
We consider maximum likelihood estimation for Gaussian Mixture Models (Gmms).
This task is almost invariably solved (in theory and practice) via the
Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm. EM owes its success to various
factors, of which is its ability to fulfill positive definiteness constraints
in closed form is of key importance. We propose an alternative to EM by
appealing to the rich Riemannian geometry of positive definite matrices, using
which we cast Gmm parameter estimation as a Riemannian optimization problem.
Surprisingly, such an outofthebox Riemannian formulation completely fails
and proves much inferior to EM. This motivates us to take a closer look at the
problem geometry, and derive a better formulation that is much more amenable to
Riemannian optimization. We then develop (Riemannian) batch and stochastic
gradient algorithms that outperform EM, often substantially. We provide a
nonasymptotic convergence analysis for our stochastic method, which is also
the first (to our knowledge) such global analysis for Riemannian stochastic
gradient. Numerous empirical results are included to demonstrate the
effectiveness of our methods.

We revisit the task of learning a Euclidean metric from data. We approach
this problem from first principles and formulate it as a surprisingly simple
optimization problem. Indeed, our formulation even admits a closed form
solution. This solution possesses several very attractive properties: (i) an
innate geometric appeal through the Riemannian geometry of positive definite
matrices; (ii) ease of interpretability; and (iii) computational speed several
orders of magnitude faster than the widely used LMNN and ITML methods.
Furthermore, on standard benchmark datasets, our closedform solution
consistently attains higher classification accuracy.

We study modeling and inference with the Elliptical Gamma Distribution (EGD).
We consider maximum likelihood (ML) estimation for EGD scatter matrices, a task
for which we develop new fixedpoint algorithms. Our algorithms are efficient
and converge to global optima despite nonconvexity. Moreover, they turn out to
be much faster than both a wellknown iterative algorithm of Kent & Tyler
(1991) and sophisticated manifold optimization algorithms. Subsequently, we
invoke our ML algorithms as subroutines for estimating parameters of a mixture
of EGDs. We illustrate our methods by applying them to model natural image
statisticsthe proposed EGD mixture model yields the most parsimonious model
among several competing approaches.

Mixture models are powerful statistical models used in many applications
ranging from density estimation to clustering and classification. When dealing
with mixture models, there are many issues that the experimenter should be
aware of and needs to solve. The MixEst toolbox is a powerful and userfriendly
package for MATLAB that implements several stateoftheart approaches to
address these problems. Additionally, MixEst gives the possibility of using
manifold optimization for fitting the density model, a feature specific to this
toolbox. MixEst simplifies using and integration of mixture models in
statistical models and applications. For developing mixture models of new
densities, the user just needs to provide a few functions for that statistical
distribution and the toolbox takes care of all the issues regarding mixture
models. MixEst is available at visionlab.ut.ac.ir/mixest and is fully
documented and is licensed under GPL.

We take a new look at parameter estimation for Gaussian Mixture Models
(GMMs). In particular, we propose using \emph{Riemannian manifold optimization}
as a powerful counterpart to Expectation Maximization (EM). An outofthebox
invocation of manifold optimization, however, fails spectacularly: it converges
to the same solution but vastly slower. Driven by intuition from manifold
convexity, we then propose a reparamerization that has remarkable empirical
consequences. It makes manifold optimization not only match EMa highly
encouraging result in itself given the poor record nonlinear programming
methods have had against EM so farbut also outperform EM in many practical
settings, while displaying much less variability in running times. We further
highlight the strengths of manifold optimization by developing a somewhat tuned
manifold LBFGS method that proves even more competitive and reliable than
existing manifold optimization tools. We hope that our results encourage a
wider consideration of manifold optimization for parameter estimation problems.

We develop \emph{geometric optimisation} on the manifold of Hermitian
positive definite (HPD) matrices. In particular, we consider optimising two
types of cost functions: (i) geodesically convex (gconvex); and (ii)
lognonexpansive (LN). Gconvex functions are nonconvex in the usual euclidean
sense, but convex along the manifold and thus allow global optimisation. LN
functions may fail to be even gconvex, but still remain globally optimisable
due to their special structure. We develop theoretical tools to recognise and
generate gconvex functions as well as cone theoretic fixedpoint optimisation
algorithms. We illustrate our techniques by applying them to maximumlikelihood
parameter estimation for elliptically contoured distributions (a rich class
that substantially generalises the multivariate normal distribution). We
compare our fixedpoint algorithms with sophisticated manifold optimisation
methods and obtain notable speedups.

GRavitational lEnsing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) is a public image
analysis challenge aimed at the development of algorithms to analyze
astronomical images. Specifically, the challenge is to measure varying image
distortions in the presence of a variable convolution kernel, pixelization and
noise. This is the second in a series of challenges set to the astronomy,
computer science and statistics communities, providing a structured environment
in which methods can be improved and tested in preparation for planned
astronomical surveys. GREAT10 extends upon previous work by introducing
variable fields into the challenge. The "Galaxy Challenge" involves the precise
measurement of galaxy shape distortions, quantified locally by two parameters
called shear, in the presence of a known convolution kernel. Crucially, the
convolution kernel and the simulated gravitational lensing shape distortion
both now vary as a function of position within the images, as is the case for
real data. In addition, we introduce the "Star Challenge" that concerns the
reconstruction of a variable convolution kernel, similar to that in a typical
astronomical observation. This document details the GREAT10 Challenge for
potential participants. Continually updated information is also available from
http://www.greatchallenges.info.

We present a probabilistic model for natural images which is based on
Gaussian scale mixtures and a simple multiscale representation. In contrast to
the dominant approach to modeling whole images focusing on Markov random
fields, we formulate our model in terms of a directed graphical model. We show
that it is able to generate images with interesting higherorder correlations
when trained on natural images or samples from an occlusion based model. More
importantly, the directed model enables us to perform a principled evaluation.
While it is easy to generate visually appealing images, we demonstrate that our
model also yields the best performance reported to date when evaluated with
respect to the crossentropy rate, a measure tightly linked to the average
loglikelihood.

We present the results of the GREAT08 Challenge, a blind analysis challenge
to infer weak gravitational lensing shear distortions from images. The primary
goal was to stimulate new ideas by presenting the problem to researchers
outside the shear measurement community. Six GREAT08 Team methods were
presented at the launch of the Challenge and five additional groups submitted
results during the 6 month competition. Participants analyzed 30 million
simulated galaxies with a range in signal to noise ratio, pointspread function
ellipticity, galaxy size, and galaxy type. The large quantity of simulations
allowed shear measurement methods to be assessed at a level of accuracy
suitable for currently planned future cosmic shear observations for the first
time. Different methods perform well in different parts of simulation parameter
space and come close to the target level of accuracy in several of these. A
number of fresh ideas have emerged as a result of the Challenge including a
reexamination of the process of combining information from different galaxies,
which reduces the dependence on realistic galaxy modelling. The image
simulations will become increasingly sophisticated in future GREAT challenges,
meanwhile the GREAT08 simulations remain as a benchmark for additional
developments in shear measurement algorithms.