• Login
    Sort by: Relevance Date Users's collections Twitter
    Group by: Day Week Month Year All time
Based on the idea and the provided source code of Andrej Karpathy (arxiv-sanity)
2:3 1:1 3:2
  • An Experimental Exploration of the QCD Phase Diagram: The Search for the Critical Point and the Onset of De-confinement (1007.2613)

    STAR Collaboration: M.M.Aggarwal, Z.Ahammed, A.V.Alakhverdyants, I.Alekseev, B.D.Anderson, D.Arkhipkin, G.S.Averichev, J.Balewski, L.S.Barnby, S.Baumgart, D.R.Beavis, R.Bellwied, M.J.Betancourt, R.R.Betts, A.Bhasin, A.K.Bhati, H.Bichsel, J.Bielcik, J.Bielcikova, B.Biritz, L.C.Bland, B.E.Bonner, J.Bouchet, E.Braidot, A.V.Brandin, A.Bridgeman, E.Bruna, S.Bueltmann, I.Bunzarov, T.P.Burton, X.Z.Cai, H.Caines, M.CalderóndelaBarcaSánchez, O.Catu, D.Cebra, R.Cendejas, M.C.Cervantes, Z.Chajecki, P.Chaloupka, S.Chattopadhyay, H.F.Chen, J.H.Chen, J.Y.Chen, J.Cheng, M.Cherney, A.Chikanian, K.E.Choi, W.Christie, P.Chung, R.F.Clarke, M.J.M.Codrington, R.Corliss, J.G.Cramer, H.J.Crawford, D.Das, S.Dash, A.DavilaLeyva, L.C.DeSilva, R.R.Debbe, T.G.Dedovich, A.A.Derevschikov, R.DerradideSouza, L.Didenko, P.Djawotho, S.M.Dogra, X.Dong, J.L.Drachenberg, J.E.Draper, J.C.Dunlop, M.R.DuttaMazumdar, L.G.Efimov, E.Elhalhuli, M.Elnimr, J.Engelage, G.Eppley, B.Erazmus, M.Estienne, L.Eun, O.Evdokimov, P.Fachini, R.Fatemi, J.Fedorisin, R.G.Fersch, P.Filip, E.Finch, V.Fine, Y.Fisyak, C.A.Gagliardi, D.R.Gangadharan, M.S.Ganti, E.J.Garcia, Solis, A.Geromitsos, F.Geurts, V.Ghazikhanian, P.Ghosh, Y.N.Gorbunov, A.Gordon, O.Grebenyuk, D.Grosnick, S.M.Guertin, A.Gupta, N.Gupta, W.Guryn, B.Haag, A.Hamed, LX.Han, J.W.Harris, J.P.HaysWehle, M.Heinz, S.Heppelmann, A.Hirsch, E.Hjort, A.M.Hoffman, G.W.Hoffmann, D.J.Hofman, B.Huang, H.Z.Huang, T.J.Humanic, L.Huo, G.Igo, P.Jacobs, W.W.Jacobs, C.Jena, F.Jin, C.L.Jones, P.G.Jones, J.Joseph, E.G.Judd, S.Kabana, K.Kajimoto, K.Kang, J.Kapitan, K.Kauder, D.Keane, A.Kechechyan, D.Kettler, D.P.Kikola, J.Kiryluk, A.Kisiel, S.R.Klein, A.G.Knospe, A.Kocoloski, D.D.Koetke, T.Kollegger, J.Konzer, I.Koralt, L.Koroleva, W.Korsch, L.Kotchenda, V.Kouchpil, P.Kravtsov, K.Krueger, M.Krus, L.Kumar, P.Kurnadi, M.A.C.Lamont, J.M.Landgraf, S.LaPointe, J.Lauret, A.Lebedev, R.Lednicky, C, H.Lee, J.H.Lee, W.Leight, M.J.LeVine, C.Li, L.Li, N.Li, W.Li, X.Li, X.Li, Y.Li, Z.M.Li, G.Lin, S.J.Lindenbaum, M.A.Lisa, F.Liu, H.Liu, J.Liu, T.Ljubicic, W.J.Llope, R.S.Longacre, W.A.Love, Y.Lu, X.Luo, G.L.Ma, Y.G.Ma, D.P.Mahapatra, R.Majka, O.I.Mall, L.K.Mangotra, R.Manweiler, S.Margetis, C.Markert, H.Masui, H.S.Matis, Yu.A.Matulenko, D.McDonald, T.S.McShane, A.Meschanin, R.Milner, N.G.Minaev, S.Mioduszewski, A.Mischke, M.K.Mitrovski, B.Mohanty, M.M.Mondal, B.Morozov, D.A.Morozov, M.G.Munhoz, B.K.Nandi, C.Nattrass, T.K.Nayak, J.M.Nelson, P.K.Netrakanti, M.J.Ng, L.V.Nogach, S.B.Nurushev, G.Odyniec, A.Ogawa, V.Okorokov, E.W.Oldag, D.Olson, M.Pachr, B.S.Page, S.K.Pal, Y.Pandit, Y.Panebratsev, T.Pawlak, T.Peitzmann, V.Perevoztchikov, C.Perkins, W.Peryt, S.C.Phatak, P.Pile, M.Planinic, M.A.Ploskon, J.Pluta, D.Plyku, N.Poljak, A.M.Poskanzer, B.V.K.S.Potukuchi, C.B.Powell, D.Prindle, C.Pruneau, N.K.Pruthi, P.R.Pujahari, J.Putschke, R.Raniwala, S.Raniwala, R.L.Ray, R.Redwine, R.Reed, H.G.Ritter, J.B.Roberts, O.V.Rogachevskiy, J.L.Romero, A.Rose, C.Roy, L.Ruan, R.Sahoo, S.Sakai, I.Sakrejda, T.Sakuma, S.Salur, J.Sandweiss, E.Sangaline, J.Schambach, R.P.Scharenberg, N.Schmitz, T.R.Schuster, J.Seele, J.Seger, I.Selyuzhenkov, P.Seyboth, E.Shahaliev, M.Shao, M.Sharma, S.S.Shi, E.P.Sichtermann, F.Simon, R.N.Singaraju, M.J.Skoby, N.Smirnov, P.Sorensen, J.Sowinski, H.M.Spinka, B.Srivastava, T.D.S.Stanislaus, D.Staszak, J.R.Stevens, R.Stock, M.Strikhanov, B.Stringfellow, A.A.P.Suaide, M.C.Suarez, N.L.Subba, M.Sumbera, X.M.Sun, Y.Sun, Z.Sun, B.Surrow, D.N.Svirida, T.J.M.Symons, A.SzantodeToledo, J.Takahashi, A.H.Tang, Z.Tang, L.H.Tarini, T.Tarnowsky, D.Thein, J.H.Thomas, J.Tian, A.R.Timmins, S.Timoshenko, D.Tlusty, M.Tokarev, V.N.Tram, S.Trentalange, R.E.Tribble, O.D.Tsai, J.Ulery, T.Ullrich, D.G.Underwood, G.VanBuren, M.vanLeeuwen, G.vanNieuwenhuizen, J.A.Vanfossen, Jr., R.Varma, G.M.S.Vasconcelos, A.N.Vasiliev, F.Videbaek, Y.P.Viyogi, S.Vokal, S.A.Voloshin, M.Wada, M.Walker, F.Wang, G.Wang, H.Wang, J.S.Wang, Q.Wang, X.L.Wang, Y.Wang, G.Webb, J.C.Webb, G.D.Westfall, C.WhittenJr., H.Wieman, S.W.Wissink, R.Witt, Y.F.Wu, W.Xie, N.Xu, Q.H.Xu, W.Xu, Y.Xu, Z.Xu, L.Xue, Y.Yang, P.Yepes, K.Yip, IK.Yoo, Q.Yue, M.Zawisza, H.Zbroszczyk, W.Zhan, J.B.Zhang, S.Zhang, W.M.Zhang, X.P.Zhang, Y.Zhang, Z.P.Zhang, J.Zhao, C.Zhong, J.Zhou, W.Zhou, X.Zhu, Y.H.Zhu, R.Zoulkarneev, Y.Zoulkarneeva
    July 15, 2010 nucl-ex
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    The QCD phase diagram lies at the heart of what the RHIC Physics Program is all about. While RHIC has been operating very successfully at or close to its maximum energy for almost a decade, it has become clear that this collider can also be operated at lower energies down to 5 GeV without extensive upgrades. An exploration of the full region of beam energies available at the RHIC facility is imperative. The STAR detector, due to its large uniform acceptance and excellent particle identification capabilities, is uniquely positioned to carry out this program in depth and detail. The first exploratory beam energy scan (BES) run at RHIC took place in 2010 (Run 10), since several STAR upgrades, most importantly a full barrel Time of Flight detector, are now completed which add new capabilities important for the interesting physics at BES energies. In this document we discuss current proposed measurements, with estimations of the accuracy of the measurements given an assumed event count at each beam energy.
  • The Centrality Dependence of the Parton Bubble Model for high energy heavy ion collisions and fireball surface substructure at RHIC (0809.3601)

    S.J.Lindenbaum, R.S.Longacre
    Oct. 17, 2008 nucl-th
    ... ... ... ... ... ...
    In an earlier paper we developed a QCD inspired theoretical parton bubble model (PBM) for RHIC/LHC. The PBM quantitatively agreed with the strong charged particle pair correlations observed by the STAR collaboration at RHIC in the highest energy Au + Au central collisions, and also agreed with the Hanbury Brown and Twiss (HBT) observed small final state source size approximately 2f radii in the transverse momentum range above 0.8 GeV/c. The model assumed a substructure of a ring of localized adjoining 2f radius bubbles(gluonic hot spots) perpendicular to the collider beam direction, centered on the beam, at mid-rapidity and located on the expanding fireball surface of the Au + Au collisions. In this paper we extend the model (PBME) to include the changing development of bubbles with centrality from the most central region where bubbles are very important to the most peripheral where the bubbles are gone. Energy density is found to be related to bubble formation and as centrality decreases the maximum energy density and bubbles shift from symmetry around the beam axis to the reaction plane region causing a strong correlation of bubble formation with elliptic flow. We obtained reasonably quantitative agreement (within a few percent of the total correlations) with a new precision RHIC experiment which extended the centrality region investigated to the range 0-80% (most central to most peripheral). The characteristics and behavior of the bubbles imply they represent a significant substructure formed on the surface of the fireball at kinetic freezeout
  • Searching for Quark-Gluon Plasma(QGP) Bubble effects at RHIC/LHC (nucl-th/0304082)

    S.J.Lindenbaum, R.S.Longacre, M.Kramer
    April 30, 2003 nucl-th
    Since the early eighties, we have shared with Leon Van Hove the following view. That if a QGP were produced in high energy heavy ion colliders, that its hadronization products would likely come from small localized in phase space bubbles of plasma. We develop a model based on HIJING, to which we added a ring of adjoining multiple bubbles in the central rapidity region. Our simulations were designed to be tested by the forthcoming RHIC STAR detector data for 65 GeV/n Au colliding with 65 GeV/n Au. We took into account background and resonance effects to allow a direct comparison with the data. Later 100 GeV/n Au colliding with 100 GeV/n Au and LHC data could also test these ideas. We used two charged particle correlation's as a sensitive method to test for bubbles.