• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler. VIII. A Fully Automated Catalog With Measured Completeness and Reliability Based on Data Release 25 (1710.06758)

    Susan E. Thompson, Jeffrey L. Coughlin, Kelsey Hoffman, Fergal Mullally, Jessie L. Christiansen, Christopher J. Burke, Steve Bryson, Natalie Batalha, Michael R. Haas, Joseph Catanzarite, Jason F. Rowe, Geert Barentsen, Douglas A. Caldwell, Bruce D. Clarke, Jon M. Jenkins, Jie Li, David W. Latham, Jack J. Lissauer, Savita Mathur, Robert L. Morris, Shawn E. Seader, Jeffrey C. Smith, Todd C. Klaus, Joseph D. Twicken, Bill Wohler, Rachel Akeson, David R. Ciardi, William D. Cochran, Thomas Barclay, Jennifer R. Campbell, William J. Chaplin, David Charbonneau, Christopher E. Henze, Steve B. Howell, Daniel Huber, Andrej Prsa, Solange V. Ramirez, Timothy D. Morton, Jorgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jessie L. Dotson, Laurance Doyle, Edward W. Dunham, Andrea K. Dupree, Eric B. Ford, John C. Geary, Forrest R. Girouard, Howard Isaacson, Hans Kjeldsen, Jason H. Steffen, Elisa V. Quintana, Darin Ragozzine, Megan Shabram, Avi Shporer, Victor Silva Aguirre, Martin Still, Peter Tenenbaum, William F. Welsh, Angie Wolfgang, Khadeejah A. Zamudio, David G. Koch, William J. Borucki
    March 4, 2018 astro-ph.EP
    We present the Kepler Object of Interest (KOI) catalog of transiting exoplanets based on searching four years of Kepler time series photometry (Data Release 25, Q1-Q17). The catalog contains 8054 KOIs of which 4034 are planet candidates with periods between 0.25 and 632 days. Of these candidates, 219 are new and include two in multi-planet systems (KOI-82.06 and KOI-2926.05), and ten high-reliability, terrestrial-size, habitable zone candidates. This catalog was created using a tool called the Robovetter which automatically vets the DR25 Threshold Crossing Events (TCEs, Twicken et al. 2016). The Robovetter also vetted simulated data sets and measured how well it was able to separate TCEs caused by noise from those caused by low signal-to-noise transits. We discusses the Robovetter and the metrics it uses to sort TCEs. For orbital periods less than 100 days the Robovetter completeness (the fraction of simulated transits that are determined to be planet candidates) across all observed stars is greater than 85%. For the same period range, the catalog reliability (the fraction of candidates that are not due to instrumental or stellar noise) is greater than 98%. However, for low signal-to-noise candidates between 200 and 500 days around FGK dwarf stars, the Robovetter is 76.7% complete and the catalog is 50.5% reliable. The KOI catalog, the transit fits and all of the simulated data used to characterize this catalog are available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.
  • Detection of Potential Transit Signals in 17 Quarters of Kepler Data: Results of the Final Kepler Mission Transiting Planet Search (DR25) (1604.06140)

    Joseph D. Twicken, Jon M. Jenkins, Shawn E. Seader, Peter Tenenbaum, Jeffrey C. Smith, Lee S. Brownston, Christopher J. Burke, Joseph H. Catanzarite, Bruce D. Clarke, Miles T. Cote, Forrest R. Girouard, Todd C. Klaus, Jie Li, Sean D. McCauliff, Robert L. Morris, Bill Wohler, Jennifer R. Campbell, Akm Kamal Uddin, Khadeejah A. Zamudio, Anima Sabale, Steven T. Bryson, Douglas A. Caldwell, Jessie L. Christiansen, Jeffrey L. Coughlin, Michael R. Haas, Christopher E. Henze, Dwight T. Sanderfer, Susan E. Thompson
    Nov. 16, 2016 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We present results of the final Kepler Data Processing Pipeline search for transiting planet signals in the full 17-quarter primary mission data set. The search includes a total of 198,709 stellar targets, of which 112,046 were observed in all 17 quarters and 86,663 in fewer than 17 quarters. We report on 17,230 targets for which at least one transit signature is identified that meets the specified detection criteria: periodicity, minimum of three observed transit events, detection statistic (i.e., signal-to-noise ratio) in excess of the search threshold, and passing grade on three statistical transit consistency tests. Light curves for which a transit signal is identified are iteratively searched for additional signatures after a limb-darkened transiting planet model is fitted to the data and transit events are removed. The search for additional planets adds 16,802 transit signals for a total of 34,032; this far exceeds the number of transit signatures identified in prior pipeline runs. There was a strategic emphasis on completeness over reliability for the final Kepler transit search. A comparison of the transit signals against a set of 3402 well-established, high-quality Kepler Objects of Interest yields a recovery rate of 99.8%. The high recovery rate must be weighed against a large number of false-alarm detections. We examine characteristics of the planet population implied by the transiting planet model fits with an emphasis on detections that would represent small planets orbiting in the habitable zone of their host stars.
  • Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler VI: Planet Sample from Q1-Q16 (47 Months) (1502.02038)

    F. Mullally, Jeffrey L. Coughlin, Susan E. Thompson, Jason Rowe, Christopher Burke, David W. Latham, Natalie M. Batalha, Stephen T. Bryson, Jessie Christiansen, Christopher E. Henze, Aviv Ofir, Billy Quarles, Avi Shporer, Vincent Van Eylen, Christa Van Laerhoven, Yash Shah, Angie Wolfgang, W. J. Chaplin, Ji-Wei Xie, Rachel Akeson, Vic Argabright, Eric Bachtell, Thomas Barclay William J. Borucki, Douglas A. Caldwell, Jennifer R. Campbell, Joseph H. Catanzarite, William D. Cochran, Riley M. Duren, Scott W. Fleming, Dorothy Fraquelli, Forrest R. Girouard, Michael R. Haas, Krzysztof G. Hełminiak, Steve B. Howell, Daniel Huber, Kipp Larson, Thomas N. Gautier III, Jon Jenkins, Jie Li, Jack J. Lissauer, Scot McArthur, Chris Miller, Robert L. Morris, Anima Patil-Sabale, Peter Plavchan, Dustin Putnam, Elisa V. Quintana, Solange Ramirez, V. Silva Aguirre, Shawn Seader, Jeffrey C. Smith, Jason H. Steffen, Chris Stewart, Jeremy Stober, Martin Still, Peter Tenenbaum, John Troeltzsch, Joseph D. Twicken, Khadeejah A. Zamudio
    Feb. 6, 2015 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    \We present the sixth catalog of Kepler candidate planets based on nearly 4 years of high precision photometry. This catalog builds on the legacy of previous catalogs released by the Kepler project and includes 1493 new Kepler Objects of Interest (KOIs) of which 554 are planet candidates, and 131 of these candidates have best fit radii <1.5 R_earth. This brings the total number of KOIs and planet candidates to 7305 and 4173 respectively. We suspect that many of these new candidates at the low signal-to-noise limit may be false alarms created by instrumental noise, and discuss our efforts to identify such objects. We re-evaluate all previously published KOIs with orbital periods of >50 days to provide a consistently vetted sample that can be used to improve planet occurrence rate calculations. We discuss the performance of our planet detection algorithms, and the consistency of our vetting products. The full catalog is publicly available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.
  • Planetary Candidates Observed by Kepler V: Planet Sample from Q1-Q12 (36 Months) (1501.07286)

    Jason F. Rowe, Jeffrey L. Coughlin, Victoria Antoci, Thomas Barclay, Natalie M. Batalha, William J. Borucki, Christopher J. Burke, Steven T. Bryson, Douglas A. Caldwell, Jennifer R. Campbell, Joseph H. Catanzarite, Jessie L. Christiansen, William Cochran, Ronald L. Gilliland, Forrest R. Girouard, Michael R. Haas, Krzysztof G. Helminiak, Christopher E. Henze, Kelsey L. Hoffman, Steve B. Howell, Daniel Huber, Roger C. Hunter, Hannah Jang-Condell, Jon M. Jenkins, Todd C. Klaus, David W. Latham, Jie Li, Jack J. Lissauer, Sean D. McCauliff, Robert L. Morris, F. Mullally, Aviv Ofir, Billy Quarles, Elisa Quintana, Anima Sabale, Shawn Seader, Avi Shporer, Jeffrey C. Smith, Jason H. Steffen, Martin Still, Peter Tenenbaum, Susan E. Thompson, Joseph D. Twicken, Christa Van Laerhoven, Angie Wolfgang, Khadeejah A. Zamudio
    Jan. 30, 2015 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The Kepler mission discovered 2842 exoplanet candidates with 2 years of data. We provide updates to the Kepler planet candidate sample based upon 3 years (Q1-Q12) of data. Through a series of tests to exclude false-positives, primarily caused by eclipsing binary stars and instrumental systematics, 855 additional planetary candidates have been discovered, bringing the total number known to 3697. We provide revised transit parameters and accompanying posterior distributions based on a Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithm for the cumulative catalogue of Kepler Objects of Interest. There are now 130 candidates in the cumulative catalogue that receive less than twice the flux the Earth receives and more than 1100 have a radius less than 1.5 Rearth. There are now a dozen candidates meeting both criteria, roughly doubling the number of candidate Earth analogs. A majority of planetary candidates have a high probability of being bonafide planets, however, there are populations of likely false-positives. We discuss and suggest additional cuts that can be easily applied to the catalogue to produce a set of planetary candidates with good fidelity. The full catalogue is publicly available at the NASA Exoplanet Archive.
  • A sub-Mercury-sized exoplanet (1305.5587)

    Thomas Barclay, Jason F. Rowe, Jack J. Lissauer, Daniel Huber, Francois Fressin, Steve B. Howell, Stephen T. Bryson, William J. Chaplin, Jean-Michel Désert, Eric D. Lopez, Geoffrey W. Marcy, Fergal Mullally, Darin Ragozzine, Guillermo Torres, Elisabeth R. Adams, Eric Agol, David Barrado, Sarbani Basu, Timothy R. Bedding, Lars A. Buchhave, David Charbonneau, Jessie L. Christiansen, Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, David Ciardi, William D. Cochran, Andrea K. Dupree, Yvonne Elsworth, Mark Everett, Debra A. Fischer, Eric B. Ford, Jonathan J. Fortney, John C. Geary, Michael R. Haas, Rasmus Handberg, Saskia Hekker, Christopher E. Henze, Elliott Horch, Andrew W. Howard, Roger C. Hunter, Howard Isaacson, Jon M. Jenkins, Christoffer Karoff, Steven D. Kawaler, Hans Kjeldsen, Todd C. Klaus, David W. Latham, Jie Li, Jorge Lillo-Box, Mikkel N. Lund, Mia Lundkvist, Travis S. Metcalfe, Andrea Miglio, Robert L. Morris, Elisa V. Quintana, Dennis Stello, Jeffrey C. Smith, Martin Still, Susan E. Thompson
    May 24, 2013 astro-ph.EP
    Since the discovery of the first exoplanet we have known that other planetary systems can look quite unlike our own. However, until recently we have only been able to probe the upper range of the planet size distribution. The high precision of the Kepler space telescope has allowed us to detect planets that are the size of Earth and somewhat smaller, but no previous planets have been found that are smaller than those we see in our own Solar System. Here we report the discovery of a planet significantly smaller than Mercury. This tiny planet is the innermost of three planets that orbit the Sun-like host star, which we have designated Kepler-37. Owing to its extremely small size, similar to that of Earth's Moon, and highly irradiated surface, Kepler-37b is probably a rocky planet with no atmosphere or water, similar to Mercury.
  • Confirmation of Hot Jupiter Kepler-41b via Phase Curve Analysis (1303.0858)

    Elisa V. Quintana, Jason F. Rowe, Thomas Barclay, Steve B. Howell, David R. Ciardi, Brice-Olivier Demory, Douglas A. Caldwell, William J. Borucki, Jessie L. Christiansen, Jon M. Jenkins, Todd C. Klaus, Benjamin J. Fulton, Robert L. Morris, Dwight T. Sanderfer, Avi Shporer, Jeffrey C. Smith, Martin Still, Susan E. Thompson
    March 4, 2013 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We present high precision photometry of Kepler-41, a giant planet in a 1.86 day orbit around a G6V star that was recently confirmed through radial velocity measurements. We have developed a new method to confirm giant planets solely from the photometric light curve, and we apply this method herein to Kepler-41 to establish the validity of this technique. We generate a full phase photometric model by including the primary and secondary transits, ellipsoidal variations, Doppler beaming and reflected/emitted light from the planet. Third light contamination scenarios that can mimic a planetary transit signal are simulated by injecting a full range of dilution values into the model, and we re-fit each diluted light curve model to the light curve. The resulting constraints on the maximum occultation depth and stellar density combined with stellar evolution models rules out stellar blends and provides a measurement of the planet's mass, size, and temperature. We expect about two dozen Kepler giant planets can be confirmed via this method.
  • Kepler Presearch Data Conditioning I - Architecture and Algorithms for Error Correction in Kepler Light Curves (1203.1382)

    Martin C. Stumpe, Jeffrey C. Smith, Jeffrey E. Van Cleve, Joseph D. Twicken, Thomas S. Barclay, Michael N. Fanelli, Forrest R. Girouard, Jon M. Jenkins, Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak, Sean D. McCauliff, Robert L. Morris
    March 7, 2012 stat.AP, astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Kepler provides light curves of 156,000 stars with unprecedented precision. However, the raw data as they come from the spacecraft contain significant systematic and stochastic errors. These errors, which include discontinuities, systematic trends, and outliers, obscure the astrophysical signals in the light curves. To correct these errors is the task of the Presearch Data Conditioning (PDC) module of the Kepler data analysis pipeline. The original version of PDC in Kepler did not meet the extremely high performance requirements for the detection of miniscule planet transits or highly accurate analysis of stellar activity and rotation. One particular deficiency was that astrophysical features were often removed as a side-effect to removal of errors. In this paper we introduce the completely new and significantly improved version of PDC which was implemented in Kepler SOC 8.0. This new PDC version, which utilizes a Bayesian approach for removal of systematics, reliably corrects errors in the light curves while at the same time preserving planet transits and other astrophysically interesting signals. We describe the architecture and the algorithms of this new PDC module, show typical errors encountered in Kepler data, and illustrate the corrections using real light curve examples.
  • Kepler Presearch Data Conditioning II - A Bayesian Approach to Systematic Error Correction (1203.1383)

    Jeffrey C. Smith, Martin C. Stumpe, Jeffrey E. Van Cleve, Jon M. Jenkins, Thomas S. Barclay, Michael N. Fanelli, Forrest R. Girouard, Jeffery J. Kolodziejczak, Sean D. McCauliff, Robert L. Morris, Joseph D. Twicken
    March 7, 2012 stat.AP, astro-ph.IM
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    With the unprecedented photometric precision of the Kepler Spacecraft, significant systematic and stochastic errors on transit signal levels are observable in the Kepler photometric data. These errors, which include discontinuities, outliers, systematic trends and other instrumental signatures, obscure astrophysical signals. The Presearch Data Conditioning (PDC) module of the Kepler data analysis pipeline tries to remove these errors while preserving planet transits and other astrophysically interesting signals. The completely new noise and stellar variability regime observed in Kepler data poses a significant problem to standard cotrending methods such as SYSREM and TFA. Variable stars are often of particular astrophysical interest so the preservation of their signals is of significant importance to the astrophysical community. We present a Bayesian Maximum A Posteriori (MAP) approach where a subset of highly correlated and quiet stars is used to generate a cotrending basis vector set which is in turn used to establish a range of "reasonable" robust fit parameters. These robust fit parameters are then used to generate a Bayesian Prior and a Bayesian Posterior Probability Distribution Function (PDF) which when maximized finds the best fit that simultaneously removes systematic effects while reducing the signal distortion and noise injection which commonly afflicts simple least-squares (LS) fitting. A numerical and empirical approach is taken where the Bayesian Prior PDFs are generated from fits to the light curve distributions themselves.
  • Asteroseismic diagrams from a survey of solar-like oscillations with Kepler (1110.1375)

    Timothy R. White, Timothy R. Bedding, Dennis Stello, Thierry Appourchaux, Jérôme Ballot, Othman Benomar, Alfio Bonanno, Anne-Marie Broomhall, Tiago L. Campante, William J. Chaplin, Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Enrico Corsaro, Gülnur Doğan, Yvonne P. Elsworth, Stephen T. Fletcher, Rafael A. García, Patrick Gaulme, Rasmus Handberg, Saskia Hekker, Daniel Huber, Christoffer Karoff, Hans Kjeldsen, Savita Mathur, Benoit Mosser, Mario J. P. F. G. Monteiro, Clara Régulo, David Salabert, Victor Silva Aguirre, Michael J. Thompson, Graham Verner, Robert L. Morris, Dwight T. Sanderfer, Shawn E. Seader
    Oct. 6, 2011 astro-ph.SR
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Photometric observations made by the NASA Kepler Mission have led to a dramatic increase in the number of main-sequence and subgiant stars with detected solar-like oscillations. We present an ensemble asteroseismic analysis of 76 solar-type stars. Using frequencies determined from the Kepler time-series photometry, we have measured three asteroseismic parameters that characterize the oscillations: the large frequency separation (\Delta \nu), the small frequency separation between modes of l=0 and l=2 (\delta \nu_02), and the dimensionless offset (\epsilon). These measurements allow us to construct asteroseismic diagrams, namely the so-called C-D diagram of \delta \nu_02 versus \Delta \nu, and the recently re-introduced {\epsilon} diagram. We compare the Kepler results with previously observed solar-type stars and with theoretical models. The positions of stars in these diagrams places constraints on their masses and ages. Additionally, we confirm the observational relationship between {\epsilon} and T_eff that allows for the unambiguous determination of radial order and should help resolve the problem of mode identification in F stars.
  • Spin-Orbit Alignment for the Circumbinary Planet Host Kepler-16A (1109.3198)

    Joshua N. Winn, Simon Albrecht, John Asher Johnson, Guillermo Torres, William D. Cochran, Geoffrey W. Marcy, Andrew Howard, Howard Isaacson, Debra Fischer, Laurance Doyle, William Welsh, Joshua A. Carter, Daniel C. Fabrycky, Darin Ragozzine, Samuel N. Quinn, Avi Shporer, Steve B. Howell, David W. Latham, Jerome Orosz, Andrej Prsa, Robert W. Slawson, William J. Borucki, David Koch, Thomas Barclay, Alan P. Boss, Jorgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, Forrest R. Girouard, Jon Jenkins, Todd C. Klaus, Soren Meibom, Robert L. Morris, Dimitar Sasselov, Martin Still, Jeffrey Van Cleve
    Sept. 22, 2011 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    Kepler-16 is an eccentric low-mass eclipsing binary with a circumbinary transiting planet. Here we investigate the angular momentum of the primary star, based on Kepler photometry and Keck spectroscopy. The primary star's rotation period is 35.1 +/- 1.0 days, and its projected obliquity with respect to the stellar binary orbit is 1.6 +/- 2.4 degrees. Therefore the three largest sources of angular momentum---the stellar orbit, the planetary orbit, and the primary's rotation---are all closely aligned. This finding supports a formation scenario involving accretion from a single disk. Alternatively, tides may have realigned the stars despite their relatively wide separation (0.2 AU), a hypothesis that is supported by the agreement between the measured rotation period and the "pseudosynchronous" period of tidal evolution theory. The rotation period, chromospheric activity level, and fractional light variations suggest a main-sequence age of 2-4 Gyr. Evolutionary models of low-mass stars can match the observed masses and radii of the primary and secondary stars to within about 3%.
  • Planet Occurrence within 0.25 AU of Solar-type Stars from Kepler (1103.2541)

    Andrew W. Howard, Geoffrey W. Marcy, Stephen T. Bryson, Jon M. Jenkins, Jason F. Rowe, Natalie M. Batalha, William J. Borucki, David G. Koch, Edward W. Dunham, Thomas N. Gautier III, Jeffrey Van Cleve, William D. Cochran, David W. Latham, Jack J. Lissauer, Guillermo Torres, Timothy M. Brown, Ronald L. Gilliland, Lars A. Buchhave, Douglas A. Caldwell, Jorgen Christensen-Dalsgaard, David Ciardi, Francois Fressin, Michael R. Haas, Steve B. Howell, Hans Kjeldsen, Sara Seager, Leslie Rogers, Dimitar D. Sasselov, Jason H. Steffen, Gibor S. Basri, David Charbonneau, Jessie Christiansen, Bruce Clarke, Andrea Dupree, Daniel C. Fabrycky, Debra A. Fischer, Eric B. Ford, Jonathan J. Fortney, Jill Tarter, Forrest R. Girouard, Matthew J. Holman, John Asher Johnson, Todd C. Klaus, Pavel Machalek, Althea V. Moorhead, Robert C. Morehead, Darin Ragozzine, Peter Tenenbaum, Joseph D. Twicken, Samuel N. Quinn, Howard Isaacson, Avi Shporer, Philip W. Lucas, Lucianne M. Walkowicz, William F. Welsh, Alan Boss, Edna Devore, Alan Gould, Jeffrey C. Smith, Robert L. Morris, Andrej Prsa, Timothy D. Morton
    March 13, 2011 astro-ph.EP
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    We report the distribution of planets as a function of planet radius (R_p), orbital period (P), and stellar effective temperature (Teff) for P < 50 day orbits around GK stars. These results are based on the 1,235 planets (formally "planet candidates") from the Kepler mission that include a nearly complete set of detected planets as small as 2 Earth radii (Re). For each of the 156,000 target stars we assess the detectability of planets as a function of R_p and P. We also correct for the geometric probability of transit, R*/a. We consider first stars within the "solar subset" having Teff = 4100-6100 K, logg = 4.0-4.9, and Kepler magnitude Kp < 15 mag. We include only those stars having noise low enough to permit detection of planets down to 2 Re. We count planets in small domains of R_p and P and divide by the included target stars to calculate planet occurrence in each domain. Occurrence of planets varies by more than three orders of magnitude and increases substantially down to the smallest radius (2 Re) and out to the longest orbital period (50 days, ~0.25 AU) in our study. For P < 50 days, the radius distribution is given by a power law, df/dlogR= k R^\alpha. This rapid increase in planet occurrence with decreasing planet size agrees with core-accretion, but disagrees with population synthesis models. We fit occurrence as a function of P to a power law model with an exponential cutoff below a critical period P_0. For smaller planets, P_0 has larger values, suggesting that the "parking distance" for migrating planets moves outward with decreasing planet size. We also measured planet occurrence over Teff = 3600-7100 K, spanning M0 to F2 dwarfs. The occurrence of 2-4 Re planets in the Kepler field increases with decreasing Teff, making these small planets seven times more abundant around cool stars than the hottest stars in our sample. [abridged]