
We propose a new way of defining Hamiltonians for quantum field theories
without any renormalization procedure. The resulting Hamiltonians, called IBC
Hamiltonians, are mathematically welldefined (and in particular, ultraviolet
finite) without an ultraviolet cutoff such as smearing out the particles over
a nonzero radius; rather, the particles are assigned radius zero. These
Hamiltonians agree with those obtained through renormalization whenever both
are known to exist. We describe explicit examples of IBC Hamiltonians. Their
definition, which is best expressed in the particleposition representation of
the wave function, involves a novel type of boundary condition on the wave
function, which we call an interiorboundary condition (IBC). The relevant
configuration space is one of a variable number of particles, and the relevant
boundary consists of the configurations with two or more particles at the same
location. The IBC relates the value (or derivative) of the wave function at a
boundary point to the value of the wave function at an interior point (here, in
a sector of configuration space corresponding to a lesser number of particles).

We develop an extension of Bohmian mechanics to a curved background
spacetime containing a singularity. The present paper focuses on timelike
singularities. We use the naked timelike singularity of the supercritical
ReissnerNordstrom geometry as an example. While one could impose boundary
conditions at the singularity that would prevent the particles from falling
into the singularity, we are interested here in the case in which particles
have positive probability to hit the singularity and get annihilated. The wish
for reversibility, equivariance, and the Markov property then dictates that
particles must also be created by the singularity, and indeed dictates the rate
at which this must occur. That is, a stochastic law prescribes what comes out
of the singularity. We specify explicit equations of a nonrigorous model
involving an interiorboundary condition on the wave function at the
singularity, which can be used also in other versions of quantum theory besides
Bohmian mechanics. As the resulting theory involves particle creation and
annihilation, it can be regarded as a quantum field theory, and the stochastic
process for the Bohmian particles is analogous to Belltype quantum field
theories.

The biggest and most lasting among David Bohm's (19171992) many achievements
is to have proposed a picture of reality that explains the empirical rules of
quantum mechanics. This picture, known as pilot wave theory or Bohmian
mechanics among other names, is still the simplest and most convincing
explanation available. According to this theory, electrons are point particles
in the literal sense and move along trajectories governed by Bohm's equation of
motion. In this paper, I describe some more recent developments and extensions
of Bohmian mechanics, concerning in particular relativistic spacetime and
particle creation and annihilation.

Bohmian mechanics, also known as pilotwave theory or de BroglieBohm theory,
is a formulation of quantum mechanics whose fundamental axioms are not about
what observers will see if they perform an experiment but about what happens in
reality. It is therefore called a "quantum theory without observers," alongside
with collapse theories and manyworlds theories and in contrast to orthodox
quantum mechanics. It follows from these axioms that in a universe governed by
Bohmian mechanics, observers will see outcomes with exactly the probabilities
specified by the usual rules of quantum mechanics for empirical predictions.
Specifically, Bohmian mechanics asserts that electrons and other elementary
particles have a definite position at every time and move according to an
equation of motion that is one of the fundamental laws of the theory and
involves a wave function that evolves according to the usual Schr\"odinger
equation. Bohmian mechanics is named after David Bohm (19171992), who was,
although not the first to consider this theory, the first to realize (in 1952)
that it actually makes correct predictions.

We study a new kind of linear integral equations for a relativistic
quantummechanical twoparticle wave function $\psi(x_1,x_2)$, where $x_1,x_2$
are spacetime points. In the case of retarded interaction, these integral
equations feature a Volterra structure in the time variables. They are
interesting not only in view of their applications in physics, but also because
of the following mathematical features: (a) time and space variables are more
interrelated than in normal timedependent problems, (b) the integral kernels
are singular, and the structure of these singularities is nontrivial, (c) they
feature time delay. Here we formulate a number of examples of such equations
and prove existence and uniqueness of solutions for them. We also point out
open mathematical problems.

Suppose that particle detectors are placed along a Cauchy surface $\Sigma$ in
Minkowski spacetime, and consider a quantum theory with fixed or variable
number of particles (i.e., using Fock space or a subspace thereof). It is
straightforward to guess what Born's rule should look like for this setting:
The probability distribution of the detected configuration on $\Sigma$ has
density $\psi_\Sigma^2$, where $\psi_\Sigma$ is a suitable wave function on
$\Sigma$, and the operation $\cdot^2$ is suitably interpreted. We call this
statement the "curved Born rule." Since in any one Lorentz frame, the
appropriate measurement postulates referring to constant$t$ hyperplanes should
determine the probabilities of the outcomes of any conceivable experiment, they
should also imply the curved Born rule. This is what we are concerned with
here: deriving Born's rule for $\Sigma$ from Born's rule in one Lorentz frame
(along with a collapse rule). We describe two ways of defining an idealized
detection process, and prove for one of them that the probability distribution
coincides with $\psi_\Sigma^2$. For this result, we need two hypotheses on
the time evolution: that there is no interaction faster than light, and that
there is no propagation faster than light. The wave function $\psi_\Sigma$ can
be obtained from the TomonagaSchwinger equation, or from a multitime wave
function by inserting configurations on $\Sigma$. Thus, our result establishes
in particular how multitime wave functions are related to detection
probabilities.

Multitime wave functions are wave functions for multiparticle quantum
systems that involve several time variables (one per particle). In this paper
we contrast them with solutions of wave equations on a spacetime with multiple
timelike dimensions, i.e., on a pseudoRiemannian manifold whose metric has
signature such as ${+}{+}{}{}$ or ${+}{+}{}{}{}{}{}{}$, instead of
${+}{}{}{}$. Despite the superficial similarity, the two behave very
differently: Whereas wave equations in multiple timelike dimensions are
typically mathematically illposed and presumably unphysical, relevant
Schr\"odinger equations for multitime wave functions possess for every initial
datum a unique solution on the spacelike configurations and form a natural
covariant representation of quantum states.

We consider a way of defining quantum Hamiltonians involving particle
creation and annihilation based on an interiorboundary condition (IBC) on the
wave function, where the wave function is the particleposition representation
of a vector in Fock space, and the IBC relates (essentially) the values of the
wave function at any two configurations that differ only by the creation of a
particle. Here we prove, for a model of particle creation at one or more point
sources using the Laplace operator as the free Hamiltonian, that a Hamiltonian
can indeed be rigorously defined in this way without the need for any
ultraviolet regularization, and that it is selfadjoint. We prove further that
introducing an ultraviolet cutoff (thus smearing out particles over a positive
radius) and applying a certain known renormalization procedure (taking the
limit of removing the cutoff while subtracting a constant that tends to
infinity) yields, up to addition of a finite constant, the Hamiltonian defined
by the IBC.

Collapse theories are versions of quantum mechanics according to which the
collapse of the wave function is a real physical process. They propose precise
mathematical laws to govern this process and to replace the vague conventional
prescription that a collapse occurs whenever an "observer" makes a
"measurement." The "primitive ontology" of a theory (more or less what Bell
called the "local beables") are the variables in the theory that represent
matter in spacetime. There is no consensus about whether collapse theories
need to introduce a primitive ontology as part of their definition. I make some
remarks on this question and point out that certain paradoxes about collapse
theories are absent if a primitive ontology is introduced.

In nonrelativistic quantum mechanics of $N$ particles in three spatial
dimensions, the wave function $\psi(q_1,\ldots,q_N,t)$ is a function of $3N$
position coordinates and one time coordinate. It is an obvious idea that in a
relativistic setting, such functions should be replaced by
$\phi((t_1,q_1),\ldots,(t_N,q_N))$, a function of $N$ spacetime points called
a multitime wave function because it involves $N$ time variables. Its
evolution is determined by $N$ Schr\"odinger equations, one for each time
variable; to ensure that simultaneous solutions to these $N$ equations exist,
the $N$ Hamiltonians need to satisfy a consistency condition. This condition is
automatically satisfied for noninteracting particles, but it is not obvious
how to set up consistent multitime equations with interaction. For example,
interaction potentials (such as the Coulomb potential) make the equations
inconsistent, except in very special cases. However, there have been recent
successes in setting up consistent multitime equations involving interaction,
in two ways: either involving zerorange ($\delta$ potential) interaction or
involving particle creation and annihilation. The latter equations provide a
multitime formulation of a quantum field theory. The wave function in these
equations is a multitime Fock function, i.e., a family of functions consisting
of, for every $n=0,1,2,\ldots$, an $n$particle wave function with $n$ time
variables. These wave functions are related to the TomonagaSchwinger approach
and to quantum field operators, but, as we point out, they have several
advantages.

We study the nature of and approach to thermal equilibrium in isolated
quantum systems. An individual isolated macroscopic quantum system in a pure or
mixed state is regarded as being in thermal equilibrium if all macroscopic
observables assume rather sharply the values obtained from thermodynamics. Of
such a system (or state) we say that it is in macroscopic thermal equilibrium
(MATE). A stronger requirement than MATE is that even microscopic observables
(i.e., ones referring to a small subsystem) have a probability distribution in
agreement with that obtained from the microcanonical, or equivalently the
canonical, ensemble for the whole system. Of such a system we say that it is in
microscopic thermal equilibrium (MITE). The distinction between MITE and MATE
is particularly relevant for systems with manybody localization (MBL) for
which the energy eigenfuctions fail to be in MITE while necessarily most of
them, but not all, are in MATE. However, if we consider superpositions of
energy eigenfunctions (i.e., typical wave functions $\psi$) in an energy shell,
then for generic macroscopic systems, including those with MBL, most $\psi$ are
in both MATE and MITE. We explore here the properties of MATE and MITE and
compare the two notions, thereby elaborating on ideas introduced in [Goldstein
et al., Phys.Rev.Lett. 115: 100402 (2015)].

According to statistical mechanics, microstates of an isolated physical
system (say, a gas in a box) at time $t_0$ in a given macrostate of
lessthanmaximal entropy typically evolve in such a way that the entropy at
time $t$ increases with $tt_0$ in both time directions. In order to account
for the observed entropy increase in only one time direction, the thermodynamic
arrow of time, one usually appeals to the hypothesis that the initial state of
the universe was one of very low entropy. In certain recent models of
cosmology, however, no hypothesis about the initial state of the universe is
invoked. We discuss how the emergence of a thermodynamic arrow of time in such
models can nevertheless be compatible with the abovementioned consequence of
statistical mechanics, appearances to the contrary notwithstanding.

The problem of detection time distribution concerns a quantum particle
surrounded by detectors and consists of computing the probability distribution
of where and when the particle will be detected. While the correct answer can
be obtained in principle by solving the Schrodinger equation of particle and
detectors together, a more practical answer should involve a simple rule
representing the behavior of idealized detectors. We have argued elsewhere
[http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.03715] that the most natural rule for this purpose
is the "absorbing boundary rule," based on the 1particle Schrodinger equation
with a certain "absorbing" boundary condition, first considered by Werner in
1987, at the ideal detecting surface. Here we develop a relativistic variant of
this rule using the Dirac equation and also a boundary condition. We treat one
or several detectable particles, in flat or curved spacetime, with stationary
or moving detectors.

We address the question of how to compute the probability distribution of the
time at which a detector clicks, in the situation of $n$ nonrelativistic
quantum particles in a volume $\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^3$ in physical space
and detectors placed along the boundary $\partial \Omega$ of $\Omega$. We have
recently [http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.03715] argued in favor of a rule for the
1particle case that involves a Schr\"odinger equation with an absorbing
boundary condition on $\partial \Omega$ introduced by Werner; we call this rule
the "absorbing boundary rule." Here, we describe the natural extension of the
absorbing boundary rule to the $n$particle case. A key element of this
extension is that, upon a detection event, the wave function gets collapsed by
inserting the detected position, at the time of detection, into the wave
function, thus yielding a wave function of $n1$ particles. We also describe an
extension of the absorbing boundary rule to the case of moving detectors.

We consider the problem of computing, for a detector waiting for a quantum
particle to arrive, the probability distribution of the time at which the
detector clicks, from the initial wave function of the particle in the
nonrelativistic regime. Although the standard rules of quantum mechanics offer
no operator for the time of arrival, quantum mechanics makes an unambiguous
prediction for this distribution, defined by first solving the Schrodinger
equation for the big quantum system formed by the particle of interest, the
detector, a clock, and a device that records the time when the detector clicks,
then making a quantum measurement of the record at a very late time, and
finally using the distribution of the recorded time. This leads to question
whether there is also a practical, simple rule for computing this distribution,
at least approximately (i.e., for an idealized detector). We argue here in
favor of a rule based on a 1particle Schrodinger equation with a certain
(absorbing) boundary condition at the ideal detecting surface, first considered
by Werner in 1987. We present a novel derivation of this rule and describe how
it arises as a limit of a "soft" detector represented by an imaginary
potential.

We consider a model quantum field theory with a scalar quantum field in de
Sitter spacetime in a Bohmian version with a field ontology, i.e., an actual
field configuration $\varphi({\bf x},t)$ guided by a wave function on the space
of field configurations. We analyze the asymptotics at late times
($t\to\infty$) and provide reason to believe that for more or less any wave
function and initial field configuration, every Fourier coefficient
$\varphi_{\bf k}(t)$ of the field is asymptotically of the form $c_{\bf
k}\sqrt{1+{\bf k}^2 \exp(2Ht)/H^2}$, where the limiting coefficients $c_{\bf
k}=\varphi_{\bf k}(\infty)$ are independent of $t$ and $H$ is the Hubble
constant quantifying the expansion rate of de Sitter spacetime. In particular,
every field mode $\varphi_{\bf k}$ possesses a limit as $t\to\infty$ and thus
"freezes." This result is relevant to the question whether Boltzmann brains
form in the late universe according to this theory, and supports that they do
not.

There are two kinds of quantum fluctuations relevant to cosmology that we
focus on in this article: those that form the seeds for structure formation in
the early universe and those giving rise to Boltzmann brains in the late
universe. First, structure formation requires slight inhomogeneities in the
density of matter in the early universe, which then get amplified by the effect
of gravity, leading to clumping of matter into stars and galaxies. According to
inflation theory, quantum fluctuations form the seeds of these inhomogeneities.
However, these quantum fluctuations are described by a quantum state which is
homogeneous and isotropic, and this raises a problem, connected to the
foundations of quantum theory, as the unitary evolution alone cannot break the
symmetry of the quantum state. Second, Boltzmann brains are random agglomerates
of particles that, by extreme coincidence, form functioning brains. Unlikely as
these coincidences are, they seem to be predicted to occur in a quantum
universe as vacuum fluctuations if the universe continues to exist for an
infinite (or just very long) time, in fact to occur over and over, even forming
the majority of all brains in the history of the universe. We provide a brief
introduction to the Bohmian version of quantum theory and explain why in this
version, Boltzmann brains, an undesirable kind of fluctuation, do not occur (or
at least not often), while inhomogeneous seeds for structure formation, a
desirable kind of fluctuation, do.

We are concerned with the problem of detecting with high probability whether
a wave function has collapsed or not, in the following framework: A quantum
system with a $d$dimensional Hilbert space is initially in state $\psi$; with
probability $0<p<1$, the state collapses relative to the orthonormal basis
$b_1,...,b_d$. That is, the final state $\psi'$ is random; it is $\psi$ with
probability $1p$ and $b_k$ (up to a phase) with $p$ times Born's probability
$\langle b_k\psi \rangle^2$. Now an experiment on the system in state
$\psi'$ is desired that provides information about whether or not a collapse
has occurred. Elsewhere, we identify and discuss the optimal experiment in case
that $\psi$ is either known or random with a known probability distribution.
Here we present results about the case that no a priori information about
$\psi$ is available, while we regard $p$ and $b_1,...,b_d$ as known. For
certain values of $p$, we show that the set of $\psi$s for which any experiment
E is more reliable than blind guessing is at most half the unit sphere; thus,
in this regime, any experiment is of questionable use, if any at all.
Remarkably, however, there are other values of $p$ and experiments E such that
the set of $\psi$s for which E is more reliable than blind guessing has measure
greater than half the sphere, though with a conjectured maximum of 64% of the
sphere.

We consider the notion of thermal equilibrium for an individual closed
macroscopic quantum system in a pure state, i.e., described by a wave function.
The macroscopic properties in thermal equilibrium of such a system, determined
by its wave function, must be the same as those obtained from thermodynamics,
e.g., spatial uniformity of temperature and chemical potential. When this is
true we say that the system is in macroscopic thermal equilibrium (MATE). Such
a system may however not be in microscopic thermal equilibrium (MITE). The
latter requires that the reduced density matrices of small subsystems be close
to those obtained from the microcanonical, equivalently the canonical, ensemble
for the whole system. The distinction between MITE and MATE is particularly
relevant for systems with manybody localization (MBL) for which the energy
eigenfunctions fail to be in MITE while necessarily most of them, but not all,
are in MATE. We note however that for generic macroscopic systems, including
those with MBL, most wave functions in an energy shell are in both MATE and
MITE. For a classical macroscopic system, MATE holds for most phase points on
the energy surface, but MITE fails to hold for any phase point.

We describe here a novel way of defining Hamiltonians for quantum field
theories (QFTs), based on the particleposition representation of the state
vector and involving a condition on the state vector that we call an
"interiorboundary condition." At least for some QFTs (and, we hope, for many),
this approach leads to a welldefined, selfadjoint Hamiltonian without the
need for an ultraviolet cutoff or renormalization.

The version of Bohmian mechanics in relativistic spacetime that works best,
the hypersurface BohmDirac model, assumes a preferred foliation of spacetime
into spacelike hypersurfaces (called the time foliation) as given. We consider
here a degenerate case in which, contrary to the usual definition of a
foliation, several leaves of the time foliation have a region in common. That
is, if we think of the time foliation as a 1parameter family of hypersurfaces,
with the hypersurfaces moving towards the future as we increase the parameter,
a degenerate time foliation is one for which a part of the hypersurface does
not move as we increase the parameter. We show that the hypersurface
BohmDirac model still works in this situation; that is, we show that a
Bohmtype law of motion can still be defined, and that the appropriate
$\psi^2$ distribution is still equivariant with respect to this law.

Let X be a real or complex Hilbert space of finite but large dimension d, let
S(X) denote the unit sphere of X, and let u denote the normalized uniform
measure on S(X). For a finite subset B of S(X), we may test whether it is
approximately uniformly distributed over the sphere by choosing a partition
A_1,...,A_m of S(X) and checking whether the fraction of points in B that lie
in A_k is close to u(A_k) for each k=1,...,m. We show that if B is any
orthonormal basis of X and m is not too large, then, if we randomize the test
by applying a random rotation to the sets A_1,...,A_m, B will pass the random
test with probability close to 1. This statement is related to, but not
entailed by, the law of large numbers. An application of this fact in quantum
statistical mechanics is briefly described.

A quantum system (with Hilbert space $\mathscr{H}_1$) entangled with its
environment (with Hilbert space $\mathscr{H}_2$) is usually not attributed a
wave function but only a reduced density matrix $\rho_1$. Nevertheless, there
is a precise way of attributing to it a random wave function $\psi_1$, called
its conditional wave function, whose probability distribution $\mu_1$ depends
on the entangled wave function $\psi\in\mathscr{H}_1\otimes\mathscr{H}_2$ in
the Hilbert space of system and environment together. It also depends on a
choice of orthonormal basis of $\mathscr{H}_2$ but in relevant cases, as we
show, not very much. We prove several universality (or typicality) results
about $\mu_1$, e.g., that if the environment is sufficiently large then for
every orthonormal basis of $\mathscr{H}_2$, most entangled states $\psi$ with
given reduced density matrix $\rho_1$ are such that $\mu_1$ is close to one of
the socalled GAP (Gaussian adjusted projected) measures, $GAP(\rho_1)$. We
also show that, for most entangled states $\psi$ from a microcanonical subspace
(spanned by the eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian with energies in a narrow
interval $[E,E+\delta E]$) and most orthonormal bases of $\mathscr{H}_2$,
$\mu_1$ is close to $GAP(\mathrm{tr}_2 \rho_{mc})$ with $\rho_{mc}$ the
normalized projection to the microcanonical subspace. In particular, if the
coupling between the system and the environment is weak, then $\mu_1$ is close
to $GAP(\rho_\beta)$ with $\rho_\beta$ the canonical density matrix on
$\mathscr{H}_1$ at inverse temperature $\beta=\beta(E)$. This provides the
mathematical justification of our claim in [J. Statist. Phys. 125:1193 (2006),
http://arxiv.org/abs/quantph/0309021] that $GAP$ measures describe the thermal
equilibrium distribution of the wave function.

While it is widely agreed that Bell's theorem is an important result in the
foundations of quantum physics, there is much disagreement about what exactly
Bell's theorem shows. It is agreed that Bell derived a contradiction with
experimental facts from some list of assumptions, thus showing that at least
one of the assumptions must be wrong; but there is disagreement about what the
assumptions were that went into the argument. In this paper, I make a few
points in order to help clarify the situation.

In an article published in 2010, Kiukas and Werner claim to have shown that
Bohmian Mechanics does not make the same empirical predictions as ordinary
Quantum Mechanics. We explain that such claim is wrong.