
Accurate shape measurements are essential to infer cosmological parameters
from large area weak gravitational lensing studies. The compact
diffractionlimited pointspread function (PSF) in spacebased observations is
greatly beneficial, but its chromaticity for a broad band observation can lead
to new subtle effects that could hitherto be ignored: the PSF of a galaxy is no
longer uniquely defined and spatial variations in the colours of galaxies
result in biases in the inferred lensing signal. Taking Euclid as a reference,
we show that this colourgradient bias (CG bias) can be quantified with high
accuracy using available multicolour Hubble Space Telescope (HST) data. In
particular we study how noise in the HST observations might impact such
measurements and find this to be negligible. We determine the CG bias using HST
observations in the F606W and F814W filters and observe a correlation with the
colour, in line with expectations, whereas the dependence with redshift is
weak. The biases for individual galaxies are generally well below 1%, which may
be reduced further using morphological information from the Euclid data. Our
results demonstrate that CG bias should not be ignored, but it is possible to
determine its amplitude with sufficient precision, so that it will not
significantly bias the weak lensing measurements using Euclid data.

The unprecedented quality, the increased dataset, and the wide area of
ongoing and near future weak lensing surveys allows to move beyond the standard
two points statistics thus making worthwhile to investigate higher order
probes. As an interesting step towards this direction, we expolore the use of
higher order moments (HOM) of the convergence field as a way to increase the
lensing Figure of Merit (FoM). To this end, we rely on simulated convergence to
first show that HOM can be measured and calibrated so that it is indeed
possible to predict them for a given cosmological model provided suitable
nuisance parameters are introduced and then marginalized over. We then forecast
the accuracy on cosmological parameters from the use of HOM alone and in
combination with standard shear power spectra tomography. It turns out that HOM
allow to break some common degeneracies thus significantly boosting the overall
FoM. We also qualitatively discuss possible systematics and how they can be
dealt with.

Gravitational lensing has long been considered as a valuable tool to
determine the total mass of galaxy clusters. The shear profile as inferred from
the statistics of ellipticity of background galaxies allows to probe the
cluster intermediate and outer regions thus determining the virial mass
estimate. However, the mass sheet degeneracy and the need for a large number of
background galaxies motivate the search for alternative tracers which can break
the degeneracy among model parameters and hence improve the accuracy of the
mass estimate. Lensing flexion, i.e. the third derivative of the lensing
potential, has been suggested as a good answer to the above quest since it
probes the details of the mass profile. We investigate here whether this is
indeed the case considering jointly using weak lensing, magnification and
flexion. We use a Fisher matrix analysis to forecast the relative improvement
in the mass accuracy for different assumptions on the shear and flexion signal
 to  noise (S/N) ratio also varying the cluster mass, redshift, and
ellipticity. It turns out that the error on the cluster mass may be reduced up
to a factor 2 for reasonable values of the flexion S/N ratio. As a general
result, we get that the improvement in mass accuracy is larger for more
flattened haloes, but extracting general trends is a difficult because of the
many parameters at play. We nevertheless find that flexion is as efficient as
magnification to increase the accuracy in both mass and concentration
determination.

The spatial variation of the colour of a galaxy may introduce a bias in the
measurement of its shape if the PSF profile depends on wavelength. We study how
this bias depends on the properties of the PSF and the galaxies themselves. The
bias depends on the scales used to estimate the shape, which may be used to
optimise methods to reduce the bias. Here we develop a general approach to
quantify the bias. Although applicable to any weak lensing survey, we focus on
the implications for the ESA Euclid mission.
Based on our study of synthetic galaxies we find that the bias is a few times
10^3 for a typical galaxy observed by Euclid. Consequently, it cannot be
neglected and needs to be accounted for. We demonstrate how one can do so using
spatially resolved observations of galaxies in two filters. We show that HST
observations in the F606W and F814W filters allow us to model and reduce the
bias by an order of magnitude, sufficient to meet Euclid's scientific
requirements. The precision of the correction is ultimately determined by the
number of galaxies for which spatiallyresolved observations in at least two
filters are available. We use results from the Millennium Simulation to
demonstrate that archival HST data will be sufficient for the tomographic
cosmic shear analysis with the Euclid dataset.