
We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering
and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from
the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three twopoint
functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source
galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation
function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the
galaxyshear crosscorrelation of luminous red galaxy positions and source
galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use
independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and
validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias,
the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we
describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during
this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM
cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for
$\Lambda$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino
mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance
matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three twopoint
functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8
(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{0.025}$ and $\Omega_m =
0.264^{+0.032}_{0.019}$ for $\Lambda$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 =
0.794^{+0.029}_{0.027}$, $\Omega_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{0.022}$, and
$w=0.80^{+0.20}_{0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results
rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing
a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms.
Although the DES Y1 bestfit values for $S_8$ and $\Omega_m$ are lower than the
central values from Planck ...

We present two galaxy shape catalogues from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1
data set, covering 1500 square degrees with a median redshift of $0.59$. The
catalogues cover two main fields: Stripe 82, and an area overlapping the South
Pole Telescope survey region. We describe our data analysis process and in
particular our shape measurement using two independent shear measurement
pipelines, METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE. The METACALIBRATION catalogue uses a
Gaussian model with an innovative internal calibration scheme, and was applied
to $riz$bands, yielding 34.8M objects. The IM3SHAPE catalogue uses a
maximumlikelihood bulge/disc model calibrated using simulations, and was
applied to $r$band data, yielding 21.9M objects. Both catalogues pass a suite
of null tests that demonstrate their fitness for use in weak lensing science.
We estimate the 1$\sigma$ uncertainties in multiplicative shear calibration to
be $0.013$ and $0.025$ for the METACALIBRATION and IM3SHAPE catalogues,
respectively.

We measure the clustering of DES Year 1 galaxies that are intended to be
combined with weak lensing samples in order to produce precise cosmological
constraints from the joint analysis of largescale structure and lensing
correlations. Twopoint correlation functions are measured for a sample of $6.6
\times 10^{5}$ luminous red galaxies selected using the \textsc{redMaGiC}
algorithm over an area of $1321$ square degrees, in the redshift range $0.15 <
z < 0.9$, split into five tomographic redshift bins. The sample has a mean
redshift uncertainty of $\sigma_{z}/(1+z) = 0.017$. We quantify and correct
spurious correlations induced by spatially variable survey properties, testing
their impact on the clustering measurements and covariance. We demonstrate the
sample's robustness by testing for stellar contamination, for potential biases
that could arise from the systematic correction, and for the consistency
between the twopoint auto and crosscorrelation functions. We show that the
corrections we apply have a significant impact on the resultant measurement of
cosmological parameters, but that the results are robust against arbitrary
choices in the correction method. We find the linear galaxy bias in each
redshift bin in a fiducial cosmology to be $b(z$=$0.24)=1.40 \pm 0.08$,
$b(z$=$0.38)=1.61 \pm 0.05$, $b(z$=$0.53)=1.60 \pm 0.04$ for galaxies with
luminosities $L/L_*>$$0.5$, $b(z$=$0.68)=1.93 \pm 0.05$ for $L/L_*>$$1$ and
$b(z$=$0.83)=1.99 \pm 0.07$ for $L/L_*$$>1.5$, broadly consistent with
expectations for the redshift and luminosity dependence of the bias of red
galaxies. We show these measurements to be consistent with the linear bias
obtained from tangential shear measurements.

We derive cosmological constraints from the probability distribution function
(PDF) of evolved largescale matter density fluctuations. We do this by
splitting lines of sight by density based on their count of tracer galaxies,
and by measuring both gravitational shear around and countsincells in
overdense and underdense lines of sight, in Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Year
and Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) data. Our analysis uses a perturbation
theory model (see companion paper Friedrich at al.) and is validated using
Nbody simulation realizations and lognormal mocks. It allows us to constrain
cosmology, bias and stochasticity of galaxies w.r.t. matter density and, in
addition, the skewness of the matter density field.
From a Bayesian model comparison, we find that the data weakly prefer a
connection of galaxies and matter that is stochastic beyond Poisson
fluctuations on <=20 arcmin angular smoothing scale. The two stochasticity
models we fit yield DES constraints on the matter density
$\Omega_m=0.26^{+0.04}_{0.03}$ and $\Omega_m=0.28^{+0.05}_{0.04}$ that are
consistent with each other. These values also agree with the DES analysis of
galaxy and shear twopoint functions (3x2pt) that only uses second moments of
the PDF. Constraints on $\sigma_8$ are model dependent
($\sigma_8=0.97^{+0.07}_{0.06}$ and $0.80^{+0.06}_{0.07}$ for the two
stochasticity models), but consistent with each other and with the 3x2pt
results if stochasticity is at the low end of the posterior range.
As an additional test of gravity, counts and lensing in cells allow to
compare the skewness $S_3$ of the matter density PDF to its LCDM prediction. We
find no evidence of excess skewness in any model or data set, with better than
25 per cent relative precision in the skewness estimate from DES alone.

We constrain the massrichness scaling relation of redMaPPer galaxy clusters
identified in the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data using weak gravitational
lensing. We split clusters into $4\times3$ bins of richness $\lambda$ and
redshift $z$ for $\lambda\geq20$ and $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.65$ and measure the
mean masses of these bins using their stacked weak lensing signal. By modeling
the scaling relation as $\langle M_{\rm 200m}\lambda,z\rangle = M_0
(\lambda/40)^F ((1+z)/1.35)^G$, we constrain the normalization of the scaling
relation at the 5.0 per cent level as $M_0 = [3.081 \pm 0.075 ({\rm stat}) \pm
0.133 ({\rm sys})] \cdot 10^{14}\ {\rm M}_\odot$ at $\lambda=40$ and $z=0.35$.
The richness scaling index is constrained to be $F=1.356 \pm 0.051\ ({\rm
stat})\pm 0.008\ ({\rm sys})$ and the redshift scaling index $G=0.30\pm 0.30\
({\rm stat})\pm 0.06\ ({\rm sys})$. These are the tightest measurements of the
normalization and richness scaling index made to date. We use a semianalytic
covariance matrix to characterize the statistical errors in the recovered weak
lensing profiles. Our analysis accounts for the following sources of systematic
error: shear and photometric redshift errors, cluster miscentering, cluster
member dilution of the source sample, systematic uncertainties in the modeling
of the halomass correlation function, halo triaxiality, and projection
effects. We discuss prospects for reducing this systematic error budget, which
dominates the uncertainty on $M_0$. Our result is in excellent agreement with,
but has significantly smaller uncertainties than, previous measurements in the
literature, and augurs well for the power of the DES cluster survey as a tool
for precision cosmology and upcoming galaxy surveys such as LSST, Euclid and
WFIRST.

We use 26 million galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 1 shape
catalogs over 1321 deg$^2$ of the sky to produce the most significant
measurement of cosmic shear in a galaxy survey to date. We constrain
cosmological parameters in both the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM models, while
also varying the neutrino mass density. These results are shown to be robust
using two independent shape catalogs, two independent \photoz\ calibration
methods, and two independent analysis pipelines in a blind analysis. We find a
3.5\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5} =
0.782^{+0.027}_{0.027}$ at 68\% CL, which is a factor of 2.5 improvement over
the fractional constraining power of our DES Science Verification results. In
$w$CDM, we find a 4.8\% fractional uncertainty on $\sigma_8(\Omega_m/0.3)^{0.5}
= 0.777^{+0.036}_{0.038}$ and a dark energy equationofstate
$w=0.95^{+0.33}_{0.39}$. We find results that are consistent with previous
cosmic shear constraints in $\sigma_8$  $\Omega_m$, and see no evidence for
disagreement of our weak lensing data with data from the CMB. Finally, we find
no evidence preferring a $w$CDM model allowing $w\ne 1$. We expect further
significant improvements with subsequent years of DES data, which will more
than triple the sky coverage of our shape catalogs and double the effective
integrated exposure time per galaxy.

We present weak lensing (WL) mass constraints for a sample of massive galaxy
clusters detected by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) via the SunyaevZeldovich
effect (SZE). We use $griz$ imaging data obtained from the Science Verification
(SV) phase of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) to fit the WL shear signal of 33
clusters in the redshift range $0.25 \le z \le 0.8$ with NFW profiles and to
constrain a fourparameter SPT massobservable relation. To account for biases
in WL masses, we introduce a WL mass to true mass scaling relation described by
a mean bias and an intrinsic, lognormal scatter. We allow for correlated
scatter within the WL and SZE massobservable relations and use simulations to
calibrate priors on nuisance parameters related to bias and scatter from WL. We
constrain the normalization of the $\zetaM_{500}$ relation,
$A_\mathrm{SZ}=12.0_{6.7}^{+2.6}$ when using a prior on the mass slope
$B_\mathrm{SZ}$ from the latest SPT cluster cosmology analysis. Without this
prior, we recover $A_\mathrm{SZ}=10.8_{5.2}^{+2.3}$ and
$B_\mathrm{SZ}=1.30_{0.44}^{+0.22}$. Results in both cases imply lower cluster
masses than measured in previous work with and without WL, although the
uncertainties are large. The WL derived value of $B_\mathrm{SZ}$ is $\approx
20\%$ lower than the value preferred by the most recent SPT cluster cosmology
analysis. The method demonstrated in this work is designed to constrain cluster
masses and cosmological parameters simultaneously and will be used for
subsequent studies that employ the full SPT cluster sample together with the
DES data.

Using $\sim 100$ Xray selected clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification data, we constrain the luminosity function (LF) of cluster red
sequence galaxies as a function of redshift. This is the first homogeneous
optical/Xray sample large enough to constrain the evolution of the luminosity
function simultaneously in redshift ($0.1<z<1.05$) and cluster mass ($13.5 \le
\rm{log_{10}}(M_{200crit}) \sim< 15.0$). We pay particular attention to
completeness issues and the detection limit of the galaxy sample. We then apply
a hierarchical Bayesian model to fit the cluster galaxy LFs via a Schecter
function, including its characteristic break ($m^*$) to a faint end powerlaw
slope ($\alpha$). Our method enables us to avoid known issues in similar
analyses based on stacking or binning the clusters. We find weak and
statistically insignificant ($\sim 1.9 \sigma$) evolution in the faint end
slope $\alpha$ versus redshift. We also find no dependence in $\alpha$ or $m^*$
with the Xray inferred cluster masses. However, the amplitude of the LF as a
function of cluster mass is constrained to $\sim 20\%$ precision. As a
byproduct of our algorithm, we utilize the correlation between the LF and
cluster mass to provide an improved estimate of the individual cluster masses
as well as the scatter in true mass given the Xray inferred masses. This
technique can be applied to a larger sample of Xray or optically selected
clusters from the Dark Energy Survey, significantly improving the sensitivity
of the analysis.

The detection of GW170817 in both gravitational waves and electromagnetic
waves heralds the age of gravitationalwave multimessenger astronomy. On 17
August 2017 the Advanced LIGO and Virgo detectors observed GW170817, a strong
signal from the merger of a binary neutronstar system. Less than 2 seconds
after the merger, a gammaray burst (GRB 170817A) was detected within a region
of the sky consistent with the LIGOVirgoderived location of the
gravitationalwave source. This sky region was subsequently observed by optical
astronomy facilities, resulting in the identification of an optical transient
signal within $\sim 10$ arcsec of the galaxy NGC 4993. These multimessenger
observations allow us to use GW170817 as a standard siren, the
gravitationalwave analog of an astronomical standard candle, to measure the
Hubble constant. This quantity, which represents the local expansion rate of
the Universe, sets the overall scale of the Universe and is of fundamental
importance to cosmology. Our measurement combines the distance to the source
inferred purely from the gravitationalwave signal with the recession velocity
inferred from measurements of the redshift using electromagnetic data. This
approach does not require any form of cosmic "distance ladder;" the
gravitational wave analysis can be used to estimate the luminosity distance out
to cosmological scales directly, without the use of intermediate astronomical
distance measurements. We determine the Hubble constant to be
$70.0^{+12.0}_{8.0} \, \mathrm{km} \, \mathrm{s}^{1} \, \mathrm{Mpc}^{1}$
(maximum a posteriori and 68% credible interval). This is consistent with
existing measurements, while being completely independent of them. Additional
standardsiren measurements from future gravitationalwave sources will provide
precision constraints of this important cosmological parameter.

We present a measurement of galaxygalaxy lensing around a magnitudelimited
($i_{AB} < 22.5$) sample of galaxies from the Dark Energy Survey Science
Verification (DESSV) data. We split these lenses into three
photometricredshift bins from 0.2 to 0.8, and determine the product of the
galaxy bias $b$ and crosscorrelation coefficient between the galaxy and dark
matter overdensity fields $r$ in each bin, using scales above 4 Mpc/$h$
comoving, where we find the linear bias model to be valid given our current
uncertainties. We compare our galaxy bias results from galaxygalaxy lensing
with those obtained from galaxy clustering (Crocce et al. 2016) and CMB lensing
(Giannantonio et al. 2016) for the same sample of galaxies, and find our
measurements to be in good agreement with those in Crocce et al. (2016), while,
in the lowest redshift bin ($z\sim0.3$), they show some tension with the
findings in Giannantonio et al. (2016). We measure $b\cdot r$ to be $0.87\pm
0.11$, $1.12 \pm 0.16$ and $1.24\pm 0.23$, respectively for the three redshift
bins of width $\Delta z = 0.2$ in the range $0.2<z <0.8$, defined with the
photometricredshift algorithm BPZ. Using a different code to split the lens
sample, TPZ, leads to changes in the measured biases at the 1020\% level, but
it does not alter the main conclusion of this work: when comparing with Crocce
et al. (2016) we do not find strong evidence for a crosscorrelation parameter
significantly below one in this galaxy sample, except possibly at the lowest
redshift bin ($z\sim 0.3$), where we find $r = 0.71 \pm 0.11$ when using TPZ,
and $0.83 \pm 0.12$ with BPZ.

We present the first constraints on cosmology from the Dark Energy Survey
(DES), using weak lensing measurements from the preliminary Science
Verification (SV) data. We use 139 square degrees of SV data, which is less
than 3\% of the full DES survey area. Using cosmic shear 2point measurements
over three redshift bins we find $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.81
\pm 0.06$ (68\% confidence), after marginalising over 7 systematics parameters
and 3 other cosmological parameters. We examine the robustness of our results
to the choice of data vector and systematics assumed, and find them to be
stable. About $20$\% of our error bar comes from marginalising over shear and
photometric redshift calibration uncertainties. The current stateoftheart
cosmic shear measurements from CFHTLenS are mildly discrepant with the
cosmological constraints from Planck CMB data; our results are consistent with
both datasets. Our uncertainties are $\sim$30\% larger than those from CFHTLenS
when we carry out a comparable analysis of the two datasets, which we attribute
largely to the lower number density of our shear catalogue. We investigate
constraints on dark energy and find that, with this small fraction of the full
survey, the DES SV constraints make negligible impact on the Planck
constraints. The moderate disagreement between the CFHTLenS and Planck values
of $\sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}$ is present regardless of the value of
$w$.

We use weaklensing shear measurements to determine the mean mass of
optically selected galaxy clusters in Dark Energy Survey Science Verification
data. In a blinded analysis, we split the sample of more than 8,000 redMaPPer
clusters into 15 subsets, spanning ranges in the richness parameter $5 \leq
\lambda \leq 180$ and redshift $0.2 \leq z \leq 0.8$, and fit the averaged mass
density contrast profiles with a model that accounts for seven distinct sources
of systematic uncertainty: shear measurement and photometric redshift errors;
clustermember contamination; miscentering; deviations from the NFW halo
profile; halo triaxiality; and lineofsight projections. We combine the
inferred cluster masses to estimate the joint scaling relation between mass,
richness and redshift, $\mathcal{M}(\lambda,z) \varpropto M_0 \lambda^{F}
(1+z)^{G}$. We find $M_0 \equiv \langle
M_{200\mathrm{m}}\,\,\lambda=30,z=0.5\rangle=\left[ 2.35 \pm 0.22\ \rm{(stat)}
\pm 0.12\ \rm{(sys)} \right] \cdot 10^{14}\ M_\odot$, with $F =
1.12\,\pm\,0.20\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.06\ \rm{(sys)}$ and $G = 0.18\,\pm\,
0.75\ \rm{(stat)}\, \pm\, 0.24\ \rm{(sys)}$. The amplitude of the massrichness
relation is in excellent agreement with the weaklensing calibration of
redMaPPer clusters in SDSS by Simet et al. (2016) and with the Saro et al.
(2015) calibration based on abundance matching of SPTdetected clusters. Our
results extend the redshift range over which the massrichness relation of
redMaPPer clusters has been calibrated with weak lensing from $z\leq 0.3$ to
$z\leq0.8$. Calibration uncertainties of shear measurements and photometric
redshift estimates dominate our systematic error budget and require substantial
improvements for forthcoming studies.

Cosmic shear is sensitive to fluctuations in the cosmological matter density
field, including on small physical scales, where matter clustering is affected
by baryonic physics in galaxies and galaxy clusters, such as star formation,
supernovae feedback and AGN feedback. While muddying any cosmological
information that is contained in small scale cosmic shear measurements, this
does mean that cosmic shear has the potential to constrain baryonic physics and
galaxy formation. We perform an analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES)
Science Verification (SV) cosmic shear measurements, now extended to smaller
scales, and using the Mead et al. 2015 halo model to account for baryonic
feedback. While the SV data has limited statistical power, we demonstrate using
a simulated likelihood analysis that the final DES data will have the
statistical power to differentiate among baryonic feedback scenarios. We also
explore some of the difficulties in interpreting the small scales in cosmic
shear measurements, presenting estimates of the size of several other
systematic effects that make inference from small scales difficult, including
uncertainty in the modelling of intrinsic alignment on nonlinear scales,
`lensing bias', and shape measurement selection effects. For the latter two, we
make use of novel image simulations. While future cosmic shear datasets have
the statistical power to constrain baryonic feedback scenarios, there are
several systematic effects that require improved treatments, in order to make
robust conclusions about baryonic feedback.

We present measurements of weak gravitational lensing cosmic shear twopoint
statistics using Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data. We demonstrate
that our results are robust to the choice of shear measurement pipeline, either
ngmix or im3shape, and robust to the choice of twopoint statistic, including
both real and Fourierspace statistics. Our results pass a suite of null tests
including tests for Bmode contamination and direct tests for any dependence of
the twopoint functions on a set of 16 observing conditions and galaxy
properties, such as seeing, airmass, galaxy color, galaxy magnitude, etc. We
furthermore use a large suite of simulations to compute the covariance matrix
of the cosmic shear measurements and assign statistical significance to our
null tests. We find that our covariance matrix is consistent with the halo
model prediction, indicating that it has the appropriate level of halo sample
variance. We compare the same jackknife procedure applied to the data and the
simulations in order to search for additional sources of noise not captured by
the simulations. We find no statistically significant extra sources of noise in
the data. The overall detection significance with tomography for our highest
source density catalog is 9.7sigma. Cosmological constraints from the
measurements in this work are presented in a companion paper (DES et al. 2015).

We present weak lensing shear catalogues for 139 square degrees of data taken
during the Science Verification (SV) time for the new Dark Energy Camera
(DECam) being used for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We describe our object
selection, point spread function estimation and shear measurement procedures
using two independent shear pipelines, IM3SHAPE and NGMIX, which produce
catalogues of 2.12 million and 3.44 million galaxies respectively. We detail a
set of null tests for the shear measurements and find that they pass the
requirements for systematic errors at the level necessary for weak lensing
science applications using the SV data. We also discuss some of the planned
algorithmic improvements that will be necessary to produce sufficiently
accurate shear catalogues for the full 5year DES, which is expected to cover
5000 square degrees.

Shear peak statistics has gained a lot of attention recently as a practical
alternative to the two point statistics for constraining cosmological
parameters. We perform a shear peak statistics analysis of the Dark Energy
Survey (DES) Science Verification (SV) data, using weak gravitational lensing
measurements from a 139 deg$^2$ field. We measure the abundance of peaks
identified in aperture mass maps, as a function of their signaltonoise ratio,
in the signaltonoise range $0<\mathcal S / \mathcal N<4$. To predict the peak
counts as a function of cosmological parameters we use a suite of $N$body
simulations spanning 158 models with varying $\Omega_{\rm m}$ and $\sigma_8$,
fixing $w = 1$, $\Omega_{\rm b} = 0.04$, $h = 0.7$ and $n_s=1$, to which we
have applied the DES SV mask and redshift distribution. In our fiducial
analysis we measure $\sigma_{8}(\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.6}=0.77 \pm 0.07$, after
marginalising over the shear multiplicative bias and the error on the mean
redshift of the galaxy sample. We introduce models of intrinsic alignments,
blending, and source contamination by cluster members. These models indicate
that peaks with $\mathcal S / \mathcal N>4$ would require significant
corrections, which is why we do not include them in our analysis. We compare
our results to the cosmological constraints from the two point analysis on the
SV field and find them to be in good agreement in both the central value and
its uncertainty. We discuss prospects for future peak statistics analysis with
upcoming DES data.

We measure the crosscorrelation between weak lensing of galaxy images and of
the cosmic microwave background (CMB). The effects of gravitational lensing on
different sources will be correlated if the lensing is caused by the same mass
fluctuations. We use galaxy shape measurements from 139 deg$^{2}$ of the Dark
Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification data and overlapping CMB lensing from
the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. The DES source galaxies have a
median redshift of $z_{\rm med} {\sim} 0.7$, while the CMB lensing kernel is
broad and peaks at $z{\sim}2$. The resulting crosscorrelation is maximally
sensitive to mass fluctuations at $z{\sim}0.44$. Assuming the Planck 2015
bestfit cosmology, the amplitude of the DES$\times$SPT crosspower is found to
be $A = 0.88 \pm 0.30$ and that from DES$\times$Planck to be $A = 0.86 \pm
0.39$, where $A=1$ corresponds to the theoretical prediction. These are
consistent with the expected signal and correspond to significances of $2.9
\sigma$ and $2.2 \sigma$ respectively. We demonstrate that our results are
robust to a number of important systematic effects including the shear
measurement method, estimator choice, photometric redshift uncertainty and CMB
lensing systematics. Significant intrinsic alignment of galaxy shapes would
increase the crosscorrelation signal inferred from the data; we calculate a
value of $A = 1.08 \pm 0.36$ for DES$\times$SPT when we correct the
observations with a simple IA model. With three measurements of this
crosscorrelation now existing in the literature, there is not yet reliable
evidence for any deviation from the expected LCDM level of crosscorrelation,
given the size of the statistical uncertainties and the significant impact of
systematic errors, particularly IAs. We provide forecasts for the expected
signaltonoise of the combination of the fiveyear DES survey and SPT3G.

We measure the weak lensing shear around galaxy troughs, i.e. the radial
alignment of background galaxies relative to underdensities in projections of
the foreground galaxy field over a wide range of redshift in Science
Verification data from the Dark Energy Survey. Our detection of the shear
signal is highly significant (10 to 15$\sigma$ for the smallest angular scales)
for troughs with the redshift range z in [0.2,0.5] of the projected galaxy
field and angular diameters of 10 arcmin...1{\deg}. These measurements probe
the connection between the galaxy, matter density, and convergence fields. By
assuming galaxies are biased tracers of the matter density with Poissonian
noise, we find agreement of our measurements with predictions in a fiducial
Lambda cold dark matter model. The prediction for the lensing signal on large
trough scales is virtually independent of the details of the underlying model
for the connection of galaxies and matter. Our comparison of the shear around
troughs with that around cylinders with large galaxy counts is consistent with
a symmetry between galaxy and matter over and underdensities. In addition, we
measure the twopoint angular correlation of troughs with galaxies which, in
contrast to the lensing signal, is sensitive to galaxy bias on all scales. The
lensing signal of troughs and their clustering with galaxies is therefore a
promising probe of the statistical properties of matter underdensities and
their connection to the galaxy field.

The joint analysis of galaxygalaxy lensing and galaxy clustering is a
promising method for inferring the growth function of large scale structure.
This analysis will be carried out on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES),
with its measurements of both the distribution of galaxies and the tangential
shears of background galaxies induced by these foreground lenses. We develop a
practical approach to modeling the assumptions and systematic effects affecting
small scale lensing, which provides halo masses, and large scale galaxy
clustering. Introducing parameters that characterize the halo occupation
distribution (HOD), photometric redshift uncertainties, and shear measurement
errors, we study how external priors on different subsets of these parameters
affect our growth constraints. Degeneracies within the HOD model, as well as
between the HOD and the growth function, are identified as the dominant source
of complication, with other systematic effects subdominant. The impact of HOD
parameters and their degeneracies necessitate the detailed joint modeling of
the galaxy sample that we employ. We conclude that DES data will provide
powerful constraints on the evolution of structure growth in the universe,
conservatively/optimistically constraining the growth function to 7.9\%/4.8\%
with its firstyear data that covered over 1000 square degrees, and to
3.9\%/2.3\% with its full fiveyear data that will survey 5000 square degrees,
including both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Spatiallyvarying depth and characteristics of observing conditions, such as
seeing, airmass, or sky background, are major sources of systematic
uncertainties in modern galaxy survey analyses, in particular in deep
multiepoch surveys. We present a framework to extract and project these
sources of systematics onto the sky, and apply it to the Dark Energy Survey
(DES) to map the observing conditions of the Science Verification (SV) data.
The resulting distributions and maps of sources of systematics are used in
several analyses of DES SV to perform detailed null tests with the data, and
also to incorporate systematics in survey simulations. We illustrate the
complementarity of these two approaches by comparing the SV data with the
BCCUFig, a synthetic sky catalogue generated by forwardmodelling of the DES
SV images. We analyse the BCCUFig simulation to construct galaxy samples
mimicking those used in SV galaxy clustering studies. We show that the
spatiallyvarying survey depth imprinted in the observed galaxy densities and
the redshift distributions of the SV data are successfully reproduced by the
simulation and wellcaptured by the maps of observing conditions. The combined
use of the maps, the SV data and the BCCUFig simulation allows us to quantify
the impact of spatial systematics on $N(z)$, the redshift distributions
inferred using photometric redshifts. We conclude that spatial systematics in
the SV data are mainly due to seeing fluctuations and are under control in
current clustering and weak lensing analyses. The framework presented here is
relevant to all multiepoch surveys, and will be essential for exploiting
future surveys such as the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST), which will
require detailed nulltests and realistic endtoend image simulations to
correctly interpret the deep, highcadence observations of the sky.

Cosmic shear has been identified as the method with the most potential to
constrain dark energy. To capitalise on this potential it is necessary to
measure galaxy shapes with great accuracy, which in turn requires a detailed
model for the image blurring, the Point Spread Function (PSF). In general the
PSF varies with wavelength and therefore the PSF integrated over an observing
filter depends on the spectrum of the object. For a typical galaxy the spectrum
varies across the galaxy image, thus the PSF depends on the position within the
image. We estimate the bias on the shear due to such colour gradients by
modelling galaxies using two cocentered, coelliptical Sersic profiles, each
with a different spectrum. We estimate the effect of ignoring colour gradients
and find the shear bias from a single galaxy can be very large depending on the
properties of the galaxy. We find that halving the filter width reduces the
shear bias by a factor of about 5. We show that, to first order, tomographic
cosmic shear two point statistics depend on the mean shear bias over the galaxy
population at a given redshift. For a single broad filter, and averaging over a
small galaxy catalogue, we find a mean shear bias which is subdominant to the
predicted statistical errors for future cosmic shear surveys. However, the true
mean shear bias may exceed the statistical errors, depending on how accurately
the catalogue represents the observed distribution of galaxies in the cosmic
shear survey. We then investigate the bias on the shear for twofilter imaging
and find that the bias is reduced by at least an order of magnitude. Lastly, we
find that it is possible to calibrate galaxies for which colour gradients were
ignored using twofilter imaging of a fair sample of noisy galaxies, if the
galaxy model is known. For a S/N of 25 the number of galaxies required in each
tomographic redshift bin is of order 1e4.

Cosmic shear requires high precision measurement of galaxy shapes in the
presence of the observational Point Spread Function (PSF) that smears out the
image. The PSF must therefore be known for each galaxy to a high accuracy.
However, for several reasons, the PSF is usually wavelength dependent,
therefore the differences between the spectral energy distribution of the
observed objects introduces further complexity. In this paper we investigate
the effect of the wavelengthdependence of the PSF, focusing on instruments in
which the PSF size is dominated by the diffractionlimit of the telescope and
which use broadband filters for shape measurement.
We first calculate biases on cosmological parameter estimation from cosmic
shear when the stellar PSF is used uncorrected. Using realistic galaxy and star
spectral energy distributions and populations and a simple threecomponent
circular PSF we find that the colourdependence must be taken into account for
the next generation of telescopes. We then consider two different methods for
removing the effect (i) the use of stars of the same colour as the galaxies and
(ii) estimation of the galaxy spectral energy distribution using multiple
colours and using a telescope model for the PSF. We find that both of these
methods correct the effect to levels below the tolerances required for percent
level measurements of dark energy parameters. Comparison of the two methods
favours the templatefitting method because its efficiency is less dependent on
galaxy redshift than the broadband colour method and takes full advantage of
deeper photometry.

Gravitational lensing shear has the potential to be the most powerful tool
for constraining the nature of dark energy. However, accurate measurement of
galaxy shear is crucial and has been shown to be nontrivial by the Shear
TEsting Programme. Here we demonstrate a fundamental limit to the accuracy
achievable by modelfitting techniques, if oversimplistic models are used. We
show that even if galaxies have elliptical isophotes, modelfitting methods
which assume elliptical isophotes can have significant biases if they use the
wrong profile. We use noisefree simulations to show that on allowing
sufficient flexibility in the profile the biases can be made negligible. This
is no longer the case if elliptical isophote models are used to fit galaxies
made up of a bulge plus a disk, if these two components have different
ellipticities. The limiting accuracy is dependent on the galaxy shape but we
find the most significant biases for simple spirallike galaxies. The
implications for a given cosmic shear survey will depend on the actual
distribution of galaxy morphologies in the universe, taking into account the
survey selection function and the point spread function. However our results
suggest that the impact on cosmic shear results from current and near future
surveys may be negligible. Meanwhile, these results should encourage the
development of existing approaches which are less sensitive to morphology, as
well as methods which use priors on galaxy shapes learnt from deep surveys.

We present equations for the gravitational lensing flexion expected for an
elliptical lens mass distribution. These can be reduced to onedimensional
finite integrals, thus saving significant computing time over a full
twodimensional calculation. We estimate constraints on galaxy halo
ellipticities for a range of potential future surveys, finding that the
constraints from the two different types of flexion are comparable and are up
to two orders of magnitude tighter than those from shear. Flexion therefore
appears to be a very promising potential tool for constraining the shapes of
galaxy haloes from future surveys.

We reconstruct the shape of the primordial power spectrum from the latest
cosmic microwave background data, including the new results from the Wilkinson
Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP), and large scale structure data from the two
degree field galaxy redshift survey (2dFGRS). We tested four parameterizations
taking into account the uncertainties in four cosmological parameters. First we
parameterize the initial spectrum by a tilt and a running spectral index,
finding marginal evidence for a running spectral index only if the first three
WMAP multipoles (ell=2,3,4) are included in the analysis. Secondly, to
investigate further the low CMB large scale power, we modify the conventional
powerlaw spectrum by introducing a scale above which there is no power. We
find a preferred position of the cut at k_c ~ 3e4 /Mpc although k_c=0 (no cut)
is not ruled out. Thirdly we use a model independent parameterization, with 16
bands in wavenumber, and find no obvious sign of deviation from a power law
spectrum on the scales investigated. Furthermore the values of the other
cosmological parameters defining the model remain relatively well constrained
despite the freedom in the shape of the initial power spectrum. Finally we
investigate a model motivated by double inflation, in which the power spectrum
has a break between two characteristic wavenumbers. We find that if a break is
required to be in the range 0.01 < k Mpc <0.1 then the ratio of amplitudes
across the break is constrained to be 1.23 +/ 0.14. Our results are consistent
with a power law spectrum that is featureless and close to scale invariant over
the wavenumber range 0.005 ~< k Mpc ~< 0.15, with a hint of a decrease in power
on the largest scales.