
In this article, inspired by Shi, et al. we investigate the optimal portfolio
selection with one riskfree asset and one risky asset in a multiple period
setting under cumulative prospect theory (CPT). Compared with their study, our
novelty is that we consider a stochastic benchmark, and portfolio constraints.
We test the sensitivity of the optimal CPTinvestment strategies to different
model parameters by performing a numerical analysis.

We study the Merton problem of optimal consumptioninvestment for the case of
two investors sharing a final wealth. The typical example would be a husband
and wife sharing a portfolio looking to optimize the expected utility of
consumption and final wealth. Each agent has different utility function and
discount factor. An explicit formulation for the optimal consumptions and
portfolio can be obtained in the case of a complete market. The problem is
shown to be equivalent to maximizing three different utilities separately with
separate initial wealths. We study a numerical example where the market price
of risk is assumed to be mean reverting, and provide insights on the influence
of risk aversion or discount rates on the initial optimal allocation.

This work considers a stochastic model in which the uncertainty is driven by
a multidimensional Brownian motion. The market price of risk process makes the
transition between real world probability measure and risk neutral probability
measure. Traditionally, the martingale representation formulas under the risk
neutral probability measure requires the market price of risk process to be
bounded. However, in several financial models the boundedness assumption of the
market price of risk fails. One example is a stock price model with the market
price of risk following an OrnsteinUhlenbeck process. This work extends
ClarkHaussmann formula to underlying stochastic processes which fail to
satisfy the standard requirements. Our result can be applied to hedging and
optimal investment in stock markets with unbounded market price of risk.

We prove that the Omega measure, which considers all moments when assessing
portfolio performance, is equivalent to the widely used Sharpe ratio under
jointly elliptic distributions of returns. Portfolio optimization of the Sharpe
ratio is then explored, with an activeset algorithm presented for markets
prohibiting short sales. When asymmetric returns are considered we show that
the Omega measure and Sharpe ratio lead to different optimal portfolios.

The model of this paper gives a convenient strategy that a bank in the
federal funds market can use in order to maximize its profit in a
contemporaneous reserve requirement (CRR) regime. The reserve requirements are
determined by the demand deposit process, modelled as a Brownian motion with
drift. We propose a new model in which the cumulative funds purchases and sales
are discounted at possible different rates. We formulate and solve the problem
of finding the bank's optimal strategy. The model can be extended to involve
the bank's asset size and we obtain that, under some conditions, the optimal
upper barrier for fund sales is a linear function of the asset size. As a
consequence, the bank net purchase amount is linear in the asset size.

We consider the problem of minimizing capital at risk in the BlackScholes
setting. The portfolio problem is studied given the possibility that a
correlation constraint between the portfolio and a financial index is imposed.
The optimal portfolio is obtained in closed form. The effects of the
correlation constraint are explored; it turns out that this portfolio
constraint leads to a more diversified portfolio.

In this paper, we propose an equilibrium pricing model in a dynamic
multiperiod stochastic framework with uncertain income streams. In an
incomplete market, there exist two traded risky assets (e.g. stock/commodity
and weather derivative) and a nontraded underlying (e.g. temperature). The
risk preferences are of exponential (CARA) type with a stochastic coefficient
of risk aversion. Both time consistent and time inconsistent trading strategies
are considered. We obtain the equilibriums prices of a contingent claim written
on the risky asset and nontraded underlying. By running numerical experiments
we examine how the equilibriums prices vary in response to changes in model
parameters.

This paper considers the portfolio management problem of optimal investment,
consumption and life insurance. We are concerned with time inconsistency of
optimal strategies. Natural assumptions, like different discount rates for
consumption and life insurance, or a time varying aggregation rate lead to time
inconsistency. As a consequence, the optimal strategies are not implementable.
We focus on hyperbolic discounting, which has received much attention lately,
especially in the area of behavioural finance. Following [10], we consider the
resulting problem as a leaderfollower game between successive selves, each of
whom can commit for an infinitesimally small amount of time. We then define
policies as subgame perfect equilibrium strategies. Policies are characterized
by an integral equation which is shown to have a solution. Although we work on
CRRA preference paradigm, our results can be extended for more general
preferences as long as the equations admit solutions. Numerical simulations
reveal that for the Merton problem with hyperbolic discounting, the consumption
increases up to a certain time, after which it decreases; this pattern does not
occur in the case of exponential discounting, and is therefore known in the
litterature as the "consumption puzzle". Other numerical experiments explore
the effect of time varying aggregation rate on the insurance premium.

In this paper, we investigate the Merton portfolio management problem in the
context of nonexponential discounting. This gives rise to timeinconsistency
of the decisionmaker. If the decisionmaker at time t=0 can commit his/her
successors, he/she can choose the policy that is optimal from his/her point of
view, and constrain the others to abide by it, although they do not see it as
optimal for them. If there is no commitment mechanism, one must seek a
subgameperfect equilibrium strategy between the successive decisionmakers. In
the line of the earlier work by Ekeland and Lazrak we give a precise definition
of equilibrium strategies in the context of the portfolio management problem,
with finite horizon, we characterize it by a system of partial differential
equations, and we show existence in the case when the utility is CRRA and the
terminal time T is small. We also investigate the infinitehorizon case and we
give two different explicit solutions in the case when the utility is CRRA (in
contrast with the case of exponential discount, where there is only one). Some
of our results are proved under the assumption that the discount function h(t)
is a linear combination of two exponentials, or is the product of an
exponential by a linear function.

We investigate the ergodic problem of growthrate maximization under a class
of risk constraints in the context of incomplete, It\^{o}process models of
financial markets with random ergodic coefficients. Including {\em
valueatrisk} (VaR), {\em tailvalueatrisk} (TVaR), and {\em limited
expected loss} (LEL), these constraints can be both wealthdependent(relative)
and wealthindependent (absolute). The optimal policy is shown to exist in an
appropriate admissibility class, and can be obtained explicitly by uniform,
statedependent scaling down of the unconstrained (Merton) optimal portfolio.
This implies that the riskconstrained wealthgrowth optimizer locally behaves
like a CRRAinvestor, with the relative riskaversion coefficient depending on
the current values of the market coefficients.