. Dari, V. Dattilo, B. Daudert, M. Davier, G. Davies, E. J. Daw, R. Day, R. De Rosa, D. DeBra, J. Degallaix, M. del Prete, V. Dergachev, S. Desai, R. DeSalvo, S. Dhurandhar, L. Di Fiore, A. Di Lieto, M. Di Paolo Emilio, A. Di Virgilio, M. Díaz, A. Dietz, F. Donovan, K. L. Dooley, E. E. Doomes, M. Drago, R. W. P. Drever, J. Dueck, I. Duke, J.-C. Dumas, J. G. Dwyer, C. Echols, M. Edgar, M. Edwards, A. Effler, P. Ehrens, E. Espinoza, T. Etzel, M. Evans, T. Evans, V. Fafone, S. Fairhurst, Y. Faltas, Y. Fan, D. Fazi, H. Fehrmann, I. Ferrante, F. Fidecaro, L. S. Finn, I. Fiori, R. Flaminio, K. Flasch, S. Foley, C. Forrest, N. Fotopoulos, J.-D. Fournier, J. Franc, A. Franzen, S. Frasca, F. Frasconi, M. Frede, M. Frei, Z. Frei, A. Freise, R. Frey, T. Fricke, P. Fritschel, V. V. Frolov, M. Fyffe, V. Galdi, L. Gammaitoni, J. A. Garofoli, F. Garufi, G. Gemme, E. Genin, A. Gennai, I. Gholami, J. A. Giaime, S. Giampanis, K. D. Giardina, A. Giazotto, K. Goda, E. Goetz, L. M. Goggin, G. González, M. L. Gorodetsky, S. Goeßzetler, S. Goßler, R. Gouaty, M. Granata, V. Granata, A. Grant, S. Gras, C. Gray, M. Gray, R. J. S. Greenhalgh, A. M. Gretarsson, C. Greverie, F. Grimaldi, R. Grosso, H. Grote, S. Grunewald, M. Guenther, G. Guidi, E. K. Gustafson, R. Gustafson, B. Hage, J. M. Hallam, D. Hammer, G. D. Hammond, C. Hanna, J. Hanson, J. Harms, G. M. Harry, I. W. Harry, E. D. Harstad, K. Haughian, K. Hayama, J. Heefner, H. Heitmann, P. Hello, I. S. Heng, A. Heptonstall, M. Hewitson, S. Hild, E. Hirose, D. Hoak, K. A. Hodge, K. Holt, D. J. Hosken, J. Hough, D. Hoyland, D. Huet, B. Hughey, S. H. Huttner, D. R. Ingram, T. Isogai, M. Ito, A. Ivanov, P. Jaranowski, B. Johnson, W. W. Johnson, D. I. Jones, G. Jones, R. Jones, L. Sancho de la Jordana, L. Ju, P. Kalmus, V. Kalogera, S. Kandhasamy, J. Kanner, D. Kasprzyk, E. Katsavounidis, K. Kawabe, S. Kawamura, F. Kawazoe, W. Kells, D. G. Keppel, A. Khalaidovski, F. Y. Khalili, R. Khan, E. Khazanov, P. King, J. S. Kissel, S. Klimenko, K. Kokeyama, V. Kondrashov, R. Kopparapu, S. Koranda, I. Kowalska, D. Kozak, B. Krishnan, A. Królak, R. Kumar, P. Kwee, P. La Penna, P. K. Lam, M. Landry, B. Lantz, A. Lazzarini, H. Lei, M. Lei, N. Leindecker, I. Leonor, N. Leroy, N. Letendre, C. Li, H. Lin, P. E. Lindquist, T. B. Littenberg, N. A. Lockerbie, D. Lodhia, M. Longo, M. Lorenzini, V. Loriette, M. Lormand, G. Losurdo, P. Lu, M. Lubinski, A. Lucianetti, H. Lück, B. Machenschalk, M. MacInnis, J.-M. Mackowski, M. Mageswaran, K. Mailand, E. Majorana, N. Man, I. Mandel, V. Mandic, M. Mantovani, F. Marchesoni, F. Marion, S. Márka, Z. Márka, A. Markosyan, J. Markowitz, E. Maros, J. Marque, F. Martelli, I. W. Martin, R. M. Martin, J. N. Marx, K. Mason, A. Masserot, F. Matichard, L. Matone, R. A. Matzner, N. Mavalvala, R. McCarthy, D. E. McClelland, S. C. McGuire, M. McHugh, G. McIntyre, D. J. A. McKechan, K. McKenzie, M. Mehmet, A. Melatos, A. C. Melissinos, G. Mendell, D. F. Menéndez, F. Menzinger, R. A. Mercer, S. Meshkov, C. Messenger, M. S. Meyer, C. Michel, L. Milano, J. Miller, J. Minelli, Y. Minenkov, Y. Mino, V. P. Mitrofanov, G. Mitselmakher, R. Mittleman, O. Miyakawa, B. Moe, M. Mohan, S. D. Mohanty, S. R. P. Mohapatra, J. Moreau, G. Moreno, N. Morgado, A. Morgia, T. Morioka, K. Mors, S. Mosca, V. Moscatelli, K. Mossavi, B. Mours, C. MowLowry, G. Mueller, D. Muhammad, H. zur Mühlen, S. Mukherjee, H. Mukhopadhyay, A. Mullavey, H. Müller-Ebhardt, J. Munch, P. G. Murray, E. Myers, J. Myers, T. Nash, J. Nelson, I. Neri, G. Newton, A. Nishizawa, F. Nocera, K. Numata, E. Ochsner, J. O'Dell, G. H. Ogin, B. O'Reilly, R. O'Shaughnessy, D. J. Ottaway, R. S. Ottens, H. Overmier, B. J. Owen, G. Pagliaroli, C. Palomba, Y. Pan, C. Pankow, F. Paoletti, M. A. Papa, V. Parameshwaraiah, S. Pardi, A. Pasqualetti, R. Passaquieti, D. Passuello, P. Patel, M. Pedraza, S. Penn, A. Perreca, G. Persichetti, M. Pichot, F. Piergiovanni, V. Pierro, M. Pietka, L. Pinard, I. M. Pinto, M. Pitkin, H. J. Pletsch, M. V. Plissi, R. Poggiani, F. Postiglione, M. Prato, M. Principe, R. Prix, G.A. Prodi, L. Prokhorov, O. Punken, M. Punturo, P. Puppo, V. Quetschke, F. J. Raab, O. Rabaste, D. S. Rabeling, H. Radkins, P. Raffai, Z. Raics, N. Rainer, M. Rakhmanov, P. Rapagnani, V. Raymond, V. Re, C. M. Reed, T. Reed, T. Regimbau, H. Rehbein, S. Reid, D. H. Reitze, F. Ricci, R. Riesen, K. Riles, B. Rivera, P. Roberts, N. A. Robertson, F. Robinet, C. Robinson, E. L. Robinson, A. Rocchi, S. Roddy, L. Rolland, J. Rollins, J. D. Romano, R. Romano, J. H. Romie, D. Rosińska, C. Röver, S. Rowan, A. Rüdiger, P. Ruggi, P. Russell, K. Ryan, S. Sakata, F. Salemi, V. Sandberg, V. Sannibale, L. Santamaría, S. Saraf, P. Sarin, B. Sassolas, B. S. Sathyaprakash, S. Sato, M. Satterthwaite, P. R. Saulson, R. Savage, P. Savov, M. Scanlan, R. Schilling, R. Schnabel, R. Schofield, B. Schulz, B. F. Schutz, P. Schwinberg, J. Scott, S. M. Scott, A. C. Searle, B. Sears, F. Seifert, D. Sellers, A. S. Sengupta, D. Sentenac, A. Sergeev, B. Shapiro, P. Shawhan, D. H. Shoemaker, A. Sibley, X. Siemens, D. Sigg, S. Sinha, A. M. Sintes, B. J. J. Slagmolen, J. Slutsky, M. V. van der Sluys, J. R. Smith, M. R. Smith, N. D. Smith, K. Somiya, B. Sorazu, A. Stein, L. C. Stein, S. Steplewski, A. Stochino, R. Stone, K. A. Strain, S. Strigin, A. Stroeer, R. Sturani, A. L. Stuver, T. Z. Summerscales, K. -X. Sun, M. Sung, Patrick J. Sutton, B. Swinkels, G. P. Szokoly, D. Talukder, L. Tang, D. B. Tanner, S. P. Tarabrin, J. R. Taylor, R. Taylor, R. Terenzi, J. Thacker, K. A. Thorne, K. S. Thorne, A. Thüring, K. V. Tokmakov, A. Toncelli, M. Tonelli, C. Torres, C. Torrie, E. Tournefier, F. Travasso, G. Traylor, M. Trias, J. Trummer, D. Ugolini, J. Ulmen, K. Urbanek, H. Vahlbruch, G. Vajente, M. Vallisneri, J.F.J. van den Brand, S. van der Putten, S. Vass, R. Vaulin, M. Vavoulidis, A. Vecchio, G. Vedovato, A. A. van Veggel, J. Veitch, P. Veitch, C. Veltkamp, D. Verkindt, F. Vetrano, A. Viceré, A. Villar, J.-Y. Vinet, H. Vocca, C. Vorvick, S. P. Vyachanin, S. J. Waldman, L. Wallace, R. L. Ward, M. Was, A. Weidner, M. Weinert, A. J. Weinstein, R. Weiss, L. Wen, S. Wen, K. Wette, J. T. Whelan, S. E. Whitcomb, B. F. Whiting, C. Wilkinson, P. A. Willems, H. R. Williams, L. Williams, B. Willke, I. Wilmut, L. Winkelmann, W. Winkler, C. C. Wipf, A. G. Wiseman, G. Woan, R. Wooley, J. Worden, W. Wu, I. Yakushin, H. Yamamoto, Z. Yan, S. Yoshida, M. Yvert, M. Zanolin, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, C. Zhao, N. Zotov, M. E. Zucker, J. Zweizig
    April 7, 2010 gr-qc, astro-ph.HE
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We present the results of a search for gravitational-wave bursts associated with 137 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) that were detected by satellite-based gamma-ray experiments during the fifth LIGO science run and first Virgo science run. The data used in this analysis were collected from 2005 November 4 to 2007 October 1, and most of the GRB triggers were from the Swift satellite. The search uses a coherent network analysis method that takes into account the different locations and orientations of the interferometers at the three LIGO-Virgo sites. We find no evidence for gravitational-wave burst signals associated with this sample of GRBs. Using simulated short-duration (<1 s) waveforms, we set upper limits on the amplitude of gravitational waves associated with each GRB. We also place lower bounds on the distance to each GRB under the assumption of a fixed energy emission in gravitational waves, with typical limits of D ~ 15 Mpc (E_GW^iso / 0.01 M_o c^2)^1/2 for emission at frequencies around 150 Hz, where the LIGO-Virgo detector network has best sensitivity. We present astrophysical interpretations and implications of these results, and prospects for corresponding searches during future LIGO-Virgo runs.
  • X-Pipeline: An analysis package for autonomous gravitational-wave burst searches (0908.3665)

    Patrick J. Sutton, Gareth Jones, Shourov Chatterji, Peter Michael Kalmus, Isabel Leonor, Stephen Poprocki, Jameson Rollins, Antony Searle, Leo Stein, Massimo Tinto, Michal Was
    April 7, 2010 gr-qc
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Autonomous gravitational-wave searches -- fully automated analyses of data that run without human intervention or assistance -- are desirable for a number of reasons. They are necessary for the rapid identification of gravitational-wave burst candidates, which in turn will allow for follow-up observations by other observatories and the maximum exploitation of their scientific potential. A fully automated analysis would also circumvent the traditional "by hand" setup and tuning of burst searches that is both labourious and time consuming. We demonstrate a fully automated search with X-Pipeline, a software package for the coherent analysis of data from networks of interferometers for detecting bursts associated with GRBs and other astrophysical triggers. We discuss the methods X-Pipeline uses for automated running, including background estimation, efficiency studies, unbiased optimal tuning of search thresholds, and prediction of upper limits. These are all done automatically via Monte Carlo with multiple independent data samples, and without requiring human intervention. As a demonstration of the power of this approach, we apply X-Pipeline to LIGO data to search for gravitational-wave emission associated with GRB 031108. We find that X-Pipeline is sensitive to signals approximately a factor of 2 weaker in amplitude than those detectable by the cross-correlation technique used in LIGO searches to date. We conclude with the prospects for running X-Pipeline as a fully autonomous, near real-time triggered burst search in the next LSC-Virgo Science Run.
  • Upper Limits from Counting Experiments with Multiple Pipelines (0905.4089)

    Patrick J. Sutton
    April 7, 2010 gr-qc, physics.data-an
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    In counting experiments, one can set an upper limit on the rate of a Poisson process based on a count of the number of events observed due to the process. In some experiments, one makes several counts of the number of events, using different instruments, different event detection algorithms, or observations over multiple time intervals. We demonstrate how to generalize the classical frequentist upper limit calculation to the case where multiple counts of events are made over one or more time intervals using several (not necessarily independent) procedures. We show how different choices of the rank ordering of possible outcomes in the space of counts correspond to applying different levels of significance to the various measurements. We propose an ordering that is matched to the sensitivity of the different measurement procedures and show that in typical cases it gives stronger upper limits than other choices. As an example, we show how this method can be applied to searches for gravitational-wave bursts, where multiple burst-detection algorithms analyse the same data set, and demonstrate how a single combined upper limit can be set on the gravitational-wave burst rate.
  • Bayesian detection of unmodeled bursts of gravitational waves (0809.2809)

    Antony C. Searle, Patrick J. Sutton, Massimo Tinto
    June 4, 2009 gr-qc
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The data analysis problem of coherently searching for unmodeled gravitational-wave bursts in the data generated by a global network of gravitational-wave observatories has been at the center of research for almost two decades. As data from these detectors is starting to be analyzed, a renewed interest in this problem has been sparked. A Bayesian approach to the problem of coherently searching for gravitational wave bursts with a network of ground-based interferometers is here presented. We demonstrate how to systematically incorporate prior information on the burst signal and its source into the analysis. This information may range from the very minimal, such as best-guess durations, bandwidths, or polarization content, to complete prior knowledge of the signal waveforms and the distribution of sources through spacetime. We show that this comprehensive Bayesian formulation contains several previously proposed detection statistics as special limiting cases, and demonstrate that it outperforms them.
  • Plans for the LIGO-TAMA Joint Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts (gr-qc/0412123)

    Patrick J. Sutton, Masaki Ando, Patrick Brady, Laura Cadonati, Alessandra Di Credico, Stephen Fairhurst, Lee Samuel Finn, Nobuyuki Kanda, Erik Katsavounidis, Sergey Klimenko, Albert Lazzarini, Szabolcs Marka, John W. C. McNabb, Saikat Ray Majumder, Peter R. Saulson, Hideyuki Tagoshi, Hirotaka Takahashi, Ryutaro Takahashi, Daisuke Tatsumi, Yoshiki Tsunesada, S. E. Whitcomb
    Dec. 28, 2004 gr-qc
    We describe the plans for a joint search for unmodelled gravitational wave bursts being carried out by the LIGO and TAMA collaborations using data collected during February-April 2003. We take a conservative approach to detection, requiring candidate gravitational wave bursts to be seen in coincidence by all four interferometers. We focus on some of the complications of performing this coincidence analysis, in particular the effects of the different alignments and noise spectra of the interferometers.
  • Swift Pointing and Gravitational-Wave Bursts from Gamma-Ray Burst Events (astro-ph/0304412)

    Lee Samuel Finn, Badri Krishnan, Patrick J. Sutton
    April 23, 2003 astro-ph
    The currently accepted model for gamma-ray burst phenomena involves the violent formation of a rapidly rotating solar-mass black hole. Gravitational waves should be associated with the black-hole formation, and their detection would permit this model to be tested. Even upper limits on the gravitational-wave strength associated with gamma-ray bursts could constrain the gamma-ray burst model. This requires joint observations of gamma-ray burst events with gravitational and gamma-ray detectors. Here we examine how the quality of an upper limit on the gravitational-wave strength associated with gamma-ray bursts depends on the relative orientation of the gamma-ray-burst and gravitational-wave detectors, and apply our results to the particular case of the Swift Burst-Alert Telescope (BAT) and the LIGO gravitational-wave detectors. A result of this investigation is a science-based ``figure of merit'' that can be used, together with other mission constraints, to optimize the pointing of the Swift telescope for the detection of gravitational waves associated with gamma-ray bursts.
  • Swift Pointing and the Association Between Gamma-Ray Bursts and Gravitational-Wave Bursts (astro-ph/0304228)

    Lee Samuel Finn, Badri Krishnan, Patrick J. Sutton
    April 11, 2003 astro-ph, gr-qc
    The currently accepted model for gamma-ray burst phenomena involves the violent formation of a rapidly rotating solar mass black hole. Gravitational waves should be associated with the black-hole formation, and their detection would permit this model to be tested, the black hole progenitor (e.g., coalescing binary or collapsing stellar core) identified, and the origin of the gamma rays (within the expanding relativistic fireball or at the point of impact on the interstellar medium) located. Even upper limits on the gravitational-wave strength associated with gamma-ray bursts could constrain the gamma-ray burst model. To do any of these requires joint observations of gamma-ray burst events with gravitational and gamma-ray detectors. Here we examine how the quality of an upper limit on the gravitational-wave strength associated with gamma-ray burst observations depends on the relative orientation of the gamma-ray-burst and gravitational-wave detectors, and apply our results to the particular case of the Swift Burst-Alert Telescope (BAT) and the LIGO gravitational-wave detectors. A result of this investigation is a science-based ``figure of merit'' that can be used, together with other mission constraints, to optimize the pointing of the Swift telescope for the detection of gravitational waves associated with gamma-ray bursts.
  • Vacuum polarization in two-dimensional static spacetimes and dimensional reduction (hep-th/0202036)

    Roberto Balbinot, Alessandro Fabbri, Piero Nicolini, Patrick J. Sutton
    May 14, 2002 hep-th, gr-qc
    We obtain an analytic approximation for the effective action of a quantum scalar field in a general static two-dimensional spacetime. We apply this to the dilaton gravity model resulting from the spherical reduction of a massive, non-minimally coupled scalar field in the four-dimensional Schwarzschild geometry. Careful analysis near the event horizon shows the resulting two-dimensional system to be regular in the Hartle-Hawking state for general values of the field mass, coupling, and angular momentum, while at spatial infinity it reduces to a thermal gas at the black-hole temperature.
  • Bounding the mass of the graviton using binary pulsar observations (gr-qc/0109049)

    Lee Samuel Finn, Patrick J. Sutton
    May 14, 2002 astro-ph, hep-th, gr-qc
    The close agreement between the predictions of dynamical general relativity for the radiated power of a compact binary system and the observed orbital decay of the binary pulsars PSR B1913+16 and PSR B1534+12 allows us to bound the graviton mass to be less than 7.6 x 10^{-20} eV with 90% confidence. This bound is the first to be obtained from dynamic, as opposed to static-field, relativity. The resulting limit on the graviton mass is within two orders of magnitude of that from solar system measurements, and can be expected to improve with further observations.
  • Bounding the graviton mass with binary pulsar observations (gr-qc/0112018)

    Patrick J. Sutton, Lee Samuel Finn
    Dec. 10, 2001 gr-qc
    By comparing the observed orbital decay of the binary pulsars PSRB1913+16 and PSRB1534+12 to that predicted by general relativity due to gravitational-wave emission, we are able to bound the mass of the graviton to be less than $7.6\times10^{-20} \text{eV}/c^2$ at 90% confidence. This is the first such bound to be derived from dynamic gravitational fields. It is approximately two orders of magnitude weaker than the static-field bound from solar system observations, and will improve with further observations.