
We construct a complexitybased morphospace to study systemslevel properties
of conscious & intelligent systems. The axes of this space label 3 complexity
types: autonomous, cognitive & social. Given recent proposals to synthesize
consciousness, a generic complexitybased conceptualization provides a useful
framework for identifying defining features of conscious & synthetic systems.
Based on current clinical scales of consciousness that measure cognitive
awareness and wakefulness, we take a perspective on how contemporary
artificially intelligent machines & synthetically engineered life forms measure
on these scales. It turns out that awareness & wakefulness can be associated to
computational & autonomous complexity respectively. Subsequently, building on
insights from cognitive robotics, we examine the function that consciousness
serves, & argue the role of consciousness as an evolutionary gametheoretic
strategy. This makes the case for a third type of complexity for describing
consciousness: social complexity. Having identified these complexity types,
allows for a representation of both, biological & synthetic systems in a common
morphospace. A consequence of this classification is a taxonomy of possible
conscious machines. We identify four types of consciousness, based on
embodiment: (i) biological consciousness, (ii) synthetic consciousness, (iii)
group consciousness (resulting from group interactions), & (iv) simulated
consciousness (embodied by virtual agents within a simulated reality). This
taxonomy helps in the investigation of comparative signatures of consciousness
across domains, in order to highlight design principles necessary to engineer
conscious machines. This is particularly relevant in the light of recent
developments at the crossroads of cognitive neuroscience, biomedical
engineering, artificial intelligence & biomimetics.

In order to understand the formation of social conventions we need to know
the specific role of control and learning in multiagent systems. To advance in
this direction, we propose, within the framework of the Distributed Adaptive
Control (DAC) theory, a novel Controlbased Reinforcement Learning architecture
(CRL) that can account for the acquisition of social conventions in multiagent
populations that are solving a benchmark social decisionmaking problem. Our
new CRL architecture, as a concrete realization of DAC multiagent theory,
implements a lowlevel sensorimotor control loop handling the agent's reactive
behaviors (prewired reflexes), along with a layer based on modelfree
reinforcement learning that maximizes longterm reward. We apply CRL in a
multiagent gametheoretic task in which coordination must be achieved in order
to find an optimal solution. We show that our CRL architecture is able to both
find optimal solutions in discrete and continuous time and reproduce human
experimental data on standard gametheoretic metrics such as efficiency in
acquiring rewards, fairness in reward distribution and stability of convention
formation.

The quest for a scientific description of consciousness has given rise to new
theoretical and empirical paradigms for the investigation of phenomenological
contents as well as clinical disorders of consciousness. An outstanding
challenge in the field is to develop measures that uniquely quantify global
brain states tied to consciousness. In particular, informationtheoretic
complexity measures such as integrated information have recently been proposed
as measures of conscious awareness. This suggests a new framework to
quantitatively classify states of consciousness. However, it has proven
increasingly difficult to apply these complexity measures to realistic brain
networks. In part, this is due to high computational costs incurred when
implementing these measures on realistically large network dimensions.
Nonetheless, complexity measures for quantifying states of consciousness are
important for assisting clinical diagnosis and therapy. This article is meant
to serve as a lookup table of measures of consciousness, with particular
emphasis on clinical applicability of these measures. We consider both,
principlebased complexity measures as well as empirical measures tested on
patients. We address challenges facing these measures with regard to realistic
brain networks, and where necessary, suggest possible resolutions.

How does our nervous system successfully acquire feedback control strategies
in spite of a wide spectrum of response dynamics from different
musculoskeletal systems? The cerebellum is a crucial brain structure in
enabling precise motor control in animals. Recent advances suggest that
synaptic plasticity of cerebellar Purkinje cells involves molecular mechanisms
that mimic the dynamics of the efferent motor system that they control allowing
them to match the timing of their learning rule to behavior. CounterFactual
Predictive Control (CFPC) is a cerebellumbased feedforward control scheme
that exploits that principle for acquiring anticipatory actions. CFPC extends
the classical WidrowHoff/Least Mean Squares by inserting a forward model of
the downstream closedloop system in its learning rule. Here we apply that same
insight to the problem of learning the gains of a feedback controller. To that
end, we frame a ModelReference Adaptive Control (MRAC) problem and derive an
adaptive control scheme treating the gains of a feedback controller as if they
were the weights of an adaptive linear unit. Our results demonstrate that
rather than being exclusively confined to cerebellar learning, the approach of
controlling plasticity with a forward model of the subsystem controlled, an
approach that we term as ModelEnhanced Least Mean Squares (MELMS), can
provide a solution to wide set of adaptive control problems.

We investigate scaling properties of human brain functional networks in the
restingstate. Analyzing network degree distributions, we statistically test
whether their tails scale as powerlaw or not. Initial studies, based on
leastsquares fitting, were shown to be inadequate for precise estimation of
powerlaw distributions. Subsequently, methods based on maximumlikelihood
estimators have been proposed and applied to address this question.
Nevertheless, no clear consensus has emerged, mainly because results have shown
substantial variability depending on the dataset used or its resolution. In
this study, we work with highresolution data (10K nodes) from the Human
Connectome Project and take into account network weights. We test for the
powerlaw, exponential, lognormal and generalized Pareto distributions. Our
results show that the statistics generally do not support a powerlaw, but
instead these degree distributions tend towards the thintail limit of the
generalized Pareto model. This may have implications for the number of hubs in
human brain functional networks.

How much information do large brain networks integrate as a whole over the
sum of their parts? Can the dynamical complexity of such networks be globally
quantified in an informationtheoretic way and be meaningfully coupled to brain
function? Recently, measures of dynamical complexity such as integrated
information have been proposed. However, problems related to the normalization
and Bell number of partitions associated to these measures make these
approaches computationally infeasible for largescale brain networks. Our goal
in this work is to address this problem. Our formulation of network integrated
information is based on the KullbackLeibler divergence between the
multivariate distribution on the set of network states versus the corresponding
factorized distribution over its parts. We find that implementing the maximum
information partition optimizes computations. These methods are wellsuited for
large networks with linear stochastic dynamics. We compute the integrated
information for both, the system's attractor states, as well as nonstationary
dynamical states of the network. We then apply this formalism to brain networks
to compute the integrated information for the human brain's connectome.
Compared to a randomly rewired network, we find that the specific topology of
the brain generates greater information complexity.